Trove
Sign In Sign Up

DOJ (Department of Justice)

Organization
Mentions
432
Relationships
13
Events
29
Documents
197
Also known as:
Department of Justice The Department / DOJ (Department of Justice) USDOJ (Department of Justice) DOJ (Department of Justice) - implied by footer stamp DOJ (Department of Justice) - implied by Bates stamp DOJ (Department of Justice) - Implied DOJ (Department of Justice) - Implied by ODAG
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
13 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person DHS and HHS
Collaborative interagency
6
1
View
organization Department of State
Inter agency disagreement
6
1
View
person HHS / DHS
Collaborative
5
1
View
organization Non-government organizations (NGOs)
Legislative opposition
5
1
View
person HHS and DHS
Collaborative recommendation
5
1
View
person Department of Health and Human Services / Department of Homeland Security
Proposed collaboration
5
1
View
person Senator Kyl
Oversight correspondence
5
1
View
person Donald Trump
Conflict tension
5
1
View
person Victims (McVeigh case)
Aligned interest in this specific instance
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization Department of State
Jurisdictional conflict
5
1
View
person Relatives of trafficking victims
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization NGOs (non-government organizations)
Adversarial conflict of interest
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... N/A View
N/A N/A Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections. N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ opposes language in Section 110(a)(1)(B) that names specific trafficking hotlines, arguin... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ objects to parts of Section 201, arguing for the Attorney General's inclusion in cooperat... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ defers to DHS on a proposal to lower the T-visa standard from 'unusual and severe harm' t... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ defers to DHS on extending T-visas to parents and siblings but argues for striking the re... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ's analysis and statement of position on proposed amendments to trafficking legislation, s... Not specified View
N/A N/A Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case / Non-prosecution agreement. Florida View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a ... N/A View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a propo... United States View
N/A N/A DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in per... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. N/A View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... Not applicable View
N/A N/A Analysis and opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation concerning chi... Internal to the DOJ View
N/A N/A Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... Not specified View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to proposed paragraph (11) of an Act, which would add a 'serious and sustained' eff... N/A View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amend... Not applicable View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to Section 108 of an Act, which would require the creation of a centralized databas... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award... N/A View
2017-05-22 N/A Department of Justice appointed a special counsel. United States View
2013-06-21 N/A Criminal charges publicly filed against Snowden. United States View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051.jpg

This document is page 72 of a legal analysis (likely by Paul Cassell) labeled with a House Oversight Bates number. It argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) applies during the investigative phase of a case, before formal charges are filed. The text cites specific statutory language regarding 'detection' and 'investigation' obligations of the DOJ and venue provisions for pre-prosecution situations to support this interpretation.

Legal analysis / law review article (page 72) submitted as house oversight exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014040.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a law review article (dated roughly 2014) included in a House Oversight investigation. It discusses the legal interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on whether victims' rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a 2010 DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion which argued rights do not attach during investigations, and notes that non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) allow prosecutors to avoid notifying victims—a key legal issue in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text mentions Senator Jon Kyl's objection to this DOJ interpretation.

Legal article / law review page (likely part of a congressional oversight report)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021675.jpg

This document is page 3 of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg to the FBI on April 16, 2010. The letter requests all records regarding the monitoring, surveillance, or investigation of Epstein, specifically asking for searches in the Central Records System and Electronic Surveillance indices. The requester preauthorizes up to $1,000 in processing fees and demands justification for any withheld information.

Legal correspondence / foia request
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021563.jpg

This document is a page from an informational brochure or FAQ regarding the Victim Notification System (VNS). It provides instructions on what to do if a PIN is forgotten, how the automated call system functions when a user is unavailable, and how to access the VNS website to register or log in. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional document production.

Informational brochure / faq sheet
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020357.jpg

This document page, part of a House Oversight record, details an interview with Russian lawyer Anatoly Kucherena regarding his representation of Edward Snowden. It describes their first meeting on July 12, 2013, at Sheremetyevo Airport, where Kucherena advised Snowden to withdraw asylum petitions to other countries to secure sanctuary in Russia. The text also covers a subsequent meeting with human rights organizations where Snowden formally requested asylum in Russia.

Interview transcript / investigative report (house oversight committee)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020310.jpg

This document page (158) details the history of NSA surveillance expansion following the 9/11 attacks, specifically focusing on the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. It discusses the conflict between government intelligence gathering and privacy advocates (hacktivists), the technical measures taken to bypass encryption/TOR, and the subsequent bureaucratic compliance framework established involving the DOJ and DOD. While part of a larger House Oversight cache, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.

Government report / congressional oversight document
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020292.jpg

This document page, bearing a House Oversight stamp, details the legal maneuvering surrounding Edward Snowden's NSA leaks. It focuses on the involvement of ACLU lawyer Ben Wizner, who was brought in by journalists Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald to represent Snowden. The text outlines the legal challenges Wizner faced in seeking amnesty for Snowden, particularly distinguishing Snowden's actions from previous whistleblowers and managing the narrative regarding whether classified documents were taken to Russia.

Narrative report / manuscript excerpt
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020284.jpg

This document discusses the likelihood of Edward Snowden's cooperation with Russian security services (FSB) following his arrival in Russia. It cites experts like Andrei Soldatov and General Oleg Kalugin, who argue that the FSB would inevitably control and exploit Snowden, and details how lawyer Anatoly Kucherena facilitated Snowden's stay in Moscow under Kremlin-dictated terms.

Government/congressional report page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020237.jpg

This document, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, details the logistical coordination behind the 2013 NSA leaks involving Edward Snowden, Laura Poitras, and Glenn Greenwald. It describes a clandestine meeting on April 19, 2013, in a New York Marriott where Poitras introduced Greenwald to communications from Snowden (alias 'Citizen 4') while employing strict operational security measures to avoid surveillance. The text also notes the alignment between Snowden's mission statement and Greenwald's public criticism of the 'Surveillance State.'

Government report / investigative narrative (house oversight committee exhibit)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020234.jpg

This page details the initial encrypted communications between Edward Snowden and filmmaker Laura Poitras in early 2013, highlighting the extreme security precautions Snowden demanded. It contrasts Snowden's willingness to leak classified documents with previous whistleblower William Binney, who exposed the "Stellar Wind" program but refused to violate secrecy oaths or provide documents.

Government report / investigative document
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018392.jpg

This document appears to be page 160 of a book or report included in a House Oversight investigation file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018392). The text discusses the economic theories of 'Arthur' (likely W. Brian Arthur) regarding 'network effects' and 'increasing returns' in the technology sector. It analyzes the monopolistic dominance of companies like Microsoft, Google, and Facebook, noting how user adoption creates a lock-in effect that stifles competition.

Publication excerpt / evidence file
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030433.jpg

This editorial from the Sun Sentinel, reprinted in The Virgin Islands Daily News, heavily criticizes the U.S. government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that the lenient 2007 non-prosecution agreement, brokered by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, was illegal, violated victims' rights, and was shrouded in secrecy to protect Epstein. The article calls on Judge Kenneth Marra to void the agreement, rejecting the Department of Justice's current stance that the deal must stand despite the acknowledged failures.

Newspaper opinion page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026463.jpg

This document is an email chain from December 2, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (from 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Larry Summers. The conversation, with the subject 'Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?', begins with cryptic messages about an 'easter egg hunt' involving 'your friend andrew'. It concludes with a lengthy, high-importance email from Epstein analyzing the constitutional authority of President Trump in comparison to past presidents like Bush and Nixon, with references to Comey and the Flynn investigation.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026252.jpg

This document is a page from a U.S. House of Representatives oversight report detailing alleged misconduct by the FBI and DOJ regarding the Steele dossier. It claims officials concealed the dossier's unverified nature, the anti-Trump bias of its author, and related conflicts of interest from the FISC when obtaining a surveillance warrant. This document is related to the 2016 election investigation and contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.

U.s. house of representatives committee report/memorandum page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026251.jpg

This document excerpt alleges that material information was omitted from the Carter Page FISA application. It claims the application failed to disclose that the "Steele dossier" was funded by the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign. It also asserts that a Yahoo News article used for corroboration was actually based on information leaked by Christopher Steele himself, a fact the application incorrectly assessed.

Government investigative report excerpt
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026249.jpg

This document is a letter from Donald F. McGahn II, Counsel to the President, announcing the President's authorization to declassify a specific memorandum. The decision was made after a review involving the White House, DNI, and DOJ, citing 'significant public interest.' The document is cc'd to Speaker Paul Ryan and Ranking Member Adam Schiff and does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Official letter
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022256.jpg

This document summarizes articles from The Daily Beast about Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his lenient 2007 plea deal for sex offenses and subsequent special treatment, such as using his own private psychologist for a court-required evaluation. It highlights Epstein's financial relationship with Jean Luc Brunel, who received $1 million and whose modeling agency, MC2, recruited girls who flew on Epstein's private jets. The document concludes with a statement from Epstein's lawyer asserting his client's full compliance with legal agreements.

News article summary / web post
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012392.jpg

This document is a legal and historical memorandum, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012392', which compiles precedents regarding the separation of powers within the U.S. government. It cites historical statements, letters, and congressional reports to explore the President's authority to challenge or refuse to implement legislation deemed unconstitutional. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals or events.

Legal or research memorandum, likely for a congressional committee, citing historical precedents on executive power.
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012384.jpg

This document is page 13 of a letter from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski to members of several congressional committees. The letter proposes an amendment to the "2005 reauthorization" to mandate collaboration between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice (Attorney General), and Homeland Security regarding a pilot program for victims. The letter states that the Office of Management and Budget has no objection to this proposal on behalf of the Administration.

Official government correspondence / letter
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.

Doj legislative analysis memo
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis objecting to three sections of a proposed anti-trafficking act. The DOJ argues against Section 107 on separation of powers grounds, Section 108 for proposing a logistically difficult and insecure interagency database, and Section 109 for interfering with the President's policy-making authority. The document is part of a larger collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' but does not contain any specific information about Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.

Governmental legal analysis / legislative commentary
2025-11-17
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018738.jpg

This document is a 'Tenant Overview' for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), sourced from a real estate investment report by Stan Johnson Company concerning a property in St. Thomas, USVI. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018738', details the organizational structure, budget (FY2008), and high credit rating of USCIS to establish it as a reliable tenant. Despite the user's prompt and the mention of St. Thomas in the footer, the content of this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related activities.

Tenant overview from a real estate investment report
2025-11-16
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search