MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Byrne
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Janice Swain
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Officer Aznaran
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mulligan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q.)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional counsel judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Durocher
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Cross examination |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Judicial oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Mulligan
|
Prosecutor witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional instructional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defense attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016419.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 759) dated August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of witness David James Mulligan by Ms. Pomerantz for the Government. Mulligan establishes his identity, age (42), background (from Arizona), and education level (master's degree).
DOJ-OGR-00016418.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial while the jury is not present. The judge calls for a 10-minute recess after encouraging counsel to confer. Following the recess, a new witness, Mr. Mulligan, is called to the stand to be sworn in.
DOJ-OGR-00016413.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the end of witness A. Farmer's testimony. After attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger state they have no further questions, the court excuses the witness. Ms. Pomerantz, representing the government, then calls the next witness, David Mulligan, to the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00016411.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer (also called Annie). Attorney Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness about what Jeffrey Epstein did to her in bed. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the questions, leading to rulings and guidance from the judge (THE COURT) on the proper form of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016410.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to recall Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.' The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to the questioning as leading, but the Court allows the line of inquiry to proceed.
DOJ-OGR-00016409.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as A. Farmer. The testimony covers A. Farmer's past interactions with the FBI in 2006 and 2020, and an award received from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which A. Farmer describes as a significant amount providing security for their family. The transcript also records objections and rulings by attorneys Ms. Menninger and Ms. Pomerantz, and the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00016406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect examination of Annie Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness regarding a statement made to the FBI in 2006 concerning a massage given to her by Maxwell. The witness describes Maxwell asking her to undress and lay on a table under sheets, and then rubbing her body and pulling back the sheet, before the defense attorney objects.
DOJ-OGR-00016404.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) featuring the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer. The witness testifies regarding statements made to the FBI, specifically asserting that either Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell was responsible for canceling an individual named Maria's trip at the last minute. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections regarding hearsay and foundation, which are overruled by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00016401.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of Annie Farmer. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her desire to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, followed by a redirect examination by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz asking about the impact of Farmer's experiences with Maxwell and Epstein. The page concludes with Farmer beginning to describe her experiences as 'upsetting and confusing'.
DOJ-OGR-00016399.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a debate during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues for the relevance of asking the witness if she wanted Epstein prosecuted in 2006, suggesting the witness's motivations have changed due to a subsequent civil lawsuit and application to a compensation fund. Opposing counsel Ms. Pomerantz objects, and the judge ultimately disallows the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016398.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (sidebar conference) from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, attempts to question witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding her motivation and whether she asked the FBI to prosecute Epstein, citing a 2017 declaration by FBI Agent Kuyrkendall that victims interviewed between 2006-2008 did not want prosecution. The prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the relevance, and the Court sustains the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016397.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on whether her personal experiences and training as a psychologist lend her credibility, and probes into a 2006 conversation she had with FBI Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall. A question about whether she told the agent she wanted a 'Mr. Epstein' prosecuted is met with a sustained objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016396.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on the witness's profession as a psychologist and her work with victims of sexual trauma. An opposing attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to a question, which is then withdrawn.
DOJ-OGR-00016395.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about an incident of sexual abuse in a movie theater and introduces exhibit AF-14. The testimony confirms that Farmer signed a release form in October 2020 and received $1.5 million from the Victims Compensation Program.
DOJ-OGR-00016394.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning establishes that the witness's attorneys helped set up the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund and that the witness participated in the fund, accepting a payout of $1.5 million.
DOJ-OGR-00016393.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her attorneys from the firm Boies Schiller and their involvement in setting up the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz objects to the line of questioning on grounds of hearsay and privilege, which the Court sustains in part, asking for a foundation to be laid first.
DOJ-OGR-00016391.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, concerning a separate civil case. The witness confirms that lawyers Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, some from the firm Boies Schiller, represent Virginia Roberts, and that the witness was prepared to testify in that civil litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00016390.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on the financial gains of the witness's lawyers in representing Epstein accusers and establishes that the witness shared legal representation with Virginia Roberts. The defense also questions the witness about preparing to testify in a previous civil case around 2016 or 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00016384.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied by case number and context). The defense questions Farmer about inconsistencies between her direct testimony and statements made to the Victims Compensation Fund regarding the specifics of sexual contact (touching of chest vs. groping of breasts) by a female associate, and an incident in a bed with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016383.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between her current testimony and prior statements made to a victims' compensation fund and the government regarding massages she received from Mr. Epstein. The questions highlight details such as Epstein staring and groaning during a foot massage, and another massage in New Mexico where her chest and breast were touched.
DOJ-OGR-00016381.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning centers on an application Farmer made to a victims compensation fund, in which they claimed to have been sexually abused in movie theaters in New York and New Mexico. Farmer clarifies that the incidents involved hand-holding and caressing, and the questioner probes the discrepancy between this description and the claim of sexual abuse on the application form.
DOJ-OGR-00016379.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions the witness about a claim form she signed, emphasizing the penalties of perjury and the consequences of filing a fraudulent claim. The questioning also touches on whether the witness remembers being asked where sexual abuse occurred on said form.
DOJ-OGR-00016377.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The testimony concerns the authentication of a signature on an application submitted on June 26, 2020. The defense attorney (Menninger) moves to admit pages of the document, and the prosecution (Pomerantz) agrees subject to a review for redactions to protect third-party privacy, which the Court grants.
DOJ-OGR-00016369.jpg
This document is page 153 of a court transcript from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding her memory of a massage where she was undressed. The defense questions inconsistencies in her recollection regarding whether she was wearing underwear, while Farmer confirms that Ghislaine Maxwell massaged her chest and upper breast.
DOJ-OGR-00013276.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 263 of 264) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witnesses Kimberly Meder, Stephen Flatley, and Carolyn by attorneys Comey, Menninger, Pomerantz, and Pagliuca. It also tracks the receipt of Government Exhibits 304, 306, 307, 320, 321, 322, and 324 into evidence.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Clarification of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio
Ms. Pomerantz clarifies their understanding of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio regarding third parties and support in literature, before deferring to the judge's point.
Direct Examination
Establishment of witness age (42) and introduction of Government Exhibit 13.
Direct examination regarding a written entry
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about an entry she wrote, asking her to state its date and read it to the jury.
Identification of Journal Entry
Questioning regarding Government Exhibit 603.
Cross-examination regarding consulting history
Pomerantz questions Loftus about her history consulting with defense attorneys in criminal cases 'hundreds of times'.
Opening Statement (Prosecution)
Ms. Pomerantz instructs the jury to pay attention to evidence, follow the judge's instructions, and use common sense to reach a guilty verdict for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Request for a lunch break
Ms. Pomerantz requests that the proceedings break for lunch and resume afterward.
Calling next witness
Ms. Pomerantz calls the witness 'Kate' on behalf of the government.
Identification of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Mr. Flatley, to establish his recognition and the authenticity of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R. Mr. Flatley confirms he recognizes them, that they were printed from 'Government 54', and that they are a true and accurate copy.
Scheduling and scope of witness testimony
Ms. Pomerantz asked for an estimate on when the next witness would be ready and raised an objection that the current witness, a psychologist, was being cross-examined on matters requiring expert testimony despite being a lay witness.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Clarification of Dr. Rocchio's testimony regarding a thir...
Ms. Pomerantz addresses the court to state the government's understanding that the Court's opinion excluded Dr. Rocchio's opinion on the presence of a third party. She references a specific part of the transcript to distinguish this from the defense's concept of 'grooming by proxy'.
Grooming and sexual gratification
Ms. Pomerantz asks if the person doing the grooming is always the recipient of sexual gratification. Dr. Rocchio begins to answer 'No' before being interrupted by an objection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity