CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
EFTA00023866.pdf
This document is an email dated August 6, 2020, sent to attorneys Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen regarding legal discovery. The sender attaches a zip file containing corrected documents. The majority of the document, including the previous email history and subsequent pages, is heavily redacted or marked as duplicate.
EFTA00023705.pdf
Email correspondence from September 30, 2020, between defense attorney Christian Everdell and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Everdell requests access to roughly 40,000 non-nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the Virgin Islands for his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to review at the MDC. The AUSA responds that they are coordinating with the FBI to transport a laptop with the files to the detention center, though the large volume of files requires a few days for processing.
EFTA00023481.pdf
An email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and likely prison or government officials. Sternheim complains about conditions during a legal visit (broken HEPA filters), requests use of a larger visiting room, and reports that legal mail sent to the MDC has not been picked up. The recipient acknowledges the concerns and promises to inquire with staff.
EFTA00023478.pdf
This document is an email dated October 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a transmittal notice for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The prosecutor notes that digital files are being sent via USAfx and a physical CD is being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell.
EFTA00023462.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 29-30, 2021, between Defense counsel (Christian Everdell et al.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of filing motions in limine. The correspondence details which specific exhibits are to be sealed (including grand jury testimony, a 'contact book', and a 'photobook') versus redacted. The parties coordinate the timing of their respective filings and discuss a joint cover letter.
EFTA00023458.pdf
This document is an email thread dated October 29, 2021, regarding urgent legal mail issues for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim complains that the MDC has failed to retrieve four items of legal mail despite them being available for pickup, noting Maxwell hasn't received legal mail in over a week. The response from a redacted official briefly states that mail was picked up that day. The footer reveals involvement from Isabel Maxwell acting as a paralegal for the Law Offices of Leah Saffian.
EFTA00023411.pdf
This document is an email dated November 13, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits a letter and exhibit 'GX-52' (referenced in attachments) and requests that the exhibit be filed under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00023363.pdf
An email chain from November 20-21, 2021, between defense counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence concerns the filing of a redacted letter regarding the self-authentication of birth certificates for alleged minor victims. The Court instructs the defense to follow Docket No. 474 for filing instructions.
EFTA00023360.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 20, 2021, from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the production of discovery materials. The government provided Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as witness statements for individuals they did not currently intend to call to testify. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under a Protective Order.
EFTA00023217.pdf
This document is a letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. It details the production of discovery materials, including Jencks Act and Giglio materials, for potential trial witnesses and others the government does not currently intend to call. The letter also clarifies a labeling change for confidential documents to avoid confusion with classified materials, replacing 'confidential' stamps with references to the Protective Order.
EFTA00023213.pdf
Legal correspondence from attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding the conditions of confinement for Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim complains that HEPA filters were not functioning during a visit on October 25, 2021, necessitating a move to a larger room, and requests that future visits occur in that larger room. Additionally, she provides tracking numbers for legal mail that has been sitting at the post office in Brooklyn without being picked up by the facility.
EFTA00023121.pdf
An email dated October 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense counsel (including Laura Menninger and Christian Everdell) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 CR 330). The email serves to transmit the Government's reply brief in support of its motions in limine and notes that a redacted version will be filed publicly on October 29.
EFTA00023118.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell (Inmate 02879-509) at the MDC. Sternheim complains that during a visit on Oct 24, HEPA filters were broken in the small visiting room and requests future visits be moved to a larger corner room, noting that officers successfully positioned cameras there despite previous denials. Additionally, Sternheim raises urgent concerns about legal mail sent to the MDC not being picked up by the facility.
EFTA00023113.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 30, 2020, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and the Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim details complaints regarding Maxwell's detention conditions, specifically citing excessive searches, lack of privacy during showers, cold temperatures in her isolation cell due to lack of insulation and body heat from other inmates, and constant surveillance. The thread concludes with the attorneys arranging a phone call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00023045.pdf
A discovery cover letter dated July 21, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of 'FedEx Records' (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753552 to SDNY_GM_02759392) which are designated as confidential under a protective order. The document outlines the ongoing discovery obligations of the government.
EFTA00023034.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). An Assistant US Attorney submits a motion to Judge Nathan's chambers to preclude the testimony of a redacted Doctor (expert witness). A subsequent internal email praises the brief as 'fantastic and very convincing' and thanks a colleague for their assistance.
EFTA00023026.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. The defense raises issues about defective hard drives provided to Maxwell in prison, missing pages from pilot David Rodgers' flight logs (specifically pages 1-27), and requests unredacted FBI reports from 2006. The government responds that the 'missing' flight log pages are accounted for in a separate document, asserts that redactions in the FBI report were original to the files found on Epstein's devices, and denies requests for grand jury subpoenas.
EFTA00023008.pdf
An email dated April 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and other counsel. The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of a letter filed that day via ECF in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca are cc'd.
EFTA00022511.pdf
A discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated May 3, 2021. The letter confirms the production of confidential photographs (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753399 to SDNY_GM_02753431) under a Protective Order.
EFTA00022454.pdf
An email dated May 7, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email provides a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00022320.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. Sternheim complains that Maxwell was deprived of blankets and food, leaving her cold and hungry, while the MDC attorney refutes these claims, stating Maxwell had three blankets, received meals, and the cell temperature was 76.5 degrees.
EFTA00022316.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and officials at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn/BOP. Sternheim complains on Dec 26 that Maxwell is freezing, her cell is uninsulated during 32-degree weather, and she was denied a holiday meal and blankets. On Dec 28, a BOP Staff Attorney responds, disputing these claims, stating Maxwell has three blankets, received her meals, and that the cell temperature was measured at 76.5 degrees.
EFTA00022052.pdf
A discovery production letter dated October 19, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter outlines a production of evidence including FBI Florida and NY documents, Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) materials, aerial video, and 3-D blueprints, spanning Bates numbers SDNY_GM_00328070 through SDNY_GM_00356148. The letter designates specific items as 'Confidential' or 'Highly Confidential' under a Protective Order.
EFTA00022023.pdf
This document is an email dated June 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The subject concerns 'US v. Maxwell' and an update on conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The email attaches a letter with requested redactions highlighted regarding these conditions.
EFTA00021965.pdf
This is an email dated November 6, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a cover for a supplemental production of discovery material, specifically regarding testifying and non-testifying witnesses, to be delivered via USAfx and a hard drive sent to the MDC.
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counts as Time-Barred
Legal arguments supporting the dismissal of counts based on time limits.
Reply Memorandum re: Motion to Dismiss (Perjury)
Reply support for motion 135
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Requesting authorization for CSOs at Worth Street entrance to allow defense counsel to bring electronic devices inside for evidence views starting shortly.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Sending attached order signed by Judge Nathan.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing list of attendees for evidence review (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Harkins, Shropshire, Delgado).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming arrival at warehouse on April 12 with investigator and paralegal.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Initial request to bring personal electronic devices and equipment into the courthouse for upcoming evidence views.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming 11am meeting at warehouse on April 12.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting they confer after vendor feedback; plan to call MDC regarding hard drive delivery.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledgment of Everdell's plan to wait for vendor feedback.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledging receipt of previous email, will confer with vendor.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting conference after vendor input. Plans to contact MDC regarding hard drive delivery to Maxwell.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing logistics of sending a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing hard drive delivery to MDC and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 legal discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata inconsistencies, and access to files for Maxwell.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments, metadata errors on Epstein's devices, and production gaps.
Discovery Issues
Initial letter outlining 7 specific discovery disputes, including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments, and metadata issues on thousands of files.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial response regarding MDC drive restrictions, file conversion, and metadata explanations.
Discovery Issues
Listing 7 specific discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata discrepancies, and Bates number gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Follow-up specifically regarding point 7 (Bates gap), stating the omission was unintentional and offering immediate upload via FTP.
RE: Discovery Issues
Detailed response to the 7 points raised. Discusses MDC restrictions on hard drives, explains metadata discrepancies on seized Epstein devices (carved/deleted files), and addresses Bates gaps.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109,000+), metadata issues (110,000+ docs), and missing Bates ranges.
Discovery Issues
List of 7 discovery issues: hard drive for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109k emails), metadata dates (July 2020) on 110k docs, CART numbers for 6500 photos, AV file metadata, and Bates number gap.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial responses to 7-point list. Discusses IT restrictions on drives to MDC, PDF conversions of excel files, and metadata on carved files.
RE: Discovery Issues
Stating supervisors will not allow direct drive delivery to MDC; offering to join application to Judge Nathan.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity