| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DHS and HHS
|
Collaborative interagency |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS / DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Legislative opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative recommendation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Department of Health and Human Services / Department of Homeland Security
|
Proposed collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Kyl
|
Oversight correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Conflict tension |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Victims (McVeigh case)
|
Aligned interest in this specific instance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Jurisdictional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Relatives of trafficking victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NGOs (non-government organizations)
|
Adversarial conflict of interest |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 110(a)(1)(B) that names specific trafficking hotlines, arguin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ objects to parts of Section 201, arguing for the Attorney General's inclusion in cooperat... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on a proposal to lower the T-visa standard from 'unusual and severe harm' t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on extending T-visas to parents and siblings but argues for striking the re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ's analysis and statement of position on proposed amendments to trafficking legislation, s... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case / Non-prosecution agreement. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a propo... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in per... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis and opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation concerning chi... | Internal to the DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to proposed paragraph (11) of an Act, which would add a 'serious and sustained' eff... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amend... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 108 of an Act, which would require the creation of a centralized databas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award... | N/A | View |
| 2017-05-22 | N/A | Department of Justice appointed a special counsel. | United States | View |
| 2013-06-21 | N/A | Criminal charges publicly filed against Snowden. | United States | View |
This document is a page from a transcript of Grand Jury testimony (labeled MM20-GJ TESTIMONY) filed on May 25, 2021, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The visible text involves a prosecutor asking a witness (likely an investigator) about independent corroboration of statements made by 'Jane Does' regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they obtained telephone records to corroborate the statement of a specific redacted individual, proving telephonic contact with another redacted party.
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal decision-making process regarding the notification of victims in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights that prosecutors (Villafaña, Acosta) deliberately chose not to inform victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) or their rights to damages, citing concerns that doing so would compromise the victims' credibility as witnesses and give the appearance of financial motivation. The document specifically references interviews with victim Courtney Wild and others in early 2008 where the existence of the signed NPA was withheld.
A transcript page from a legal proceeding recording a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Leopold accuses Tein of repetitive questioning, while Tein asks Leopold to stop yelling. The argument escalates when Leopold mistakenly calls Tein 'Lewis,' leading to an insult from Leopold suggesting Tein made no impression during a previous three-day evidentiary hearing.
This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons email chain dated August 13, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Sonya Thompson forwards a request to Michael Carvajal and Ray Ormond to 'reconstruct 292 data' for Inmate Epstein (Register No. 76318-054). The '292 data' likely refers to specific correctional logs or rosters.
A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan disputing the government's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The letter details excessive searches, lack of access to discovery materials, and argues that the strict surveillance is a reaction to BOP negligence regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an activity log from Sunday, August 11, 2019 (the day following Jeffrey Epstein's death). It records the movements of a Computer Services Manager and Office of the Inspector General (OIG) agents at the correctional institution. Notably, it documents the seizure/removal of two specific computers (assets FPS 021407270 and FPS 0214207268) by the OIG at 11:15 am.
This document is a legal filing arguing against bail for a defendant, citing the high flight risk due to a potential 35-year sentence and the strong opposition from victims. It emphasizes the strength of the government's evidence, particularly the anticipated testimony of three victims regarding the defendant's role in grooming them for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein.
This document page is an excerpt from the Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Lisa Marie Rocchio, filed as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) on October 29, 2021. It lists her academic presentations and workshops from 1995 to 2011, focusing heavily on trauma psychology, PTSD, ethics, and women's issues. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
This document is a single page (Page 9 of 81) from a Department of Justice public records release (Request No. 17-295). It appears to be part of a fingerprint card or biometric record, labeled 'Right Thumb', but the image itself is entirely redacted. The document is dated 07/26/17 in the footer.
This document is a photocopy of a handwritten note on stationery printed with the name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein'. The handwritten message reads 'saying thank you for the car.' indicating a transaction or gift involving a vehicle. The recipient's name is not clearly visible. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp.
This document is page 5 of a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report dated April 20, 2006, regarding case number 1-05-000368 (commonly associated with the Jeffrey Epstein investigation). It lists demographic data for three female juvenile victims (aged 16, 17, and 16), including birth dates and race, but omits names and specific contact details. The document was released via a public records request in 2017.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report printout dated April 20, 2006, regarding Case No. 1-05-000368 (associated with the Epstein investigation). It lists demographic data for multiple female victims (labeled #4 and #5), including birth dates, race, and victim status (Juvenile vs Adult). The document contains placeholder phone numbers (561/000-0000) and does not list specific names or street addresses.
This document is a page from the prosecution's closing argument (summation) by Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor rebuts the defense's claim that Maxwell was too busy managing Epstein's life (including tasks like ordering sand for his private island and interviewing staff in limos) to be involved in crimes. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell participated in the abuse, lived with Epstein, and knew exactly what was happening with the young girls she interacted with.
This document is an email chain from July 30, 2019, between a partner at the law firm Steptoe & Johnson and a Bureau of Prisons official regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence details a delay in an attorney-conference due to Epstein receiving a shower, haircut, and medical assessment, and coordinates a 2:00 PM phone call between the attorney and the BOP official.
This document is a timeline graphic from a Department of Justice report detailing key events surrounding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) analysis in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It tracks internal DOJ communications, victim notifications, and court actions from 2006 to 2008, with an additional sidebar covering legal developments up to 2020. Key events include the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the deferral of victim notification regarding the plea deal, and subsequent court rulings finding that the U.S. violated the CVRA.
This document is the cover sheet for a 'Suicide Watch Chronological Log' and 'Inmate Companions Log' for inmate Epstein (Register #76318-054) at the MCC. It covers the period from July 23, 2019, to July 24, 2019. It lists specific restricted items allowed for the inmate (such as suicide smock and paper spoon) and indicates the log is Booklet 1 of 1.
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski. The testimony confirms that construction, including the moving of a helipad, occurred in the late 1990s and that Ghislaine Maxwell was 'absolutely' involved in the supervision of it. The witness also confirms a personal connection with Jeffrey Epstein through a shared interest in classic cars.
This document is page 44 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, who argues that Ghislaine Maxwell is being used as a 'scapegoat,' 'target,' and 'stand-in' for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein to satisfy the anger of his victims. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz objects repeatedly during the statement.
This document is a page from a court transcript (opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines upcoming evidence, including flight logs showing Maxwell and Epstein traveling with minors, FedEx records of gifts sent to a 15-year-old victim, and records placing Maxwell and Epstein at an arts camp with a 14-year-old victim named Jane. The statement asserts that this evidence proves the defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic and sexually abuse children.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It records a procedural discussion between Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, Prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge regarding the order of 'alternating strikes' during jury selection. The Judge agrees to allow the defense to start the process because they have ten strikes available.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022, featuring a victim impact statement. The victim details how Epstein and Maxwell used the promise of admission to FIT (Fashion Institute of Technology) to manipulate them, while simultaneously subjecting them to body shaming (calling them a 'piglet'), forced diets (Atkins), and conflicting medical treatments. The victim describes escaping to the U.K. in 2007 and suffering from severe PTSD, anxiety, and depression as a result of the trafficking.
This document is page 167 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the filename). It details Edward Snowden's time at Sheremetyevo Airport and the pressure applied by the FSB for him to cooperate. It highlights quotes from former US intelligence chief Michael Hayden regarding the inevitability of Snowden being exploited by Russian intelligence, and introduces Anatoly Kucherena, a lawyer linked to Putin who took Snowden on as a client. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document is page 142 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, stamped as a House Oversight Committee exhibit. It analyzes Edward Snowden's flight to Russia, comparing it to Cold War spies like Kim Philby to suggest a potential prior intelligence connection. The text disputes Snowden's claim that he was 'trapped' in Russia, detailing how the State Department attempted to facilitate his return to the U.S. to face felony charges, including a specific detail about a typographical error regarding his middle name (James vs. Joseph) in communications with Hong Kong authorities.
This document is page 124 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019612). The text details Edward Snowden's leaks regarding NSA surveillance, specifically the PRISM program and a FISA warrant issued by Judge Roger Vinson compelling Verizon to share customer records. It discusses the legal framework involving the Patriot Act, the USA Freedom Act, and the role of the FISA court.
This document page, marked as evidence for House Oversight, outlines a plan for a monthly seminar series focused on career empowerment and branding. It identifies Kathy Ruemmler as the speaker for the first seminar to be held in NYC on April 5th. The document includes a detailed biography of Ruemmler, highlighting her role at Latham & Watkins, her tenure as White House Counsel under President Obama, and her history as a federal prosecutor in the Enron cases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity