MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013917.jpg
This court transcript details the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. She testifies about her first trip to Europe three years prior, during which she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine for permission. The questioning then pivots to her knowledge, from her "work in the office," of whether Epstein made charitable donations, which she confirms he did.
DOJ-OGR-00013916.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about their knowledge of Ghislaine's residences, confirming she had a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and another residence at 44 Kinnerton Street in London. The witness also states that, to their knowledge, Ghislaine never lived with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013906.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein, stating that when she began working for him, he owned Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, 9 East 71st Street in New York, and El Brillo in Florida. She also states that during her employment, Epstein acquired a Paris apartment and an island in St. Thomas, which was originally named Little Saint James but was later renamed Little Saint Jeffs.
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) and Mr. Everdell (defense) before the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs intended to prove a 'continuing relationship' between a witness (pseudonym 'Jane') and the defendant. The Court rules to allow the evidence, citing that it is not prejudicial under Rule 403, while emphasizing the need to maintain the witness's anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00013884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context and LCGVMAX1 code). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that photographs sent by a witness ('Jane') to Ms. Espinosa, an employee who worked in Epstein's office daily, should be admitted as evidence to show 'Jane' maintained relationships with Epstein's circle after claiming to flee. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz counters that the evidence is irrelevant because the witness already acknowledged maintaining such relationships during direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013883.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, requests to admit photographs into evidence that were provided by Ms. Espinosa, a fan of a soap opera star named Jane who sent them to her. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects, stating that the government does not understand the relevance of these photographs to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00013857.jpg
This document is an index of examinations from a legal proceeding, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses WILLIAM BROWN, ANNIE FARMER, DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN, and JANICE SWAIN by various attorneys, including Mr. Rohrbach, Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim, referencing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00013826.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the conclusion of a witness's testimony, where counsel (Ms. Menninger) confirms the witness was in Germany at the same time a person named Annie was in Thailand. After the witness is excused, another counsel (Ms. Moe) informs the court that the government rests its case.
DOJ-OGR-00013824.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Swain by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Swain's phone conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically whether they discussed Ghislaine Maxwell or Epstein's dating life, and details regarding a trip to New Mexico involving individuals named Annie and Maria. Swain explicitly testifies that they never spoke with Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013821.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain describes attempting to question a person named Annie about a trip she took to New Mexico, which occurred sometime before her return from Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. Annie was consistently evasive, refused to discuss the trip, and repeatedly stated, "I'm not going to let it ruin my life."
DOJ-OGR-00013820.jpg
This is page 229 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Swain by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on a woman named Annie, specifically inquiring about who paid for her trips to Thailand and Vietnam, and noting her 'tired and withdrawn' demeanor following a trip to New Mexico. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger successfully objects to questions about the payment source on hearsay grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00013818.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Swain. The testimony concerns a trip taken by an individual named Annie to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, which the witness confirms was paid for by Epstein. The witness denies any contact or meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell but confirms speaking with Epstein shortly before the trip and driving Annie to the airport.
DOJ-OGR-00013817.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness recounts a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein. During the call, Epstein offered to fund a trip to New Mexico for 20-25 students, including a girl named Annie. The witness states they felt comfortable with the offer after Epstein claimed his "wife," Ghislaine, would chaperone the girls and that he was funding the entire trip, which the witness perceived as a "generous offer."
DOJ-OGR-00013814.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain states that she first spoke with Jeffrey Epstein by phone in 1995, when he called to invite a person named Maria on a work trip to Florida via his plane. Swain confirms they spoke more than once, and that during these initial calls, Epstein discussed Maria's art career and talent.
DOJ-OGR-00013811.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony establishes that Annie Farmer is the middle child of Maria Farmer (born in 1969) and introduces Annie Farmer's birth certificate into evidence as Government Exhibit 13.
DOJ-OGR-00013810.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of witness Janice Swain by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. Ms. Swain identifies herself as a 71-year-old sales representative with a high school education and three children.
DOJ-OGR-00013809.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a witness's, Mr. Mulligan's, testimony where he describes conversations with someone named Annie about New Mexico as 'memorable' and 'emotional.' After Mr. Mulligan is excused, the government calls its next witness, Janice Swain.
DOJ-OGR-00013808.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Ms. Sternheim concludes her questioning of witness Mr. Mulligan, establishing that he spoke to the New York Times to corroborate a story and that Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. Ms. Pomerantz then begins a redirect examination regarding Mulligan's memory of conversations with Annie.
DOJ-OGR-00013806.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mulligan. The questioning attorney probes Mulligan about conversations with a woman named Annie, focusing on Annie's media involvement, her alleged contact with other victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and whether she expressed a desire to make money from the case. The witness denies recalling Annie mentioning contact with other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00013794.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of the direct examination of David James Mulligan. After being sworn in as a witness for the Government, Mulligan states his name for the record. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz then begins her questioning, establishing basic background information about Mulligan, including his age (42), his state of origin (Arizona), and his level of education (master's degree).
DOJ-OGR-00013788.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It records the conclusion of testimony by witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer), with both Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger stating they have no further questions. The government then attempts to call David Mulligan as the next witness, but Ms. Sternheim interrupts to request a sidebar/conference with the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00013786.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on clarifying details regarding Jeffrey Epstein's anatomy and specific actions he took while in bed with the witness, amidst procedural objections from defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to remember Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.'
DOJ-OGR-00013784.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms she first spoke with the FBI in 2006 without a lawyer present and acknowledges receiving a significant financial award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Farmer states the money provides security for her family and explicitly denies having any financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013781.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness recounts what she told the FBI in 2006 about a massage given to her by someone named Maxwell, describing being asked to undress and being touched. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the testimony on the grounds that it is narrative.
Clarification on questioning a witness
Ms. Pomerantz asked for clarification about a planned line of questioning for a witness, initially believing it concerned an unsigned declaration involving the witness's ex-husband.
Explanation of a forensic practice
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, asking him to explain to the jury what a forensic practice entails. Dr. Rocchio describes being hired by attorneys to conduct psychological evaluations for various legal matters.
Allegations of sexual abuse and recruitment against the d...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein and facilitated their sexual abuse at various locations, including New York, Florida, and New Mexico.
Cross-examination
Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination of the witness, Ms. Espinosa.
Questioning about a diary entry from January 25, 1996
MS. POMERANTZ questions the witness, Annie Farmer, about an entry in what appears to be a diary or journal. The entry, dated January 25, 1996, is admitted as Government's Exhibit 604, and the witness is asked to read it to the jury.
Diary entry from January 25, 1996
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie (A. Farmer), about a diary entry dated January 25, 1996, and asks her to read it to the jury. The entry details the witness's activities in New York.
Questioning about Jeffrey Epstein's actions
Ms. Pomerantz asks the witness, A. Farmer (Annie), to describe what Jeffrey Epstein did when he got into bed with her. This follows objections from Ms. Menninger which were overruled by the court.
Direct Examination
Questions regarding Flatley's background, role in CART, and experience.
Topics for cross-examination
Conferred with defense counsel regarding topics for cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding memory of abuse and reliance on documentation.
Direct Examination
Establishing that 'Kate' is a pseudonym and directing her to the evidence binder.
Evidence Request
Requesting jurors view Government Exhibit 16.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding Government Exhibits 16 and 18.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding Epstein's actions in bed and previous cross-examination questions about his penis.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding metadata dates and titles of Government Exhibits 420, 418R, and 418B.
CBP Record Keeping
Questioning regarding whether CBP records in the 1990s were paper and if they were logged in systems prior to 9/11.
Scheduling and Scope of Cross-Examination
Ms. Pomerantz asks about the timing for the next witness and flags an issue regarding 'hindsight bias' questions being asked of a lay witness who happens to be a psychologist.
Clarification on Detective Byrne
Disputing a representation regarding Detective Byrne and noting tech support was available.
Exhibit Identification
Exchange regarding identifying exhibit K-8 / 3513-019.
Redaction Dispute
Discussion regarding a dispute over redactions on page 2370, lines 14 to 18, concerning an objection to a question lacking predicate foundation.
Objection Ruling
Judge sustains an objection regarding the line of questioning, prohibiting the attorney from drawing associations with other defendants the witness has testified for to avoid prejudice under Rule 403.
Direct Examination regarding 1995 trip
Q&A regarding a trip to NY in 1995, meeting Epstein, and identifying a photo.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding travel logistics to New York and payment of flight.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding the emotional significance of compensation funds and potential financial interest in the trial outcome.
Witness Transition
Pomerantz ends questioning of Farmer and calls David Mulligan; Sternheim requests a sidebar.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity