the defendant
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
17
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
65 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
13
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror defendant |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MDC staff
|
Custodial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator alleged |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Financial |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
France
|
Citizenship |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-4
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jane's trip to New Mexico where she was abused | Epstein's ranch in New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interactions with Minor Victim-3 | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing regarding requested discovery | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing where the judge overrules a defense objection regarding sentencing guidelines ... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant approached Virginia Roberts in a parking lot, later seen at Palm Beach residence. | Parking lot / Palm Beach re... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acquittal by Jury on Count 2ss | SDNY | View |
| N/A | N/A | Law enforcement breached the door; defendant resisted opening the door and retreated to a separat... | Defendant's residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant allegedly placed a cell phone in foil to conceal location monitoring. | Defendant's residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annie's trip to Santa Fe. | Santa Fe | View |
| N/A | N/A | Instruction on sexual gratification | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant lived in isolation, used aliases, and hid assets. | Unknown (Hiding location) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denied initial bail application. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Jury Selection Process | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bail hearing argument. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Creation of a manual and checklists. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation into co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant's Arrest | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interactions between the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and minor victims. | Particular places (unspecif... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Enticement and transport of Jane from Florida to New York for sexual abuse. | Florida to New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Travel to New York for the purpose of abuse. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Field trips | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Purchase of cowboy boots for Annie Farmer | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Photographs taken of Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew, and the Defendant | Defendant’s London townhome | View |
| N/A | N/A | Protracted discussion regarding a jury note | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Course of conduct involving coercive control and sexual abuse. | New York | View |
EFTA00024806.pdf
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report (Narrative #13) detailing the execution of a search warrant on October 20, 2005, related to Case No. 1-05-000368. The reporting officer describes assembling the Crime Scene Investigative Team, video recording the search from entry to exit, and designating specific roles for evidence collection and photography. The search concluded at 3:05 p.m., after which officers met with the defendant's lawyer and left inventory receipts in the personal assistant's office.
EFTA00014016.pdf
A confidential letter dated September 18, 2008, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDFL) to the Florida Bar Ethics Counsel seeking a written opinion on the propriety of contacting victims. The letter discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving a defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) who pleaded guilty to state sex offenses. The AUSA defends against an accusation by a victim's attorney that notifying victims of the NPA and the availability of independent counsel (Robert Josefsberg) violated Florida Bar rules against solicitation.
DOJ-OGR-00000113.tif
This document outlines conditions for the payment of criminal monetary penalties, including options for installment payments and immediate payment upon release from imprisonment or during imprisonment. It specifies that the court will determine payment plans based on the defendant's ability to pay and that the defendant will receive credit for prior payments. Payments are generally made to the clerk of the court, with an exception for payments via the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
DOJ-OGR-00030313.tif
This document is a page from a court transcript dated May 22, 2009, from case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. It details a discussion between the Court, the Defendant, and Ms. Belohlavek concerning the conditions of the Defendant's sentence, specifically regarding contact with victims and the completion of a sex offender program, particularly for victims under 18.
DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the admissibility of video evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, argues that a video showing a photograph in the context of a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein should be admitted. The Court overrules an objection, agreeing that the video's context makes it different from the photograph in isolation and that it corroborates other testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018107.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey argues for the admissibility of evidence showing a 'sexually suggestive photograph of a young girl' located in the entryway to the bedroom where Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly slept. Comey argues this proves Maxwell's knowledge of the environment, countering the defense's portrayal of Epstein as an upstanding citizen surrounded by prominent people.
DOJ-OGR-00018105.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, contends that a 40-minute walk-through video (Gov. Exhibit 296) is relevant because it shows a previously excluded photograph (Gov. Exhibit 270) prominently displayed outside a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The defense expresses concern that such evidence would be prejudicial to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00017878.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a legal argument between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) before a judge. The discussion centers on the admissibility of a 'contact book' versus a 'household manual,' with the government arguing that the contact book belongs to the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and/or Jeffrey Epstein and constitutes statements made in furtherance of a conspiracy. The judge acknowledges the government's argument regarding the hearsay exception.
DOJ-OGR-00014838.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 22, 2022, details testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who describes being subjected to a long cycle of sexual abuse by the defendant (identified as Ms. Maxwell) starting at age 14. The defendant exploited knowledge of Carolyn's prior abuse by her grandfather. The document also notes that this was part of a broader pattern of criminal conduct where Ms. Maxwell and Epstein victimized multiple underage girls over many years, and it commends the bravery of the witnesses who testified at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg
This document is page 88 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Judge ('The Court') is addressing the courtroom regarding sentencing guidelines, stating the applicable range is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment. The Judge outlines the legal requirements under *Booker* and 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) for determining a sentence that is 'sufficient, but no greater than necessary.'
DOJ-OGR-00014798.jpg
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The text details a recruitment chain involving the defendant, Virginia [Giuffre], Carolyn, and Melissa, noting that Melissa's name appears in the defendant's 'little black book.' The court also discusses financial fines, specifically mentioning the defendant's objection to including a $10 million bequest from Jeffrey Epstein as part of her assets.
DOJ-OGR-00014792.jpg
Page 45 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The judge is issuing a ruling regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically overruling the defendant's objection to an 'undue influence' enhancement. The judge argues that applying the enhancement does not constitute 'double counting' because it addresses the specific harm of using influence to coerce a commercial sex act, distinct from the base offense of the victim being a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00014790.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) discussing the legal definition of 'extensive' criminal activity for sentencing purposes. It details the hierarchy of the conspiracy, naming Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants, noting Sarah Kellen joined in 2002, and identifying Virginia and Carolyn as recruiters of minors starting in 2001. It also credits testimony from employee Juan Alessi regarding his unknowing facilitation of sexualized massages under the defendant's instructions and mentions pilots Visoski and Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00014788.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The judge is ruling on sentencing guideline objections, specifically rejecting the defendant's argument against an enhancement for sexual abuse of minors and moving to discuss an enhancement for her 'leadership role' in the criminal activity. The text references Congressional intent regarding the sentencing of sex offenders and the requirements for proving a defendant was an organizer or leader.
DOJ-OGR-00014760.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 22, 2022. The judge is overruling objections made by the defendant regarding the credibility of a witness named Carolyn. The court accepts as fact that Carolyn was introduced to Epstein by Virginia at age 14, visited Epstein's Palm Beach residence over 100 times, and performed sexualized massages until 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Court makes findings on disputed issues, concluding that Virginia was paid to recruit girls just as Carolyn was. The Judge also overrules defense objections regarding the inclusion of an individual named 'Kate' and the characterization of the defendant 'grooming' a victim named 'Jane.'
DOJ-OGR-00014752.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a portion of a hearing. The judge confirms with the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, and her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, that they have reviewed and discussed the presentence report. The transcript also notes that another attorney, Mr. Everdell, will handle objections for the defense, and confirms with counsel Ms. Moe that a court order was posted online.
DOJ-OGR-00008629.jpg
This document is page 91 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 4, which advises the jury that statements made by counsel (arguments, objections) and the court (rulings, sidebars) are not evidence, and that the jury's own recollection of the evidence controls the verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00008612.jpg
This document is Page 74 of a court filing (Jury Instruction No. 52) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. The judge instructs the jury that evidence seized by law enforcement was obtained lawfully and properly admitted. The jury is directed to disregard any personal opinions about the search methods and to give the evidence full consideration in determining the defendant's guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00008611.jpg
This document is page 73 of a legal filing (Document 563) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 51, which advises the jury that the Government is not legally required to use specific investigative techniques to prove its case.
DOJ-OGR-00008578.jpg
This document is page 40 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 30 regarding 'Aiding and Abetting' for Counts Two, Four, and Six. The text explains the legal standard that allows the jury to convict Ms. Maxwell if she assisted, counseled, or induced another person to commit the charged crimes, even if she did not physically commit them herself.
DOJ-OGR-00008573.jpg
This legal document is a jury instruction (Instruction No. 25) from a court case, filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the four elements the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to find the defendant guilty of Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor. The instruction specifies that this particular count pertains solely to a person named Carolyn and the alleged acts occurred between 2001 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00008567.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 19) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the three legal elements required to prove 'Count Four: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' specifically relating to a victim identified as 'Jane' between 1994 and 1997. The text includes markup showing specific legal language adjustments, such as defining the age requirement and limiting the scope to interstate commerce.
DOJ-OGR-00008510.jpg
This document is page 54 of 82 from a court filing dated December 17, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 38, which explains the legal standard for holding a defendant liable for the acts, declarations, and omissions of co-conspirators committed in furtherance of a conspiracy. The instruction notes that such acts can be used as evidence against the Defendant even if they occurred in her absence or without her knowledge, provided the conspiracy is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00008489.jpg
This document is page 33 of a court filing (Jury Instructions) from December 2021 in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the four legal elements required to prove Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor. The document specifically specifies that this count relates to a victim named Carolyn during the period of 2001 to 2004.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Security Guards | $0.00 | Defendant proposes to pay for on-premises secur... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Young girls | $0.00 | Cash payments handed to girls after massage app... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Bank Accounts | $0.00 | Placing assets into accounts held under other n... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Unnamed real esta... | $0.00 | Purchasing a home using a trust in another name. | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Unknown (Employee... | $250,000.00 | Payment discussed by The Court and Defense as p... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Unknown (Employee... | $100,000.00 | Payment discussed by The Court and Defense as p... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Security Guards | $0.00 | Proposal that Defendant would pay for on-premis... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Spouse/Husband | $0.00 | Transfer of 'millions of dollars' of assets thr... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Virginia | $0.00 | Paid more as encouragement to recruit additiona... | View |
| N/A | Received | Sale of Property | the defendant | $0.00 | Sale of the Manhattan townhouse, noted as the p... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Various Accounts | $0.00 | Placing assets into accounts held under other n... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Unknown seller | $0.00 | Purchase of a real estate transaction under a f... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | US | $0.00 | Purchasing a home using a trust in another name. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'absence of payments' mentioned as... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Real Estate Selle... | $0.00 | Purchase of a real estate transaction under a f... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Virginia | $0.00 | Monetary incentives used to encourage Virginia ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Security Guards | $0.00 | Proposal that Defendant would pay for on-premis... | View |
| N/A | Received | N/A | the defendant | $70,000.00 | Cash found in safe at NY home. | View |
| N/A | Paid | the defendant | Unknown | $0.00 | Purchase of Kinnerton Street residence | View |
| 2025-03-01 | Paid | the defendant | Marital Assets | $20,000,000.00 | Amount brought to the marriage by the defendant... | View |
| 2023-02-28 | Paid | the defendant | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed as part of sentencing | View |
| 2022-07-08 | Paid | the defendant | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed as part of sentencing. | View |
| 2022-07-08 | Paid | the defendant | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal Fine imposed during sentencing | View |
No Subject
Defendant stated ''92, '93 was when I was there' regarding the residence.
Appointments
Called to set up appointments with Carolyn at Epstein's mansion.
Personal Life
Talked about family problems, traumatic personal experiences, and goals; compliemented her body.
Legal Defense
Communications regarding defense preparation and review of discovery
Recruitment of minors
Q. Can you list for me all the girls that you have met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein’s house that were under the age of 18?
Request 2(c)
Request seeking documentation of dates on which Juror 50 opened and closed social media accounts.
Motion for a New Trial
Referenced as 'The Defendant's Motion for a New Trial'
Identification
Announced themselves as federal agents.
Financial Assets
Defendant reported approximately $3.8 million in assets; Government claims this was less than candid.
Sentencing Arguments
Defendant's brief cited at page 12 regarding legislative history.
Questioning regarding guilt
Defendant was asked 'did you do that' and answered 'no', leading to perjury charges.
Boarding assistance
Defendant 'made it happen' for Jane to get on a flight without proper identification.
Threat to safety
The defendant sent an email from within the MDC to the IG, claiming to be in fear for her safety and that MDC staff members were threatening her.
Threat to safety
The defendant sent an email from within the MDC to the IG, claiming to be in fear for her safety and that MDC staff members were threatening her.
Reply Brief
Devotes a single sentence to claim of pre-indictment delay.
Request to stay ruling
Request to stay ruling pending release of a documentary featuring Juror 50; request was denied.
Request to stay ruling
Request to stay ruling pending release of a documentary featuring Juror 50 (Denied).
Motion for a new trial
Defendant filed a motion for a new trial.
Opposition to hearing request
A second letter from the Defendant on the same day, opposing the Government's request for a hearing.
Juror's interviews
A letter from the Defendant informing the Court about the juror's interviews, filed shortly after the Government's letter.
Request for Reciprocal Discovery
Request for notice regarding any expert witness the defendant intends to rely upon.
Thirteen motions in limine
Defense filed motions to exclude certain evidence, which this document opposes.
Court-ordered disclosures
Hard drive sent via FedEx.
Intent to call expert witness
Notification of intent to call Dr. Rocchio in the case-in-chief.
Plea
The defendant confirms they have discussed the matter with their attorney, waives the public reading of the indictment, and pleads 'not guilty'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity