Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Black
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Goldberger
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Potential co-conspirators
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Alleged co conspirator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Martin Weinberg
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Victim perpetrator implied |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rand
|
Co authors |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Conspiracy association |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Assistant
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein's assistant
|
Romantic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Maxwell (Ghislaine)
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed victim
|
Sexual |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth Starr
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Petitioners
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Leslie Groff
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Adriana Ross
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell (implied)
|
Exploitative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation involving Epstein where his lawyers attacked the credibility of the girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process blocked by Epstein and co-conspirators, leading to the need for alternative inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged criminal scheme and the defense's efforts to secure non-prosecution and immigra... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement provisions precluding criminal charges and immigration proceedings against certain indi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing for an 18-month incarceration, reduced from a 'non-negoti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, i... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor girl (Jane Doe #5) was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Brillo Way for massages and/or sex ... | Epstein's mansion on El Bri... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving 12 months of house arrest at his Palm Beach home, with curfew, no unsupervised co... | Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea deal (non-prosecution agreement) for two prostitution charges. | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail with work release privileges. | Palm Beach County jail | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attempt to get out of the NPA after it was signed. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016584.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness is questioned about the meaning of fields in financial records belonging to Epstein, which span from January 1999 to December 2006. After confirming the scope of the records, the attorney, Mr. Everdell, concludes his questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016581.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Sud. The questioning focuses on a report of invoice information from a company called Shoppers Travel, confirming that the report is an accurate copy of records related to "Epstein" from January 1999 to December 2006 and that the information was entered into the company's database promptly as part of their regular business practice.
DOJ-OGR-00016580.jpg
This document is a page of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Sud. He is being questioned about a report, Defense Exhibit RS-1, which he confirms he ran in 2016 for a customer with the file name "Epstein". The report contains invoice details and covers the years 1999, 2005, and 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00016570.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa. The questioning by Mr. Everdell focuses on Ms. Espinosa's past employment, the departure of Ghislaine, and the management of Epstein's properties by Sarah Kellen. An objection raised by Ms. Pomerantz regarding Sarah Kellen's marital status is sustained by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00016566.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on Espinosa's recollection of booking hotels in Miami for a woman (implied to be Ghislaine) and confirms that Ghislaine dated and was in a relationship with a man named Ted Waitt in the 2000s. A question about whether the woman stayed at 'Epstein's residence' was asked, but an objection to it was sustained by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00016561.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about her observations of Jeffrey Epstein's relationships, stating she believed he and Celina Midelfart were a couple. She also states that Ghislaine Maxwell was unaware that Espinosa was buying flowers for Midelfart on Epstein's behalf, possibly during a time when Maxwell and Epstein were also in a romantic relationship.
DOJ-OGR-00016559.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies about visitors to Jeffrey Epstein's office, stating that Ghislaine's presence decreased in the last two years of their employment. Espinosa identifies several female visitors, including Celina Midelfart, Shelly Lewis, Jane, and Gwendolyn Beck, describing them as 'young women' who appeared to be 'eighteen and over'.
DOJ-OGR-00016547.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an individual named Jane, her relationship as Jeffrey's goddaughter, and how this status influenced her treatment in 'the office' where her mother also worked. The examination also inquires about Jane's siblings and the extent of contact between Jane's mother and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016543.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Espinosa, testifies about Epstein giving 'Lion King' tickets to almost all employees and confirms that Epstein received female visitors at his office. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests to display Government Exhibit 12, which is under seal, only to the Court, the deputy, and the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016541.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing testimony from Espinosa. The testimony covers her trip to Europe three years prior, where she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine, and questions about the residence's features. It also includes questions and answers regarding Epstein's charitable donations.
DOJ-OGR-00016487.jpg
This legal document is a judicial ruling from a case dated August 10, 2022. The judge permits the defense to ask a witness, Mr. Glassman, a single, specific question about whether he told the government that he had informed another witness, Jane, that her testimony would benefit her civil case against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein's estate. The judge deems this question relevant for potential impeachment, as it could suggest a motive for Jane's testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00016459.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against a defendant's motion to dismiss charges of enticement. Rohrbach asserts that the defendant, along with an individual named Epstein, manipulated a victim named Jane by building a relationship with her over several years, ultimately persuading her to travel to New York. The argument centers on the idea that playing on Jane's 'hopes and desires' fits the legal definition of enticement, justifying the charges.
DOJ-OGR-00016443.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Swain is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz. Swain testifies that a person named Annie took a weekend trip to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, that Epstein paid for the trip, and that Swain personally drove Annie to the airport. The witness denies ever having spoken to or met a person named Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016441.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Swain, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies that her sister, Annie, a high school junior, took two trips: one to New York over a Christmas holiday where she went to the movies with Epstein and another girl named Maria, and a second trip to Epstein's ranch in New Mexico. The New Mexico trip was part of a 'get-together' or 'retreat' that Epstein was planning for 20-25 students, which he communicated to the witness via a phone call.
DOJ-OGR-00016399.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a debate during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues for the relevance of asking the witness if she wanted Epstein prosecuted in 2006, suggesting the witness's motivations have changed due to a subsequent civil lawsuit and application to a compensation fund. Opposing counsel Ms. Pomerantz objects, and the judge ultimately disallows the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016393.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her attorneys from the firm Boies Schiller and their involvement in setting up the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz objects to the line of questioning on grounds of hearsay and privilege, which the Court sustains in part, asking for a foundation to be laid first.
DOJ-OGR-00013260.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between lawsuits she filed against Epstein and Kellen in 2008-2009 and a subsequent claim to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn denies including Ms. Maxwell in her claim and corrects the compensation amount she received from $3.25 million or $3.9 million to $2,804,000.
DOJ-OGR-00013259.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions a witness named Carolyn about her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. The questioning focuses on the alleged start date of abuse by Epstein (May 1, 2001) and highlights alleged inconsistencies between this submission and two prior lawsuits. Specifically, the attorney suggests she added new claims of sexual acts, which Carolyn vehemently denies, calling the assertion a "lie."
DOJ-OGR-00013258.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on confirming the submission date of Carolyn's application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund as October 14, 2020, using an exhibit to refresh her memory. The transcript also establishes that this fund submission is a separate matter from two lawsuits she filed against Epstein and Kellen.
DOJ-OGR-00013215.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The conversation centers on the consistency of paragraph 206 of an exhibit, which describes allegations against Epstein, with prior testimony. The Court ultimately rules that the paragraph is not inconsistent and sustains an objection.
DOJ-OGR-00013214.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting a legal argument between counsel, Ms. Comey, and the judge. Ms. Comey objects to admitting a document (C4), arguing it was drafted by lawyers and would confuse the jury, but the judge overrules the objection. The transcript also references another document (C5) which alleges an agreement between defendant Epstein, his employee Kellen, and others to facilitate a crime.
DOJ-OGR-00013211.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca argues that a legal complaint is inconsistent due to factual omissions, specifically citing that paragraph 8 fails to mention the witness's testimony of being subjected to penetration and intercourse by Epstein. The judge acknowledges this "omission theory" and states an intention to hear from a Ms. Comey on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00013204.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding an alleged 6.5-hour meeting with Dr. Richard Hall on October 21, 2009. The attorney presses the witness on whether she told Dr. Hall she began seeing Jeffrey Epstein in 2002, though the witness claims no recollection of the meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00013192.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning establishes that Carolyn filed a lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen in 2008 and was represented by lawyer Jack Scarola in a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. The transcript also mentions that Carolyn moved from Florida to Georgia in 2003 after being told by someone named Sarah that Epstein wanted to take her photograph.
DOJ-OGR-00013191.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, confronts Carolyn with her 2007 statement to the FBI, in which she allegedly claimed a person named Sarah called her to relay messages from Epstein regarding concert tickets and a request to take photographs. The witness appears to challenge the relevance of the questions to the document she is being shown.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Recruiting other girls
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
Future contact
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Maria's artistic career
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
Instruction to write down contact information
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
Resignation/Leaving
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
Job offer
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Presence at New Mexico residence
Epstein consistently notified Detective Deborah Anaya, a New Mexico official, whenever he spent time at his residence in New Mexico.
Unknown
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
Future contact for work
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
Important Message
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Socializing
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
Second thoughts about public figure status
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
Ongoing communication
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
Unwanted touching
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
Second Amended Complaint
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Freedom of Information Act Notice
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Recruitment
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
Annie's trip
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
No Subject
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Ghislaine being there
Epstein called Annie's mom and talked to her about Ghislaine being present for a trip.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity