MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Expert witness Lo... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court hearing regarding the admissibility of photographic evidence and witness anonymity protocols. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court recess during the cross-examination of A. Farmer. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Sidebar conference during court proceedings (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court redirect examination of A. Farmer. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing of Document 741 (Transcript of Opening Statement) | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Elizabeth Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxw... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of document from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) about the scope of cross-examination. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing date of the transcript containing the testimony. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Expert witness testimony | Professor Elizabeth Loftus is qualified as an expert witness in the field of memory science and b... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding metadata in Word documents, specifically Government E... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory, trauma, and confidence. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court with the jury not present, where a witness is excused and procedural matter... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Meeting | The attorneys agree to confer to narrow the issues regarding prior inconsistent statements. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiment... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | An opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine, where she argues that her client... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of Kate regarding money for therapy and her acquaintance with Ray Hamilton. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding the location of a desktop computer used to create ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of a witness named Flatley by an attorney named Ms. Pomerantz regarding Govern... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of Ms. Espinosa in open court. | In open court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Identification of Government Exhibit 16 (GX16) | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | The cross-examination of witness Espinosa concludes, and the defense calls its next witness, Ragh... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Kate regarding her involvement in a publicized scandal. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016278.jpg
A court transcript page from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies about reclaiming a pair of boots she had kept at her mother's house after being interviewed by agents in 2006/2007. She also details a six-week service trip to Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996 before the prosecution introduces Government Exhibit 103.
DOJ-OGR-00016266.jpg
This is page 50 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Witness A. Farmer testifies under direct examination by Ms. Pomerantz about a weekend trip to Epstein's ranch (identifiable by the description of a 'western movie set'). Farmer testifies that she believed Epstein and Maxwell were romantic partners based on their intimate behavior and confirms that she stayed in a 'small residence' on the property with only Epstein and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016265.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies about her reluctance to go to New Mexico to see Jeffrey Epstein due to a prior incident in a New York movie theater, stating she only felt comfortable going because her mother told her Maxwell (whom she viewed as Epstein's romantic partner) would be present. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises a hearsay objection regarding the mother's statement, which the judge overrules with a limiting instruction.
DOJ-OGR-00016264.jpg
This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct testimony of Annie Farmer. Farmer describes arriving at a large property in New Mexico (presumed to be Zorro Ranch) characterized by a desert landscape and a western movie set. She testifies to meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell there, describing Maxwell as an attractive woman in her thirties, and subsequently identifies Maxwell in a photograph (Government Exhibit 115).
DOJ-OGR-00016263.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that in the spring of 1996 (likely April), she flew commercially to New Mexico for a weekend trip, noting that she did not pay for the ticket and thanked Jeffrey Epstein for it upon arrival. She describes being met at the airport by a driver holding a sign with her name who drove her to 'the ranch.'
DOJ-OGR-00016260.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between attorneys Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and the judge. The discussion revolves around the admissibility of a witness's testimony concerning her reasons for feeling comfortable going on a trip to New Mexico. The judge sustains Ms. Menninger's objection, ruling that testimony about what the witness's mother told her regarding who would be on the trip constitutes inadmissible hearsay, and instructs counsel on how to rephrase the questions to avoid this issue.
DOJ-OGR-00016257.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named A. Farmer (also called Annie). The witness states she spoke with Jeffrey Epstein by phone two or three times and saw him in person in New Mexico in April 1996. A photograph of the witness from the spring of 1996, showing her getting ready for prom, is identified and admitted into evidence as Government Exhibit 102.
DOJ-OGR-00016254.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer is questioned by attorney Ms. Pomerantz and reads a diary entry from January 25, 1996, for the jury. The entry, admitted as Government's Exhibit 604, describes the witness's activities in New York, including attending a New Year's Eve party at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion.
DOJ-OGR-00016252.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, questions a witness named Annie Farmer, who reads aloud an entry she wrote on January 7, 1996. The entry details her feelings after a significant trip to New York, expressing a sense of depression upon returning home, feeling isolated from friends, and being eager to start college.
DOJ-OGR-00016251.jpg
This document is page 35 of 267 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page details the direct examination of witness 'Annie' Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, where Government Exhibit 601 is admitted into evidence and Government Exhibit 603 is identified by the witness as an entry from her journal. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections based on Rule 106 (Rule of Completeness).
DOJ-OGR-00016250.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies about visiting Epstein in New York when she was 16 years old and her hopes for an international trip to help with school applications. The prosecution introduces Government Exhibit 601, which Farmer identifies as a notebook she used as a journal during that time period.
DOJ-OGR-00016248.jpg
This document is page 32 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York where she and her sister Maria were taken by Epstein's driver to see 'The Phantom of the Opera' and later accompanied Epstein to see a movie identified as 'Five Monkeys'. The witness describes Epstein sitting between her and her sister at the movie and making physical advances, including caressing and interlocking his hand with hers.
DOJ-OGR-00016245.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Annie (A. Farmer). Under questioning by Ms. Pomerantz, Annie states she was 16 when she took a trip to New York and identifies Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then describes her first meeting with Epstein, stating that she and her sister went to his home after he had purchased tickets for them to see 'Phantom of the Opera'.
DOJ-OGR-00016244.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of Annie Farmer (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Farmer testifies about a one-week trip to New York after Christmas in 1995, where she stayed with her sister. She confirms meeting Jeffrey Epstein twice during this trip but states she did not meet Ghislaine Maxwell on that specific occasion. The testimony concludes with the introduction of Government Exhibit 101, which Farmer identifies as her high school photo from her junior year.
DOJ-OGR-00016243.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she flew commercially and alone to New York but did not pay for the ticket herself. When asked who she thought bought the ticket, she begins to answer 'When I met Epstein' before being interrupted by a sustained hearsay objection from defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00016242.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named A. Farmer (addressed as Annie) testifies that her sister, Maria, told her that a person named Epstein was purchasing a ticket for her to travel to New York. The stated reason for the trip and the ticket purchase was Epstein's interest in helping the witness with her education.
DOJ-OGR-00016239.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Annie Farmer by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer identifies the defendant in the courtroom as a person named Maxwell, who she states gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. She also provides background information, stating she lived in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley, at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00016238.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer' by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers the witness's personal background, including their birthplace (Missouri), childhood in Arizona, and education (University of Pennsylvania and University of Texas at Austin), culminating in their current profession as a psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00016154.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing part of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. She argues that her client, Ghislaine, is being unfairly targeted as a 'scapegoat' and 'convenient stand-in' for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein to satisfy victims seeking justice. The transcript shows another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, making objections that are overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00016151.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the transition from the prosecution's opening statement to the defense's, delivered by Ms. Sternheim. Ms. Sternheim begins her defense by arguing that Maxwell is being unfairly scapegoated for the actions of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing that while Epstein's conduct is central to the case, Maxwell is a separate individual who should not be conflated with him.
DOJ-OGR-00016149.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case. The prosecution outlines its case against the defendant, detailing the evidence and testimony to be presented, including from victims' relatives, Epstein's staff, pilots, and law enforcement. The statement alleges the defendant's close involvement with Epstein in the abuse of underage victims, citing travel, communications, and rules imposed by the defendant to maintain secrecy, as well as evidence found during searches of Epstein's properties.
DOJ-OGR-00016148.jpg
This document is page 38 of a court transcript from the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines that victims, including 'Jane,' will testify about the sexual abuse they suffered, specifically highlighting the defendant's active role in grooming, touching, and facilitating the abuse alongside Jeffrey Epstein. It also addresses the fact that witnesses received financial compensation but emphasizes that the money does not negate the trauma they endured.
DOJ-OGR-00016147.jpg
This document is page 37 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as 'the defendant'), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's opening argument, describing a 'pyramid scheme of abuse' where the defendant recruited and groomed minors for Jeffrey Epstein under the guise of massage appointments. The text details specific charges, including transporting minors under age 17 across state lines and sex trafficking of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00016146.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the case against a defendant associated with Epstein. It details how the recruitment of victims evolved from individual targeting in the 1990s using scholarship promises to a "pyramid scheme" in the 2000s where victims were paid to recruit their friends.
DOJ-OGR-00016145.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case. The prosecution alleges that the defendant conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit multiple underage girls for sexual abuse, detailing specific instances involving victims known as 'Jane', a 16-year-old, and a 17-year-old. The abuse and recruitment allegedly occurred in various locations, including New York, Florida, and a ranch in New Mexico.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Clarification of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio
Ms. Pomerantz clarifies their understanding of a question posed to Dr. Rocchio regarding third parties and support in literature, before deferring to the judge's point.
Direct Examination
Establishment of witness age (42) and introduction of Government Exhibit 13.
Direct examination regarding a written entry
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about an entry she wrote, asking her to state its date and read it to the jury.
Identification of Journal Entry
Questioning regarding Government Exhibit 603.
Cross-examination regarding consulting history
Pomerantz questions Loftus about her history consulting with defense attorneys in criminal cases 'hundreds of times'.
Opening Statement (Prosecution)
Ms. Pomerantz instructs the jury to pay attention to evidence, follow the judge's instructions, and use common sense to reach a guilty verdict for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Request for a lunch break
Ms. Pomerantz requests that the proceedings break for lunch and resume afterward.
Calling next witness
Ms. Pomerantz calls the witness 'Kate' on behalf of the government.
Identification of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Mr. Flatley, to establish his recognition and the authenticity of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R. Mr. Flatley confirms he recognizes them, that they were printed from 'Government 54', and that they are a true and accurate copy.
Scheduling and scope of witness testimony
Ms. Pomerantz asked for an estimate on when the next witness would be ready and raised an objection that the current witness, a psychologist, was being cross-examined on matters requiring expert testimony despite being a lay witness.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Clarification of Dr. Rocchio's testimony regarding a thir...
Ms. Pomerantz addresses the court to state the government's understanding that the Court's opinion excluded Dr. Rocchio's opinion on the presence of a third party. She references a specific part of the transcript to distinguish this from the defense's concept of 'grooming by proxy'.
Grooming and sexual gratification
Ms. Pomerantz asks if the person doing the grooming is always the recipient of sexual gratification. Dr. Rocchio begins to answer 'No' before being interrupted by an objection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity