Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00028646.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.
EFTA00028585.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.
EFTA00028584.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.
EFTA00028571.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.
EFTA00028538.pdf
This document is an automated email notification (Notice of Docket Activity) from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated September 28, 2020. It confirms the filing of an 'Opposition to Motion to dismiss' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-3061). The notice lists attorneys Ty Gee, Adam Mueller, and Laura Menninger as recipients, alongside Deputy Clerk Gerard Whidbee.
EFTA00028272.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel Christian Everdell (Cohen Gresser). Everdell submitted a Defense Rule 16 Disclosure letter. The internal USANYS emails discuss saving this document to the shared drive (specifically the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' folder) and organizing discovery materials into subfolders like 'AT&T' and 'Federal Express'.
EFTA00028257.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 9, 2021, regarding the production of discovery materials (Jencks Act and Giglio) for her trial. The letter explains that materials previously designated as 'confidential' are now marked with a specific reference to the Protective Order paragraphs to avoid confusion with classified document markings.
EFTA00028203.pdf
This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Nathan at NYSD Chambers. The email concerns the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and submits a letter regarding 'Minor Victim-3' along with proposed redactions. Defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00028183.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger) from March 2021. The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a review of 'highly confidential images' and physical evidence at 500 Pearl Street, as well as the production of indices listing items seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the Virgin Islands in 2019. The prosecutor clarifies which items are indexed in spreadsheets versus search warrant returns and coordinates a phone call to discuss these matters.
EFTA00028045.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter dated October 1, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It details the transfer of financial records from Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, UBS, and American Express, many of which are designated as confidential. The letter specifically links Ghislaine Maxwell to various entities including the Terramar Project, Max Foundation, and Angara Trust via UBS records, and notes shared American Express records between Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00027864.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and US prosecutors (USANYS). The defense raises seven specific technical issues regarding discovery, including the need to provide evidence on hard drives rather than disks for the prison computer, over 100,000 emails missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation dates after his death (July 2020). The email also mentions videos from SDFL and PBPD investigations.
EFTA00027861.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The defense raises several technical discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to read discovery disks on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices (showing 2020 dates instead of original dates). The prosecution forwards these issues to their contractor (PAE) to address.
EFTA00027752.pdf
An email dated October 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves to distribute a courtesy copy of a defense filing (Defense_Reply_to_Dkt_350.pdf) to redacted recipients, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00027749.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. Following a letter filed by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding legal mail at the MDC, Judge Nathan ordered the prosecution to respond by 5 PM on October 15. The emails depict the prosecution team scrambling to draft a response, coordinating with the BOP and a contact named Sophia at the MDC, and expressing frustration regarding the tight deadlines imposed by Judge Nathan.
EFTA00027703.pdf
This document is an email dated October 19, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca). The email serves to serve the Government's 'motions in limine' and requests that certain attached documents be filed under seal. The email references case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
EFTA00027663.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 2021 regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the government's letters concerning 'Accuser-3's evidence' to Judge Nathan's chambers, filing the document under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions. The correspondence also lists other defense team members including Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, and Bobbi Sternheim.
EFTA00027653.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email notes that a court-ordered response due by 12:00 p.m. that day had not yet been received.
EFTA00027648.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
EFTA00027456.pdf
This document is an email dated April 23, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger. The email serves to transmit a sealed order attached as a PDF regarding the case '20-cr-330, US v Ghislaine Maxwell'. The document indicates legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell were ongoing in 2021 under Judge Nathan.
EFTA00027301.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter from the DOJ to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 5, 2021. It lists materials being turned over, including files recovered from discs seized at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence, images from his electronic devices, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a 1995 Oxford letter. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
EFTA00027296.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 4, 2021. It lists produced materials including FBI recovered metadata, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a letter from 1995 related to Oxford. The letter also clarifies new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
EFTA00027167.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, involving the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Laura Menninger, representing Maxwell, emailed Judge Nathan attaching a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial (120 or 180 days) and requesting permission to redact names of other clients based on professional conduct rules. Subsequent emails between government attorneys discuss a draft response due by 5 PM that same day.
EFTA00027165.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, concerning the case US v. Maxwell. The initial email features Laura Menninger, defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, submitting a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial to Judge Nathan and requesting redactions to protect client confidentiality under Rule 1.6. Subsequent emails show internal coordination among USANYS prosecutors drafting a response to this motion, which was due by 5 PM that day.
EFTA00027162.pdf
An email chain from April 21, 2021, between attorneys Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner), Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger regarding compliance with an order from Judge Nathan. McCawley requests confirmation to send specific documents and redactions related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case to the Government. Pagliuca forwards the relevant PDF attachments, noting they were missing from a previous email.
EFTA00027076.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 20, 2020, regarding 'US v. Maxwell - discovery production'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, and Bobbi Sternheim. The sender is redacted, and the document appears to be part of the legal discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
[EXTERNAL] Supplemental letter regarding [Redacted] testi...
Counsel – Please see attached letter regarding Mr. [Redacted] anticipated testimony.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Inquiry about missing Bates numbers 2774105-2774194 in the discovery letter.
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Asks when the prosecution is ready to exchange the last batch of juror questionnaire positions. Notes they prepared theirs in Excel for easier import.
RE: questionnaires
Sender attaches a draft of a joint letter and notes they have joined the defense's position on specific prospective jurors (list of numbers included).
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Checking in to see if compiled lists are ready for review.
RE: questionnaires
Acknowledges receipt and attaches their list.
[EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness mat...
Inquiring about missing 3521-003 material.
Joint letter
Checking in to see if you guys have your scheduling position statement ready for the joint letter.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Response to Government...
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's Letter Response to government's Rule 17 subpoena items 9-11 and Exhibits A and B. Noted Exhibit B is filed under seal due to Confidential marking.
RE: Conferral Regarding Possible Violation of Local Crimi...
Confirming Spencer Kuvin does not represent trial witnesses; raising counter-concern about David Markus's statements to the press.
Conferral Regarding Possible Violation of Local Criminal ...
Raising concerns that statements in The Sun by Spencer Kuvin might violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1.
RE: Discovery Issues
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native formats vs PDF conversion, and MIME types.
RE: Discovery Issues
Detailed technical questions regarding SUPP production, PDF conversion, MIME types, and metadata for carved/deleted files.
RE: Discovery Issues
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native format vs PDF conversion, and MIME type/metadata for converted files.
US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment o...
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial and request for redaction of other clients' names based on professional conduct rules.
US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment o...
Requesting adjournment of trial and redaction of other clients' names/case numbers from the Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment o...
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial pursuant to Court Order. Requests redaction of other clients' names based on Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Confirming Marshals/FBI can start review at 8am at 500 Pearl. Asking for attendee list.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12. Discussing 'bulky' photos, 16 discs, and shredded paper analysis.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Addressing issues raised about evidence review: confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12; discussing photography of bulky items; explaining 16 discs and missing items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming updated spreadsheets and requesting particulars for visiting the Bronx warehouse to photograph excluded items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussing logistics for Bronx view. Raising issues about 'Highly Confidential' vs 'bulky' items, specific Florida evidence items, and electronic surveillance files.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity