Ms. Comey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Parkinson
|
Direct examination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Witness prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Dawson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAVID RODGERS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kimberly Meder
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Examiner witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional instructional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Examiner witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Co counsel implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA Rossmiller
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Prosecutor witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Counsel judge interaction |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Meder
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017410.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. The proceedings cover the stipulation and admission of Government Exhibits 11 through 16 and 1004, which includes a birth certificate from England and Wales. Ms. Comey notes that these exhibits are sealed to protect witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, and the Court grants permission for jurors to view these sealed binders.
DOJ-OGR-00011718.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conference during a trial. The defense counsel, Ms. Sternheim, claims in her opening statement that witnesses' memories were manipulated by their civil lawyers, prompting an objection from the prosecution, Ms. Comey and Ms. Moe. Ms. Moe argues to the judge that introducing evidence about lawyer-client conversations is inappropriate and that the issue of subpoenaing these lawyers had already been raised.
DOJ-OGR-00011716.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the opening statement of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the accusers' memories are unreliable due to media influence and monetary incentives (False Memory Syndrome defense strategy). An objection by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding Sternheim's characterization of investigators is sustained by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00011710.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording a sidebar conference during the opening statements of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Prosecutor Ms. Comey objects that the defense is improperly arguing the government is targeting the defendant, violating a pretrial ruling. The Court rules that while the defense cannot attack the prosecution's motives, they are permitted to argue that witnesses are using the defendant as a scapegoat or stand-in.
DOJ-OGR-00011690.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The judge announces a 45-minute lunch break, stating that the court will resume with opening statements and adjourn at 5 p.m. After the jury is excused, the judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim, that there are no further matters to discuss before the recess.
DOJ-OGR-00011679.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a logistical delay in open court involving defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge regarding three jurors who are missing or delayed at the security line. The Judge discusses moving jurors between the first and fifth floors to manage the situation.
DOJ-OGR-00011677.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It records a procedural discussion between Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, Prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge regarding the order of 'alternating strikes' during jury selection. The Judge agrees to allow the defense to start the process because they have ten strikes available.
DOJ-OGR-00011672.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Ms. Moe, representing the government, requests the opportunity to review binders of documents before they are presented to a witness or the jury. The Court affirms that the government and the Court must see any document before it is shown, clarifying the procedure for using such materials in the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011664.jpg
This is the final page (43) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The proceedings conclude with the Judge instructing Ms. Comey (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) to confer regarding rebuttal witnesses and submit a letter by Saturday if there is a disagreement. The court adjourns for the Thanksgiving holiday.
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing procedural discussions in a criminal case. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, requests and receives permission from the government and court to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with two other witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. The court also sets a deadline of the upcoming Saturday for the government to provide its order-of-witness list and confirms with both the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) that no plea offers have been communicated.
DOJ-OGR-00011661.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion during a final pretrial conference. The judge inquires about the exclusion of witnesses, and the government's counsel, Ms. Comey, clarifies that victims have a right to be present after testifying but other witnesses will be excluded. Another attorney, Ms. Menninger, then raises a related issue about the admissibility of accusers' prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00011637.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the admissibility of 'Government Exhibit 52,' with the judge deciding not to preclude it before trial. They clarify the nature of anticipated testimony from a witness, Ms. Comey, who is expected to authenticate the exhibit by describing its similarity to a book she has seen, even though she is unaware of how the government obtained it.
DOJ-OGR-00011631.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a discussion between the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the testimony of a records custodian and the government's failure to list a specific financial institution prior to trial. Additionally, Mr. Pagliuca requests permission to use electronic methods for impeaching or refreshing the recollection of witnesses during the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011629.jpg
This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, an attorney, Ms. Moe, raises a concern to the court about prospective Juror No. 93. Ms. Moe explains that this juror is an attorney at the same financial institution where a key trial witness works as an executive director, creating a potential conflict of interest that has been flagged for both the court and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00011628.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument where the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) is barred by the Court from calling an attorney as a witness without prior briefing due to privilege concerns regarding 'Minor Victim 4'. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) then requests clarification on whether the jury will be instructed during preliminary instructions that witnesses will use pseudonyms, to which the Court agrees to address before opening statements.
DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the Court regarding an issue where the defense has subpoenaed the attorney representing 'Minor Victim 4' to testify at trial. The government argues they cannot understand what admissible testimony this attorney could offer that isn't covered by attorney-client privilege and indicates they will move to preclude it.
DOJ-OGR-00011625.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Ms. Comey (Government) argues that the defense should not be allowed to cross-examine a witness regarding juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors, and asks for a pretrial ruling to determine if she needs to disclose these facts on direct examination to 'draw the sting.' The Judge orders the parties to have a 'mature, reasonable discussion' to resolve agreed-upon issues and to submit only genuine legal disputes in writing.
DOJ-OGR-00011624.jpg
This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, details a procedural discussion where government counsel, Ms. Comey, raises an issue with the court. She explains that the defense intends to cross-examine government witnesses on topics the government deems improper—including sensitive personal information and old criminal convictions—and requests to submit a written briefing on the matter. The court agrees but requires the parties to first attempt to resolve and narrow their dispute through further discussion.
Direct Examination
Ms. Comey asks Shawn to identify himself and Government Exhibit 20 (his ID).
Reading record
Requesting that the whole question and answer be read if Mr. Pagliuca introduces specific testimony.
Evidentiary Ruling
The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.
Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics
Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.
Jury Charge Draft
Inquiring when the draft of the jury charge will be available.
Direct examination of witness's background
Ms. Comey questions witness Juan Patricio Alessi about his personal background, including his name, age, birthplace, upbringing, education, and work history after moving to the United States.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.
Massages at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house
Ms. Comey questions Mr. Alessi about the people who gave Jeffrey Epstein massages, their gender, how they entered the house, and where the massages took place.
Description of Government Exhibits 202, 206, and 209
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Parkinson, asking him to describe what is depicted in a series of government exhibits showing various parts of a property.
Timing of evidence release
Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.
Admission of Evidence GX 296R
Discussion regarding the admission of a redacted video exhibit under seal to protect witness identities.
Identification of Government Exhibits 201-222
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Parkinson, to identify Government Exhibits 201-222. Mr. Parkinson confirms they are photos of the exterior of a residence at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. Ms. Comey then offers the exhibits into evidence.
Evidence offer 332B
Ms. Comey informed the court that they are not planning to offer exhibit 332B, so the issue does not need to be resolved.
Request to use an exhibit
Ms. Comey asks the court for permission for the witness to use an exhibit as an aid during testimony.
Identification of Government Exhibit 303
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Visoski, to identify a photograph (Government Exhibit 303) as a depiction of the interior of Jeffrey Epstein's Boeing 727. The exhibit is then offered into evidence.
Identification of Government Exhibit 322
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Meder, who identifies a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states the photo is from a CD (1B78) reviewed as part of the Epstein and Maxwell investigation.
Admission of evidence
Ms. Comey states she has no objection to Exhibit B and then moves to enter numerous redacted government exhibits into evidence.
Admission of evidence
Ms. Comey states she has no objection to Exhibit B and then moves to enter numerous redacted government exhibits into evidence.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding which planes were flown and identification of photos.
Identification of Government Exhibits 52A and 52
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Alessi, to confirm that Government Exhibit 52A is a copy of a page from Government Exhibit 52. The dialogue involves an objection from Mr. Pagliuca and clarification with the Court.
Admissibility of video evidence
MS. COMEY argues that a video showing a photograph in the context of the master bedroom shared by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein has probative value that is not outweighed by unfair prejudice.
Redactions in documents
Ms. Comey explained her reasoning for not referencing certain names, stated she has no objection to Mr. Everdell naming individuals (except those granted anonymity), and requested permission to perform the time-intensive task of narrowing redactions over the upcoming long weekend.
Identification of photographic exhibits 226 through 241
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Parkinson, to establish the identity and accuracy of photographs showing the interior of a house at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005.
Admission of evidence
Ms. Comey offers Government's Exhibit 332 under seal to protect a third party's privacy and later asks for jurors to be permitted to view exhibits 313 and 332.
Logistical issue regarding video screens
Requesting confirmation that video played for jurors will not appear on public screens in overflow rooms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity