| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
William Kunstler
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Franklin
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Berrigan brothers
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matthew Hale
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 3
|
Adversarial accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioned association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Denial of presence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Doe
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Scott
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Academic social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Victim 1
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minors (unnamed)
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Recarey
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cohen
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas Ashe
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joanne Ashe
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Doe
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political critic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Phyllis Chesler
|
Professional intellectual |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of flight logs from Alan Dershowitz to Detective Riccari. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz negotiates Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Organization of the first law school class on the Vietnam War at Harvard. | Harvard Law School | View |
| N/A | N/A | Release of a statement by 500 law teachers opposing the Johnson Administration's war policy. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal proceeding regarding First Amendment rights and obscenity laws. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of story 'Trump Defender Alan Dershowitz is deeply involved in the sordid Jeffrey Eps... | Online | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prince Andrew meeting guests at Epstein's house. | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prince Andrew sitting in Dershowitz's law class. | Harvard Law School | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Appeals | Brooklyn, Albany, Federal C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion/Interview regarding legal representation. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI monitoring and protection of Alan Dershowitz due to death threat. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz visiting Epstein's properties. | Island, New Mexico, Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Career change to writing books and TV appearances | US | View |
| N/A | N/A | Began representing world famous clients/billionaires | US | View |
| N/A | N/A | Devoted time to defense of Israel | Global/Israel | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Congressional hearing regarding impeachment/perjury | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of case brought by Edwards and Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Krischer's office decided to delay the grand jury session for several months following a meet... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Confidential settlement negotiations | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz met with prosecutors to cast doubt on teens' reliability using MySpace profiles. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OJ Simpson double murder prosecution | California (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Claus Von Bulow assault prosecution | Unknown | View |
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on March 24, 2015, in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (Southern District of Florida). It confirms that attorney Bradley J. Edwards served a document via the CM/ECF system to government attorneys Dexter Lee and A. Marie Villafaña, as well as to Thomas Scott, the attorney representing Alan Dershowitz. The document includes contact information for the recipients and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email dated April 29, 2019, from Richard Kahn (HBRK Associates) to Jeffrey Epstein marked as High Importance. The email contains no body text other than a link to a Newshounds article regarding Donald Trump attacking Judge Napolitano and obstruction of justice, while the subject line notes 'trump praising dershowitz'. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
An email dated April 29, 2019, from Richard Kahn (HBRK Associates Inc.) to Jeffrey Epstein. The email is marked as high importance and contains a link to a news article about Donald Trump attacking Judge Napolitano and praising Alan Dershowitz. The document footer indicates it is part of House Oversight records.
This document appears to be page 7 of an article or op-ed written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by the footer promoting his book 'The Trials of Zion'). The text offers a critical analysis of President Obama's negotiation strategy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, specifically arguing that Obama's call for a return to 1967 borders backfired and forced Prime Minister Netanyahu into a defensive posture during his visit to Washington. The document is part of the House Oversight Committee's files.
This document is a page from a House Oversight file containing an NY Daily News op-ed written by Alan Dershowitz on May 27, 2011. In the article, Dershowitz critiques President Obama's strategy regarding Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, arguing that while Obama's goals are correct, his public strategy and 'tone-deafness' have hardened positions on both sides. The document is stamped with a Bates number indicating it is part of a larger investigative file.
This document appears to be a page from a report or legal analysis produced by the House Oversight Committee regarding the Mueller investigation into Donald Trump. It details the dismissal of Andrew McCabe, legal theories surrounding the potential indictment of a sitting president, and the conflicting views between the Mueller team and the White House (supported by Alan Dershowitz) regarding obstruction of justice and executive privilege. While likely included in a larger dataset due to the mention of Alan Dershowitz (Epstein's former lawyer), the content focuses entirely on the 2017-2018 political and legal conflict between the Trump administration and the DOJ.
This document appears to be a drafted statement or email by Jeffrey Epstein (sent from jeevacation@gmail.com) in which he aggressively defends himself against federal charges and media narratives. He details his grievances with the FBI's plea deal tactics, claims he was forced to pay women he never met, and specifically attempts to discredit a redacted accuser (likely Virginia Giuffre) by denying her claims regarding Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Prince Andrew. The text is notable for its numerous spelling errors and the author's insistence that the women involved were not underage or were strip club workers lying about their age.
This document, likely from a House Oversight investigation, details the 2011 fallout where victim Roberts publicly accused Epstein, Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. It describes Alexander Acosta's defense of his decision not to prosecute Epstein federally, citing a 'year-long assault' by Epstein's legal team. However, the report notes that documents show prosecutors capitulated to the defense team's demands, abandoning a prepared 53-page indictment from 2007.
This document, part of House Oversight records, details the friction between investigators (Recarey and Reiter) and the Palm Beach County State Attorney's office (Krischer and Belohlavek) during the Epstein investigation. It highlights defense attorney Alan Dershowitz's attempts to discredit a victim using her MySpace page and marijuana use, and Investigator Recarey's strong rebuttal against such victim-blaming. The text also notes that the prosecutors actively avoided communication with the investigators and delayed the approval of subpoenas.
This document, likely an excerpt from a report or book included in House Oversight files (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016439), details Alan Dershowitz's legal strategy in the Epstein case. It describes how Dershowitz and his team investigated the victims to compile dossiers on their 'troubled pasts' and met with officials Krischer and Recarey to argue that the accusers would not be credible witnesses.
This document appears to be a page from a Miami Herald article (part of the 'Perversion of Justice' series) included in a House Oversight file. It details the investigative process into Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning how investigator Recarey was overwhelmed by the number of victims and describing aggressive tactics used by Epstein's private investigators, including intimidation, trash picking, and posing as police officers. It also highlights the involvement of Alan Dershowitz and Sarah Kellen, noting Kellen's role in allegedly warning victims against speaking to law enforcement.
This document appears to be a page from a 2018 news article (likely the Miami Herald) included in a House Oversight Committee file. It details the legal maneuvering by Epstein's high-profile legal team to avoid prison time for him and highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and Detective Joseph Recarey to investigate Epstein despite the risks to their careers. The text describes the influx of underage girls to Epstein's Palm Beach compound and the wealthy environment of the island.
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript related to a lawsuit identified as 'Epstein versus RRA'. An unidentified witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Scarola, asserts their 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights when asked about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under 18. The witness objects to a subsequent question about Tommy Mottola, accusing a 'Mr. Edwards' of introducing irrelevant names to damage the witness's personal relationships.
This document is page 89 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Scarola. The witness invokes their Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights when asked about the contents of private jet flight logs and about socializing with Donald Trump in the presence of females under 18. The witness confirms having socialized with both Donald Trump and Alan Dershowitz, identifying Dershowitz as his attorney.
This document from April 27, 2016, is an email from attorney Martin Weinberg to his client, Jeffrey Epstein, forwarding a media inquiry. An investigative reporter from Fox News, referred by Alan Dershowitz, requested to arrange an on-the-record interview with Epstein regarding his ties to both the Clintons and Donald Trump.
This document, from public relations firm Osborne & partners, is a strategic proposal for Jeffrey Epstein to rehabilitate his public image after 2005. It advises Epstein to focus on international political and financial circles, leveraging his scientific philanthropy to build credibility while avoiding US domestic politics and tabloid media. Key recommendations include engaging with specific high-profile journalists, attending elite global forums like Bilderberg, and overhauling his online presence by taking down existing websites.
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
This document is a December 15, 2018 email chain revealing a discussion about public relations strategy for Jeffrey Epstein. The chain includes a forwarded message from Ken Starr, who calls Epstein a 'now-friend' and provides a drafted defense of his controversial plea deal, framing it as a state matter with federal overreach. Correspondents Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik discuss strategic messaging, including whether to invoke Epstein's Clinton connection, target Trump official Alex Acosta, and have Epstein admit some wrongdoing.
This August 14, 2006, article from the Palm Beach Post details the conflict surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the criticism Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter leveled against State Attorney Barry Krischer for his lenient handling of the case, and the subsequent personal attacks on Reiter's character by Epstein's high-powered legal team. The article contrasts the police's push for serious charges with the eventual plea deal, which dropped a federal investigation and allowed Epstein to avoid significant prison time.
This document, comprised of clippings from a September 20, 2007 New York Post article, details the state of the sex case against Jeffrey Epstein. It notes that a grand jury found witnesses not credible, leaving only a single solicitation charge, while police allege Epstein's assistant Sarah Kellen facilitated liaisons. Epstein's lawyers claim a police vendetta, cite a passed lie-detector test, and are reportedly negotiating a 15-month plea deal with federal prosecutors.
This document combines two New York Post articles regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The main article, from July 27, 2008, heavily criticizes the lenient plea deal Epstein received in Florida, highlighting the influence of his high-powered legal team (including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr) and the failure of the state attorney, Barry Krischer, to secure a harsher penalty. A shorter, appended article from July 27, 2006, reports on Epstein's initial arrest for soliciting a prostitute and his subsequent release on $3,000 bail.
This document contains two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles. The first, from February 13, criticizes the lack of consequences for Epstein despite a 2006 indictment and details his high-profile legal team's efforts to dismiss allegations. The second editorial, from July 7, reports that Epstein finally admitted to luring a teenage girl and began serving an 18-month jail sentence as part of a plea deal.
This document is a Palm Beach Post editorial from August 10, 2006, titled "Massaging the system." The editorial criticizes the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and State Attorney Barry Krischer for an apparent bias in favor of the wealthy, well-connected Jeffrey Epstein in a sex crimes case involving underage girls. It details the police investigation's findings, the defense's claims, and evidence that contradicted the defense, suggesting the justice system was failing the young victims.
This document critiques the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in Palm Beach, questioning why prosecutors, led by State Attorney Barry Krischer, did not pursue more serious charges despite evidence that Epstein knew his victims were teenagers. It details efforts by Epstein's legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, to discredit the victims and highlights a lenient plea deal offered by the state. The text also notes allegations of witness intimidation and includes a quote from Epstein's lawyer admitting girls were at the house.
This document appears to be a set of preparatory questions for a deposition or interview, directed at an individual implied to be Jeffrey Epstein ('JEE'). The questions probe into his connections with figures like Graydon Carter and Alan Dershowitz, media profiling by magazines, and highly sensitive personal activities, including daily massages from 'Jack Shacks' with 'happy endings' in Palm Beach. A confidentiality notice at the end indicates the communication is the property of 'JEE' and provides an associated email address, jeevacation@gmail.com.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Harry Reems | Alan Dershowitz | $0.00 | Reems told Dershowitz he had no money; Dershowi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Bakkers' backers | Alan Dershowitz | $20,000.00 | Legal bill for the Jim Bakker appeal. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Alan Dershowitz | Brad Edwards and ... | $900,000.00 | Defamation settlement paid by Dershowitz to Rob... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Alan Dershowitz | Brad Edwards and ... | $900,000.00 | Defamation settlement paid by Dershowitz to Rob... | View |
| N/A | Received | Matthew Hale | Alan Dershowitz | $0.00 | Proposed legal fee which Dershowitz wanted to d... | View |
| 2016-04-01 | Paid | Alan Dershowitz | Brad Edwards and ... | $0.00 | Settlement of defamation claims; financial term... | View |
Stated he would waive statute of limitations so Roberts could sue him.
Dershowitz referenced Ms. Giuffre's affidavit regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Epstein.
Dershowitz calling Giuffre a 'liar' and denying sexual relations.
Confidential settlement discussions that Dershowitz allegedly misrepresented.
Zacky told Dershowitz he admired the content but not the heretical views, and suggested changing the word 'Dershowitz' on the cover.
Discussed business immediately in the bedroom, Jeffrey gave orders/notes while wearing a towel.
Confidential settlement negotiations surreptitiously tape recorded by Dershowitz.
Shared information about accusers, including MySpace posts concerning drugs and alcohol.
Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing anyone to follow police/families.
Falsely told media he was a pawn in a plan to extort a billionaire.
A 'Christian Evangelical rip-off' of a Haggadah meant for Jews for Jesus.
Reems asked Dershowitz to argue his appeal pro bono.
Advice to 'turn off one of your barrels' and be respectful/polite to judges.
Recarey describes this meeting as involving 'shenanigans'.
Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing people to follow police/families.
Described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Host asked about biggest fee; Dershowitz cited Sharansky's hug rather than money from Milken or Helmsley.
Dershowitz shared results of an investigation into one of the girls to discredit her, describing her as an 'accomplished drama student'.
Private meeting described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Excited whispering during testimony
Arguments that a president cannot be prosecuted for exercising constitutional prerogatives.
Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing people to follow them.
Enclosing examples of a victim's website showing 'fascination with marijuana'.
Dershowitz shared results of an investigation into a victim, characterizing her as a drama student to undermine her credibility.
Information showing alleged victims boasted of alcohol and marijuana use.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity