MR. ROSSMILLER
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Boies Schiller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Your Honor (Judge)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Adversarial prosecutor vs defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Speaker (Defense)
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant (Epstein)
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Glassman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Prosecutor state |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial prosecutor vs defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Sweet
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding the definition of confidential materials and subpoena compliance. | Courtroom (Presumably SDNY) | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court hearing | A legal discussion regarding the precarious standing of a protective order granted by a deceased ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court hearing | A procedural discussion during a court hearing where the judge questions the government's motion ... | Court of the Southern Distr... | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court proceeding | A discussion took place regarding a protective order for sealed documents in a libel lawsuit. The... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing (Bail/Detention) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Epstein's release/bail. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court Hearing in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A hearing regarding the defendant's potential release, where the government presented arguments a... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing (Detention/Bail Hearing) in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding the defendant's proposal for home confinement and electronic monitoring. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein). Discussion centers on wh... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing on the issue of remand versus bail for a defendant charged with sex trafficking. ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail/detention for the defendant. | Courtroom (implied Southern... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court proceeding (likely a bail hearing) where the government argues for the detention of a def... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing where Mr. Rossmiller discusses evidence from Florida police reports and the gover... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court Hearing / Bail Argument | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A judge granted a joint request from the prosecution and defense for an adjournment and the exclu... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A legal argument was presented in court regarding the scope of a nonprosecution agreement from th... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A hearing to determine if the defendant should be detained pending trial. | Court | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A pretrial detention hearing where the government presented arguments for detaining the defendant... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Detention Hearing proceedings where defense requests adjournment to prepare bail package. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A court hearing was held to discuss pretrial matters related to Mr. Epstein, including a pretrial... | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000398.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. An attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, argues before a judge that a nonprosecution agreement made in the Southern District of Florida was understood by that district to be limited in scope, and therefore does not impede a separate prosecution in the Southern District of New York. This argument is intended to counter the defense's position and validate the ongoing investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Epstein) filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten argues that discovery is needed to determine if Florida prosecutors violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by steering victims to New York. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller responds that the conduct is within the statute of limitations and denies allegations of a conspiracy within the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00000390.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The court discusses a search conducted at Epstein's East 71st Street residence over the previous weekend and questions the impact of discovered materials on his sex offender status. Prosecutor Rossmiller describes the materials as 'extremely concerning' regarding bail, while defense attorney Weingarten notes they have not yet seen the 'pictures' in question.
DOJ-OGR-00000389.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Epstein). The Judge questions prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller to ensure victims have been notified of the case. The discussion also covers Epstein's status as a Tier 3 sex offender in New York, originating from his 2008 Florida prosecution, classifying him as a high-risk individual for committing sex crimes with minors.
DOJ-OGR-00016759.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and several attorneys (Ms. Menninger, Ms. Comey, Mr. Everdell). The conversation centers on the prior testimony of a witness named Jane, specifically her memory of a trip to New York around 1997 and whether that memory was influenced by her attorney, Mr. Rossmiller. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, also informs the court of their intent to call Special Agent Amanda Young as a witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Comey and Ms. Menninger discuss with the Court the admissibility of testimony and specific emails involving Mr. Glassman (referencing 'The Lion King') and Mr. Rossmiller. The discussion centers on a prior ruling limiting testimony from attorneys to specific statements regarding whether testifying would help the defendant's case.
DOJ-OGR-00004907.jpg
This document is a page from a sealed court transcript filed on July 2, 2021, as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The transcript captures a dialogue between the Court and attorney Mr. Rossmiller regarding the definition of confidential materials involving plaintiff Virginia Roberts and a subpoena issued to the law firm Boies Schiller. The discussion focuses on privilege, privacy interests, and a proposed order submitted to Judge Sweet.
DOJ-OGR-00004901.jpg
This court transcript details a discussion about a protective order that the presiding judge believes is on 'precarious footing'. The order was granted years prior by Judge Sweet, who is now deceased, making it difficult to ascertain the original reasoning. The judge and Mr. Rossmiller debate whether the Second Circuit would or should handle an inquiry involving 150 litigation documents to resolve the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00004900.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 2, 2021, detailing a conversation between Mr. Rossmiller and a judge regarding a protective order over sealed documents from a settled libel lawsuit. The judge expresses reluctance to uphold the order, citing the Second Circuit's apparent criticism of Judge Sweet for failing to conduct a detailed inquiry into the confidentiality of each document. The core issue is whether the sealed litigation materials should remain confidential.
DOJ-OGR-00004897.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a sealed case, filed on July 2, 2021. In the transcript, the judge questions a government representative, Mr. Rossmiller, about a procedural issue: why the government has filed a motion for relief from a protective order on behalf of a third party, rather than the third party's own law firm, Boies Schiller, filing it. The judge expresses skepticism about this arrangement and asserts their judicial authority, referencing the Martindell case as applicable precedent.
Unspecified information related to testimony
A communication between Jane and her lawyer, Mr. Rossmiller, is discussed. Ms. Menninger states that information came through her attorney, which is why Jane didn't know about it.
Allegations against Mr. Epstein
The Court references a letter from Mr. Rossmiller that described allegations of obstruction, harassment, and witness tampering by Mr. Epstein.
Argument for pretrial detention
Mr. Rossmiller argues that the government seeks pretrial detention for the defendant due to extraordinary flight risk and danger to the community, citing prior actions, recommendations from pretrial services, victim requests, and the legal presumption in sex trafficking cases which has not been rebutted.
Presumption of detention
Mr. Rossmiller confirms the government's burden and argues that there are good reasons for a presumption of detention, especially since the defendant has a prior sex offense conviction.
Defendant's bail conditions and risk assessment
A speaker, presumably for the government, argues against the defendant's release, citing danger to the community, witness tampering, and a recent suspicious financial transaction. MR. ROSSMILLER confirms for the court that police reports are from Florida.
Defendant's actions and financial information
Mr. Rossmiller states the reports suggest the defendant harassed individuals and explains why the government took no position on sealing the defendant's financial information.
Defendant's flight risk and proposal for home confinement.
This document is a transcript of a dialogue between Mr. Rossmiller and the Court. Mr. Rossmiller argues that the defendant is a flight risk due to immense wealth and the recent discovery of a safe containing cash, diamonds, and a fraudulent passport. The Court questions Mr. Rossmiller for more specific details about the discovery.
Victim Views
Rossmiller conveys that victims have expressed views to the government, which were then conveyed to the Court, and mentions efforts to reach out to victims.
Bail Hearing Arguments
Discussion regarding flight risk, foreign connections, and a fraudulent passport.
Detention and Defense Preparation
Rossmiller argues that detention does not prevent adequate defense preparation, citing the Zarrab case as precedent.
Scope of a nonprosecution agreement
Mr. Rossmiller argues to the court that the Southern District of Florida believed its nonprosecution agreement was limited to its own district, implying that it does not prevent prosecution in the Southern District of New York. This argument is presented to counter the defense's position.
Scope of a nonprosecution agreement
Mr. Rossmiller argues to the court that the Southern District of Florida believed its nonprosecution agreement was limited to its own district, implying that it does not prevent prosecution in the Southern District of New York. This argument is presented to counter the defense's position.
Potential superseding indictments
Rossmiller states they do not expect imminent superseding indictments but it is possible later.
Pretrial detention hearing
Mr. Rossmiller describes evidence found at the defendant's home, including a massage room and electronic disks, and argues that the defendant is a danger and flight risk who should be detained pending trial.
Rebuttal on charges
Argument regarding the nature of federal trafficking laws vs child prostitution.
Inquiry about arrest details
Can I have the date and time of arrest, please?
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity