CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
EFTA00019420.pdf
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter documents the production of materials designated as confidential, specifically referencing a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated December 15, 2020. The document indicates ongoing discovery obligations and mentions that physical items are in FBI custody.
EFTA00019092.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 regarding discovery disputes in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific issues to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), including technical problems with Maxwell accessing files on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and significant metadata discrepancies where files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation/modification dates occurring after his death and the seizure of the devices (dates in 2020). The chain concludes with USANYS contractors scheduling an internal meeting to address these production issues.
EFTA00019056.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 1, 2021, addressed to defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves to distribute an attached Order issued by the Judge which was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00019029.pdf
This document contains an email thread from March 22, 2021, between Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP and likely government prosecutors regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence discusses a 'meet and confer' requirement ordered by Judge Nathan concerning redactions to 'Exhibit 11' and references a sealed document ('Exhibit H') from a civil docket before Judge Preska. The government (implied sender of the top email) asks Everdell if they wish to keep certain quotations redacted given they are sealed in the civil case.
EFTA00018893.pdf
This document is an email chain between the defense team (including Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence, dated November 6-7, 2021, coordinates the exchange of juror 'strike' lists and 'keeps' for a joint submission to the Court. Specific details include technical difficulties with Excel files and a specific agreement to allow jurors 127, 151, and 458 to proceed to voir dire.
EFTA00018883.pdf
This document is a formal notice from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated April 23, 2021. The Government notifies the defense of its intent to call Dr. Lisa Rocchio as an expert witness to testify on trauma psychology, the dynamics of sexual abuse, grooming, and delayed disclosure, though she has not evaluated specific victims in this case. The letter also reiterates requests for reciprocal discovery and disclosure of defense expert witnesses.
EFTA00018880.pdf
This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits an unredacted request to charge (RTC) and verdict sheet, noting that redacted versions will be filed on the Electronic Court Filing (ECF) system and that the defense seeks to seal 'Exhibit A'. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00018879.pdf
An email chain from November 3, 2021, regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the disclosure of juror names to counsel. The email also serves to notify recipients of Sternheim's new office address.
EFTA00018837.pdf
An email chain from October 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that discovery materials were shared via USAfx and discusses logistics for providing digital copies (CD or hard drive) to Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00018708.pdf
This document is an email chain dated February 23, 2021, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of a bail application filing (attached as 'MAXWELL_BAIL_APPLICATION_with_EXHIBIT_2-23-17.pdf') to USANYS prosecutors, copying co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's office with the comment 'FYI'.
EFTA00018560.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and likely Bureau of Prisons staff regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (Inmate 02879-506). Sternheim requests confirmation that arrangements are in place for Maxwell's participation in a telephonic court conference scheduled for October 21 at noon. The recipient confirms that staff has been notified and they are prepared.
EFTA00018026.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2021, relating to the case United States v. Maxwell (20-Cr-330). Attorney David Oscar Markus emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit a responsive letter regarding a government filing from June 30, 2021, explaining that he lacked filing privileges in the SDNY. Judge Nathan's chambers replied with an attached order.
EFTA00017813.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in November 2020. The defense expresses significant frustration regarding technical issues with hard drives provided to Maxwell at the MDC, including broken drives and a lack of consolidation, as well as severe restrictions on the hours Maxwell is permitted to use a laptop to review over 2 million pages of evidence. The prosecution responds by offering to consolidate materials onto a single drive and explaining that the limited laptop access (8:30am-3:30pm) is due to MDC security protocols requiring lieutenant supervision.
EFTA00017768.pdf
An email dated July 6, 2020, from Assistant US Attorney Maurene (likely Comey) to redacted recipients, copying defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen. The email concerns arranging a pretrial interview for the attorneys with their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, prior to her upcoming bail hearing in case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
EFTA00016958.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated October 20, 2021, regarding a telephonic court conference scheduled for the following day at noon. Sternheim requests confirmation that arrangements are in place for Ghislaine Maxwell's participation in the conference.
EFTA00016953.pdf
An email dated October 20, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim, Pagliuca, Menninger). The email attaches a 'Draft joint proposed request to charge' related to the Maxwell trial (inferred from attachment name) and sets a deadline for comments.
EFTA00016949.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 23, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It serves as a formal notice pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(G) that the Government intends to call a clinical expert witness (name redacted) to testify about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and the impact of trauma on minors. The letter outlines the scope of the expert's anticipated testimony and requests reciprocal discovery regarding any experts the defense intends to call.
EFTA00016768.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan, dated December 19, 2020. It serves as a transmittal for filing a Renewed Bail Motion Reply Memorandum and accompanying exhibits under seal in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Other defense counsel, including Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger, are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00016726.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (20cr330). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim provides a list of attendees, including legal counsel and Maxwell's family members (Ian, Kevin, Pandora, Philip, Isabel, Christine), for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The email responds to a request from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers regarding logistics, COVID-19 protocols, and speaking rules for the upcoming hearings.
EFTA00016723.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim filed a letter with the court, prompting Judge Nathan to order the prosecution (USANYS) to respond by 5 PM the following day. The prosecution notes internally that they have contacted the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to set up a call, likely to gather information needed for their response.
EFTA00016492.pdf
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
EFTA00016302.pdf
An email dated September 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits agreed-upon proposed redactions to defense letters dated August 24, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Legal counsel Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Mark S. Cohen are copied.
EFTA00016262.pdf
An email chain from October 29, 2021, regarding urgent issues with Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. Attorney Bobbi Sternheim threatens an order to show cause because Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week despite USPO tracking showing items available for pickup. The document includes a signature block for Isabel Maxwell acting as a paralegal for Leah Saffian, Inc.
EFTA00016259.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding urgent issues with legal mail delivery to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim provides USPS tracking evidence showing four items waiting for pickup in Brooklyn and threatens court action if the MDC does not retrieve them. The document includes screenshots of the tracking information and a signature block for Isabel Maxwell, a paralegal.
EFTA00016204.pdf
This document contains an email chain dated November 3, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates courtesy copies of Electronic Case Files (ECF) filings, specifically a bail application and a document regarding the disclosure of juror names. The email is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
RE: Discovery Requests
Government response to defense concerns regarding discovery hard drives, metadata, flight log pages, and unsealed warrants.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to defense's Jan 7 letter. Addresses 4TB drive, metadata, FBI report redactions, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 discovery points raised by defense, including hard drive access, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and metadata issues.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 points raised by defense regarding discovery, including hard drives, metadata, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
RE: Bill of Particulars Request
Counsel, Please see attached. Best, [Redacted]
Discovery Requests
Formal letter raising 8 discovery issues + 1 media issue. Key points: Hard drive delays preventing Maxwell's defense prep, unredacted FBI report request, missing Rodgers flight logs (pages 1-27), metadata gaps, and inquiry about unsealed affidavit.
Discovery Requests
Defense request for status of hard drives for Maxwell, unredacted FBI reports, missing flight log pages (Rodgers), and clarification on Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Initial lengthy email raising 9 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight log pages, unredacted FBI reports, and Daily Beast article concerns.
Discovery Requests
Detailed letter listing 8 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight logs, metadata gaps, and questions about a Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Letter outlining 9 specific discovery issues/deficiencies including missing flight logs pages, unreadable CDs at MDC, and request for unredacted FBI reports.
RE: Redactions
Agreement to write a joint letter to the Court conveying the parties' position regarding redactions.
RE: Redactions
Email header information regarding redactions. The body is an embedded message labeled 'RE: _Redactions.msg'.
Redactions
Stating that after reviewing Judge Nathan's order denying bail, they do not believe redactions are necessary and requesting the prosecution write the joint letter.
Bill of Particulars Request
I hope you all had a good holiday. Please see attached a request for a Bill of Particulars.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of sealed documents including a cover letter, reply memorandum (redacted and unredacted), and exhibits A-B pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of a renewed bail motion and exhibits to be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of accompanying exhibits O-X (unredacted) to the Court and counsel under seal pursuant to Court order (Dkt. 89).
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...
Submission of redacted exhibits O-P, S, and W-X under seal pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.
Letter re: Briefing Schedule
Attached is a draft of the letter to Judge Nathan regarding the briefing schedule. Unless you have any comments, we will send it to the judge in the next hour or so.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
AUSA explains drive sizing and confirms consolidation of CD images (Epstein's iPhone) and hard drive documents onto a single new drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense complains about broken/missing hard drives, the 'patchwork' of drives, and the restricted access hours (7 hours vs 13 hours) at MDC.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production
Defense asks about drive size and questions why a CD was used alongside a hard drive, noting the laptop lacks a disk drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Informs that 'Your drive' is ready for pickup at 1 St. Andrews, and Ms. Maxwell's drive has been sent to the MDC. Attached a letter.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Email header information regarding discovery production in the US v. Maxwell case. The body content is embedded as an attachment and not visible on this page.
RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production
Confirms receipt of drives, states they are being loaded, and will update when 'yours' is ready for pickup and client's sent to MDC. Mentions agents will plan for Friday from 8am to 3pm.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity