DOJ (Department of Justice)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DHS and HHS
|
Collaborative interagency |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS / DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Legislative opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative recommendation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Department of Health and Human Services / Department of Homeland Security
|
Proposed collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Kyl
|
Oversight correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Conflict tension |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Victims (McVeigh case)
|
Aligned interest in this specific instance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Jurisdictional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Relatives of trafficking victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NGOs (non-government organizations)
|
Adversarial conflict of interest |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 110(a)(1)(B) that names specific trafficking hotlines, arguin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ objects to parts of Section 201, arguing for the Attorney General's inclusion in cooperat... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on a proposal to lower the T-visa standard from 'unusual and severe harm' t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on extending T-visas to parents and siblings but argues for striking the re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ's analysis and statement of position on proposed amendments to trafficking legislation, s... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case / Non-prosecution agreement. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a propo... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in per... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis and opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation concerning chi... | Internal to the DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to proposed paragraph (11) of an Act, which would add a 'serious and sustained' eff... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amend... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 108 of an Act, which would require the creation of a centralized databas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award... | N/A | View |
| 2017-05-22 | N/A | Department of Justice appointed a special counsel. | United States | View |
| 2013-06-21 | N/A | Criminal charges publicly filed against Snowden. | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031671.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner regarding General Michael Flynn. It argues that General Flynn is exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege to decline a Congressional subpoena for documents, citing that the act of production is testimonial in nature and could be used against him in ongoing investigations, including one by a newly appointed special counsel. The document cites legal precedents including *Watkins v. United States* and *United States v. Hubbell* to support the refusal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.jpg
This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein via the address jeevacation@gmail.com). The emails contain significant redactions under privilege, but the visible content is a forwarded Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article details the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recusing itself from the Epstein case and the Department of Justice reassigning the victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031398.jpg
This document is a page from a Washington Post article printout containing a statement from Martin G. Weinberg, an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg defends Epstein's plea deal, asserting it was fairly negotiated, rigorously reviewed by the Department of Justice, and that Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations including jail time and probation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016541.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of prosecutorial discretion, federal versus state enforcement redundancy, and political accountability in the context of police violence and other crimes. It highlights the 'executive separation of powers' model and the limitations of democratic accountability for elected state prosecutors. The page also contains numerous footnotes citing legal precedents, government reports, and academic works related to the Department of Justice and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017721.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article attached as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation, bearing the name of Epstein attorney David Schoen. The text discusses the legal limitations of the Victims' Rights Act and the Crime Victims' Rights Act, specifically analyzing the *United States v. McVeigh* (Oklahoma City bombing) case where victims were denied certain rights despite statutory protections. It argues that statutory measures often fail due to judicial interpretation and bureaucratic inertia, leading advocates to push for a constitutional amendment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017719.jpg
This document outlines the history and development of federal victims' rights legislation, beginning with the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982. It details subsequent acts and the resulting Department of Justice guidelines that established protocols for treating crime victims, including notification requirements and the right to confer with prosecutors. The text also highlights the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990, which created a comprehensive list of procedural rights for victims in the federal criminal justice process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017706.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 71 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the Advisory Committee's proposed rules improperly limit the venue for asserting victims' rights to cases where prosecution is already underway, potentially failing to protect victims during the investigation phase (pre-charge) when rights to fairness and dignity might be violated by federal agents. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation file, likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case and the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017701.jpg
This document is page 66 of 78 from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on the necessity of providing notice to victims regarding court proceedings and the funding allocated to the DOJ for notification systems. The text argues that failure to notify victims of proceedings renders their rights useless and discusses proposed rules for how courts should handle situations where a victim was not notified.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017626.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis (likely a law journal article or brief) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, indicated by the Bates stamp. It discusses the legal definition of a 'target' of investigation by the DOJ and argues for a parallel definition for 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Section B specifically applies this legal test to the Jeffrey Epstein case, stating as fact that he sexually abused over thirty minor girls between 2001 and 2007.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017615.jpg
This document is a page from a legal text (likely a law journal article or brief by David Schoen) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques a 2011 Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum which argued that Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) rights only attach after formal criminal proceedings are initiated. The text argues this position is 'unpersuasive' and 'disingenuous' because the DOJ routinely identifies victims earlier, such as during grand jury investigations or under the VRRA of 1990.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017611.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal journal article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victim rights should apply before formal charges are filed. It uses the Jeffrey Epstein case as a primary example of failure in the system, noting that federal prosecutors negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein that barred federal charges for sex offenses against dozens of victims without informing them. The text highlights the outrage of victims 'Jane Doe Number One' and 'Jane Doe Number Two' upon discovering their rights to object had been bargained away secretly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (Page 2 of 31) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and whether victim rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a conflict between a 2010 DOJ OLC opinion, which argued rights do not attach pre-charging, and Senator Jon Kyl, who argued they do. The text specifically uses the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case in Florida as a concrete example of the controversy, noting that victims argued they should have been consulted regarding his non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017586.jpg
The document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from technology, media, finance, government, and military sectors. It appears to be an attendee list or briefing document for an event, detailing the current roles and backgrounds of figures such as General Stan McChrystal, Max Levchin, and Jorge Lemann. The document is marked with a House Oversight footer, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010546.jpg
This document is an excerpt from 'Chapter 55' of a larger work, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case between 2005 and 2009, noting the involvement of the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney. The text discusses jurisdictional issues (state vs. federal), the hiring of underage females for massages, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy (presumably Roy Black). The right side of the page is cut off, obscuring the ends of many sentences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011927.jpg
This document is a printout of a Daily Beast article from July 29, 2010, reporting that the DOJ was investigating Jeffrey Epstein for child trafficking following his release from jail on lesser charges. It highlights that the FBI was also investigating Epstein's friend Jean Luc Brunel and his MC2 modeling agency for allegedly sourcing girls from overseas for Epstein. The article discusses the legal implications of the non-prosecution agreement versus potential new federal charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013407.jpg
This document is page 2 of a printout from the website 'Main Justice' dated April 7, 2011. The specific article referenced in the header and URL ('Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act') relates to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement Jeffrey Epstein received from Miami prosecutors (Alexander Acosta's office), though the body text for that article is not visible on this page. The visible content consists primarily of sidebar links to Department of Justice news releases regarding various financial penalties, fraud cases, and speeches by Attorney General Eric Holder and Associate AG Tom Perrelli.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029168.jpg
This document outlines a timeline of events spanning from early 2017 to July 2017 involving the President, FBI Director James Comey, and the investigation into Russian interference. It details the President's requests to Comey to end the Flynn investigation and "lift the cloud," Comey's subsequent firing, the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and the President's alleged attempt to fire Mueller and cover up the nature of the Trump Tower meeting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025545.jpg
This document appears to be a personal narrative or draft written by Jeffrey Epstein reflecting on his legal representation and crimes. He criticizes his lawyers, Lewis and Tein, accusing them of celebrating his ongoing legal troubles for the sake of fees, and explicitly admits to being a 'john' who paid for sex while attempting to minimize the severity of his crimes by comparing them to jaywalking and claiming state attorneys found 'no real victims.' He discusses the age of consent in New York versus Florida and argues that the women involved were knowing participants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029424.jpg
James Robertson, Senior Managing Editor of the National Enquirer, submits a formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the FBI seeking all records regarding the investigation and prosecution of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The letter outlines Epstein's background, his plea deal, and mentions connections to high-profile figures such as Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029417.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Case 1:17-cv-03956-PGG) outlining the facts behind a FOIA request regarding the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details Epstein's 2005 investigation, his lenient plea deal, his connections to Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, and a subsequent 2017 FOIA request by James Robertson of The National Enquirer seeking FBI records on the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029416.jpg
This document is the first page of a civil complaint filed on May 25, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Radar Online LLC, is suing the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to compel the release of records regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking. The document establishes the parties, jurisdiction, and the nature of the action.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029413.jpg
This document is a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by James Robertson, Senior Managing Editor of The National Enquirer, to the FBI on April 20, 2017. The request seeks all documents related to the FBI's investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, citing his background as a sex offender and alleged connections to prominent political figures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029405.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal complaint filed on May 25, 2017, in the Southern District of New York by Radar Online LLC against the FBI. The lawsuit seeks to compel the FBI to release records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking. The document establishes the parties involved and the court's jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014073.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic article (Vol. 104, likely by Paul Cassell) analyzing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details that the FBI found abuse allegations against Epstein credible and presented the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Florida, which then negotiated a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The text argues that victims should have been notified and allowed to confer with prosecutors once substantial evidence was developed, rather than being excluded from the plea negotiation process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity