| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
This document is an email dated November 7, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits a letter regarding 'Minor Victim-3' in the US v. Maxwell case, noting that while the government seeks no redactions, the filing is temporarily sealed to allow the defense team (copied as Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) to propose their own redactions.
This is an email dated November 6, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a cover for a supplemental production of discovery material, specifically regarding testifying and non-testifying witnesses, to be delivered via USAfx and a hard drive sent to the MDC.
This document is a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 11, 2021. It serves to notify the defense that the Government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals as co-conspirators during the trial, pursuant to a court order. The letter is marked as Exhibit 1 and designated as confidential under a protective order.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger) dated July 27, 2020. The prosecution requests a 'meet and confer' to discuss a protective order, specifically challenging the defense's desire to name victims in public filings rather than using pseudonyms. The email also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
This document is an email chain from August 9-12, 2020, between defense attorneys (Jeff Pagliuca, Nicole Simmons, Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen) and the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding a discovery dispute. The defense is pressing for a quick response to an August 9th letter, citing a tight schedule with the Circuit and threatening to advise Judge Nathan if they do not receive a response sooner than the Government's proposed date of August 13th. The correspondence also notes technical email issues at the defense firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman.
This document is an email chain from August 2020 involving legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, etc.) and likely government prosecutors (names redacted). The discussion concerns a discovery letter sent by the defense, the handling of criminal grand jury materials in relation to Maxwell's civil cases, and a dispute over the disclosure of victim names. The redacted senders discuss strategy for responding to 'Jeff and Laura,' specifically refuting claims of government malfeasance and debating whether to allow materials to be filed under seal.
An email chain from July 2020 involving defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, et al.) discussing a 'Protective Order' for discovery, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by 'GM' in filenames). Everdell sends a revised draft to the Government following a call on July 20th. The top emailer (name redacted) forwards this message expressing confusion, noting they cannot see the difference between the attached documents or find the redline.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 related to the criminal case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Laura Menninger emailed prosecutors (USANYS) attaching a letter regarding a request to view 'highly confidential materials' and 'scenes'. This email was then forwarded internally (likely among law enforcement or prosecution team members) with a request to discuss the matter.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 12, 2021. It serves as notice that the Government intends to introduce evidence showing Maxwell provided other men with access to women, in addition to her conduct with Epstein. The letter also discloses a redacted witness who worked for Epstein in 2005-2006 and will testify about scheduling sexualized massages with underage girls.
An email dated July 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a group of recipients including David Oscar Markus, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of a legal filing (Reply_to_Order_Dkt_312.pdf) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. S2 20 Cr. 330).
A letter from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 23, 2021. The letter details the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as courtesy materials regarding individuals the government does not currently plan to call. It also clarifies confidentiality designations under a Protective Order.
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 23, 2021, accompanying a discovery production. The production includes JPMC records, phone records, and other documents designated as confidential under a protective order. The letter clarifies labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
This document is an email dated November 9, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim). The email notifies counsel that a hard drive containing new discovery production is available for pickup at One St. Andrew's Plaza and highlights a specific disclosure regarding a witness statement. It also confirms that copies of this and prior productions are being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell's review.
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 13, 2021. It accompanies the production of spreadsheets previously reviewed by the defense at an FBI office in Denver. The letter notes that the original spreadsheets contained embedded hyperlinks to images of 'child exploitation materials,' necessitating the creation of a sanitized version for production.
This document is an email chain dated July 14, 2020, providing a detailed log of legal calls made by Ghislaine Maxwell (USMS No. 02879-509) between July 6 and July 14, 2020. The sender forwards this list to ensure that 'Mark' (likely Mark Cohen or opposing counsel) does not misrepresent Maxwell's access to counsel during an upcoming hearing. The log details dates, times, durations, and participants of the calls, which primarily include attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, as well as Lea Harmon from Pretrial Services.
An email dated October 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), copying Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email attaches joint proposed jury questionnaires and voir dire questions, likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific technical issues regarding discovery production, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on over 110,000 documents extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution team discusses internally setting up a call with their vendor, PAE, to address these errors.
This document contains an email chain from March 29, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence details technical disputes regarding discovery materials, specifically the defense's inability to provide a hard drive to Maxwell in prison (MDC), issues with unreadable disks, missing email attachments, and discrepancies in metadata for over 110,000 files seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution explains that some metadata is missing because files were 'carved or deleted' and offers solutions for transferring missing files.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
This document is an Amended Application, Affidavit, and Warrant from the SDNY dated June 30, 2020, authorizing the FBI to obtain prospective location and pen register information for a cellphone subscribed to 'G Max' (Ghislaine Maxwell) to effect her arrest on sex trafficking charges. The amendment was filed to correct inadvertent errors in a previous affidavit regarding the dates of Maxwell's most recent phone contacts with her sister, Isabel Maxwell, and associate Scott Borgerson. The document establishes probable cause by linking the phone to Maxwell through contacts with her civil attorneys, sister, and financial partner.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Laura Menninger, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing physical and electronic evidence. The discussion focuses on arranging a secure location (500 Pearl Street) for Maxwell and her team to review 'highly confidential' materials, including thousands of images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences, as well as physical evidence stored in an FBI warehouse. The defense raises concerns about access to laptops, the ability to compare physical and electronic evidence, and the specific handling of sensitive materials.
An email dated April 30, 2021, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to redacted recipients and copied to members of the defense team (Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email serves to circulate an attached letter regarding 'Hard Drives' that was recently filed on the docket addressed to Judge Nathan.
A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 11, 2021. The letter discloses that the Government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and two other redacted individuals (one with a former alias) as 'co-conspirators' during the upcoming trial. The document is marked confidential under a protective order.
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sent a courtesy copy of an ECF filing—specifically a letter regarding sleep deprivation—to US Attorneys and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
Counsel – Please see attached letter regarding Mr. [Redacted] anticipated testimony.
Inquiry about missing Bates numbers 2774105-2774194 in the discovery letter.
Asks when the prosecution is ready to exchange the last batch of juror questionnaire positions. Notes they prepared theirs in Excel for easier import.
Sender attaches a draft of a joint letter and notes they have joined the defense's position on specific prospective jurors (list of numbers included).
Checking in to see if compiled lists are ready for review.
Acknowledges receipt and attaches their list.
Inquiring about missing 3521-003 material.
Checking in to see if you guys have your scheduling position statement ready for the joint letter.
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's Letter Response to government's Rule 17 subpoena items 9-11 and Exhibits A and B. Noted Exhibit B is filed under seal due to Confidential marking.
Confirming Spencer Kuvin does not represent trial witnesses; raising counter-concern about David Markus's statements to the press.
Raising concerns that statements in The Sun by Spencer Kuvin might violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1.
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native formats vs PDF conversion, and MIME types.
Detailed technical questions regarding SUPP production, PDF conversion, MIME types, and metadata for carved/deleted files.
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native format vs PDF conversion, and MIME type/metadata for converted files.
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial and request for redaction of other clients' names based on professional conduct rules.
Requesting adjournment of trial and redaction of other clients' names/case numbers from the Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial pursuant to Court Order. Requests redaction of other clients' names based on Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
Confirming Marshals/FBI can start review at 8am at 500 Pearl. Asking for attendee list.
Confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12. Discussing 'bulky' photos, 16 discs, and shredded paper analysis.
Addressing issues raised about evidence review: confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12; discussing photography of bulky items; explaining 16 discs and missing items.
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
Confirming updated spreadsheets and requesting particulars for visiting the Bronx warehouse to photograph excluded items.
Discussing logistics for Bronx view. Raising issues about 'Highly Confidential' vs 'bulky' items, specific Florida evidence items, and electronic surveillance files.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity