| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Flight crew |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Flight crew |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney
|
Professional document transfer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Flight crew |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of the witness. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Government's Exhibit 662 (Pilot Logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of standard operating procedures for scheduling Epstein's flights. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hiring of Rodgers by Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness's initial estimated date of meeting Jane (later corrected). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Handover of records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Traverse City to Cahokia (CPS) for maintenance. | Traverse City to Cahokia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Columbus to Traverse City (TBC). | Columbus to Traverse City | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights involving an unnamed female estimated to be 18 or 19 years old. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Atlantic crossing flights to Europe. | Atlantic Ocean/Europe | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rodgers visited Maxwell's 59th Street apartment | 59th Street near Columbus C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Refurbishment of first aid kits | Maxwell's residences | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight planning and logistics discussions. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Interlochen Center for the Arts. | Traverse City, Michigan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Employment of Rodgers by Epstein | Various (Flight crew) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony provided by pilots Visoski, Alessi, and Rodgers. | Court | View |
| N/A | Discussion | The witness (Rodgers) recalls being present to discuss the acquisition of a G2B aircraft. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Visoski and Rodgers were employed as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness (Rodgers) is being questioned about flights they piloted for Epstein. | in-flight | View |
| N/A | Flight | Seven flights were taken to Interlochen. | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, particularly special guests, to the witness (Ro... | cockpit | View |
| N/A | Passenger interaction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, including special guests, to the witness (Rodge... | Cockpit of a plane | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness, Rodgers, stated he took an unnamed male on seven flights to Interlochen. | To Interlochen, Michigan (v... | View |
| N/A | Flight | A series of flights to Interlochen that occurred in August, with one exception in July. The year ... | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Service visit | Witness would visit Ms. Maxwell's residences to pick up and return first aid kits that needed to ... | Ms. Maxwell's residences | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Rodgers - direct) discussing specific entries in flight logs from 1997 and 1998. The testimony confirms a 1997 flight where Jeffrey Epstein was the sole passenger, and a 1998 flight from Palm Beach to Teterboro where Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a person identified only as 'Jane' were passengers. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, objected to the mention of 'Jane,' but was overruled.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony covers standard procedures involving an employee named Mr. Alessi in Palm Beach and specifically details a flight (Flight 979) on May 9, 1997. The flight traveled from Teterboro, NJ, to Santa Fe, NM, carrying Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a passenger identified as 'Jane' to Epstein's Zorro Ranch.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, who was the pilot of a Gulf Stream G2B. He testifies regarding flight number 916 on November 11, 1996, confirming a trip from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro, New Jersey, carrying passengers including Jeffrey Epstein and a person identified only as 'Jane'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange where the judge (THE COURT) confirms with Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell that there are no other matters before deciding to bring in the jury and addressing the witness, Mr. Rodgers.
This document is page 132 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The page contains a brief portion of the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers and indicates that the following pages (1838-1843) are sealed. The transcript was produced by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge, Ms. Comey (for the government), and Mr. Everdell. The attorneys agree on two edits to a limiting jury instruction for an upcoming witness's testimony concerning an alleged incident with Mr. Epstein in New Mexico. The key change is replacing the term "sexual conduct" with "physical contact" to describe the alleged event.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and government attorney Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the procedural issue of raising a new argument that was not addressed during a witness's examination, specifically in relation to the testimony of Mr. Alessi. The judge explains their position while affirming they will keep an open mind to future arguments from both sides before the court goes into recess.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Comey, and the judge regarding whether the defense had an adequate opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The judge also mentions a planned briefing on "Government Exhibit 52" as indicated by a Mr. Rohrbach.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the examination of a witness named Rodgers. The proceedings involve a discussion between the Court, Ms. Comey, and Mr. Everdell regarding the redaction of a name ('Carolyn') and phone numbers from evidence. Mr. Everdell also coordinates the placement of folders for the jury ahead of cross-examination, and the parties agree to discuss an 'in limine instruction' after the lunch break.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Comey. The judge rules that document redactions are overly broad and must be narrowed. Ms. Comey agrees, noting the task will be time-intensive, and receives permission from the Court to complete the work over an upcoming long weekend.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) during the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that the initials 'JE' and 'GM' in a logbook refer to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, respectively. Following the dismissal of the jury for lunch, defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises a procedural issue regarding the government's practice of referring to other flight passengers as 'and others' without naming them.
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on two flights, 573 and 574, that occurred in 1994. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was a passenger on flight 573, and that both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were passengers on flight 574 from Traverse City, Michigan, to Teterboro, New Jersey, on August 20, 1994.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about being a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically recalling a flight on August 18, 1994, from Aspen, Colorado, to Traverse City, Michigan, on a Gulfstream 2B aircraft. He also states that he flew Epstein to Traverse City seven times between 1991 and 1998, typically in August.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers explains the protocol for logging passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's planes, stating that crew members often did not know passengers' names and would use the abbreviation "PAX" (for passenger) in the logbook. He clarifies that a name appearing in the logbook for the first time did not necessarily mean it was that individual's first flight, as they may have flown previously as an unidentified "PAX".
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers, a pilot, describes a flight on July 26, 1991, from Teterboro, NJ, to Palm Beach, FL, confirming that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and two other individuals were passengers. The witness also states that Epstein owned a home on Palm Beach Island.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony concerns a flight log for an HS125-700 aircraft with tail number N404CB. Rodgers describes 'flight number one' as a repositioning flight from Wilmington, Delaware, to Teterboro, New Jersey, immediately following the purchase ('closing') of the airplane. Rodgers also notes that at the start of their employment, Jeffrey Epstein lived in an apartment in Manhattan.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers authenticates their pilot logbook, confirming it is an accurate record kept in the regular course of their duties. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully moves to admit the logbook into evidence as a sealed exhibit (662) and a redacted public version (662-R), which the court accepts without objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers, a former employee and crew member for Mr. Epstein, describes a personal logbook they maintained, which recorded flight dates, destinations, flight times, and passenger names for only the flights they personally worked on. The witness is then directed to examine a document identified as Government Exhibit 662.
This document is an excerpt from a deposition transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a pilot named Rodgers is questioned about flight records. Rodgers states that he kept passenger manifests, aircraft logs, and a personal logbook for flights he piloted for Jeffrey Epstein. He confirms that he turned over the passenger manifests for Epstein's planes to one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a pilot named Rodgers. Rodgers describes the fleet of aircraft owned by his employer between 1991 and 2004, specifically listing a Hawker Siddeley 125, Gulfstream G2B, Cessna 421, and Boeing 727. The questioning focuses on the physical layout of the Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft, establishing that doors separating the cockpit from the passenger areas prevented the pilot from observing passenger activities.
This document is a transcript of court testimony from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Rodgers, identified as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein, is questioned about Epstein's and Ms. Maxwell's travel between 1994 and 2004. Rodgers states that Epstein almost always flew private, except for occasional Concorde flights to Europe, and that his plane was down for maintenance annually. The witness also testifies that Ms. Maxwell possessed a 'Raytheon Travel Air card' which allowed her to charter private jets.
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large townhouse in Manhattan, the nature of the relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein between 1991 and 2004 as changing from romantic to not romantic, and the process by which Ms. Maxwell would provide 24-72 hours notice for flights on Mr. Epstein's planes via beeper or cell phone.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on establishing a timeline of Ghislaine Maxwell's residences (moving from a larger apartment to a studio, then to 84th Street, then a townhouse) and mentions the death of her father in November 1991. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises objections regarding foundation and hearsay, which are ruled upon by the Court.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The transcript captures an exchange where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, argues against the notion that moving into a smaller apartment implies poverty, an argument the court overrules. The testimony also references a point in time when an unnamed female first met Mr. Epstein.
This document is a transcript of a sidebar conference during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense (Mr. Everdell) argues against admitting evidence regarding the death of Maxwell's father and her subsequent move to a smaller apartment, claiming it predates the alleged conspiracy by three years. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues this evidence is relevant to establish motive, specifically that Maxwell was not wealthy and participated in crimes with Jeffrey Epstein in exchange for financial support, including the purchase of a large townhouse.
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (about every month) to Epstein's office in New York. The witness explicitly denies sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
After receiving a page, Rodgers would call back Epstein's office and speak with his secretary or assistant about the flight.
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
A questioner asks the witness, Rodgers, about conversations with Mr. Epstein regarding renovations for a G2B aircraft purchased in 1994. Rodgers is also asked about travel to Michigan and to identify staff who worked at the Palm Beach house in the 1990s.
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
During the 1990s, Rodgers would usually speak to Epstein's secretary in New York to schedule flights.
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (usually at the end of the month) to Epstein's office in New York. It is explicitly stated that these manifests were not sent to Ghislaine.
The witness (Rodgers) confirms speaking to Sarah Kellen often enough to have her number programmed in their phone.
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
Rodgers confirms that 'JE' stands for Jeffrey Epstein and 'GM' stands for Ghislaine Maxwell in the logbook.
Conversations serving as the basis for the witness's knowledge about Maxwell's moves.
Instructions regarding Epstein needing to fly somewhere.
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Rodgers confirms he did not send his pilot logbook to Ghislaine.
Communication via beeper if she needed something
Communication via cell phones
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
A cross-examination where the witness, Rodgers, confirms they were not always given the full names of all passengers, that passenger names were not critical information, and that no airline regulation required them to gather the names.
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about how passengers were recorded in flight logbooks. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers on Epstein's planes, initials were sometimes used instead of full names to save space.
A questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about Shelly Lewis's romantic involvement with Epstein and Ghislaine's share in a charter plane during the 1990s versus flying on Epstein's plane in the 2000s.
A witness, Rodgers, is questioned about the meaning of various columns in a document. Rodgers explains how the date, aircraft make/model, registration number, departure/arrival points, and flight number are recorded.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity