Attorney General
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Franklin Roosevelt
|
Professional correspondence |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Administrative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. Attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deputy Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Solicitor General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorneys
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. ATTORNEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorneys
|
Professional supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Superior subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Franklin Roosevelt
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Franklin Roosevelt
|
Official correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Oversight response |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard Indyke
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roth
|
Communicated concern |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Potential repeal of Special Counsel regulations to close down the investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Evaluation of the Tison v. Arizona case arguments. | Courtroom (likely Supreme C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential firing of the Attorney General or Rod Rosenstein. | White House | View |
| 2025-07-19 | Announcement | The White House press secretary announced the President had directed the AG to request the unseal... | White House | View |
| 2020-05-29 | N/A | Article published regarding Attorney General's approval of Jeffrey Epstein's victim fund | New York | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Attorney General requests DOJ Office of Inspector General investigation. | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Drafting of official notification regarding an investigation involving the FBI and DOJ OIG (Conte... | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Initiation of FBI Investigation into Epstein's death | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | N/A | President called the Attorney General to fire McCabe. | White House (implied) | View |
| 2008-06-26 | N/A | Roth alerts Office of the Attorney General that Epstein's counsel might try to contact them for a... | N/A | View |
| 2006-12-22 | N/A | Amendment to Title 18, United States Code, specifically Section 3486(a) and (b), related to subpo... | United States | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Department updated its Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance to include t... | USA | View |
| 1995-04-28 | Policy issuance | The Attorney General issued a memorandum entitled “Deportation of Criminal Aliens” to all federal... | N/A | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel... | United States | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel stat... | United States | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it oppos... | United States | View |
| 0001-07-01 | N/A | Deadline for the next Special Counsel's budget request. | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021310.jpg
This document details events in late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's case, where federal authorities concluded their review and declined to intervene further. Subsequently, federal prosecutor Villafaña discovered the proposed state plea agreement's sentencing terms appeared to violate the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by not requiring Epstein to be confined in the county jail, leading her to suspect foul play.
DOJ-OGR-00021203.jpg
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
DOJ-OGR-00021201.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the structure and function of the U.S. Department of Justice and its key components. It details the mission of the Department, the role of the 94 U.S. Attorney's Offices in prosecuting federal crimes, and the oversight structure involving the Attorney General. The text also highlights specialized units within the Criminal Division, such as the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), and their role in assisting federal prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00003312.jpg
This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004766.jpg
This document is a court transcript from June 15, 2021, in which a judge expresses profound frustration with the inhumane and mismanaged conditions at the MCC and MDC federal prisons in New York. The judge describes the facilities as being 'run by morons' and lurching from crisis to crisis, such as gun smuggling related to Jeffrey Epstein. While addressing an inmate, Ms. Days, the judge states that the conditions she endured were disgusting and inhuman, and wishes they could release her but is legally bound to a sentence of at least five years.
DOJ-OGR-00023231.jpg
This document page (193) details the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) legal interpretation that rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) formally commence upon the filing of a complaint, as that establishes a 'Federal offense.' It also outlines the 2005 Attorney General Guidelines, which assigned the responsibility of identifying and notifying victims during the 'investigation stage' to the FBI Special Agent in Charge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017696.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely submitted as evidence by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text provides a legal analysis of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that victims should have the right to be heard by the judiciary when charges are dismissed (Rule 48) and proposing amendments to Rule 50 to ensure victims' rights to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. It critiques the Advisory Committee's resistance to formalizing these rights in the federal rules.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017678.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 18 and 20 regarding venue transfer and victim notification. It details the Advisory Committee's acceptance of changes to Rule 18 but rejection of changes to Rule 20 based on prosecutorial discretion. The document bears a 'David Schoen' footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to the congressional investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding victims' rights violations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017616.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing authored by David Schoen (likely representing victims in the Epstein case), produced to the House Oversight Committee. It presents a legal argument contrasting the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA) with the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that the Justice Department is obligated to recognize and inform victims as soon as an investigation opens, not just after formal charges are filed. It criticizes a 2011 Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum that attempted to limit these protections for victims of uncharged conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017262.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the 'Tison v. Arizona' case discussed) describing Supreme Court oral arguments. The text details the legal debate regarding the 'felony murder' rule, specifically whether the brothers (Ricky and Raymond) had the specific intent to kill the Lyons family or were merely present. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the Congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely included to illustrate the author's legal philosophy or history.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015082.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book (possibly distinct from standard flight logs or financial records) bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015082. The text recounts historical anecdotes regarding the 1960s, specifically alleging an intimate encounter between Marilyn Monroe and the Attorney General (implied RFK), and describing President Lyndon Johnson's crude behavior toward subordinates Douglas Dillon and Senator Fulbright. It also details Jacqueline Kennedy's distaste for Johnson's lack of 'style' compared to JFK.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029171.jpg
This document, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029171, appears to be a page from a narrative report or manuscript discussing the internal legal analysis of the Mueller Special Counsel team. It details their concerns regarding the President's potential strategies to end the investigation, including firing the Attorney General or Rod Rosenstein, refusing budget requests, or using pardon powers. The text analyzes the legal ramifications of these hypothetical actions in relation to obstruction of justice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029169.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal narrative or investigative report (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT) detailing the conflict between President Trump and the FBI/Special Counsel. It focuses on the firing of Andrew McCabe, alleging it was retaliation for his ability to corroborate James Comey's claims about loyalty pledges. It also discusses the Special Counsel's (Mueller) legal argument that a sitting president can be charged with a crime.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016118.jpg
This document is a page from a Merrill Lynch financial research report dated June 30, 2016, labeled as evidence in a House Oversight Committee investigation. It analyzes the Saudi Public Investment Fund's (PIF) shift from a domestic to a global investor, detailing specific assets and investments such as a $3.5bn stake in Uber. It also discusses the potential economic impact of the JASTA bill ('9/11 bill'), noting Saudi threats to liquidate $750bn in US assets, while predicting that the bill will not significantly hinder Saudi investment in the US due to procedural hurdles and White House opposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014056.jpg
This document is page 77 of a legal analysis or report from 2014, included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamped). It details the legal obligations of the Justice Department under the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA) and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on the requirement to identify and notify victims of available services and investigation status before formal charges are filed. It references the Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030263.jpg
The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030262.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or book produced to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030262). It details the internal strategic analysis of Robert Mueller's Special Counsel team regarding the threat of President Trump shutting down the investigation. It discusses the potential firing of Rod Rosenstein, the recusal of the Attorney General, and the legal and political ramifications (including impeachment and obstruction of justice) if the President were to act unilaterally to end the probe. NOTE: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' this specific page contains no text regarding Jeffrey Epstein; it is focused entirely on the Mueller investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030252.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report, book, or detailed memo obtained by the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030252). It analyzes the legal strategies and tensions between the Trump White House and the Mueller Special Counsel investigation. Key topics include the President's potential to unilaterally fire Rod Rosenstein or the Attorney General, the strategic use of presidential pardons (specifically regarding Michael Flynn), and the Special Counsel's view that using pardons to protect oneself constitutes obstruction of justice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012393.jpg
This document is a legal analysis discussing the U.S. President's executive power in relation to enforcing laws believed to be unconstitutional. It summarizes a 1985 Congressional Research Service memorandum and five Supreme Court cases (from 1926-1991) that illustrate historical conflicts between the executive and legislative branches. Despite the user's query identifying it as 'Epstein-related', the text of this specific page contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391.jpg
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391,' lists historical precedents of U.S. Presidents from 1876 to 1990 using signing statements to challenge the constitutionality of 'legislative veto' provisions in various acts. Presidents including Kennedy, Nixon, Reagan, and Grant are cited as having declared they would not be bound by such provisions, treating them as non-binding requests or nullities. The document appears to be legal or historical research compiled for a government body, but its content does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012388.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Walter Dellinger regarding the President's constitutional authority to decline enforcement of a law believed to be unconstitutional, even after signing it. The analysis relies on legal precedent, including the Myers case, and historical examples from Presidents Eisenhower and Roosevelt. Despite the user's query, this document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012384.jpg
This document is page 13 of a letter from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski to members of several congressional committees. The letter proposes an amendment to the "2005 reauthorization" to mandate collaboration between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice (Attorney General), and Homeland Security regarding a pilot program for victims. The letter states that the Office of Management and Budget has no objection to this proposal on behalf of the Administration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice (DOJ) legislative analysis, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382'. The DOJ expresses its opposition to several subsections of proposed legislation (Sections 234 and 236) concerning child trafficking and the management of unaccompanied minors, arguing the proposals are burdensome, based on unreliable findings, and too restrictive. The department advocates for greater flexibility for agencies like DHS and HHS and opposes granting HHS access to sensitive law enforcement databases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012379.jpg
This Department of Justice (DOJ) document outlines the department's opposition to several proposed legislative amendments concerning human trafficking, specifically sections 214 and 221 of an unspecified bill. The DOJ argues that the changes are redundant, create legally problematic strict liability offenses without an affirmative defense, and improperly federalize crimes like pandering and pimping that are historically handled at the state level. The DOJ asserts that its existing authority under laws like the Mann Act is sufficient for prosecuting federal trafficking crimes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.
State of Arizona's argument
Argued presence at the scene was essential but conceded lack of proof of intent to kill.
Records Feb 1 2020 - June 30 2020
Subpoena for all transaction records.
Prioritizing home confinement for inmates
The Attorney General's original memo instructed the Bureau of Prisons to prioritize home confinement as an appropriate response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Records 1998-2020
Subpoena for Estate's operating account records.
Firing Andrew McCabe
President called upon the Attorney General to fire McCabe.
Firing Andrew McCabe
President called upon the Attorney General to fire McCabe.
Deportation of Criminal Aliens
A memorandum directing federal prosecutors to actively and directly become involved in the process of removing criminal aliens from the United States, outlining tools for doing so and establishing a policy that all deportable criminal aliens should be deported absent extraordinary circumstances.
Deportation of Criminal Aliens
A memorandum directing federal prosecutors to be actively involved in removing criminal aliens from the United States.
No Subject
Legal opinion from Roosevelt to Jackson concerning the unconstitutionality of a legislative veto in the Lend-Lease Act.
No Subject
A legal opinion from President Roosevelt to Attorney General Jackson regarding the unconstitutionality of a legislative veto in the Lend-Lease Act.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity