CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Trafficker victim |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Visitor victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unspecified |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kellen
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Adversarial professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter recruit |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Adversarial professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged trafficker and victim |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Transactional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
AMANDA
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Tatum
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Carolyn's mom
|
Family |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sean
|
Confidant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Scheduler victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Willits
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Sean stole a car and ran away from Florida to Georgia. | Florida to Georgia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Ms. Roberts leaving Epstein's house after payment | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits by Carolyn to Epstein's home. | Mr. Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receipt of package containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second visit to Epstein's property. Sean drove and waited in the car. Carolyn sat in the kitchen ... | Epstein's Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant (Maxwell) entered massage room while Carolyn was nude and touched her. | Massage room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial testimony regarding Count Five and Count Three. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn's second visit: Greeted by Sarah, Chef offered food, Sarah prepared table. | Epstein's residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn dropped out of school in the seventh grade. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. | Jeffrey Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage encounter where Epstein masturbated in Carolyn's presence. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 14. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Larry Visoski, Cimberly Espinosa, and Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn turned 18, marking the legal end of the specific charged sex-trafficking conspiracy regar... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn received a package via FedEx containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Carolyn and Juan Alessi regarding the roles of Maxwell and Kellen. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn going to Epstein's house for massages. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn observing Maxwell in the office area off the kitchen. | Jeffrey Epstein's house (of... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017067.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, arguing that Maxwell was integral to Epstein's operation. The argument uses evidence like FedEx records from 2002 showing Maxwell sending packages from Epstein's office, and corroborates the testimony of a witness, Carolyn, who received packages from Epstein at age 15, using phone messages she left at Epstein's Palm Beach house in 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00017066.jpg
This page is a transcript of a closing argument (summation) by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor summarizes evidence regarding Epstein and Maxwell's abuse of minors, specifically mentioning victims Jane, Annie, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn. The text details sexual acts, flight records, and FedEx records (Government Exhibits 801 and 803) proving Epstein sent packages to Carolyn when she was 15.
DOJ-OGR-00017065.jpg
This document is a summation by Ms. Moe in a legal case against Maxwell. It recounts the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, who stated that in 2001 at age 14, Maxwell recruited her for 'sexualized massages' at Jeffrey Epstein's house. The summation highlights corroborating testimony from Carolyn's then-boyfriend, Sean, and details conversations between Maxwell and Carolyn about her personal life, which were seemingly aimed at grooming her for travel and further exploitation.
DOJ-OGR-00017064.jpg
This document is a page from the summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell was fully aware of the sexual abuse occurring in Epstein's house. The text highlights testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who stated in a 2009 deposition that Epstein never called her directly; instead, Maxwell or Sarah Kellen would call to schedule 'massages'.
DOJ-OGR-00017063.jpg
This document contains a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details testimony from a witness named Carolyn regarding interactions with Virginia, Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, describing sexual acts that occurred in a massage room. The speaker also describes the physical layout of the room, including nude drawings and furniture, characterizing it as a site of sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017062.jpg
This document is a page from the closing summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor discusses the recruitment of a victim named Carolyn, connecting her to Virginia Roberts. The text references testimony from Juan Alessi (referred to as 'John'), who described driving Maxwell near Mar-a-Lago when Maxwell ordered him to stop the car so she could approach and recruit a young Virginia Roberts.
DOJ-OGR-00017052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a legal summation given by Ms. Moe. She argues for the credibility of a witness, Jane, by citing the expert testimony of Dr. Rocchio, who explains that delayed disclosure is typical for victims of sexual trauma. Ms. Moe further supports Jane's testimony by highlighting that it is corroborated by the strikingly similar experiences of three other witnesses: Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00017038.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor outlines the vulnerability of specific victims (Annie, Kate, Carolyn) due to age, financial struggles, and family issues, arguing that Maxwell and Epstein exploited these needs as part of a predatory 'playbook.' The text describes how the perpetrators isolated these girls at Epstein's ranch and Upper East Side mansion, specifically noting that parents were excluded.
DOJ-OGR-00017037.jpg
This document is a page from a court summation, likely delivered by 'Ms. Moe', in a criminal case. The speaker outlines the stages of 'grooming' as explained by a Dr. Rocchio and alleges that the defendants, Maxwell and Epstein, used this exact 'playbook' to carefully select and target vulnerable girls from struggling, single-mother households, specifically naming Jane, Kate, Annie, and Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00017036.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a prosecutor's summation in a trial against 'Maxwell'. The prosecutor argues that a warning in a household manual for staff to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb' was intended to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' she and Epstein were committing. The prosecutor also introduces the argument that Maxwell used a consistent 'playbook' to exploit multiple young girls, citing victims by name and referencing the testimony of an expert psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00017013.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves attorneys Everdell and Rohrbach debating and agreeing upon the specific phrasing for legal charges with the Judge, specifically regarding 'sex trafficking' and 'conspiracy' counts involving individuals under the age of 18 and a specific individual named Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00016993.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the 'conscious avoidance' theory, stating that instructions to lie about age came from Virginia, not Ms. Maxwell. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach counters by citing testimony from Mr. Alessi regarding Maxwell recruiting at legitimate hotels, suggesting she may have confused underage girls with adults.
DOJ-OGR-00016992.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text captures a legal argument between Mr. Rohrbach and the Court regarding whether the defense has opened the door to the issue of Maxwell's knowledge of the victims' ages. Specific references are made to testimony from Larry Visoski, Kimberly Espinosa, and a victim named Carolyn, who was instructed to lie about her age at 'the house'.
DOJ-OGR-00016991.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the concept of 'conscious avoidance,' stating that the core issue is a factual dispute regarding the ages of alleged victims (specifically Jane and Kate) and whether the defense had any interaction with another individual named Carolyn. The defense cites testimony from Mr. Alessi stating he only saw two underage-looking individuals at Epstein's house, contrary to the inference of 'hundreds' of underage women.
DOJ-OGR-00016989.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, a lawyer named Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony for the judge, stating that three witnesses—Carolyn, Jane, and Kate—all testified that they had told Ms. Maxwell their age. He also recounts the testimony of another witness, Mr. Alessi, who said he saw Ms. Roberts and Jane at a house and believed them to be under 18, which is relevant to the issue of the defendant's knowledge of the witnesses' ages.
DOJ-OGR-00016986.jpg
This court transcript captures an argument from a defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, objecting to a 'conscious avoidance' jury instruction for his client, Ms. Maxwell. He argues that the instruction is inappropriate because testimony from witnesses Jane, Annie, and Carolyn establishes Ms. Maxwell as an active participant in the alleged sexual crimes, not someone who deliberately ignored them. The attorney cites specific acts like participating in massages and groping to prove direct involvement, thereby negating the basis for a conscious avoidance theory.
DOJ-OGR-00016983.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court hearing on August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The discussion centers on amending a legal document, specifically a clause alleging that Maxwell, among Epstein's employees, sent gifts to Carolyn between 2001 and 2004. Mr. Everdell argues for the exclusion of Maxwell's name from this clause, citing a lack of evidence and contradictory FedEx records, to which the government, represented by Mr. Rohrbach, ultimately agrees.
DOJ-OGR-00016971.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, where attorneys Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach discuss jury instructions with the judge. Key points include a request to substitute a 'Miller charge', a modification to specify a count relates 'solely to Carolyn', and a court clerk's observation about the word 'Minor' in the heading of Count Six. The document captures the procedural process of finalizing legal instructions for a jury.
DOJ-OGR-00016937.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving a legal debate over jurisdiction and conspiracy charges. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that testimony from witnesses Annie, Kate, and Carolyn regarding events in New Mexico, Arizona, or 'an island' does not satisfy the requirement to prove a violation of New York law. The Judge overrules the objection, stating that the defense is conflating substantive counts with conspiracy counts and that a direct violation of NY law is not required to establish the elements of the conspiracy count.
DOJ-OGR-00016935.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney argues that a specific conspiracy charge is narrowly focused on a violation of New York law, with Jane as the sole victim. The attorney distinguishes this from separate conduct in Florida involving a person named Carolyn and clarifies that while witnesses Kate and Annie provided testimony, they are not victims under this particular charge.
DOJ-OGR-00016931.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and the Judge regarding jury instructions for 18 U.S.C. 1591 (sex trafficking). The discussion focuses on whether 'foreign commerce' elements apply to charges involving Virginia Roberts versus Carolyn, with the defense/court noting a lack of evidence regarding Maxwell enticing Roberts specifically.
DOJ-OGR-00016790.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Richards. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions the witness about their recollection of a person named Carolyn stating she had obtained Epstein's phone number from a telephone book. The witness confirms this account is documented in a '302' report.
DOJ-OGR-00016625.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the testimony of a witness named Loftus and the admission of an FBI 302 report. The defense argues for a live witness to highlight an inconsistent statement regarding whether 'Virginia' approached 'Carolyn' to offer $300 at a party or at a house in Virginia.
DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca discuss scheduling and stipulations regarding 'prior inconsistent statements' found in FBI 302 reports for witnesses identified as Carolyn, Jane, and Annie. The court focuses on resolving issues related to 'Carolyn' immediately as she is an out-of-state witness present to testify that afternoon.
DOJ-OGR-00013276.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 263 of 264) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witnesses Kimberly Meder, Stephen Flatley, and Carolyn by attorneys Comey, Menninger, Pomerantz, and Pagliuca. It also tracks the receipt of Government Exhibits 304, 306, 307, 320, 321, 322, and 324 into evidence.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of birth certificate (Government Exhibit 11).
Confirmation of past events and prior legal complaints
Questioning regarding paragraph 33 of a 2009 complaint and the details of a sexual encounter with Epstein.
Clarification of prior testimony regarding sexual interco...
Witness explains she previously denied having intercourse with Epstein because she was not a willing participant (it was non-consensual).
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding signature on Exhibit C8.
Cross-examination regarding instructions to lie about age...
Carolyn is being cross-examined about being told by Ms. Roberts and Virginia to say she was 17 to Epstein, and about her first visit to Epstein's house.
Discrepancies in Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Carolyn, about the start date of alleged abuse (May 1, 2001) and additional claims of specific sexual acts in her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she denies making.
Cross-examination regarding substance abuse
Attorney questions witness about drug use in 2002-2003 and at age 13.
Events during a massage involving Mr. Epstein and Virginia
An unnamed questioner elicits testimony from Carolyn about a massage she and Virginia gave to Mr. Epstein. Carolyn states that after 45 minutes, Mr. Epstein turned over, Virginia got on top of him, and they had sex while Carolyn watched from a couch. Afterwards, Carolyn and Virginia were paid $300.
Bringing friends to Jeffrey Epstein's house
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Carolyn, about the ages of her friends (Amanda, Tatum, Julie) when she brought them to Jeffrey Epstein's house. Carolyn states Epstein asked her to bring friends, and describes entering the house and going to a massage room.
Cross Examination
Questioning regarding prior statements and drug use.
Victim Compensation Application
Submission of application for compensation.
Witness meetings
Witness was meeting with the government during the same time period she applied to the fund.
Unknown
Emails forwarded by Scarola to Carolyn.
Legal representation/advice
Witness confirms speaking with Mr. Scarola in 2020
Contacting the government
Mr. Scarola left multiple voice messages for the witness (Carolyn) in 2020 regarding the government.
Legal consultation
Witness confirms speaking with Mr. Scarola in 2020.
Re-establishing contact
Agents contacted Carolyn; she requested to speak to her lawyer first.
Unspecified
The witness confirms she did not respond to messages from Mr. Scarola in 2019.
Request to come to Epstein's home
Requests for Carolyn to visit Epstein's home, made on Epstein's behalf.
Request to come to Epstein's
Requests for Carolyn to visit Epstein, made by Sarah or Maxwell rather than Epstein directly.
Lawsuit connection
Alleged 6.5-hour meeting at lawyer's office regarding the lawsuit.
Deposition testimony
Carolyn described Maxwell in her deposition.
Deposition/Prior Testimony
Reference to prior testimony given under oath in 2009.
Escort Service
Deposition where Carolyn was not asked about working for an escort service.
Deposition
Witness confirms testimony said nothing about Ms. Maxwell other than two specific words.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity