Sigrid S. McCawley
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
anonymous victim
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Victim/Author
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Opposing counsel implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Author (Victim)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
District of Columbia Bar
|
Professional membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 3
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
boies
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia L. Giuffre
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Captivity | The author describes being held captive by 'Wexner's thugs via Ghislaine and Jeffrey,' which resu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Reporting to law enforcement | The author, Sigrid S. McCawley, went to the FBI, an event which she states led to her life no lon... | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Filing | Filing of Document 72 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-27 | Court filing | A letter from Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan was electronically filed with the court. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 674 | Court Docket 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 674 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Letter submitted regarding Victim Impact Statement | New York, NY | View |
| 2022-06-01 | N/A | Sentencing submission for Ghislaine Maxwell | New York (implied by Case 1... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Document filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Order granting Pro Hac Vice for Sigrid S. McCawley | Court | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Order granting Motion for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice in the case of United States of America v. Ghislain... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Motion filed for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice, with a $200.00 filing fee paid. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice of Appearance filed for Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of victims. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | A letter was filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, objecting to her... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Sigrid S. McCawley. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion for Sigrid S. McCawley was reviewed and found to have no def... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley representing victims. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Issuance of Certificate of Good Standing. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2021-03-04 | Court filing | This declaration (Document 142) was filed in Case 1:9-cv-00383-AJN. | N/A | View |
052.pdf
A joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, to Judge Debra Freeman in the case of Juliette Bryant v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter informs the court that Bryant submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program on June 26, 2020, and requests a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery pending the program's determination. The document includes a stamp from Judge Freeman dated September 11, 2020, granting the requested extension.
013.pdf
This document is a letter from plaintiff's counsel (Boies Schiller Flexner) to Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. in the case *Bryant v. Indyke et al.*, dated January 29, 2020. The letter argues against the defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Juliette Bryant's claims are timely under New York statutes (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It details that Bryant was a resident of New York during the abuse (2002-2005 era) and was raped repeatedly by Epstein at his New York home.
010.pdf
A joint letter dated January 10, 2020, from legal counsel representing plaintiffs (victims) and defendants (Epstein Estate executors) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter provides a status update on discovery schedules and settlement discussions, specifically noting the development of a Victims' Compensation Program awaiting approval in the US Virgin Islands. The parties request a court conference in early February 2020.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on November 21, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP requests permission to represent plaintiff Juliette Bryant in her lawsuit against the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn). The filing includes a declaration of good standing and a certificate from the Supreme Court of Florida confirming McCawley's bar admission since 1997.
EFTA00038962.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. On April 29, 2022, Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an Opinion & Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 29 motion and confirming her conviction on Counts Three, Four, and Six, while dismissing other counts as multiplicitous. The order explicitly mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a co-conspirator in a scheme to abuse underage girls and confirms Maxwell's sentencing date for June 28, 2022.
EFTA00031690.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, forwarding a 'Notice of Electronic Filing' from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The notice contains the text of an order by Judge J. Nathan granting a continuance of the trial until Fall 2021 to allow the defense time to prepare for additional charges in the S2 indictment. The order mandates that the parties meet and confer by May 10, 2021, to propose a specific trial start date.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00024708.pdf
This document contains a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Maxwell, dated May 14, 2021, and an associated email chain circulating the order. The order denies Maxwell's request to alter detention protocols regarding flashlight checks every 15 minutes, ruling that the checks are necessary for safety in a high-profile case and do not violate her rights. The email chain shows the order being forwarded by a Staff Attorney at MDC Brooklyn.
EFTA00022960.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.
EFTA00014595.pdf
A 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, regarding the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (20-2413). The document confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Hearing Date Acknowledgment' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on October 9, 2020, and lists the attorneys served electronically with the notice.
EFTA00010410.pdf
This document contains an email chain between defense attorney Christian Everdell and US Attorney's Office prosecutors (Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, et al.) dated June 30, 2021, regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that the defense has no redactions to propose regarding a court opinion and coordinates the filing of a joint letter to the court. The document also includes the official Notice of Electronic Filing (Order 305) from Judge Alison J. Nathan, which set the deadlines for these redaction proposals.
DOJ-OGR-00015107.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and Maxwell's criminal scheme, advocating for the redaction of victims' names while opposing similar protection for third-party enablers. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum and several civil cases, asserting that transparency and accountability necessitate the release of information concerning individuals involved in sex trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00001179.jpg
This legal document, a letter dated December 15, 2020, from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, contains a statement from Annie Farmer opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer, a victim of Maxwell, details Maxwell's history of abuse, manipulative behavior, and flight risk, arguing that Maxwell is a psychopath who lacks remorse and would flee to avoid justice. The statement emphasizes the need for Maxwell to stand trial to ensure justice for her victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020650.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings from March 24 to March 29, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP appearing for victims, the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel filing letters with Judge Alison J. Nathan, and the filing of a superseding indictment against Maxwell. The docket also records a motion to appear pro hac vice and a related $200 filing fee.
DOJ-OGR-00020627.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing in Case 22-1426 from the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated February 28, 2023. It lists the legal counsel involved, identifying the USA as the plaintiff. The plaintiff is represented by Assistant US Attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Gainfort Moe, and Maurene Ryan Comey from the U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY. The document also provides contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, who is designated as a retained lead attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg
This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020521.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment, various motions regarding subpoenas and trial scheduling, and a specific incident where Maxwell's defense claimed MDC guards wrongfully seized her confidential legal documents. Judge Nathan issued scheduling orders for pretrial motions and ordered MDC counsel to explain the seizure of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020514.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 31, 2021, to April 14, 2021. It details procedural events including the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment, the granting of Pro Hac Vice status to attorney Sigrid McCawley, and various letter motions regarding MDC conditions and subpoenas. It also includes a specific denial by Judge Nathan regarding a request for Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing US Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00020512.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's order regarding the handling of subpoenas involving alleged victims, specifically requiring a law firm (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) to coordinate with defense counsel on redactions and objections. The docket also records Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, the filing of several sealed documents, and the formal appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020492.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court docket (Case 22-1426) listing the legal counsel for various parties involved in the case, dated July 8, 2022. It details contact information and representation status for attorneys representing the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (representing victims), and the USA (Plaintiff).
DOJ-OGR-00020488.jpg
This document is a service list (Page 2 of 92) from a court filing dated July 8, 2022, associated with Case 22-1426 and the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the email addresses for various attorneys receiving electronic notice, including prosecutors from the US Department of Justice (Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, etc.) and private counsel (Sigrid McCawley). The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00020488.
DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020413.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between March 31, 2021, and April 14, 2021. Key events include the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment to April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The document also details a denial by Judge Nathan of a defense request to allow Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing U.S. Marshal policy.
No Subject
Email contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Phone contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Fax contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Email contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Phone contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Fax contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
Virginia Giuffre's attendance at sentencing
Counsel informs court that Ms. Giuffre cannot attend physically due to a medical issue and requests permission to read her statement. Judge grants permission.
Clarification of Order regarding Virginia Giuffre
Requesting permission to read Giuffre's statement due to her medical inability to attend.
Virginia Giuffre Statement Reading
Request to read Virginia Giuffre's statement at sentencing due to her medical inability to attend physically.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley writes to Judge Nathan to seek clarification that she will be permitted to read a statement on behalf of her client, Virginia Giuffre, who cannot attend a hearing due to a medical issue.
The impact of Ghislaine Maxwell on the author's life for ...
Sigrid S. McCawley writes to describe the profound and lasting trauma inflicted upon her by Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Wexner. She details threats to her life, the trauma of captivity, and her ongoing fear, urging the recipient to recognize Ghislaine as a 'very dangerous and devious individual' when determining her sentence.
Unknown (Redacted)
Closing of a formal letter or filing.
Unknown (Redacted)
The content is fully redacted.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for permission for victim Teresa Helm to make an oral statement at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Legal counsel submitting a victim impact statement on behalf of Teresa Helm for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing pursuant to the Crimes Victims’ Rights Act.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Virginia Giuffre's counsel submitting Giuffre's victim impact statement for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The letter requests that the statement be read into the record because Giuffre is unable to attend in person due to a medical issue.
Reply in Support of Objections to Rule 17 Subpoena Document
Filed on docket 04/23/2021.
MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP filed a motion to be admitted to practice 'pro hac vice' in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose is to appear as counsel for the law firm and the victims it represents in the case.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from BSF, representing victims, to the court regarding a previous filing. It states that BSF conferred with the Defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a narrow piece of information, but will remove the redactions if ordered by the court.
Request for continued incarceration of Ghislaine Maxwell
Argument that Maxwell should remain incarcerated until trial to prevent her from escaping justice or abusing children again.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting a statement from Annie Farmer in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The statement argues Maxwell is a psychopath and a flight risk who will not see justice if released.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting a statement from Annie Farmer in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The statement argues Maxwell is a psychopath and a flight risk who will not see justice if released.
Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke & Richard D. Kahn, 19-104...
Reply in support of letter motion for a conference to address Defendants' failure to participate in discovery.
Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke & Richard D. Kahn, 19- ...
Reply in support of letter motion for a conference to address Defendants' failure to participate in discovery.
Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke & Richard D. Kahn, 19-104...
Pre-motion conference request regarding Defendants' failure to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity