CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
EFTA00032797.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell case. It discusses a filing by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and a subsequent endorsement by Judge Nathan regarding the delay of legal mail for Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as GM). The judge expressed a 'firm expectation' that the defendant receive legal mail within one business day.
EFTA00032789.pdf
This document is an email dated April 16, 2021, from a Law Clerk for Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to the defense counsel (Cohen Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Sternheim) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v Maxwell (20-cr-330). The email serves to distribute an attached court order which was about to be entered into the public docket. The document marks a procedural step in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00032744.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government officials (likely BOP/MDC) regarding her conditions of confinement in June 2021. Sternheim alleges that guards are sleep-depriving Maxwell by waking her at 1 AM and 3 AM when she shivers from cold, and subsequently confiscated her blankets. The correspondence also debates the quality of VTC (video) connections for legal preparation and the behavior of guards, which the defense characterizes as hostile and the prosecution characterizes as enforcing orders.
EFTA00032729.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 16, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate behavior by guards, including 'barking orders' and 'officiousness.' The BOP official responds by explaining VTC storage protocols, noting that Maxwell has declined daily medical care offers, and requesting a photo of ear buds Sternheim wishes to bring in.
EFTA00032727.pdf
An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (forwarded to USANYS). Sternheim complains about poor VTC quality affecting attorney-client privilege and alleges inappropriate/harassing behavior by guards towards Maxwell. The prison official responds that VTC units are stored for protection, Maxwell must obey orders, and notes that Maxwell consistently declines daily medical care offers.
EFTA00032724.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room impeding attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate and threatening behavior by the guards assigned to Maxwell's detail.
EFTA00032722.pdf
An email chain from June 16, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim lodges a formal complaint regarding conditions affecting her client, Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaints focus on technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and specific allegations of inappropriate, threatening, and mocking behavior by detention guards toward Maxwell.
EFTA00032697.pdf
This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Nathan at NYSD Chambers regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email attaches a letter regarding a Marshall Order and a proposed order for the Marshal. It is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00032686.pdf
An email dated April 9, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding a new discovery production. The prosecution offers to send the files via FTP to the lawyers and notes that a CD with PDF-converted files (originally Excel) will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell to review.
EFTA00032669.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Haddon, Morgan & Foreman; Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence details disputes and arrangements for reviewing 'highly confidential' materials, including over 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, as well as physical evidence stored at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx. Specific items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, a stuffed dog, cash held at Federal Plaza, and various electronic recording media.
EFTA00032602.pdf
An email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of the Government's reply brief regarding Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in the case US v. Maxwell, noting it is submitted temporarily under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00032234.pdf
This document is an email dated August 18, 2020, from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves to transmit a sealed Letter Motion, Affidavit, and ten exhibits on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell regarding a 'Request to Modify Protective Order' in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing was made at the request of attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.
EFTA00032083.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim is formally notifying government officials (likely USANYS) of a breach in attorney-client privilege, stating that during a VTC session the previous day, Maxwell observed suspicious activity on the monitor which was also witnessed by an MDC Case Manager. Sternheim demands an explanation and remediation for this interference with the 'secure' Webex line.
EFTA00032021.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated September 15, 2021. It serves as notice that the government intends to call FBI Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen [Redacted] as an expert witness to testify regarding the extraction of data from seized electronic devices. The letter also reiterates previous government requests from 2020 and early 2021 for reciprocal discovery and expert witness notices from the defense.
EFTA00031952.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 4, 2020, involving defense attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP and prosecutors from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a draft letter regarding a briefing schedule to be sent to Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The top email indicates approval of the draft ('Fine with me') from one of the recipients.
EFTA00031916.pdf
This document is an email dated March 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the chambers of Judge Nathan (NYSD). Sternheim submits an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application under seal, copying other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00031906.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 28, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit Ms. Maxwell's Omnibus Reply Memorandum in support of supplemental pretrial motions related to the S2 Superseding Indictment. The memorandum was filed under seal, while the cover letter was filed publicly. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS).
EFTA00031675.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 7, 2021, originating from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (Reply to Dkt 270) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) to prosecutors (redacted) and cc's fellow defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally by a redacted sender.
EFTA00031440.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated April 14, 2021. It details the production of a single photograph (Bates number SDNY_GM_02753398) designated as 'Confidential' under a Protective Order. The letter is signed by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, with the specific Assistant U.S. Attorneys' signatures redacted.
EFTA00031437.pdf
A discovery letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated April 14, 2021. The letter documents the production of a single item, a photograph (Bates SDNY_GM_02753398), which is designated as confidential under a July 2020 Protective Order. The specific names of the Assistant U.S. Attorneys signing the document are redacted.
EFTA00031432.pdf
An email chain from April 2021 discussing the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement. Her attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be allowed to access legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she spent over three hours idle there that morning. The forwarding party indicates they have no objection to this request subject to Marshal approval.
EFTA00031428.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2021 between Defense Counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers (specifically Law Clerk Juan Ruiz Toro). The correspondence concerns a request by the defense to bring electronic devices into the courthouse via the Worth Street entrance for 'evidence views'. The final email confirms that Judge Nathan has signed an order granting permission.
EFTA00031205.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (a response to government voir dire opposition) to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email is then forwarded internally among USANYS staff with an 'FYI'. The document lists co-counsel for the defense including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00031202.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, among US Attorney's Office (USANYS) staff coordinating a response to a letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim. The emails reveal urgent internal coordination to meet a 5 PM deadline set by Judge Nathan, discussions about reviewing the draft with the MDC/BOP, and strategic decisions regarding how to address specific points raised by the defense, specifically regarding legal mail and the volume of discovery materials.
EFTA00031113.pdf
A letter from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 24, 2021, detailing the production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as courtesy materials for individuals the government does not currently intend to call. The letter also clarifies protective order designations for the enclosed documents.
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counts as Time-Barred
Legal arguments supporting the dismissal of counts based on time limits.
Motion to Dismiss Either Count One Or Count Three
Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Maxwell regarding multiplicity of counts.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Requesting authorization for CSOs at Worth Street entrance to allow defense counsel to bring electronic devices inside for evidence views starting shortly.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Sending attached order signed by Judge Nathan.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing list of attendees for evidence review (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Harkins, Shropshire, Delgado).
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Initial request to bring personal electronic devices and equipment into the courthouse for upcoming evidence views.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming 11am meeting at warehouse on April 12.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming arrival at warehouse on April 12 with investigator and paralegal.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing logistics of sending a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting they confer after vendor feedback; plan to call MDC regarding hard drive delivery.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting conference after vendor input. Plans to contact MDC regarding hard drive delivery to Maxwell.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing hard drive delivery to MDC and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledgment of Everdell's plan to wait for vendor feedback.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledging receipt of previous email, will confer with vendor.
Discovery Issues
Listing 7 specific discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata discrepancies, and Bates number gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Stating supervisors will not allow direct drive delivery to MDC; offering to join application to Judge Nathan.
Discovery Issues
Initial list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments (109,000 emails), and metadata discrepancies.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial responses to 7-point list. Discusses IT restrictions on drives to MDC, PDF conversions of excel files, and metadata on carved files.
Discovery Issues
List of 7 discovery issues: hard drive for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109k emails), metadata dates (July 2020) on 110k docs, CART numbers for 6500 photos, AV file metadata, and Bates number gap.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109,000+), metadata issues (110,000+ docs), and missing Bates ranges.
RE: Discovery Issues
Detailed response to the 7 points raised. Discusses MDC restrictions on hard drives, explains metadata discrepancies on seized Epstein devices (carved/deleted files), and addresses Bates gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Follow-up specifically regarding point 7 (Bates gap), stating the omission was unintentional and offering immediate upload via FTP.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues regarding hard drives, file formats, missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments, metadata errors on Epstein's devices, and production gaps.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 legal discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata inconsistencies, and access to files for Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity