Attorney General

Person

Mentions

138

Relationships

Events

Documents

Also known as:

Attorney General Jackson Attorney General (generic)

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

19 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person Franklin Roosevelt	Professional correspondence	10 Very Strong	1	View
organization Department of Justice (DOJ)	Hierarchical	6	1	View
person Counsel	Administrative	5	1	View
person U.S. Attorney	Professional	5	1	View
person Deputy Attorney General	Professional	5	1	View
person Solicitor General	Professional	5	1	View
organization U.S. Attorneys	Professional	5	1	View
organization U.S. ATTORNEY	Professional	5	1	View
person The President	Professional	5	1	View
organization DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE	Professional	5	1	View
organization U.S. Attorneys	Professional supervisory	5	1	View
person The President	Superior subordinate	5	1	View
organization DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE	Authority	5	1	View
person Franklin Roosevelt	Legal representative	5	1	View
person Franklin Roosevelt	Official correspondence	5	1	View
person Jeffrey Epstein	Oversight response	1	1	View
organization Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein	Legal representative	1	1	View
person Richard Indyke	Adversarial	1	1	View
person Roth	Communicated concern	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	N/A	Potential repeal of Special Counsel regulations to close down the investigation.	Washington D.C.	View
N/A	N/A	Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President.	Washington D.C. (Implied)	View
N/A	N/A	Evaluation of the Tison v. Arizona case arguments.	Courtroom (likely Supreme C...	View
N/A	N/A	Potential firing of the Attorney General or Rod Rosenstein.	White House	View
2025-07-19	Announcement	The White House press secretary announced the President had directed the AG to request the unseal...	White House	View
2020-05-29	N/A	Article published regarding Attorney General's approval of Jeffrey Epstein's victim fund	New York	View
2019-08-10	N/A	Attorney General requests DOJ Office of Inspector General investigation.	Washington D.C. (implied)	View
2019-08-10	N/A	Drafting of official notification regarding an investigation involving the FBI and DOJ OIG (Conte...	Washington D.C. (Implied)	View
2019-08-10	N/A	Initiation of FBI Investigation into Epstein's death	N/A	View
2017-07-26	N/A	President called the Attorney General to fire McCabe.	White House (implied)	View
2008-06-26	N/A	Roth alerts Office of the Attorney General that Epstein's counsel might try to contact them for a...	N/A	View
2006-12-22	N/A	Amendment to Title 18, United States Code, specifically Section 3486(a) and (b), related to subpo...	United States	View
2005-01-01	N/A	Department updated its Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance to include t...	USA	View
1995-04-28	Policy issuance	The Attorney General issued a memorandum entitled “Deportation of Criminal Aliens” to all federal...	N/A	View
1988-01-01	N/A	Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel...	United States	View
1988-01-01	N/A	Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel stat...	United States	View
1983-01-01	N/A	Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it oppos...	United States	View
0001-07-01	N/A	Deadline for the next Special Counsel's budget request.	Washington D.C.	View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377.jpg

This document is a legal analysis from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a law concerning human trafficking, likely the Immigration and Nationality Act. The DOJ argues against changes that would limit the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, remove the Attorney General from the victim certification process, and delay law enforcement's involvement in identifying victims. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377', does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.

Governmental legal analysis / commentary on legislation

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012376.jpg

This document, page 5 of a submission to House Oversight, is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes regarding human trafficking. The DOJ opposes several provisions, such as extending a victim's 'continued presence' during a civil suit and removing the Attorney General's role in T-visa eligibility. The DOJ also recommends specific textual changes to avoid creating new legal liabilities for the government and to consolidate authority under the Attorney General rather than a new task force.

Legislative analysis document from the department of justice, part of a house oversight collection.

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012375.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes related to human trafficking. The DOJ opposes certain sections, such as naming specific hotlines (Section 110) and granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sole authority over 'extreme hardship' determinations (Section 201). While deferring to DHS on some T-visa eligibility changes, the DOJ argues for its own inclusion in key decisions and provides a more accurate description of the nature of threats made by traffickers against victims.

Government legislative analysis / memo

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012372.jpg

In a letter dated November 9, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) writes to Chairman John Conyers, Jr. of the House Committee on the Judiciary to express significant concerns with H.R. 3887, the "William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2007." The DOJ argues the bill would undermine its authority, negatively impact victim protection and prosecution of traffickers, and unconstitutionally intrude on Executive authority, specifically citing issues with Sections 102 and 103 of the proposed legislation.

Official correspondence

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

From: Franklin Roosevelt

To: Attorney General

A legal opinion from President Roosevelt to Attorney General Jackson regarding the unconstitutionality of a legislative veto in the Lend-Lease Act.

Legal opinion

1953-01-01

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search