| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DHS and HHS
|
Collaborative interagency |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS / DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Legislative opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative recommendation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Department of Health and Human Services / Department of Homeland Security
|
Proposed collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Kyl
|
Oversight correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Conflict tension |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Victims (McVeigh case)
|
Aligned interest in this specific instance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Jurisdictional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Relatives of trafficking victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NGOs (non-government organizations)
|
Adversarial conflict of interest |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 110(a)(1)(B) that names specific trafficking hotlines, arguin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ objects to parts of Section 201, arguing for the Attorney General's inclusion in cooperat... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on a proposal to lower the T-visa standard from 'unusual and severe harm' t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on extending T-visas to parents and siblings but argues for striking the re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ's analysis and statement of position on proposed amendments to trafficking legislation, s... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case / Non-prosecution agreement. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a propo... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in per... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis and opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation concerning chi... | Internal to the DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to proposed paragraph (11) of an Act, which would add a 'serious and sustained' eff... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amend... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 108 of an Act, which would require the creation of a centralized databas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award... | N/A | View |
| 2017-05-22 | N/A | Department of Justice appointed a special counsel. | United States | View |
| 2013-06-21 | N/A | Criminal charges publicly filed against Snowden. | United States | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard for a 'demonstrative' presentation to the jury, necessitated by COVID-19 restrictions. Sternheim asks if a photo should be taken for the record, and the Court clarifies that demonstratives (like whiteboards) are generally not entered into evidence.
This document is page 110 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies that while she was nude setting up a massage table at Jeffrey Epstein's house, Ghislaine Maxwell entered, touched her breasts, hips, and buttocks, and commented that she had a 'great body for Mr. Epstein and his friends.' The testimony confirms that Epstein entered the room immediately after Maxwell left.
This document is a printout of a MySpace blog page belonging to user 'sublimehottie' (friendID 20425696), printed on December 21, 2005. It contains two blog entries: one from December 10, 2005, describing a fun experience at a Toys For Tots bike rally, and a more somber entry from November 15, 2005, expressing distress about an upcoming move on January 5th and separating from a person named Will. The document is part of a DOJ public records release (17-295) and contains redactions regarding the user's location.
A printout of a private MySpace profile page captured on April 5, 2006. The profile owner's name and photo are redacted or missing ('NO PHOTO'), but the profile ID '65739018' is preserved in the URL footer. The document was processed as part of a DOJ Public Records Request (No. 17-295) on July 26, 2017.
A heavily redacted document, page 8 of 11, from a Department of Justice (DOJ) public records request (17-295), dated July 26, 2017. The page features a large, obscured image with a partially redacted, upside-down caption reading "...STRAIGHT FEMALE...DO HAVE MORE FUN...". The subject matter is indeterminable due to the redactions.
This document is a printout from the 'Albuquerque Tribune Online' archives, dated December 7, 2002 (based on the URL), listing donors who contributed $5,000 each to an unspecified cause (likely a political campaign or charitable fund). The list includes individuals and corporations from various states including New York, California, and New Mexico. The document is part of a Department of Justice public records release (DOJ-OGR-00031251).
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.
This document is the final page (29 of 29) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the end of the court session where the jury is dismissed, and attorneys Ms. Moe (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) confirm they have no further matters. The court adjourns until December 28, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who testifies about her educational background at UCLA and Stanford, establishing her credentials in mathematics and psychology. The questioning focuses on the definition and contents of her Curriculum Vitae (CV) to lay the foundation for further expert testimony.
This document is the final index page (page 267 of 267) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists Government and Defendant exhibits received into evidence, along with the corresponding transcript page numbers where they were received. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion where the Judge instructs Defense Attorney Mr. Pagliuca to provide witness lists and exhibits, noting that the Government (represented here by Ms. Moe) is expected to rest its case that week. The proceedings are briefly interrupted by an unexplained noise, which the Judge jokingly refers to as 'the ghost of Friday.'
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains defense arguments asserting that Ghislaine Maxwell did not 'entice' a victim known as 'Jane' to travel for illegal purposes, arguing that return trips to Palm Beach do not constitute enticement to commit crimes in New York. The defense emphasizes testimony stating that Jeffrey Epstein's office typically handled travel arrangements, with Maxwell only occasionally assisting.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed August 10, 2022) documenting the cross-examination of Ms. Chapell by attorney Mr. Everdell. They are reviewing Government's Exhibit 803-R, a FedEx invoice dated October 14, 2002, associated with Jeffrey Epstein's account at 457 Madison Avenue, New York. The testimony confirms a specific shipment occurred on October 7, 2002.
This document is a court transcript (page 212 of 262) from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers in the US v. Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony confirms details of a specific flight log entry (Flight 1105) dated May 3, 1998, traveling from Palm Beach to Teterboro. The witness confirms the identities of the passengers, including Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, her assistant Emmy Taylor, the Dubin family (Glenn, Eva, and their children), and Gwendolyn Beck.
This document is page 205 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by attorney Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on challenging Rodgers' memory of a meeting with a person named 'Jane' on November 11, 1996, establishing that the date is derived solely from flight logs which only list a first name—a name shared by others in Epstein's circle, including an assistant. The page concludes with the introduction of sealed exhibits LV3A and LV3B to the jury.
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). Rodgers admits that his previous statement to the government—that he first met 'Jane' around 2000—was based on memory without researching his logbooks and was 'a couple of years off.' The attorney points out that flight logs from 1996, 1997, and 1998 show a passenger with Jane's first name, establishing an earlier connection than Rodgers initially recalled.
This document is a page from a court transcript (direct examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony concerns a specific flight on July 26, 1991, piloted by Rodgers from Teterboro, NJ to Palm Beach, FL, carrying Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and two other passengers. The witness also describes general procedures for how they were informed of passenger manifests by a secretary.
This is the final signature page (page 7 of 7) of a court document filed on June 26, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It lists attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Brittany N. Henderson of the law firm Edwards Pottinger, LLC as the submitters, including their contact information in Fort Lauderdale, FL.
This document is a fully redacted page from a court filing dated June 24, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). No content is visible other than the court header and the Department of Justice Bates stamp.
This document is a separator page designated as 'Exhibit F'. It is part of a larger court filing (Document 663) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 15, 2022. It bears a Department of Justice production stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010503.
This document is a page from a court transcript index (Page 382, A-5839) listing exhibits received into evidence. It lists Government Exhibits 10 and 28, and Defendant Exhibits PMD 4 and PMD 27, alongside the page numbers where they were received (358, 312, and 245 respectively). The document was filed on March 21, 2022, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
This document is page 71 of 117 from a court filing (Exhibit A-5914) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on Feb 24, 2022. The content is a transcript from a different legal proceeding (likely a tax fraud case involving Deutsche Bank) where attorney Mr. Shechtman argues about 'ineffective assistance' and 'prejudice,' comparing the situations of a Mr. Parse and Mr. Brubaker. The text discusses bank records, backdating allegations, and the cross-examination of a government cooperator by the Kramer Levin firm.
This document is a page from the Curriculum Vitae of legal ethics professor Stephen Gillers, listed as 'Page 13 of 29' in a 2012 court filing and 'Page 40 of 117' in a 2022 filing. It lists his academic publications and articles ranging from 1999 to 2011, focusing on legal ethics, settlement agreements, and attorney conduct. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, indicating it was processed by the Department of Justice Office of Government Relations.
This is the cover page for the Government's Omnibus Memorandum opposing the defendant's pre-trial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S1 20 Cr. 330). The document was filed on April 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, and lists the prosecution team led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity