| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Co-counsel
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial in deposition |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner deponent adversarial |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Witness questioner |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversaries in a deposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator witness |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Saige
|
Adversarial questioner deponent |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner and respondent |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. | Unknown (Transcription serv... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Recess | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Exhibit 31-001 | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Proceeding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a redacted witness | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... | Unknown (Reporting firm bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness | Unknown (Likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancelled Hearing | Unknown Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition hearing | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a... | During deposition | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where Mr. Tein questioned an unnamed witness represented by Mr. Leopold. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness represented by attorney Mr. ... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by MR. TEIN. The questioning focuses on wheth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A scheduled appearance was allegedly missed by the deponent, which Mr. Tein refers to as breaking... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent who is represen... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A hearing was scheduled but got cancelled. An agreement related to this cancellation was allegedl... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz and Roy Black, dated August 26, 2008. The letter confirms a 'final list' of 32 victims, discusses the logistics of victim notification letters, and demands confirmation of payment for Mr. Josefsberg's fees. It also explicitly warns that if Epstein breaches the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the Office intends to indict him.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about their parents filing a police report against Mr. Epstein. The witness is evasive and claims not to know answers, while their counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, citing lack of foundation and speculation.
This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying and visiting a 'crack house' in Georgia. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, frequently objects and instructs the witness not to answer the questions.
This document is page 108 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017, produced by Consor & Associates. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about her relationship with her 22-year-old boyfriend, Brett Albritton, who is a firefighter with the Palm Beach Fire Department. The questioning focuses on whether the deponent is underage and lied about her age, which she denies, stating the relationship is 'legal'.
This document is page 103 of a deposition transcript (processed 07/26/17) involving questioning by Mr. Tein. The witness is asked about communications regarding 'the case' with individuals named Roman, Vince, Tiffany Rich, Justin, and Cara. The witness confirms speaking briefly with Tiffany Rich but denies speaking to Vince or knowing a friend named Justin.
This document is page 102 of a deposition transcript (Bates DOJ-OGR-00033090) recorded by Consor & Associates. An unnamed witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein regarding the identification of several men in a photograph or video, including John Brown, Steven Lavelle, Robbie Shergan, and Brandon Salnal. The witness also identifies a woman named Courtney Sailor and a man named Vince as friends of their sister.
This is a page from a deposition transcript (page 101) processed on July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about a photograph involving Steven Lavelle and a man identified phonetically as Robbie Shergan. The opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to Mr. Tein interrupting the witness.
This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.
This document is page 88 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their mother's husband, Paul, and his potential interactions with reporters. The questioning then shifts to the witness's knowledge of a Detective Recarey and a potential deal involving cooperation against someone named Epstein, as well as any contact with people who have been to Epstein's house. The witness consistently denies any knowledge of these subjects, and their likely attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes an objection.
This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.
This document is a single page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing a contentious exchange between two individuals, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, who are likely opposing attorneys. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding' and unprofessional conduct, while Mr. Leopold pleads to be allowed to make the record without interruption and calls for professionalism from all parties in the room. The exchange highlights a significant level of conflict and animosity between the two speakers during the legal proceeding.
This page is a transcript of a deposition involving a female witness being questioned by Mr. Tein while being defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness testifies that her mother and sister have not spoken to reporters ('zero'), but she cannot speak for her father and stepmother as she does not contact them. The exchange becomes heated when the attorneys argue over the line of questioning, with Mr. Tein telling Mr. Leopold to 'Be quiet' and Mr. Leopold threatening to leave if professional conduct is not maintained.
This document is page 81 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of several individuals, including Tony Figueroa and Zack Bryan, and events that occurred at a house belonging to a Mr. Epstein. The witness denies knowing most of the people mentioned but confirms they know Zack Bryan, leading to further questioning about that relationship.
This document is page 76 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Mr. Tein questions a witness regarding a car ride with an individual named Hayley and another unidentified person described as 'dark like a Spanish girl.' The witness denies knowing a specific redacted individual (alleged to be a good friend) and denies lying to the police. The witness acknowledges speaking about the case with their twin sister (name redacted) but claims the sister does not have an email address.
This document is page 75 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their knowledge of Mr. Epstein, including whether he or his employees ever harmed the witness's father's property and a more serious allegation that Epstein almost killed the father. The questioning also probes a past statement the witness made to police about a trip to Epstein's house with a person named Hayley, suggesting the witness lied to authorities.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their credibility, accusing them of lying on their MySpace page about their income and marital status, and also of lying to Detective Michelle Pagan in a tape-recorded statement three years prior. The witness admits to the MySpace fabrications, calling them a joke, but denies lying to the police.
This document is page 71 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age on a MySpace page (claiming to be 18) and subsequently changing it to their true age four days before testifying before a Grand Jury. The witness admits to lying about the age initially but claims not to remember changing it back, citing that they had a 'bazillion' MySpace accounts. The page concludes with Mr. Tein asking if the witness remembers Detective Recarey.
This document is page 69 of a legal deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page where the witness's age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and confirms that listing their age as 18 was a lie, with the questioning implying it was done to circumvent the platform's age restrictions.
This document is page 68 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an attorney named Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about lying about their age on MySpace, referencing specific exhibits. The witness admits to lying about being 18 but denies lying about being 19, while other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, interject during the questioning.
Page 66 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, attorney Mr. Tein, and attorney Mr. Leopold. The questioning focuses on the witness's alleged habit of lying about their age, specifically in relation to MySpace and obtaining body piercings. The witness denies lying to get piercings but clarifies they have one body piercing (excluding ears) after initially stating five.
This is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Tein questions a redacted witness about an incident at the 'Quarterdeck Tavern' where the witness's manager, Justin, allegedly lied to process servers to hide the witness. The page opens with a contentious exchange between the lawyers before a recess is taken.
A transcript page from a legal proceeding recording a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Leopold accuses Tein of repetitive questioning, while Tein asks Leopold to stop yelling. The argument escalates when Leopold mistakenly calls Tein 'Lewis,' leading to an insult from Leopold suggesting Tein made no impression during a previous three-day evidentiary hearing.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about a photograph (marked 18-001), in which the deponent identifies themself and Tiffany Rich. Mr. Tein then characterizes Tiffany Rich as the deponent's friend from the Quarterdeck Tavern. Other attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger, are also present and interject to ensure the clarity of the record.
A contentious argument between attorneys during a legal deposition. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold interrupts and objects. Mr. Goldberger tries to clarify procedural rules.
The deposition from which this transcript is taken, concerning the witness's interactions with Jeff Epstein.
This document is a transcript of a deposition where MR. TEIN questions an unnamed witness. MR. LEOPOLD, the witness's attorney, objects to questions about how much money the witness hopes to get from Mr. Epstein, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing the witness not to answer.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about her awareness that people were looking for her. The witness admits she knew people were looking for her at her job at Quarterdeck and describes an incident where she and a friend switched name tags. Mr. Leopold, acting as counsel, objects to a question from Mr. Tein, calling it harassment.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about Mr. Epstein, a trip to his house, and prior statements made to the police. Mr. Leopold objects to the questions.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about their knowledge of allegations against Brett and about the witness's sister. The witness denies the allegations and lying, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes several objections.
This document records a portion of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions a witness. Mr. Leopold, an attorney, instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege, which leads to a dispute between the two attorneys over speaking objections.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about lying to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they lied about being 18 and told Epstein they went to school in Wellington.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about lying to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they lied about being 18 and told Epstein they went to school in Wellington.
Mr. Tein questions an unnamed deponent about a picture, her relationship with her 22-year-old boyfriend Brett Albritton, and whether she lied about her age. The deponent denies lying and asserts that the relationship is legal.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about conversations they had with their aunt regarding a lawsuit and Mr. Herman. The witness denies that Tiffany Rich had any conversations with Mr. Herman.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects and instructs the witness not to answer if their knowledge comes from privileged conversations.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf by Mr. Leopold against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects and instructs the witness not to answer if their knowledge comes from privileged conversations.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about their knowledge of a press conference and a photograph (Exhibit 20-01) showing the witness's father, stepmother, and Mr. Herman at that conference.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace page where their age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and that stating their age as 18 was a lie, prompted by the platform's age restrictions.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace page where their age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and that stating their age as 18 was a lie, prompted by the platform's age restrictions.
Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about their knowledge of Tony Figueroa, Hayley, Detective Recarey, and Zack Bryan. The witness denies knowing most of them but confirms knowing Zack Bryan and is asked about events at Mr. Epstein's house. Mr. Leopold, presumably another attorney, objects to one of the questions.
Mr. Tein questions a witness about whether their mother's husband, Paul, had contact with reporters or received money from them. The witness is also questioned about their knowledge of a Detective Recarey, a potential deal against Epstein, and Epstein's house. The witness denies knowledge of all these matters. Mr. Leopold, likely the witness's attorney, makes an objection.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about who took two different photographs. The witness identifies their stepmother as the photographer for one and a man named Chris (aka Swiss) for the other, while denying Mr. Tein's characterization of the photos' content.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about who took two different photographs. The witness identifies their stepmother as the photographer for one and a man named Chris (aka Swiss) for the other, while denying Mr. Tein's characterization of the photos' content.
This document is a transcript of a deposition where MR. TEIN questions an unnamed witness. MR. LEOPOLD, the witness's attorney, objects to questions about how much money the witness hopes to get from Mr. Epstein, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing the witness not to answer.
A contentious exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent about a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege.
A contentious exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent about a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege.
A contentious exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent about a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege.
A procedural argument between opposing counsel regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to questioning, and Mr. Tein urges him to stop talking so he can proceed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity