The government
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Counsel for Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Cooperating witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Expert witness counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial prosecution vs defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Cooperative witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims and witnesses
|
Cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Metropolitan Detention Center
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal counsel at the MDC
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
the defense
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Complainants' civil attorneys
|
Professional collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Chapell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Entity]
|
Informant source |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Court proceedings/Trial discussions | Courtroom (referenced by Tr... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Modification of a Protective Order | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Argument regarding NPA applicability | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Limited Hearing | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closing Arguments and Jury Charge | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Modification of Protective Order | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Boies Schiller began producing materials not covered by protective orders in response to subpoenas. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial Testimony (Trial Tr. at 2518–22) | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Submission of evidence (Journal) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anticipated trial where evidence regarding victims and terms like 'rape' will be used. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Materials | Court (Southern District of... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's motion to unseal testimony and exhibits | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Entry of Non-Prosecution Agreement | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Previous hearing where government touted documentary evidence. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Three bail renewal hearings | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proffer session | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing regarding requested discovery | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of legal materials | Court / MDC | View |
| N/A | N/A | The government served a redacted party with a subpoena to produce [redacted items]. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal defense against charges | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal indictment alleging Ms. Maxwell committed perjury. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness preparation for trial where the government asked McHugh to review exhibits. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government charged Jeffrey Epstein with conduct falling within the NPA time scope. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bail hearing argument. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government secret deal (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Florida (implied context of... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000987.jpg
This document is page 2 of a government legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 13, 2020, arguing against the defendant's release on bail. The government asserts that the defendant is a flight risk with opaque finances, has the ability to live in France to avoid extradition, and has proposed an insufficient $5 million bond backed by unidentified co-signers and foreign property of no collateral value to the U.S. court.
DOJ-OGR-00000984.jpg
This document serves as a cover sheet or separator page for Exhibit C within a legal filing for Case 21-770. It identifies the attached document as 'Doc. 22', titled 'The Government's Reply Memorandum in Support of Detention,' filed on April 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000979.jpg
This document is page 18 of a defense motion (filed July 10, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her decision to stay in the U.S. after Epstein's arrest, and argues that the government overstates the risk posed by the potential length of her sentence. The text cites various legal precedents (Friedman, Sabhnani) to support the claim that a long potential sentence alone is insufficient grounds for detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000956.jpg
This document is the cover page for Exhibit B of a legal filing in Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. It is a memorandum submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing against the U.S. Government's motion to keep her in detention pending trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000945.jpg
This document is the cover page for Exhibit A in the legal case 21-770, filed on April 1, 2021. The exhibit is identified as Document 4, which is "The Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention". The page is part of a larger 200-page document and is marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00000943.jpg
This document is an appendix from a legal filing in Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. It serves as a table of contents for various court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including numerous motions and responses concerning her detention and requests for bail, filed by both her legal team and the Government. The list also references a transcript from a bail hearing and a letter from Maxwell about her conditions of confinement at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000936.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bond. The defense asserts she is not a flight risk because she voluntarily stayed in the U.S. to fight 'bogus charges.' To alleviate concerns about her wealth and foreign ties, the filing states she has agreed to renounce her British and French citizenships and place all her and her spouse's assets into an account monitored by a retired federal judge.
DOJ-OGR-00000932.jpg
This legal document page (dated April 1, 2021) argues that the government lacks any contemporaneous documentary evidence (emails, texts, police reports) to corroborate allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding conduct between 1994 and 1997. The defense asserts that Maxwell is being prosecuted as a 'substitute' for Jeffrey Epstein following his 'inexplicable death' at the MCC, noting that she was not named in Epstein's original indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00000931.jpg
This legal document argues that the trial court improperly denied bail to Ghislaine Maxwell by relying on the government's proffer, which was based on an indictment. The author contends that an indictment is merely an accusation and not evidence, citing legal precedent and pattern jury instructions from the Third Circuit to support this claim. The document asserts that the court should order Maxwell's release.
DOJ-OGR-00000924.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text details a proposed bail package valued at over $28.5 million, including $22.5 million in personal/spousal assets, $5 million from friends/family, and a $1 million bond from a security company. The defense argues that Maxwell has no intention of fleeing and is willing to renounce her British and French citizenship to prove it.
DOJ-OGR-00000923.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal brief filed on April 1, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding bail denial. It argues that the trial judge denied bail without reviewing actual evidence and highlights Maxwell's 'Kafkaesque' detention conditions. It also summarizes 12 pretrial motions filed by the defense, including arguments regarding the statute of limitations and the violation of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000921.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Procedural History) dated April 1, 2021, detailing the arrest and bail applications regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her arrest on July 2, 2020, the government's allegations that she groomed minors for Jeffrey Epstein, and the subsequent legal motions leading to her detention order following a Zoom hearing where no accusers testified.
DOJ-OGR-00000920.jpg
This legal document is a page from a filing arguing that the district court erred in denying bail to Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that the court improperly relied on the government's weak and unsubstantiated allegations, which are based on old, anonymous hearsay. The document concludes by asserting that Ms. Maxwell should be granted bail or the case should be remanded.
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, outlining legal issues presented for review regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that her detention conditions—including sleep deprivation, surveillance, solitary confinement, lack of food/water, and inability to review discovery documents—prevent her from effectively preparing a defense. It also challenges the trial court's decision to deny bail based on 'old, anonymous, unconfronted, hearsay accusations' from the government.
DOJ-OGR-00000914.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing for her innocence. It claims the government's evidence is weak and consists of old, untested hearsay, and that the prosecution is motivated by the 'Epstein Effect'—a need for a scapegoat following the public outrage over Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody. The filing asserts that this effect has biased prosecutors, the Bureau of Prisons, and the public against her.
DOJ-OGR-00000899.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 covering February 23, 2021, to March 18, 2021. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bond, the Government's opposition to it, and various scheduling orders regarding pretrial motions. A significant order on March 18, 2021, addresses the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically denying the Government's request to completely seal 'Exhibit 11' because portions of the transcript are already public record in the *Giuffre v. Maxwell* civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00000892.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, dated March 24, 2021, detailing events from early December 2020 concerning the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters from Maxwell's legal team and subsequent orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding procedural matters such as briefing schedules, sealing documents, a renewed motion for bail, and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A key event is the Court's denial of Maxwell's request to summon the prison warden to testify about her confinement, instead ordering the Government to continue providing written updates.
DOJ-OGR-00000869.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's third request for release on bail, concluding that she remains a significant flight risk and that no conditions can reasonably assure her appearance. The judge cites the nature of the charges involving a minor victim as a strong factor favoring continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000866.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from September 22, 2021, detailing the procedural history of a defendant's third motion for release on bail. It outlines the dates of the defendant's motion, the government's opposition, and the defendant's reply. The document then discusses the legal standard regarding the court's jurisdiction to rule on the bail motion while the defendant's bail appeal is pending in a higher court.
DOJ-OGR-00000865.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a Court Order filed on December 28, 2020 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) third motion for release on bail. The Court rejects new proposals, including renouncing French and British citizenship and placing assets in a monitored account, reaffirming that she remains a flight risk with substantial resources and foreign ties. It references previous denials from July and December 2020 and notes her continued incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000849.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) detailing legal proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between July and August 2020. It includes a judicial order rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders to safeguard witness privacy, followed by a log of subsequent letter motions and responses regarding discovery disclosure filed by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and government attorney Alex Rossmiller. The document tracks the procedural back-and-forth regarding the handling of sensitive discovery materials and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000809.jpg
This legal document details the extensive financial assets of a defendant, including hundreds of millions in equities and numerous high-value properties, to argue against a bail package. The government contends that these assets, along with recently discovered cash and diamonds, provide the defendant with the means to flee the jurisdiction. The document also references the defendant's past alleged criminal conduct, including working with associates to exploit minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000807.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6 million Paris residence, ownership of private jets used for frequent international travel, and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals that a recent search of his New York City home uncovered an expired Austrian passport with his photo but another name, listing a residence in Saudi Arabia, further heightening concerns about his potential to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00000800.jpg
This legal document outlines the U.S. Government's argument that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to influence potential witnesses after a critical Miami Herald report was published in late 2018. The government alleges Epstein paid a total of $350,000 to two 'potential co-conspirators,' identified as Individual I and Individual II, for whom he had previously secured protection in his 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement. Individual II is specifically described as an employee who facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity