Jane Doe
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Bradley James Edwards
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Mother
|
Family |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Trump
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Father
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
DONALD J. TRUMP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane Doe dropped her lawsuit against Epstein due to parental squabbling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's molestation of Jane Doe and other minors. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Exhaustive attempts by Jane Doe and other plaintiffs to obtain discovery from Epstein, including ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of two redacted clients ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of three minor girls | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed state court actions on behalf of two redacted clients and a federal c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of Jane Doe | Jane Doe's home/Hiding place | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe | Epstein's home (massage room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe involving massage and specific sexual acts. | Epstein’s mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to si... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein took Jane Doe's deposition, asking questions suggesting she is fabricating allega... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled the case before trial. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acting classes | Herbert Berkoff Studios and... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voice lessons | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of photographs of minor Plaintiff without her knowledge | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car trips for Doe driven by Decedent's drivers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Defendants allegedly participated in an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity, including ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing entered on June 28, 2010, in the case of Doe v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys request a court order for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or further mediation with Rodney Romano before July 1, 2010. The Rule 7.1 Certification indicates that the Plaintiff's counsel opposes this request, stating that mediation requirements have already been met.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013477.jpg
This court document, filed on June 28, 2010, updates the court on the status of Doe v. Epstein. It reports that since mediation on April 5, 2010, Jeffrey Epstein has resolved/settled numerous lawsuits, including cases involving C.L., C.M.A., and multiple Jane Does, leaving only the current federal case and two state court cases unresolved, all represented by Brad Edwards. The document also notes the extensive scope of the upcoming trial, citing over 170 potential witnesses and 140 exhibits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013476.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on June 28, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the civil case 'Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein' (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Epstein is requesting a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or a second mediation attempt before July 1, 2010, citing upcoming trial deadlines on July 19, 2010. The document notes that a previous mediation on April 5, 2010, with mediator Rodney Romano failed to produce an agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013473.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by an attorney representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the legal strategy regarding RICO and federal claims, specifically the importance of flight logs in establishing a federal nexus via interstate commerce for sexual abuse cases. It also mentions the attorney's departure from the RRA law firm following the exposure of Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and the subsequent settlement of Epstein cases in July 2010.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013469.jpg
This document is an affidavit from an attorney who joined Scott Rothstein's law firm (RRA) in 2009 while representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The author denies involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and refutes Epstein's allegations that the lawsuits were used for fraud or that depositions of 'high profile friends' were improper. The text asserts that Epstein paid for the legal representation of his employees and associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and pilots) to ensure they refused to testify.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013468.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards outlines his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña, alleging that the prosecution failed to inform him of a secret non-prosecution agreement and withheld evidence despite admitting to having proof of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit highlights the timeline of the plea deal and the subsequent revelation that federal prosecution would be blocked.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013466.jpg
This document is a legal affidavit signed by attorney Brad Edwards on April 23, 2010, in support of obtaining a specific tape recording as evidence for a civil trial involving Jane Doe and Jeffrey Epstein. Edwards describes negotiations with Anne B. Carroll (representing the Daily News) and argues the tape is critical to prove Epstein's perjury and lack of remorse, noting that Epstein otherwise only pleads the Fifth Amendment. The document also mentions a 'Mr. Rush' who allegedly risked his job by disclosing the tape.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg
This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013463.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It details Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), his repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment during depositions to avoid self-incrimination regarding sex crimes against minors, and the depositions of his co-conspirators who were employed to procure underage girls. The document highlights that Jane Doe refused to limit her damages to $150,000 as stipulated in the NPA and asserts that Epstein's co-conspirators helped protect him from law enforcement detection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg
A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013398.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal motion in the case Edwards adv. Epstein. It details Epstein's allegations that attorney Brad Edwards conspired with Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein to 'pump' the value of sexual assault cases against Epstein for investors. The text highlights the irony that while Epstein claimed these cases had 'minimal value' and sued Edwards for aggressive litigation tactics, Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding the abuse and ultimately settled the three cases for a confidential amount.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013397.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal motion titled 'Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages' in the case Edwards adv. Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's lawsuit against attorney Bradley J. Edwards was baseless, filed out of malice to intimidate Edwards and his clients (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe), and that Epstein has voluntarily dismissed his claims. It explicitly states that Epstein sexually abused these three clients and refutes allegations that Edwards was involved in a 'Ponzi Scheme' against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013389.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that a fact-finder should draw adverse inferences from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer specific deposition questions. It lists several unanswered questions regarding sexual assault allegations, contact with minors (L.M., Jane Doe, E.W.), and claims of fabricated cases by Mr. Edwards, proposing that his silence implies admission of guilt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013387.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013387) arguing for the dismissal of Epstein's claims against a party named Edwards. It lists specific unanswered discovery questions regarding physical contact with individuals identified as L.M., Jane Doe, and E.W., and cites Florida case law to argue that Epstein's refusal to answer these questions violates discovery rules and deprives Edwards of a fair defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013384.jpg
This page from a legal filing (likely by attorney Brad Edwards) argues that discovery efforts targeting Jeffrey Epstein's friends were necessary and valid. It highlights that Epstein and his household staff—who helped recruit minor girls—pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions about activities at the West Palm Beach mansion. The document asserts that evidence of other sexual abuse is admissible to prove modus operandi or motive.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013371.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing defending attorney Edwards against a lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's complaint alleged that Edwards conspired with Scott Rothstein (of the RRA law firm) to use sexual assault lawsuits against Epstein to 'pump' a Ponzi scheme by preventing settlements. The document refutes these claims as false, noting that Edwards was simply providing competent representation to victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) whom Epstein had sexually abused.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013370.jpg
This document is the first page of a Renewed Motion for Final Summary Judgment filed by Bradley J. Edwards in a civil lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009CA 040800...). Edwards argues that there is no evidence he participated in fraud against Epstein and asserts that his actions were legitimate legal representation of three clients (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) whom Epstein sexually abused. The document is marked as Exhibit B and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013364.jpg
This page of a legal affidavit, likely by attorney Brad Edwards, addresses allegations that his lawsuits against Epstein were used to fuel Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The author denies knowledge of the scheme and defends the strategy of deposing Epstein's high-profile friends. The document asserts that Epstein paid the legal fees for key associates including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski to ensure they refused to testify (pleading the Fifth) regarding daily sexual abuse of minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013363.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) against Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards describes his interactions with AUSA Marie Villafaña, alleging that the U.S. Attorney's Office withheld critical information regarding a plea agreement that blocked federal prosecution, despite admitting they had evidence of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit outlines the timeline of the plea deal revelation in June and July 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013357.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (stamped House Oversight) listing specific instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during a deposition. He refused to answer questions regarding his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, potential fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the value of claims by victims E.W., L.M., and Jane Doe, the destruction of evidence ('garbage'), sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of flight logs involving celebrities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013354.jpg
This legal document page argues that Edwards reasonably expected Epstein to be liable for substantial punitive damages due to his history of molesting children and billionaire status. It notes that on July 6, 2010, Epstein settled civil suits with victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe to avoid trial, and discusses Epstein's attempt to link Edwards to a Ponzi scheme (involving Scott Rothstein) as an excuse for failing to settle cases for 'minimal value.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013353.jpg
This legal document page details allegations of witness tampering and harassment by Jeffrey Epstein against a victim identified as Jane Doe. It describes a specific incident on July 1, 2010, where a private investigator hired by Epstein stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to flee to a secure location with a retired police officer. The text also references multiple exhibits regarding indictments and no-contact orders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
This document outlines statements attributed to Jeffrey Epstein regarding his legal challenges, including minimizing his Florida conviction and disparaging victims as seeking a 'meal ticket.' It specifically alleges Epstein committed perjury during a February 17, 2010 deposition by denying he knew journalist George Rush, despite having given him a recorded interview. The text also details Epstein's defense of Ghislaine Maxwell and his animosity toward attorney Bradley Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013351.jpg
This document, page 33 of a House Oversight report, details legal strategies involving attorney Edwards and his client Jane Doe. It discusses the use of flight logs to prove a federal nexus of interstate commerce for sexual abuse to counter Epstein's summary judgment motion. The text highlights allegations from Jane Doe No. 102 regarding the abuse of minors as young as 12 and mentions a Fall 2009 interview where Epstein denied wrongdoing and showed no remorse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013350.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing that the discovery of pilot and flight logs was legally proper in civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. It explains that this evidence was necessary to support a federal RICO claim depicting Epstein's operation as a criminal enterprise dependent on air travel, as well as to establish a 'federal nexus' for claims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 regarding interstate commerce and telephone usage. The text documents the legal team's strategy despite Judge Marra's dismissal of the RICO claim.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... | View |
| N/A | Received | employer | Jane Doe | $100,000.00 | Hypothetical salary for absolute income example | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Cash payments | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for massage mentioned in complaint | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $200.00 | Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $2,500,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Paid | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
Silence
Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.
Massage Request
Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.
Investigation Interview
Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.
Police Report
Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.
No Subject
Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.
Money and modeling career
Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.
Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
Criticism of Epstein plea bargain
A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
Criticism of plea bargain
Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.
Defense
Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.
Criticism of Plea Bargain
Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
N/A
Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe
Instructions
Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.
Victim Statement
A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.
Victim Statement
Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein
Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.
Threats
Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.
Investigators at their homes
Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.
Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Deposition Preparation
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Solicitation
Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.
No Subject
Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity