MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | An afternoon session of a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) during the cross-examination of witness ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding the dating of a past event. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | The cross-examination of witness Espinosa concludes, and the defense calls its next witness, Ragh... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Witness testimony | A witness identified as 'Kate' is called by the government and sworn in to testify. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Redirect examination | Ms. Sternheim conducts a redirect examination of Professor Loftus regarding her career in psychol... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her knowledge of Ghislaine's involvement in her ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Direct examination | Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Dr. Rocchio in a legal proceeding. | Courtroom or deposition set... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding a past incident and statements made to a victims... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Redirect examination of a witness named Loftus in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The questioning focuses... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, is taking a lunch break. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Lunch break | The court announced a lunch break starting at 12:45 for a duration of 45 minutes to an hour. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding their memory of a trip to New Mexico. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | A sidebar discussion in court regarding the admissibility of evidence to test a witness's memory. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion was held regarding the jury deliberation schedule, a jury note requesting transcript... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, during which a legal objection was raised and ru... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Loftus regarding the constructive process of memory. An obj... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Redirect examination of witness A. Farmer in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript shows a legal... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court with the jury not present, where a witness is excused and procedural matter... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A sidebar discussion during a trial regarding the admissibility of a witness's prior consistent s... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her public statements and involvement in legal m... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding literature on child sexual abuse. The testimony is int... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Expert witness testimony | Professor Elizabeth Loftus is qualified as an expert witness in the field of memory science and b... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014924.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, questions a witness, Dr. Rocchio, about a peer-reviewed study published in October 2020 concerning the behaviors of perpetrators. Dr. Rocchio explains that the study involved a comprehensive literature review to identify common behavioral stages and strategies.
DOJ-OGR-00014923.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. Dr. Rocchio testifies about the psychological concepts of 'trauma bonding,' 'coercion,' and 'grooming' in the context of sex trafficking and pimp/sex worker relationships. The prosecution also introduces Government Exhibit 3, an academic article validating a model of child sexual abusers, authored by Georgia Winters, Elizabeth Jeglic, and Leah Kaylor.
DOJ-OGR-00014920.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct testimony of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, discussing methods of substantiating abuse cases, including legal convictions and medical evidence (specifically gonorrhea in children). During the testimony, the government introduces 'Government Exhibit 2,' an article regarding 'coercive control' authored by Jacquelynn Duron, Laura Johnson, Gretchen Hoge, and Judy Postmus, which is admitted into evidence without objection from the defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca.
DOJ-OGR-00014902.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on Rocchio's professional background in psychology, including their involvement with the division of trauma psychology and leadership roles in the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, as well as their methods for continuing education.
DOJ-OGR-00014901.jpg
This document is page 25 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness identified as Rocchio by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness describes their professional responsibilities as the president-elect of the Division of Trauma Psychology within the American Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00014896.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on 01/15/25. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the witness's academic credentials at Brown University and their expertise in traumatic stress and childhood trauma. During the testimony, Government Exhibit 1 is admitted into evidence without objection from the defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca.
DOJ-OGR-00014895.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, showing Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio states he is a clinical assistant professor at Brown University's Alpert School of Medicine since July 2020, where he supervises and teaches psychiatry fellows. The examination leads to the introduction of his curriculum vitae as Government Exhibit 1.
DOJ-OGR-00014881.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. The court discusses upcoming trial dates with counsel, proposing a final pretrial conference for November 23rd and discussing the start of voir dire on November 16th. Counsel Ms. Pomerantz (for the government) and Ms. Sternheim agree to the proposals, with Ms. Sternheim asking for a specific start time for the voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00014880.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge sets a firm hearing date for November 15th to discuss jury questionnaires and motions in limine, specifically mentioning defense motions regarding co-conspirator statements, 'alleged victim 3', and Exhibit 52. The court also plans to address government motions seeking to exclude testimony from experts Dr. Loftus and Dr. Dietz.
DOJ-OGR-00014879.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. The Judge discusses the necessity of sealing portions of the proceedings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and outlines the schedule for addressing 'Daubert' issues first. The Judge also notes a high response rate for jury summons, with 565 prospective jurors having filled out questionnaires in two days.
DOJ-OGR-00020912.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) involving the questioning (voir dire) of a potential juror. The text covers a sidebar conference where defense counsel (Ms. Sternheim) requests the Judge ask the juror if they read the case summary, specifically regarding the charges. The Judge then reads a portion of the indictment summary to the juror, stating that the defendant is charged with conspiring with and aiding Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors between 1994 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00018861.jpg
This document is an index of examinations from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It outlines the direct, cross, redirect, and recross examinations of witnesses Kimberly Meder, Stephen Flatley, and Carolyn by various attorneys. The index also lists several government exhibits that were received during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00018817.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a moment after a recess where the judge and attorneys prepare for a witness, and the judge then addresses the jury to apologize for a delay and inform them of upcoming scheduling changes, including days off due to a personal conflict and the Christmas holiday.
DOJ-OGR-00018762.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the resumption of proceedings after a lunch break, where the jury returns and the witness, 'Carolyn,' takes the stand to continue cross-examination by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The judge reminds the witness she is under oath and instructs the attorney to adjust his microphone.
DOJ-OGR-00018679.jpg
This is a transcript page from the trial USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Mr. Flatley confirming that all emails in 'Government Exhibit 54' came from the account 'gmax1@mindspring.com'. Subsequently, Defense attorney Ms. Menninger begins recross-examination, asking technical questions about how email clients (like Outlook) automatically refresh data from servers when connected to the internet.
DOJ-OGR-00018678.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a specific computer, establishing that Ghislaine Maxwell held the only non-default user account on the device. The defense attorney attempts to establish doubt about who physically accessed the computer, suggesting it could have been in a common area (like a kitchen) and used by others via Maxwell's logged-in account.
DOJ-OGR-00018677.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on the creation of a document, attempting to cast doubt on whether a person named 'gmax' could have created it by highlighting that her physical location on January 29, 2002, might differ from the computer's location. The witness, Flatley, admits to not knowing who created the document or where the computer was located.
DOJ-OGR-00018673.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning attorney establishes that the witness does not know the physical location of a desktop computer at the time certain exhibits were created, suggesting it could have been in Florida, New York, or elsewhere. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes two objections during this line of questioning, both of which are overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018671.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on the forensic examination of a hard drive, confirming it originated from a desktop computer rather than a laptop, and establishing that the drive examined was a 'clone' of another hard drive. An objection regarding the transport of desktops on airplanes was sustained by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018668.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) featuring the testimony of a Mr. Flatley. Ms. Pomerantz concludes her questioning after Flatley reads a statement describing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as 'great partners' and 'best of friends' who complement each other well. Ms. Menninger then begins cross-examination, establishing that a hard drive (Exhibit GX54) was found in Mr. Epstein's New York home.
DOJ-OGR-00018665.jpg
This page documents the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness is asked to read specific details from documents, including names of workers (John and Mary Alessi), information about 'Palm Beach House Maintenance' and a FedEx account, and metadata (author 'gmax' and 2002 timestamps) from a digital file labeled 418B.
DOJ-OGR-00018664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata (creation, save, and print dates in September 2002) and titles of specific evidence documents. The documents discussed are titled 'PB New Shampoo and Massage Products' (Exhibit 420) and 'Palm Beach House Workers' (Exhibit 418R), linking the evidence to operations at a Palm Beach residence.
DOJ-OGR-00018663.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on Word document metadata, specifically for Government Exhibit 420B, establishing that the author and the person who last saved the document are both listed as "gmax".
DOJ-OGR-00018660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, who identifies and authenticates Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422. Following his testimony and with no objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger, the court admits the exhibits into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018659.jpg
This document is page 61 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the review of evidence using forensic software. During the proceedings, Government Exhibit 418B is admitted without objection from Ms. Menninger, and Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 are presented for identification.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Grooming and sexual gratification
Ms. Pomerantz asks if the person doing the grooming is always the recipient of sexual gratification. Dr. Rocchio begins to answer 'No' before being interrupted by an objection.
Direct and Redirect Examination
Legal examination in court
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding the emotional significance of compensation funds and potential financial interest in the trial outcome.
Cross-examination regarding consulting history
Pomerantz questions Loftus about her history consulting with defense attorneys in criminal cases 'hundreds of times'.
Clarification of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio
Ms. Pomerantz clarifies their understanding of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio regarding third parties and support in literature, before deferring to the judge's point.
Work location cross-examination
Pomerantz confirms Espinosa worked at the Madison Ave office, not the homes or Palm Beach house.
Direct Examination regarding 1995 trip
Q&A regarding a trip to NY in 1995, meeting Epstein, and identifying a photo.
Opening Statement (Prosecution)
Ms. Pomerantz instructs the jury to pay attention to evidence, follow the judge's instructions, and use common sense to reach a guilty verdict for Ghislaine Maxwell.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Clarification of questioning regarding grooming
Discussion regarding a distinction between third-party presence and sexual gratification in the context of grooming strategies.
Objection Ruling
Judge sustains an objection regarding the line of questioning, prohibiting the attorney from drawing associations with other defendants the witness has testified for to avoid prejudice under Rule 403.
Allegations of recruiting underage girls for sexual abuse
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages, citing specific examples involving victims named Jane, a 16-year-old, and a 17-year-old in various locations.
Direct examination and introduction of evidence
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Flatley, about his review of evidence using forensic software. She successfully enters Government Exhibit 418B into evidence and requests that exhibits 420, 421, and 422 be displayed for the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity