CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg
This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.
DOJ-OGR-00009775.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-000389-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, attests that they do not personally know and have had no dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The juror's negative responses indicate no known conflicts of interest with the key legal figures in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00009677.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror ID 50 attests that they do not know and have no past or present dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The responses indicate no declared conflicts of interest between the potential juror and the key legal figures in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00002716.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Christian Everdell certifies that on January 25, 2021, he served a memorandum and exhibits via email to Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach at the SDNY office.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg
This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00005295.jpg
This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00002674.jpg
This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.
DOJ-OGR-00002673.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in federal court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on February 4, 2021. It certifies that on January 25, 2021, Christian Everdell served a memorandum and exhibits via email to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York: Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00002692.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, dated January 25, 2021. It serves as a notice of motion from Maxwell's defense team, led by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP, requesting a bill of particulars and other pretrial disclosures from the prosecution. The document also requests oral argument on the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00011707.jpg
This document is a transcript of the defense's opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that the jury must focus solely on whether the government can prove the charges against Maxwell, not on the actions of Epstein. She characterizes the prosecution's case as weak, asserting it relies on the testimony of four accusers whose memories are unreliable, corrupted over 25 years, and motivated by a desire for money.
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counts as Time-Barred
Legal arguments supporting the dismissal of counts based on time limits.
Motion to Dismiss Either Count One Or Count Three
Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Maxwell regarding multiplicity of counts.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Requesting authorization for CSOs at Worth Street entrance to allow defense counsel to bring electronic devices inside for evidence views starting shortly.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Sending attached order signed by Judge Nathan.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing list of attendees for evidence review (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Harkins, Shropshire, Delgado).
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Initial request to bring personal electronic devices and equipment into the courthouse for upcoming evidence views.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming 11am meeting at warehouse on April 12.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming arrival at warehouse on April 12 with investigator and paralegal.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing logistics of sending a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting they confer after vendor feedback; plan to call MDC regarding hard drive delivery.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting conference after vendor input. Plans to contact MDC regarding hard drive delivery to Maxwell.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing hard drive delivery to MDC and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledgment of Everdell's plan to wait for vendor feedback.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledging receipt of previous email, will confer with vendor.
Discovery Issues
Listing 7 specific discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata discrepancies, and Bates number gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Stating supervisors will not allow direct drive delivery to MDC; offering to join application to Judge Nathan.
Discovery Issues
Initial list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments (109,000 emails), and metadata discrepancies.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial responses to 7-point list. Discusses IT restrictions on drives to MDC, PDF conversions of excel files, and metadata on carved files.
Discovery Issues
List of 7 discovery issues: hard drive for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109k emails), metadata dates (July 2020) on 110k docs, CART numbers for 6500 photos, AV file metadata, and Bates number gap.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109,000+), metadata issues (110,000+ docs), and missing Bates ranges.
RE: Discovery Issues
Detailed response to the 7 points raised. Discusses MDC restrictions on hard drives, explains metadata discrepancies on seized Epstein devices (carved/deleted files), and addresses Bates gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Follow-up specifically regarding point 7 (Bates gap), stating the omission was unintentional and offering immediate upload via FTP.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues regarding hard drives, file formats, missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments, metadata errors on Epstein's devices, and production gaps.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 legal discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata inconsistencies, and access to files for Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity