| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. The initial email is from defense attorney Nicole Simmons to Judge Nathan's chambers, submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's reply in support of motions in limine. This email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) with a note attaching both the defense reply and the government's final brief.
This document is an email dated October 26, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan's chambers. It serves to file the Government's opposition to the Defense's motions in limine in the case US v. Maxwell (20 CR 330). The email indicates that redacted versions of the opposition will be filed publicly on October 29.
This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, related to the US v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr 330). Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (a legal mail delivery request) to co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) and potentially opposing counsel. The top email discusses the filing and attempts to schedule a call regarding an issue to be addressed at the final pretrial conference scheduled for the following Monday at 11 a.m.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 related to the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP submits reply memoranda and exhibits for pretrial motions to Judge Nathan's chambers and government prosecutors (USANYS), noting that documents are being filed under seal with redacted versions for the public docket.
This document is a Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 10, 2020. It confirms the filing of 'EXHIBITS, volume(s) 1 of 7' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case *United States of America v. Maxwell*. The notice lists several attorneys, including Ty Gee, Adam Mueller, and Laura Menninger, who were electronically served with this document.
This document is an email dated October 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a transmittal notice for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The prosecutor notes that digital files are being sent via USAfx and a physical CD is being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell.
This document is an email chain from October 29-30, 2021, between Defense counsel (Christian Everdell et al.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of filing motions in limine. The correspondence details which specific exhibits are to be sealed (including grand jury testimony, a 'contact book', and a 'photobook') versus redacted. The parties coordinate the timing of their respective filings and discuss a joint cover letter.
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 29, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It is addressed to counsel, including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, distributing an attached Order issued by the Judge and noting it will be filed publicly the following Monday.
This document is an email dated November 13, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits a letter and exhibit 'GX-52' (referenced in attachments) and requests that the exhibit be filed under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca are copied on the correspondence.
An email chain from November 20-21, 2021, between defense counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence concerns the filing of a redacted letter regarding the self-authentication of birth certificates for alleged minor victims. The Court instructs the defense to follow Docket No. 474 for filing instructions.
This document is an email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca. The email transmits attachments containing proposed redactions regarding 'Witness-3' (also referred to as Accuser-3 and MV-3 in filenames) related to case filings (Case 20cr330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
This document is a letter dated November 20, 2021, from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the production of discovery materials. The government provided Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as witness statements for individuals they did not currently intend to call to testify. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under a Protective Order.
This document is an email thread from November 19, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It originates from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, distributing a sealed Memorandum Opinion & Order (Dkt. No. 477) to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The top email forwards this order with the comment 'Sealed opinion on MV-3.'
Defense counsel Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan opposing the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) regarding alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these materials are exculpatory under Brady because they relate to post-1997 allegations where witnesses do not implicate Maxwell, thereby supporting her defense against perjury charges that she was unaware of Epstein's abuse. The letter also argues the government has failed to show 'good cause' under Rule 16 to delay this discovery.
This document is a letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. It details the production of discovery materials, including Jencks Act and Giglio materials, for potential trial witnesses and others the government does not currently intend to call. The letter also clarifies a labeling change for confidential documents to avoid confusion with classified materials, replacing 'confidential' stamps with references to the Protective Order.
This document is an automated Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 23, 2020. It confirms the filing of supplementary papers to a motion (correcting a previously defective document) on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in case 20-3061. The notice was electronically mailed to attorneys Ty Gee, Laura Menninger, and Adam Mueller, as well as Deputy Clerk Gerard Whidbee.
An email dated October 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense counsel (including Laura Menninger and Christian Everdell) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 CR 330). The email serves to transmit the Government's reply brief in support of its motions in limine and notes that a redacted version will be filed publicly on October 29.
A discovery cover letter dated July 21, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of 'FedEx Records' (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753552 to SDNY_GM_02759392) which are designated as confidential under a protective order. The document outlines the ongoing discovery obligations of the government.
This document contains an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). An Assistant US Attorney submits a motion to Judge Nathan's chambers to preclude the testimony of a redacted Doctor (expert witness). A subsequent internal email praises the brief as 'fantastic and very convincing' and thanks a colleague for their assistance.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. The defense raises issues about defective hard drives provided to Maxwell in prison, missing pages from pilot David Rodgers' flight logs (specifically pages 1-27), and requests unredacted FBI reports from 2006. The government responds that the 'missing' flight log pages are accounted for in a separate document, asserts that redactions in the FBI report were original to the files found on Epstein's devices, and denies requests for grand jury subpoenas.
An email dated April 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and other counsel. The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of a letter filed that day via ECF in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca are cc'd.
A discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated May 3, 2021. The letter confirms the production of confidential photographs (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753399 to SDNY_GM_02753431) under a Protective Order.
An email dated May 7, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email provides a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330).
A discovery production letter dated October 19, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter outlines a production of evidence including FBI Florida and NY documents, Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) materials, aerial video, and 3-D blueprints, spanning Bates numbers SDNY_GM_00328070 through SDNY_GM_00356148. The letter designates specific items as 'Confidential' or 'Highly Confidential' under a Protective Order.
This document is an email dated June 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The subject concerns 'US v. Maxwell' and an update on conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The email attaches a letter with requested redactions highlighted regarding these conditions.
Counsel – Please see attached letter regarding Mr. [Redacted] anticipated testimony.
Inquiry about missing Bates numbers 2774105-2774194 in the discovery letter.
Sender attaches a draft of a joint letter and notes they have joined the defense's position on specific prospective jurors (list of numbers included).
Checking in to see if compiled lists are ready for review.
Acknowledges receipt and attaches their list.
Asks when the prosecution is ready to exchange the last batch of juror questionnaire positions. Notes they prepared theirs in Excel for easier import.
Inquiring about missing 3521-003 material.
Checking in to see if you guys have your scheduling position statement ready for the joint letter.
Confirming Spencer Kuvin does not represent trial witnesses; raising counter-concern about David Markus's statements to the press.
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's Letter Response to government's Rule 17 subpoena items 9-11 and Exhibits A and B. Noted Exhibit B is filed under seal due to Confidential marking.
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native format vs PDF conversion, and MIME type/metadata for converted files.
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native formats vs PDF conversion, and MIME types.
Detailed technical questions regarding SUPP production, PDF conversion, MIME types, and metadata for carved/deleted files.
Raising concerns that statements in The Sun by Spencer Kuvin might violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1.
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial and request for redaction of other clients' names based on professional conduct rules.
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial pursuant to Court Order. Requests redaction of other clients' names based on Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
Requesting adjournment of trial and redaction of other clients' names/case numbers from the Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
Confirming Marshals/FBI can start review at 8am at 500 Pearl. Asking for attendee list.
Confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12. Discussing 'bulky' photos, 16 discs, and shredded paper analysis.
Addressing issues raised about evidence review: confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12; discussing photography of bulky items; explaining 16 discs and missing items.
Providing Bronx warehouse address (2350 Lafayette Ave); confirming FBI availability for review.
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
Confirming updated spreadsheets and requesting particulars for visiting the Bronx warehouse to photograph excluded items.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity