DOJ (Department of Justice)

Organization
Mentions
432
Relationships
13
Events
29
Documents
197
Also known as:
Department of Justice The Department / DOJ (Department of Justice) USDOJ (Department of Justice) DOJ (Department of Justice) - implied by footer stamp DOJ (Department of Justice) - implied by Bates stamp DOJ (Department of Justice) - Implied DOJ (Department of Justice) - Implied by ODAG

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
13 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person DHS and HHS
Collaborative interagency
6
1
View
organization Department of State
Inter agency disagreement
6
1
View
person HHS / DHS
Collaborative
5
1
View
organization Non-government organizations (NGOs)
Legislative opposition
5
1
View
person HHS and DHS
Collaborative recommendation
5
1
View
person Department of Health and Human Services / Department of Homeland Security
Proposed collaboration
5
1
View
person Senator Kyl
Oversight correspondence
5
1
View
person Donald Trump
Conflict tension
5
1
View
person Victims (McVeigh case)
Aligned interest in this specific instance
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization Department of State
Jurisdictional conflict
5
1
View
person Relatives of trafficking victims
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization NGOs (non-government organizations)
Adversarial conflict of interest
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... N/A View
N/A N/A Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections. N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ opposes language in Section 110(a)(1)(B) that names specific trafficking hotlines, arguin... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ objects to parts of Section 201, arguing for the Attorney General's inclusion in cooperat... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ defers to DHS on a proposal to lower the T-visa standard from 'unusual and severe harm' t... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ defers to DHS on extending T-visas to parents and siblings but argues for striking the re... N/A View
N/A N/A The DOJ's analysis and statement of position on proposed amendments to trafficking legislation, s... Not specified View
N/A N/A Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case / Non-prosecution agreement. Florida View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a ... N/A View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a propo... United States View
N/A N/A DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in per... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. N/A View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... Not applicable View
N/A N/A Analysis and opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation concerning chi... Internal to the DOJ View
N/A N/A Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... Not specified View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to proposed paragraph (11) of an Act, which would add a 'serious and sustained' eff... N/A View
N/A N/A The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amend... Not applicable View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to Section 108 of an Act, which would require the creation of a centralized databas... N/A View
N/A N/A DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award... N/A View
2017-05-22 N/A Department of Justice appointed a special counsel. United States View
2013-06-21 N/A Criminal charges publicly filed against Snowden. United States View

DOJ-OGR-00016061.jpg

This document is page 13 of 15 of a FedEx invoice (Invoice Number 4-495-33932) dated December 16, 2002. It provides a 'FedEx Ground Summary' detailing a prepaid ground shipment sent on December 5th weighing 3.0 lbs costing $5.21, and a weekly service charge of $11.00 applied on December 6th, totaling $16.21 for this section. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00016061.

Financial record (invoice)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015663.jpg

This document is a photograph submitted as Government Exhibit 347 in a criminal case (S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)). The image, bearing the Department of Justice control number DOJ-OGR-00015663, depicts Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell sitting closely together on the porch of a log cabin. The body language in the photo suggests a close personal relationship and was likely used as evidence to establish their association.

Photograph (legal exhibit)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015656.jpg

This document is a photograph, designated as Government Exhibit 340 from the U.S. Department of Justice for the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), which is the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The image shows Maxwell smiling while holding an unidentified person's foot in an informal setting. The document's primary significance is its use as evidence by the prosecution in a federal criminal trial.

Photograph (legal exhibit)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015641.jpg

This document is a photograph entered as Government Exhibit 318 in the case 52 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It depicts Ghislaine Maxwell kissing Jeffrey Epstein on the cheek while embracing him outdoors near a body of water. Epstein is wearing sunglasses and a t-shirt with the word 'Illusion' written on it.

Photograph / government exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015603.jpg

This document is a photograph labeled as 'Government Exhibit 268' for the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image displays a desk with a telephone, notebook, and other office items in a room with a black and white checkered floor. The document is marked with the Department of Justice identifier DOJ-OGR-00015603.

Legal document / photograph exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015594.jpg

This image is a U.S. Department of Justice photograph, labeled as Government Exhibit 256 from the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). It depicts a desk laden with office equipment and papers, including several notepads personalized with the name "Jeffrey E. Epstein," strongly suggesting the desk belongs to him. The contents provide a glimpse into an office environment, but most of the documents are illegible.

Photograph (government exhibit)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015586.jpg

This document is a photograph labeled "Government Exhibit 247-R" for a legal case, identified by the number DOJ-OGR-00015586. The image displays a bookshelf containing a collection of books primarily on the subjects of science, evolution, philosophy, and skepticism, with authors such as Stephen Jay Gould and James Randi being identifiable. The specific context of the legal case is not provided, but the selection of books may be relevant to the case's subject matter.

Legal exhibit photograph
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015579.jpg

This document is a photograph from the Department of Justice, labeled 'Government Exhibit 238' for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows a home office setup with a desk, multiple computers, a printer, and other electronic equipment, likely documented as evidence in a legal investigation.

Legal exhibit (photograph)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015547.jpg

This document is a photograph marked as Government Exhibit 206 for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The image depicts the exterior back patio of a white two-story residence featuring large sliding glass doors, palm trees, blue planters, and a white patio table set. A tracking number DOJ-OGR-00015547 is printed in the bottom right margin.

Photograph / government exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015506.jpg

This document consists of four telephone message slips, all addressed to a person named Jeffrey. Three of the messages are dated January 24, 2005, and document calls from various numbers, with messages such as 'She called' and 'She has a female friend for you.' A fourth message, taken by someone named Cecilia, notes a call from a redacted party and mentions that the call will be logged in a sheet.

Telephone message slips
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015440.jpg

This document is page 13 of 15 of a FedEx invoice (Number 4-495-33932) dated December 16, 2002, for Account Number 1144-2081-6. It details 'FedEx Ground Summary' charges, including a prepaid ground shipment on December 5, 2002, and a weekly service charge on December 6, 2002, totaling $16.21 for the page. The document bears 'CONFIDENTIAL' stamps and Bates numbers associated with the SDNY and DOJ.

Financial record (invoice)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015360.jpg

This document is Page 2 of 5 of a FedEx invoice dated November 18, 2002 (Invoice #4-447-92160). It is a blank 'Adjustment Request' form intended to be faxed to FedEx to dispute charges or update account information. The specific account number listed is 1144-2081-6. The document bears 'CONFIDENTIAL' markings and Bates stamps from the SDNY and DOJ, indicating it is part of a legal production.

Fedex adjustment request form / invoice attachment
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015305.jpg

This document is a 'Find Report' of 'All Transactions' from Shoppers Travel, Inc., dated April 27, 2016, covering invoices from October 1999 through January 2000. It serves as a financial ledger listing specific invoice numbers, dates, amounts, and names of individuals such as Ghislaine Maxwell, George Mitchell, Melanie Walker, and others associated with the account. The document tracks a running balance exceeding $1.2 million and is marked with Department of Justice and SDNY identifiers, indicating its use as evidence.

Financial report / invoice ledger (shoppers travel, inc.)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015293.jpg

This document is a 'Find Report' from Shoppers Travel, Inc. listing financial transactions (invoices) from October 30, 2003, to October 1, 2004. It details travel expenses for numerous individuals in Jeffrey Epstein's circle, including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Marvin Minsky, and Dr. Mehmet Oz. The report includes invoice numbers, dates, names, specific amounts, and a running balance, with several names redacted by the DOJ.

Financial record / transaction report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002378(1).jpg

This document is a cover sheet labeled 'EXHIBIT B' for a court filing submitted on February 4, 2021. It serves as page 1 of 23 for Document 134-2 in the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002378.

Legal exhibit cover page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002343(1).jpg

This document is page 2 of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Sophia Papapetru, a Staff Attorney for the Federal Bureau of Prisons at MDC Brooklyn, requests the judge vacate an order from January 15, 2021, and restore the previous schedule for laptop access (Monday through Friday, 7:00 AM – 8:00 PM), presumably for the defendant's legal preparation.

Court filing / legal correspondence
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030498.jpg

This document is a printout of a MySpace 'View All Friends' page for a user with the profile name 'YA FUCK YOU 2!!!!!!' (Friend ID 76552710), dated June 13, 2006. It lists 41 friends with profile pictures and usernames, including standard profiles like 'Tom' and various personal handles. The document was processed as part of a Department of Justice Public Records Request (No. 17-295) and printed on July 26, 2017.

Webpage printout / evidence file
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022047.jpg

This document is a cover page for 'Exhibit B' contained within a larger court filing. It is identified as Document 33, filed on April 9, 2020, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). The page contains a Department of Justice bates stamp at the bottom.

Court filing exhibit cover page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021928.jpg

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York, dated November 19, 2019, signed by District Judge Analisa Torres. The order schedules an initial conference for defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty the night of Jeffrey Epstein's death) for November 25, 2019, at the United States Courthouse in New York.

Court order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021378.jpg

This page from an OPR report critiques the USAO's handling of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically regarding the failure to seize Epstein's computers. It details how prosecutors Sloman and Villafaña postponed litigation to obtain the computers, and how US Attorney Acosta signed the NPA—which effectively ended the pursuit of this critical evidence—despite likely being aware of the ongoing efforts to obtain it. The report argues the USAO gave away significant leverage and potential evidence of crimes without proper consideration.

Opr (office of professional responsibility) report / legal filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021346.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report (page 146 of the original report, filed in court in 2021 and 2023) detailing the justifications provided by USAO prosecutors (Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Acosta) for entering into a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein rather than pursuing a federal trial. The prosecutors cite significant evidentiary challenges, including unreliable witnesses, victims who 'loved' Epstein or would claim they lied about their age, and the trauma a trial would cause victims. Acosta admits his knowledge of the case facts was not 'granular' and that he relied on the diligence of his team, particularly Villafaña.

Doj opr report / court filing exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021174.jpg

This document is a Table of Contents page from a legal filing (Appellate Case 22-1426, Document 77) dated June 29, 2023. It indexes four items included in the appendix: an OPR Report from November 2020, a District Court Opinion & Order from February 2022, a Sentencing Transcript from June 2022, and an exhibit labeled GX-422. The footer indicates this document is part of a Department of Justice production (DOJ-OGR).

Legal filing / table of contents
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017056.jpg

This document is page 35 of a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a diary entry by a victim named Annie, describing grooming behavior by Jeffrey Epstein during a trip to the movies, specifically noting how Epstein touched her and hid the action from a person named Maria. The text mentions Maxwell was not present for this specific New York trip but was involved in subsequent escalation in the spring of 1996.

Court transcript / summation
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016637.jpg

This document is page 154 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination testimony of an expert witness named Loftus regarding memory science. Loftus explains the concepts of 'confidence malleability' and 'prestige enhancing memory distortion,' describing how humans often inaccurately remember themselves in a more positive light without intending to lie.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016529.jpg

This document is page 46 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell's role was strictly that of an 'estate manager' who ran Jeffrey Epstein's properties, distinct from the finance staff and attorneys who handled money and business affairs. Espinosa confirms assisting Maxwell with daily tasks, which included making reservations and handling lists of 25 to 50 items per day.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity