DOJ (Department of Justice)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DHS and HHS
|
Collaborative interagency |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS / DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Legislative opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative recommendation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Department of Health and Human Services / Department of Homeland Security
|
Proposed collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Kyl
|
Oversight correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Conflict tension |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Victims (McVeigh case)
|
Aligned interest in this specific instance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Jurisdictional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Relatives of trafficking victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NGOs (non-government organizations)
|
Adversarial conflict of interest |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 110(a)(1)(B) that names specific trafficking hotlines, arguin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ objects to parts of Section 201, arguing for the Attorney General's inclusion in cooperat... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on a proposal to lower the T-visa standard from 'unusual and severe harm' t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ defers to DHS on extending T-visas to parents and siblings but argues for striking the re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ's analysis and statement of position on proposed amendments to trafficking legislation, s... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case / Non-prosecution agreement. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a propo... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in per... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis and opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation concerning chi... | Internal to the DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to proposed paragraph (11) of an Act, which would add a 'serious and sustained' eff... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amend... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 108 of an Act, which would require the creation of a centralized databas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award... | N/A | View |
| 2017-05-22 | N/A | Department of Justice appointed a special counsel. | United States | View |
| 2013-06-21 | N/A | Criminal charges publicly filed against Snowden. | United States | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017907.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a psychologist, who is establishing his credentials by detailing his leadership roles within the American Psychological Association (specifically the division of trauma psychology and ethics committee) and his state psychological association.
DOJ-OGR-00017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Besselsen. Besselsen testifies about their oversight of the finance department at Interlochen and confirms the institution's business practices regarding the retention of records for major donors, including letters, emails, and call notes. The testimony establishes the foundation for admitting these donor communications as business records.
DOJ-OGR-00017683.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies or gaps in Jane's memory regarding whether Ghislaine Maxwell was present for, or touched Jane during, sexual encounters (specifically oral sex) with Jeffrey Epstein, and what Jane previously told the government about these details.
DOJ-OGR-00014943.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on the 'victim-selection model' as the first stage of grooming, discussing how offenders choose victims based on specific vulnerability factors established by professional literature and offender interviews.
DOJ-OGR-00014832.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330). In this statement, Maxwell addresses the court, acknowledging the suffering of the victims and admitting her conviction for helping Jeffrey Epstein. She attempts to distance herself by characterizing Epstein as a manipulative man who fooled everyone, while stating that meeting him was the greatest regret of her life.
DOJ-OGR-00014758.jpg
This page is a transcript from the sentencing phase of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 22, 2022. The judge rules on defense objections regarding the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) concerning three specific individuals: Jane, Kate, and Annie. The court affirms that testimony showed Maxwell facilitated sexual acts for Jane and recruited Kate for massages, but agrees to amend the record to state Kate was above the age of consent.
DOJ-OGR-00008435.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information and signatures of Maxwell's defense attorneys: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00008296.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in court on December 9, 2021. Maxwell is being questioned about a 'book' (likely a contact book) belonging to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding a large list of masseuses located in Florida. Maxwell claims the specific version of the book presented was created after her 'departure' and states she does not know the qualifications of the people listed, while her attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00008288.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in December 2021. Maxwell is questioned about her role in maintaining contact information for Jeffrey Epstein, confirming that she would pass numbers to an assistant to enter into a computer. The questioning attorney also asks specifically about the existence of a 'hardcopy book' relevant to Epstein's life, likely referring to the infamous 'Black Book,' though the answer is cut off by an objection and the end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00001000.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell based on the case number) dated June 15, 2020. It provides a string citation of legal precedents from the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) where judges denied pre-trial bail to defendants during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the defendants citing various health conditions like asthma and diabetes. The text argues that health risks alone have not been sufficient grounds for release in recent comparable cases.
DOJ-OGR-00000962.jpg
This document is a page from a legal defense filing arguing against the pre-trial detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her US citizenship since 1991 and strong family ties in the US to counter the government's argument that she is a flight risk. The defense disputes the government's claim that she was 'hiding,' asserting she was in regular contact with authorities through counsel since Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00000852.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural updates in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions of discovery deadlines, and disputes over the disclosure of materials and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC. Judge Nathan issued orders requiring the parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00000751.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 29, 2025, concerning the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The Government argues for disclosure based on intense public interest and the 'magnitude and abhorrence' of Epstein's crimes, while noting that victim identification will be redacted. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum and details the dates of the original grand jury proceedings in 2019, 2020, and 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000719.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript from the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490) filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a harrowing victim impact statement describing forceful sexual penetration, psychological manipulation, threats of ruin ("I'll bury you"), and the routine nature of paid sexual encounters at Epstein's mansion. The victim describes the involvement of assistants who managed the schedule and witnessed Epstein bragging about the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00000530.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, in the case of USA v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490). Prosecutor Rossmiller describes search warrant materials containing numerous photos of nude women and young girls, noting that one individual in the photos has self-identified as a victim. The discussion also covers the defendant's sex offender registration in New York, confirming he is classified at the 'highest status of risk for re-offense.'
DOJ-OGR-00000289.jpg
This document is the final page (16 of 16) of a legal filing submitted on July 11, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (the federal case against Jeffrey Epstein). The page contains only the contact information and signature block for attorney Marc Allan Fernich.
DOJ-OGR-00020847.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed as part of an appeal in 2023) documenting a dispute between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Everdell) regarding jury instructions. The issue concerns a jury question about 'Count Four' and potential confusion between New York and New Mexico laws. The Judge shuts down the debate and decides to refer the jury back to the original charge.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019045.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' recollection of Sarah Kellen's phone number and the general logistical protocols for scheduling flights for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding necessary details like destination and departure time.
DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The defense attorney (Ms. Menninger) and the prosecutor (Mr. Rohrbach) are discussing a potential witness named Brian before the Judge. The government has decided not to call Brian, and the defense is debating whether to call him despite having him under subpoena, due to concerns about his prior inconsistent statements regarding his sister and the risk of opening the door to prior consistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00018508.jpg
This document is page 171 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh, focusing on the definitions and distinctions between 'signatory authority' and 'power of attorney' regarding bank accounts. The questioning establishes that an account holder can authorize others to sign checks or hold power of attorney over their finances.
DOJ-OGR-00018416.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her background as a musician and singer, her time living in the South of France at age 16 or 17, and her production of an album. The witness explicitly denies a suggestion by the attorney that she was discovered by the musician Seal at a piano bar.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity