Jane Doe
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Bradley James Edwards
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Mother
|
Family |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Trump
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Father
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
DONALD J. TRUMP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane Doe dropped her lawsuit against Epstein due to parental squabbling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's molestation of Jane Doe and other minors. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Exhaustive attempts by Jane Doe and other plaintiffs to obtain discovery from Epstein, including ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of two redacted clients ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of three minor girls | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed state court actions on behalf of two redacted clients and a federal c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of Jane Doe | Jane Doe's home/Hiding place | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe | Epstein's home (massage room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe involving massage and specific sexual acts. | Epstein’s mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to si... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein took Jane Doe's deposition, asking questions suggesting she is fabricating allega... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled the case before trial. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acting classes | Herbert Berkoff Studios and... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voice lessons | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of photographs of minor Plaintiff without her knowledge | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car trips for Doe driven by Decedent's drivers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Defendants allegedly participated in an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity, including ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001915.jpg
This document is page 38 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 10, 2020. Prosecutor Ms. Moe reads a written statement from an anonymous victim ('Jane Doe') who claims she knew Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. The statement alleges that Maxwell was the primary manipulator in charge, recruiting victims and delivering them to Jeffrey Epstein for abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00030549.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal complaint filed in March 2008 by plaintiff "Jane Doe" against defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. It describes Epstein paying Jane Doe $300 and Robson $200 for bringing Jane Doe to him. The complaint, filed by attorney Theodore J. Leopold, demands a jury trial and seeks compensatory, treble, and punitive damages under Florida law.
DOJ-OGR-00030548.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal complaint detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his associates, Robson and Kellen. Paragraph 33 outlines a scheme where Epstein paid Robson to recruit underage girls for prostitution. Paragraph 34 describes a specific incident where Plaintiff Jane Doe was brought to Epstein's home ostensibly for a massage, during which Epstein allegedly harassed and sexually assaulted her.
DOJ-OGR-00030547.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal complaint, specifically Count IV, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against defendants Epstein, Robson, and Kellen. The count alleges that the defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida statutes related to prostitution. The specific allegations include procuring minors for prostitution, soliciting, recruiting, and coercing individuals into prostitution.
DOJ-OGR-00030546.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal complaint filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe against defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. It concludes a count on civil conspiracy and introduces 'COUNT III: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress against Defendant Epstein,' alleging his conduct was outrageous and caused severe trauma to Jane Doe and her mother. The plaintiff demands judgment for compensatory and punitive damages, costs, and attorney's fees against all three defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00030544.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a complaint, details the alleged sexual assault of a 14-year-old minor, Jane Doe, by the defendant, Epstein, around 2005. It describes the assault in graphic detail, and mentions accomplices Ms. Robson and Kellen being present afterwards. The document also records financial transactions where Epstein paid Jane Doe $300 and paid Ms. Robson $200 for bringing the minor to him.
DOJ-OGR-00030543.jpg
This legal document describes a scheme allegedly orchestrated by Epstein to procure underage girls for sexual exploitation. It details the roles of his associates, Ms. Robson as a recruiter and Sarah Kellen as an assistant, in targeting economically disadvantaged girls. The document provides a specific account of a victim, Jane Doe, being brought to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was instructed by Epstein to remove her clothes.
DOJ-OGR-00030542.jpg
This document is page 2 of a civil legal complaint detailing factual allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. It describes Epstein as a wealthy financier with a preference for minor girls and alleges a scheme involving Kellen and Haley Robson recruiting disadvantaged minors for sexual acts disguised as massages in Palm Beach, Florida, New York, and Little St. James. The document specifically mentions a victim, 'Jane Doe', who was 14 years old in 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00030541.jpg
This document is the first page of a civil complaint filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The plaintiffs are 'Jane Doe' (a minor) and her mother, suing defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen for allegations involving sexual assault and abuse. The document establishes jurisdiction and venue, noting the residency of the parties involved.
DOJ-OGR-00030438.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing, dated January 24, 2008, from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. On behalf of the plaintiff, Jane Doe's Father, the filing demands judgment for loss of consortium and other damages, and formally requests a jury trial. The document is signed by attorney Jeffrey M. Herman and lists other attorneys from the firm.
DOJ-OGR-00030437.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 26, 2017. It outlines two counts: Count II, 'Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress,' brought by plaintiff Jane Doe and her parents (Father and Stepmother), and Count III, 'Loss of Parental Consortium,' brought by Jane Doe's Father. The plaintiffs allege Epstein's conduct was intentional and outrageous, causing severe emotional distress and damages for which they seek compensatory and punitive relief.
DOJ-OGR-00030436.jpg
This legal document, part of a lawsuit, details the sexual assault of a 14-year-old minor named Jane by Jeffrey Epstein around 2005. It describes how Epstein paid Jane $300 after the assault and paid Ms. Robson $200 for bringing Jane to him. The document outlines the first count of the lawsuit, Sexual Assault, and seeks compensatory and punitive damages from Epstein for the severe trauma inflicted upon the victim.
DOJ-OGR-00030435.jpg
This page from a legal filing details the systematic recruitment of economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee, FL, by Ms. Robson for Jeffrey Epstein. It describes the procedure upon arrival at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, where victims were processed by assistant Sarah Kellen and led to a massage room before being subjected to sexual acts by Epstein. The document highlights that victims were targeted specifically because they were perceived as unlikely to complain to authorities.
DOJ-OGR-00030434.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal complaint filed against Jeffrey Epstein, establishing jurisdiction, venue, and outlining factual allegations regarding his wealth, residences, and alleged sexual abuse of minors. It specifically details a scheme to exploit economically disadvantaged girls, introduces a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe who was victimized at age 14 in 2005, and names Haley Robson as an integral player in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00030426.jpg
This legal document, page 2 of a filing, details a dispute between opposing counsel regarding the deposition of "Jane Doe." The author, Jane Doe's attorney, alleges that Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, ignored an agreement to find a mutually convenient date and improperly served subpoenas on both Jane Doe and her out-of-state mother for a date he knew Jane Doe's counsel was unavailable. The filing argues that the service on the mother was legally defective.
DOJ-OGR-00021390.jpg
This document is a timeline detailing key events from 2006 to 2020 related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It outlines actions taken by the FBI, USAO, and DOJ officials, including Villafaña, Sloman, and Acosta, regarding victim interviews and notifications surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and state court plea. The timeline also tracks subsequent legal challenges by victims, court rulings on CVRA violations, and major developments in the case, such as Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
DOJ-OGR-00021233.jpg
This page from an OPR report details internal conflicts within the USAO in June 2007 regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Prosecutor Villafaña urged speed, believing Epstein was still offending, while supervisors Menchel and Lourie preferred to engage with defense counsel, believing Epstein was 'under a microscope' and unlikely to re-offend. The document details the supplementation of the prosecution memo with information on a new Jane Doe and a specific victim who had sexual contact with both Epstein and an assistant, as well as the logistics of setting up a meeting with defense counsel Sanchez.
DOJ-OGR-00021212.jpg
This document provides a timeline of key events in the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008. It details the opening of the investigation, meetings between prosecutors and Epstein's counsel, the decision to offer a state-based resolution, and the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline concludes with Epstein's guilty plea in state court, a subsequent legal challenge by a victim (Jane Doe), and the start of Epstein's work release program.
DOJ-OGR-00021178.jpg
This document outlines the procedural history of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), detailing his guilty plea to state charges of procuring minors for prostitution and the subsequent sentence of 18 months in jail. It highlights the nine-month delay caused by Epstein's legal team attempting to renegotiate terms with senior DOJ officials, culminating in the Deputy Attorney General's refusal to intervene on June 23, 2008. The text also describes the immediate legal fallout, specifically a July 7, 2008 emergency petition filed by a victim ('Jane Doe') alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act because victims were not consulted about the deal.
DOJ-OGR-00019445.jpg
This document is a Memorandum and Order from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) dated September 14, 2020, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman grants a motion filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to stay the civil proceedings entirely pending the resolution of Maxwell's parallel criminal case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document notes that Maxwell is currently in custody at the MDC awaiting a criminal trial scheduled for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00019433.jpg
This document is page 29 (labeled Page 34 of 58 in the header) of a legal brief filed on September 24, 2020, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that the government is acting inconsistently by intervening to stay proceedings in the civil case 'Doe v. Indyke' to protect the criminal prosecution's integrity, while failing to do the same in 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' regarding unsealing deposition materials. The text highlights that Jane Doe alleges abuse by both Epstein and Maxwell when she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00019396.jpg
Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 23, 2020, arguing against the unsealing of documents. Maxwell's defense contends that unsealing her deposition in a civil case (*Doe v. Indyke*) would prejudice her ability to litigate Fifth Amendment rights in her parallel criminal case before Judge Nathan. The document accuses the government of gamesmanship regarding the stay of proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00031558.jpg
This document is the final page (page 3) of a legal motion filed on February 5, 2008, by attorney Theodore J. Leopold on behalf of a 'Jane Doe' victim. The motion requests a Protective Order against Jeffrey Epstein and his counsel, alleging systematic harassment, including an incident where an unidentified male claiming to be an attorney approached the victim at her workplace. The document asserts these actions are inflicting further emotional injury on a young girl already 'scarred for life'.
DOJ-OGR-00031555.jpg
This is a letter dated February 5, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold of the Ricci~Leopold law firm to Judge Sandra K. McSorley. The letter serves as a cover for the enclosed 'Motion For Protective Order' filed on behalf of 'Jane Doe' in the criminal case of State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2006 CF 009454 A). Leopold requests ten minutes of the court's time to present the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00031538.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to share copies of exhibits after a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm a prior agreement that Goldberger will provide copies of all exhibits to him and the State Attorney, highlighting a potential conflict or lack of cooperation among the legal team.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... | View |
| N/A | Received | employer | Jane Doe | $100,000.00 | Hypothetical salary for absolute income example | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Cash payments | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for massage mentioned in complaint | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $200.00 | Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $2,500,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Paid | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
Massage Request
Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.
Money and modeling career
Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.
Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
Criticism of Epstein plea bargain
A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
Criticism of plea bargain
Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.
Silence
Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.
Defense
Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.
Criticism of Plea Bargain
Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
N/A
Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe
Instructions
Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.
Investigation Interview
Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.
Police Report
Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.
No Subject
Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.
Victim Statement
A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.
Victim Statement
Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein
Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.
Threats
Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.
Investigators at their homes
Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.
Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Deposition Preparation
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Solicitation
Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.
No Subject
Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity