Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00019599.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responding to a discovery request. The Government declines to produce broad FOIA-related documents citing lack of legal basis under Rule 16, but provides specific materials related to Radar Online and FBI-NY's involvement in the SDFL investigation as a courtesy. The letter also corrects a defense assertion regarding the FBI Florida office's role in the prosecution team.
EFTA00019422.pdf
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of materials stamped SDNY_GM_00274187 through SDNY_GM_0274302, which are identified in the index as a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated 12-15-2020. The document notes that the letter and materials are subject to a protective order.
EFTA00019420.pdf
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter documents the production of materials designated as confidential, specifically referencing a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated December 15, 2020. The document indicates ongoing discovery obligations and mentions that physical items are in FBI custody.
EFTA00019092.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 regarding discovery disputes in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific issues to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), including technical problems with Maxwell accessing files on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and significant metadata discrepancies where files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation/modification dates occurring after his death and the seizure of the devices (dates in 2020). The chain concludes with USANYS contractors scheduling an internal meeting to address these production issues.
EFTA00019056.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 1, 2021, addressed to defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves to distribute an attached Order issued by the Judge which was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00018883.pdf
This document is a formal notice from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated April 23, 2021. The Government notifies the defense of its intent to call Dr. Lisa Rocchio as an expert witness to testify on trauma psychology, the dynamics of sexual abuse, grooming, and delayed disclosure, though she has not evaluated specific victims in this case. The letter also reiterates requests for reciprocal discovery and disclosure of defense expert witnesses.
EFTA00018880.pdf
This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits an unredacted request to charge (RTC) and verdict sheet, noting that redacted versions will be filed on the Electronic Court Filing (ECF) system and that the defense seeks to seal 'Exhibit A'. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00018879.pdf
An email chain from November 3, 2021, regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the disclosure of juror names to counsel. The email also serves to notify recipients of Sternheim's new office address.
EFTA00018837.pdf
An email chain from October 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that discovery materials were shared via USAfx and discusses logistics for providing digital copies (CD or hard drive) to Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00018708.pdf
This document is an email chain dated February 23, 2021, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of a bail application filing (attached as 'MAXWELL_BAIL_APPLICATION_with_EXHIBIT_2-23-17.pdf') to USANYS prosecutors, copying co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's office with the comment 'FYI'.
EFTA00018663.pdf
This document is an application for a search warrant and a supporting affidavit filed on July 1, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It seeks to use a cell-site simulator to locate a cellular device (the 'Target Cellular Device') believed to be used by GHISLAINE MAXWELL, who is a subject of an arrest warrant for crimes including conspiracy and enticement/transportation of minors. The FBI has probable cause to believe the device is currently in New Hampshire and that its location will assist in arresting Maxwell, based on prior GPS and cell site data, AT&T records, and contact with her attorney's phone.
EFTA00018026.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2021, relating to the case United States v. Maxwell (20-Cr-330). Attorney David Oscar Markus emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit a responsive letter regarding a government filing from June 30, 2021, explaining that he lacked filing privileges in the SDNY. Judge Nathan's chambers replied with an attached order.
EFTA00017813.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in November 2020. The defense expresses significant frustration regarding technical issues with hard drives provided to Maxwell at the MDC, including broken drives and a lack of consolidation, as well as severe restrictions on the hours Maxwell is permitted to use a laptop to review over 2 million pages of evidence. The prosecution responds by offering to consolidate materials onto a single drive and explaining that the limited laptop access (8:30am-3:30pm) is due to MDC security protocols requiring lieutenant supervision.
EFTA00016953.pdf
An email dated October 20, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim, Pagliuca, Menninger). The email attaches a 'Draft joint proposed request to charge' related to the Maxwell trial (inferred from attachment name) and sets a deadline for comments.
EFTA00016949.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 23, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It serves as a formal notice pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(G) that the Government intends to call a clinical expert witness (name redacted) to testify about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and the impact of trauma on minors. The letter outlines the scope of the expert's anticipated testimony and requests reciprocal discovery regarding any experts the defense intends to call.
EFTA00016944.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18-19, 2021, regarding the filing of Motions in Limine in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons submits the motions to Judge Nathan's chambers on behalf of Jeffrey Pagliuca. Subsequent internal emails among USANYS staff discuss accessing the files, revealing an internal DOJ file path labeled 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'.
EFTA00016768.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan, dated December 19, 2020. It serves as a transmittal for filing a Renewed Bail Motion Reply Memorandum and accompanying exhibits under seal in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Other defense counsel, including Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger, are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00016726.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (20cr330). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim provides a list of attendees, including legal counsel and Maxwell's family members (Ian, Kevin, Pandora, Philip, Isabel, Christine), for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The email responds to a request from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers regarding logistics, COVID-19 protocols, and speaking rules for the upcoming hearings.
EFTA00016723.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim filed a letter with the court, prompting Judge Nathan to order the prosecution (USANYS) to respond by 5 PM the following day. The prosecution notes internally that they have contacted the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to set up a call, likely to gather information needed for their response.
EFTA00016509.pdf
An email dated November 28, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits a motion to preclude cross-examination under seal and copies defense attorneys including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger.
EFTA00016508.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding legal proceedings. Laura Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. sends a supplemental letter to USANYS counsel regarding the anticipated testimony of a redacted individual (Mr. [Redacted]). The forwarding email references 'Flatley and their rebuttal expert,' suggesting the correspondence concerns expert witness testimony or rebuttal.
EFTA00016492.pdf
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
EFTA00016484.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.
EFTA00016470.pdf
An email correspondence dated November 24, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to counsel involved in the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). The email serves to distribute two attached orders regarding protective orders and subpoenas. Recipients include attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00016306.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). It forwards a 'Notice of Docket Activity' from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the filing of an interlocutory criminal appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). A USANYS staff member asks a colleague to file a notice of appearance as additional counsel for the appeal.
[EXTERNAL] Supplemental letter regarding [Redacted] testi...
Counsel – Please see attached letter regarding Mr. [Redacted] anticipated testimony.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Inquiry about missing Bates numbers 2774105-2774194 in the discovery letter.
RE: questionnaires
Sender attaches a draft of a joint letter and notes they have joined the defense's position on specific prospective jurors (list of numbers included).
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Checking in to see if compiled lists are ready for review.
RE: questionnaires
Acknowledges receipt and attaches their list.
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Asks when the prosecution is ready to exchange the last batch of juror questionnaire positions. Notes they prepared theirs in Excel for easier import.
[EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness mat...
Inquiring about missing 3521-003 material.
Joint letter
Checking in to see if you guys have your scheduling position statement ready for the joint letter.
RE: Conferral Regarding Possible Violation of Local Crimi...
Confirming Spencer Kuvin does not represent trial witnesses; raising counter-concern about David Markus's statements to the press.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Response to Government...
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's Letter Response to government's Rule 17 subpoena items 9-11 and Exhibits A and B. Noted Exhibit B is filed under seal due to Confidential marking.
RE: Discovery Issues
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native format vs PDF conversion, and MIME type/metadata for converted files.
RE: Discovery Issues
Requesting list of carved/deleted files, confirmation of native formats vs PDF conversion, and MIME types.
RE: Discovery Issues
Detailed technical questions regarding SUPP production, PDF conversion, MIME types, and metadata for carved/deleted files.
Conferral Regarding Possible Violation of Local Criminal ...
Raising concerns that statements in The Sun by Spencer Kuvin might violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1.
US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment o...
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial and request for redaction of other clients' names based on professional conduct rules.
US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment o...
Submission of a Letter Motion for Adjournment of trial pursuant to Court Order. Requests redaction of other clients' names based on Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment o...
Requesting adjournment of trial and redaction of other clients' names/case numbers from the Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Confirming Marshals/FBI can start review at 8am at 500 Pearl. Asking for attendee list.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12. Discussing 'bulky' photos, 16 discs, and shredded paper analysis.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Addressing issues raised about evidence review: confirming Bronx warehouse review on April 12; discussing photography of bulky items; explaining 16 discs and missing items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing Bronx warehouse address (2350 Lafayette Ave); confirming FBI availability for review.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming updated spreadsheets and requesting particulars for visiting the Bronx warehouse to photograph excluded items.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity