Jane Doe
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Bradley James Edwards
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Mother
|
Family |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Trump
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Father
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
DONALD J. TRUMP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane Doe dropped her lawsuit against Epstein due to parental squabbling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's molestation of Jane Doe and other minors. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Exhaustive attempts by Jane Doe and other plaintiffs to obtain discovery from Epstein, including ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of two redacted clients ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of three minor girls | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed state court actions on behalf of two redacted clients and a federal c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of Jane Doe | Jane Doe's home/Hiding place | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe | Epstein's home (massage room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe involving massage and specific sexual acts. | Epstein’s mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to si... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein took Jane Doe's deposition, asking questions suggesting she is fabricating allega... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled the case before trial. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acting classes | Herbert Berkoff Studios and... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voice lessons | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of photographs of minor Plaintiff without her knowledge | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car trips for Doe driven by Decedent's drivers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Defendants allegedly participated in an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity, including ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to provide copies of exhibits to Leopold and the State Attorney during a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm an agreement that Goldberger will now provide copies of all exhibits used.
DOJ-OGR-00013486.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony reviews a specific flight log entry for Flight 916 on November 11, 1996, traveling from Palm Beach to Teterboro. The questioning confirms the passengers included Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Sophie Biddle (identified as a professional masseuse), Jeff Shantz and family, Eva, a child, a nanny, Russ, and a person referred to by 'Jane's true first name'.
DOJ-OGR-00010737.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on June 26, 2022, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim identified as 'Jane Doe' (who testified under the pseudonym 'Kate') is requesting permission to deliver an oral victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing scheduled for June 28. The motion cites 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to support the inclusion of victim statements.
DOJ-OGR-00004699.jpg
This legal document, part of an affidavit by an Assistant U.S. Attorney, describes the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein that began in 2006. It focuses on the process of notifying victims, specifically mentioning letters sent by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI to victims C.W., T.M., and S.R. The document confirms these three individuals, represented by attorney Bradley Edwards, were minor victims of Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004698.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by A. Marie Villafaña, an Assistant United States Attorney, filed on July 9, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Villafaña outlines her professional background, including her 1993 graduation from Berkeley Law, her bar admissions in Florida, California, and Minnesota, and her past work as a judicial clerk. The declaration establishes her credentials and her employment as an AUSA during the events relevant to the case involving petitioner Jane Doe.
DOJ-OGR-00005407.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing (Document 380) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 29, 2021. The text argues for the protection of the identities of Minor Victims 1 through 6, citing the risk of social stigma, harassment by the press, and damage to future employment prospects. It notes that Victims 1-4 are expected to testify about explicit sexual abuse by Epstein and the defendant, while Victims 5 and 6 will not testify.
DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
This legal document is a court filing, page 50 of 84, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the defense's argument to dismiss allegations concerning "Minor Victim-3," claiming the defendant's conduct with her was lawful in the United Kingdom and that she was an adult when she was later abused by Epstein in the U.S. The defense contends the government mistakenly charged the defendant, believing Minor Victim-3 was a minor at the time of the alleged sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00023228.jpg
This document is a timeline graphic from a Department of Justice report detailing key events surrounding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) analysis in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It tracks internal DOJ communications, victim notifications, and court actions from 2006 to 2008, with an additional sidebar covering legal developments up to 2020. Key events include the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the deferral of victim notification regarding the plea deal, and subsequent court rulings finding that the U.S. violated the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031792.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 regarding the 'Jane Doe' case, involving the law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman. The correspondence discusses scheduling conflicts between a proposed hearing on August 20th and a pre-existing deposition. Additionally, a paralegal is seeking contact information for a 'Dr. Rishard' and the 'Office of Palm Beach Doctors' mentioned by a person identified as 'LM', noting that they have been unable to locate either entity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 5, 2009, forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorney Robert Critton. The emails discuss the status of serving legal papers to Ghislaine Maxwell, Leslie Wexner, and Donald Trump in relation to a 'Jane Doe' case. The thread confirms that Maxwell was not served, while Wexner's counsel and Trump's staff accepted service on their behalf.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031708.jpg
This document is an email sent on October 1, 2016, from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein. The email, marked as 'High' importance, contains a link to a LawNewz.com article regarding the refiling of a rape lawsuit against Donald Trump with a new witness. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022085.jpg
This document is a page from a James Patterson book, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the background of Ghislaine Maxwell, her father Robert Maxwell's financial crimes, her move to NYC, and her transition from Jeffrey Epstein's lover to his household manager and alleged procurer of young girls. It also introduces the story of Nadia Bjorlin, a young girl Epstein met in Michigan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026624.jpg
This document is an email dated October 1, 2016, from attorney Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein. Indyke forwards a link to a 'LawNewz' article with the subject line 'Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Refiled With New Witness'. The email includes a standard attorney-client privilege disclaimer and indicates it was sent from an iPhone.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017627.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (likely the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the timeline of the Epstein investigation between 2006 and 2007, detailing how the Palm Beach Police referred the case to the FBI, who then referred it to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The text argues that under proper application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), victims should have been notified and allowed to confer with prosecutors regarding the nonprosecution agreement eventually reached with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026855.jpg
This document is a PACER docket report receipt for case 1:16-cv-04642-RA from the Southern District of New York. It details court activities in June 2016, including the assignment of Judge Ronnie Abrams, the issuance of electronic summonses to both Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein, and the scheduling of an initial conference for September 2016. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026854.jpg
This document is a civil docket report from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for Case #: 1:16-cv-04642-RA, filed on June 20, 2016. The case involves a plaintiff proceeding under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' suing Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein for Libel, Assault, and Slander. The document lists the initial filing of the complaint, the payment of filing fees, and requests for summonses for both defendants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010604.jpg
This document is page 39 of a House Oversight report detailing a deposition where Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The questions Epstein refused to answer concern his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, allegations of fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the destruction of evidence in his garbage, sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of his flight logs regarding celebrities and dignitaries.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010600.jpg
This document page details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein violated judicial no-contact orders by hiring a private investigator to harass and intimidate a witness ('Jane Doe') prior to a scheduled civil trial in July 2010. It describes a specific incident where an investigator stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to be moved to a secure location by a retired police officer. It also notes that attorney Edwards filed civil cases on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe regarding sexual abuse of children.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010598.jpg
This document, likely a page from a House Oversight report, details the legal strategies employed by attorney Edwards against Jeffrey Epstein, specifically the use of flight logs to prove a federal nexus for sexual crimes. It discusses a complaint by 'Jane Doe No. 102' alleging the use of Epstein's plane for transporting minors as young as 12 for abuse by Epstein and his friends. Additionally, it references a Fall 2009 interview with the New York Daily News where Epstein denied wrongdoing and claimed civil suits were result of jealousy over his success.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010583.jpg
This page from a legal filing details the judicial orders prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein from contacting his victims following his 2008 guilty plea. It outlines specific no-contact orders issued by Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo and the federal court. Furthermore, it documents two civil lawsuits filed by attorney Brad Edwards against Epstein in August and September 2008 on behalf of victims 'Jane Doe' and 'E.W.,' alleging sexual assault and a RICO conspiracy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010582.jpg
This document, page 17 of a legal filing marked with House Oversight bates stamps, details the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It outlines his guilty plea to state charges in Palm Beach County on June 30, 2008, and the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal Government that shielded him from federal charges while acknowledging potential compensation for approximately 34 victims. The text also references an attorney named Edwards filing a motion regarding a CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) action and a victim (Jane Doe) appearing on television to criticize the leniency of the plea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010579.jpg
This document, page 14 of a legal filing produced by the House Oversight Committee, details the retention of attorney Bradley J. Edwards by victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe in April 2008. It outlines the victims' desire to pursue civil damages against Epstein and their specific concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly negotiating a plea deal without consulting them, despite previous assurances. The text highlights the failure of federal authorities to notify the victims about the plea agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010567.jpg
This document outlines allegations that Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted over 40 young girls between 2002 and 2005 in West Palm Beach, citing deposition testimony from victims and Epstein himself invoking the Fifth Amendment. It details specific instances of abuse against minors identified as Jane Doe, L.M., and E.W., and notes that L.M. was paid to recruit other underage girls. The footer contains legal citations regarding the invocation of constitutional privileges in civil settings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010536.jpg
This document contains pages 194 and 195 of a book detailing the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein, marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp. Page 194 provides a graphic, albeit partially cut-off, account of a sexual assault against a victim named Jane Doe at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, facilitated by a woman named Sarah. Page 195 recounts the events of June 30, 2008, when Epstein reported to Palm Beach County jail following Officer Pagan's investigation, and mentions his communications with the media regarding his legal status.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011946.jpg
This document, likely an excerpt from a larger report or article (marked House Oversight), summarizes court filings related to the Epstein case. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's evasion of a deposition to attend Chelsea Clinton's wedding, Alfredo Rodriguez's theft of a 'Holy Grail' victim journal, and Bill Clinton's presence in Epstein's flight logs and phone directory. The text also describes Epstein's intimidation tactics against a victim identified as 'Jane Doe,' causing her to flee her home.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... | View |
| N/A | Received | employer | Jane Doe | $100,000.00 | Hypothetical salary for absolute income example | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Cash payments | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for massage mentioned in complaint | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $200.00 | Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $2,500,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Paid | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
Criticism of Plea Bargain
Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
N/A
Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe
Investigation Interview
Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.
Police Report
Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.
No Subject
Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.
Money and modeling career
Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.
Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
Criticism of Epstein plea bargain
A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
Criticism of plea bargain
Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.
Silence
Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.
Defense
Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.
Instructions
Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.
Massage Request
Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.
Victim Statement
A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.
Victim Statement
Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein
Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.
Threats
Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.
Investigators at their homes
Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.
Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Deposition Preparation
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Solicitation
Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.
No Subject
Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity