Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Comey

Person
Mentions
1419
Relationships
127
Events
630
Documents
693
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
127 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
18 Very Strong
28
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
17
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
organization The government
Representative
12 Very Strong
10
View
person CAROLYN
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Alessi
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person CAROLYN
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mr. Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Shawn
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Meder
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
37
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
155
View
person Mr. Visoski
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Rodgers
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Shawn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00017301.jpg

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's management of jury proceedings. The judge notes the jury's desire to adhere to their plans for the next day, confirms that a limiting instruction regarding 'Annie's testimony' was correctly provided, and sets a 4:25 PM dismissal time. Counsel, Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim, confirm they have no further matters to discuss before the jury is brought in.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017299.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case where the judge and counsel discuss how to communicate with a deliberating jury about their schedule. The judge proposes a note asking if the jury wants to deliberate the next day, "December 23rd". After a recess, the court receives a note back from the jury requesting the testimonies of individuals named Jane and Kate Wong.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017297.jpg

This document is the final page of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the moment the court adjourns the proceedings for the day, with participants Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim present. The session is scheduled to resume at 9:00 a.m. on December 22, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017296.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge and attorneys after the jury has been dismissed, focusing on procedural matters such as the government's review of transcripts and the defense's readiness to proceed. The judge also outlines instructions for contacting the alternate jurors to inform them that deliberations are ongoing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017294.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or open court discussion during jury deliberations where the Judge addresses a question from the jury, confirms the schedule for dismissal at 5:00 PM, and arranges lunch for the following day. The Judge also notes a directive from the Chief Judge requiring masks to be worn in the jury room due to a COVID-19 variant.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017291.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a debate between attorneys (Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell) and the judge regarding a jury question. The core issue is whether the testimony of a witness named Annie can be considered for conspiracy counts, given a prior instruction that it did not describe illegal sexual activity. The judge rules that the testimony is relevant and permissible for the jury to consider in relation to the conspiracy counts.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017290.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal discussion between a judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. The central issue is whether a limiting instruction should be given to the jury regarding the testimony of a witness named Annie, and how her testimony relates to specific counts (One, Two, Three, and Four) in an indictment. The parties disagree on the necessity and scope of such an instruction, with the judge ultimately asserting that the answer to the underlying question is 'yes'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017289.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between a judge and multiple counsel regarding a note from the jury. The jury, via Court Exhibit 9, asks if they can consider 'Annie's testimony' as evidence of conspiracy for two specific counts. The government's counsel, Ms. Comey, affirms this, while another counsel, Mr. Everdell, requests time to confer on the matter.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017288.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim, and the Judge regarding the jury's deliberation schedule around the Christmas holiday. The main point of discussion is whether to offer the jury the option to deliberate on Thursday, December 23rd, and the importance of informing them promptly to allow for personal arrangements, such as childcare.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017286.jpg

A court transcript page (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting a discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and attorneys (Ms. Sternheim, Ms. Menninger, Ms. Comey) regarding the handling and redaction of jury notes. The parties discuss that counsel knows the identity of jurors, allowing them to see unredacted notes, but public exhibits must be redacted. The transcript ends with the Court reading a note from the jury requesting to end deliberations at 5 p.m.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017284.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge and several individuals, likely attorneys, regarding testimony from 'Carolyn' and 'Special Agent Jason Richards' concerning an exhibit. The discussion concludes with a request for court notes, which the judge agrees to provide after redacting the jury foreperson's signature.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017282.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between counsel (Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca) and the judge. The main topic is how to properly respond to a jury's request for a specific document that has not been admitted into evidence, although testimony about the document has been presented. The lawyers and judge debate the precise wording of the response to avoid confusing the jury or improperly influencing their view of the existing evidence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017281.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge regarding how to instruct the jury about a document used for impeachment but not admitted into evidence. The parties debate the appropriate wording to avoid confusion while acknowledging the testimony related to the document.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017280.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during jury deliberations. The jury sent notes requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition (3505-005) related to Carolyn. Counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) discuss preparing these documents with necessary redactions.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017202.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues against the defense's conspiracy theory by highlighting the consistency of eight witnesses (including Juan Alessi and accusers like Annie and Carolyn) and pointing out the chronological impossibility of a conspiracy formed in 2019, given that incriminating statements were made to the FBI and in depositions in 2006 and 2009. The prosecutor references corroborating evidence such as flight records, FedEx records, and message pads.

Court transcript (rebuttal argument)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017197.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey, arguing that witness testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell predating 2019 could not be a 'frame-job' because Jeffrey Epstein was still alive and considered the primary target ('big fish') at that time. The page argues that accusations made years prior invalidate the defense theory of a fabricated narrative against Maxwell.

Court transcript (rebuttal argument)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017191.jpg

This document is a page from the rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Comey contrasts the memories of victims Jane and Carolyn, whose frequent abuse causes details to blur, with Annie, whose limited interactions remain vivid. She argues that despite peripheral details fading, the core traumatic events—specifically Maxwell's presence during abuse—are strongly remembered.

Court transcript (rebuttal argument)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014000.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca are discussing procedural matters with the Judge regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements for a witness named 'Carolyn' (who is present from out of state) and future discussions regarding witnesses 'Jane' and 'Annie'. The attorneys reference specific transcript lines (1610 and 1611) and an FBI 302 report.

Court transcript (trial proceedings)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013887.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between several attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Comey, Ms. Sternheim) and the judge. The discussion covers procedural issues such as making photocopies, a request for a brief recess, and a request to use a screen for a potential witness, Dr. Loftus. The court resolves the copying issue and prepares to bring in the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument over the admissibility of hearsay testimony during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorneys debate with the judge how to question the witness about why she was willing to see Jeffrey Epstein again, despite her discomfort, focusing on a conversation with her mother about Maxwell's presence. The discussion revolves around whether this testimony is offered for the truth of the matter asserted or to explain the witness's state of mind.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013589.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It records the end of a day's session where counsel for both sides, Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell, confirm they have no further business, leading the Court to adjourn the proceedings until 8:45 a.m. on December 10, 2021.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013587.jpg

A court transcript page filed on August 10, 2022, documenting a procedural pause in a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Comey request a private discussion in the robing room with the defense's consent, leading the judge to excuse the jury. The transcript notes that the subsequent pages (2020-2024) regarding this discussion are sealed.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013559.jpg

A transcript page from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge discusses a potential stipulation regarding testimony from Mr. Glassman about advice he gave to 'Jane' concerning cooperation with the government, aiming to avoid attorney-client privilege issues. The court also addresses administrative matters regarding letters submitted the previous night.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022. The judge and attorneys for the government and defense discuss the scheduling of future trial events, such as the charge conference and closing arguments, which depends on when the defense will rest its case. A defense attorney, Ms. Comey, also brings up an unresolved issue regarding a subpoena issued to a Mr. Glassman.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013556.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 757, filed 2022-08-10). The discussion primarily revolves around the nature of closing arguments, the proper method for presenting evidence (specifically regarding a witness's personal experience), and an 'Exhibit 52 issue.' The Court, Ms. Moe, Mr. Pagliuca (representing the defense), and Ms. Comey participate in the dialogue, clarifying procedural matters related to the trial.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
113
As Recipient
4
Total
117

Missing Jurors

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Asking if the Court has attempted to call the missing jurors.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussing the redaction of phone numbers for Carolyn and third parties.

Court dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Ending the day

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Stopping the examination because it is 4:59 PM.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding Exhibit 662

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding the columns in a logbook exhibit.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding Melissa and Amanda's visits to Epstein's house.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness testimony issue

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Comey requests permission to submit a letter to the court to look into the issue being discussed regarding witnesses.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Search of 358 El Brillo Way

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["Mr. Parkinson"]

Ms. Comey questions Mr. Parkinson about a search conducted on October 20, 2005, at 358 El Brillo Way. The questioning clarifies the timeline of events, distinguishing between an incident in 2003 and the 2005 search, and details the rooms Mr. Parkinson observed.

Direct examination testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Property Layout

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Alessi

Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding a specific female passenger on Epstein's planes who attended Interlochen.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Video Evidence Presentation

From: Ms. Comey
To: The Court / Ms. Drescher

Discussion regarding the playback of a video on Ms. Drescher's laptop and pausing at specific timestamps.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admission of Evidence

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Requesting admission of exhibits 11-16 and 1004, and requesting jurors view sealed binders.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a moment

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey asks for a moment, Judge grants it, counsel confers.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Photograph Identification

From: Ms. Comey
To: Parkinson

Questioning regarding a photograph of a work area containing the name Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding witness background, education, and past relationships.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Transcript availability

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Not necessarily, your Honor. We're not being recorded right now and we're getting a transcript.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary Ruling

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photograph (Exhibit 250)

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Argument describing a photo of Epstein and a girl, arguing its probative value because it was displayed in the house the defendant ran.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect Examination

From: Rodgers
To: Ms. Comey

Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Timing of evidence release

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: CAROLYN

Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 313

From: Ms. Comey
To: Ms. Meder

Questioning regarding a photo found on a CD (1B75) from the Epstein/Maxwell investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Meder

Questioning regarding the identification of a photo found on a CD during the investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search