Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MR. ROHRBACH

Person
Mentions
523
Relationships
69
Events
254
Documents
254
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
69 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
14
View
organization The government
Representative
11 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
14
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Chapell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
90
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
22
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
7
3
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
7
3
View
person Gill Velez
Professional
7
3
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
7
3
View
person Ms. Comey
Co counsel
7
3
View
person Ms. Comey
Business associate
6
2
View
person your Honor
Professional
6
1
View
person Supervisory Investigator Brown
Professional
6
2
View
organization The government
Professional
6
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Representation
6
2
View
person William Brown
Professional
6
2
View
person Tracy Chapell
Legal representative
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Court Hearing/Trial Proceedings Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding witness testimony and evidence admissibility in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing discussing redaction procedures for a letter and Exhibit A, while waiting for juror... Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context implie... Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding jury instructions in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine M... Courtroom View
2022-08-09 Court discussion A discussion took place at the end of the court day regarding the defense's plans for witnesses J... Courtroom View
2022-07-22 N/A Court hearing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) Southern District Court (li... View
2022-03-11 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern District) View
2021-12-20 Court adjournment The court session was adjourned to 8:30 a.m. on Monday, December 20, 2021. Court (implied Southern Dis... View
2021-12-10 N/A Court hearing discussion regarding the admissibility and scope of expert testimony by Mr. Flatley. Southern District of New Yo... View
2021-12-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court regarding the nature of Mr. Flatley's testimony, specifically whether he is... Courtroom View
2021-12-10 Court hearing A legal argument regarding jury instructions in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The discussion focused on... Courtroom View
2021-12-10 Court proceeding A legal argument and clarification between an attorney (Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge (The Court) r... N/A View
2021-12-10 Pretrial conference A court hearing where procedural matters were discussed, including an exception to witness seques... Courtroom (unspecified) View
2021-12-10 Court hearing/proceeding Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the... Courtroom (implied) View
2021-12-10 Court hearing Legal arguments were presented regarding the relevance of sexual conduct in New Mexico to a consp... Courtroom View
2021-12-10 Court hearing A legal discussion took place regarding the charges in an indictment, specifically focusing on th... Courtroom (implied) View
2021-12-10 Court proceeding A discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding the potential for defense experts to testi... Southern District Court (im... View
2021-12-10 Court proceeding A discussion between the court (judge) and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the legal correctness of a pote... Courtroom (unspecified) View
2021-12-10 Legal proceeding A discussion in court between an attorney (Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge regarding jury instruction... Courtroom (Southern District) View
2021-12-10 Court hearing A court hearing to discuss pre-trial matters, including the admissibility of a statement under ru... Court View
2021-12-08 Court adjournment A court session was adjourned until December 9, 2021, at 8:45 a.m. after a brief discussion about... Courtroom (implied) View
2021-04-01 N/A Court Hearing Court (Southern District) View
2008-10-22 N/A Review of Defense Exhibit LV3A Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011645.jpg

A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Ms. Menninger), and the Judge regarding expert witness Mr. Flatley. The discussion focuses on the scope of Mr. Flatley's expertise, specifically regarding forensic principles, digital document storage, and metadata, and whether proper notice was given to the defense regarding his opinions. The Judge instructs that any differing expert opinions on these technical matters must be noticed.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated August 10, 2022) involving a legal debate over witness testimony. Ms. Menninger argues that the government did not provide sufficient notice regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony concerning the extraction of user data and metadata, claiming the '3500 material' was insufficient. Mr. Rohrbach responds that while they view Flatley primarily as a fact witness, they provided expert notice due to the blurred lines between fact and expert testimony in this technical context.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the rules for disclosing expert testimony and the scope of evidence contained on several hard drives marked as exhibits. The attorneys debate the government's representations about which documents will be used, and Mr. Rohrbach clarifies that a witness, Mr. Kelso, will testify on the general principles of document creation.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011642.jpg

This document is a partial court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, discussing the anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley. His testimony concerns the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home, and the possibility of Mr. Kelso serving as a rebuttal witness. The government and defense are preparing for this testimony and related disclosures, with Mr. Flatley having given similar testimony in other cases.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
53
As Recipient
3
Total
56

Insurance records

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: Ms. Gill

Mr. Rohrbach states he will 'go have a conversation with Ms. Gill about this' (referring to records).

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Surprise at receiving the defendant's filing.

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach mentions a letter his side sent, which indicated they were surprised to receive a filing from the defendant.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether personnel forms constitute hearsay or business records.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Details of a package shipment from 2002

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Ms. Chapell"]

Mr. Rohrbach questions witness Ms. Chapell about the sender's address, recipient's first name, delivery location, and shipment date of a package sent on December 3, 2002. They also refer to Government Exhibits GX-11 and GX-803/801.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Argument for relevance of documents

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach argues that documents, such as a birth certificate, are relevant to connect Virginia Roberts (daughter of Sky Roberts) to the person who was present at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, corroborating testimony from Juan Alessi and Carolyn.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Witnesses observing the trial

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach confirms an understanding that witnesses testifying as victims will not observe the trial until both sides have rested.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Objection to a question

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach objects to a question on the grounds that it is attenuated from any notion of bias or motive (a '401' objection).

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Expertise and research on the topic of grooming

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: Dr. Rocchio

Mr. Rohrbach questions Dr. Rocchio, who confirms he has not published his own research or conducted metadata studies on grooming. Dr. Rocchio also confirms his testimony is based on studies by other experts and acknowledges there is disagreement in the scientific literature on the topic.

Court testimony (cross-examination)
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 802

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Ms. Chapell"]

Mr. Rohrbach questions Ms. Chapell to identify Government Exhibit 802. She identifies it as an invoice on Jeffrey E. Epstein's account and confirms it is an accurate copy of a version held by FedEx.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 802

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Ms. Chapell"]

Mr. Rohrbach questions Ms. Chapell to identify Government Exhibit 802. She identifies it as an invoice on Jeffrey E. Epstein's account and confirms it is an accurate copy of a version held by FedEx.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 802

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Ms. Chapell"]

Mr. Rohrbach questions witness Ms. Chapell to identify Government Exhibit 802. Ms. Chapell confirms she recognizes it as an invoice on Jeffrey E. Epstein's account and that it is an accurate copy of a version held by FedEx.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Government Exhibits 21 and 22

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Supervisory Investig...

Mr. Rohrbach questions Supervisory Investigator Brown about Government Exhibit 22, an image capture from an ID card application. Brown confirms it depicts the same person as in Exhibit 21 and explains the record is stored in a DMV photosystem database.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Argument against defendant's motion regarding enticement ...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach argues that the defendant's motion should be denied because the defendant enticed Jane to travel to New York by building a relationship with her and playing on her hopes and desires, which fits the legal definition of enticement.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of evidence

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach argues for the relevance and admissibility of a phone number and Mar-a-Lago personnel records, explaining the expected testimony of Ms. Gill to establish them as business records.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Calling and examining a witness

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["THE COURT", "Ms. Gill"]

Mr. Rohrbach calls Janine Gill to the stand and begins the direct examination by greeting her.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach clarifies that he believes witness Jane only testified to a single incident of sexual abuse in New Mexico, which was disclosed in the 3500 material and should not have been a surprise to the defense.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Clarification on the legal standard for conviction based ...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

A dialogue between Mr. Rohrbach and the Court about whether adding the word 'solely' to a statement of law is correct, specifically concerning the conviction of a defendant based on the testimony of 'witness 3' regarding sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary basis for comments on witness interviews

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach, for the government, argues that Ms. Menninger's comments about how witness interviews were conducted are supported by evidence from Special Agent Young's testimony, which was elicited by Ms. Comey. The Court disagrees and overrules the government's request.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Update on factual investigation and witness list

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach informs the court that the government cannot complete its investigation by 6 o'clock, partly because Jane's counsel is unavailable, and therefore elects not to call Brian as a witness. He also states the government does not believe any court rule has been violated.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Impeachment of witness Juan Alessi

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Your Honor"]

Mr. Rohrbach argues against the impeachment, stating that the details of the prior burglary are a collateral matter and not central to the current trial.

Sidebar conversation (in-person)
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Legal argument on conspiracy charges and the Mann Act

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach agrees with the Court's summary and adds a point about 'minor Victim 2' being charged only with conspiracy, arguing that events in New Mexico are relevant to proving intent for illegal sexual activity in New York under the Mann Act.

Court hearing dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of evidence, specifically a deposition tran...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach argues for the admission of a deposition transcript of Mr. Epstein concerning a move in 1996, comparing the issue to a matter involving 44 Kinnerton Street.

Court hearing
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Update on factual development and witness Brian

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach informs the court that the government could not complete its factual investigation by 6 o'clock, was unable to speak with Jane, and has decided not to call Brian as a witness.

Court hearing dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scope of evidence and examination regarding investigation...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach argues to the court, disagreeing with Mr. Everdell, that while the defense can cross-examine witnesses about who was present during certain events, they cannot call a case agent in their direct case to question investigative steps that were not taken, citing the Watson and Brady cases.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of testimony regarding photos in Epstein's ...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach asks the Court for clarification regarding the government's plan to question a witness about photos of celebrities and nude women in Epstein's house, without presenting the photos as exhibits. The Court indicates it sees no issue with the question but reserves judgment on admitting any exhibits.

Court hearing dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search