The Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
196 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
228 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Members of the jury
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
116 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
136 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-10-22 | N/A | Court hearing discussion regarding redactions of names and phone numbers. | Courtroom | View |
| 2008-10-22 | N/A | Pre-trial court hearing/conference regarding subpoenas and cross-examination scope. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2008-10-22 | N/A | Court Trial - Direct Examination of Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| 2008-10-22 | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 22 | Courtroom | View |
| 2008-06-30 | Court hearing | Epstein entered guilty pleas in Palm Beach County court to charges of solicitation of prostitutio... | Palm Beach County court | View |
| 2007-12-18 | N/A | Effective date (nunc pro tunc) of respondent's suspension from the practice of law and denial of ... | New York | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Legal finding | The Court states its belief that the end of the conspiracy date, based on acts in furtherance of ... | N/A | View |
| 1997-04-28 | Legal proceeding | Examination of Juror No. 5 under oath in the presence of counsel for both parties, as cited in th... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1953-01-01 | Legal case | The Court applied a categorical approach to the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act (WSLA) in *... | N/A | View |
| 0025-01-15 | N/A | Admission of Evidence | Courtroom | View |
| 0025-01-15 | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding grooming tactics. | Courtroom | View |
| 0025-01-15 | N/A | Court Hearing / Direct Examination of Rocchio | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 0025-01-15 | N/A | Ten-minute comfort break (Recess). | Courtroom | View |
| 0025-01-15 | N/A | Court Testimony - Direct Examination of Rocchio | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 0025-01-15 | N/A | Direct examination testimony of Dr. Rocchio regarding the definition and scientific consensus of ... | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 0023-12-01 | N/A | Jury Deliberations | Jury Room | View |
| 0023-11-01 | Conference | Discussion about the limiting instruction, where the defense agreed with it. | N/A | View |
| 0023-11-01 | N/A | Final Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings regarding stipulations and witness subpoenas | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding the interpretation of border crossing/flight manifest reports. | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Opening Statements | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Scheduling of Rule 29 Motion (Motion for Judgment of Acquittal). | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony (Direct Examination of Alessi) | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding 2002 FedEx invoices. | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Judge sustains a 'lack of foundation' objection regarding a book and instructs the jury to disreg... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000723.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated 2019-09-03, detailing a witness's testimony about a traumatic encounter with Mr. Epstein. The speaker recounts how an 'audition' turned into a 'casting call for prostitution' and mentions Mr. Epstein's connections to powerful individuals like Bill Clinton. The court also expresses gratitude to all participants, victims, and attorneys for their contributions to the hearing and proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00000691.jpg
This court transcript from September 3, 2019, captures a judge's opinion that the law is outdated regarding civil cases against deceased individuals. A representative for Mr. Epstein's victims then states their intention to pursue legal action against not only Epstein's estate but also his co-conspirators and enablers, who they allege were essential to his crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00000690.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where an attorney argues against an article by Professor Green that opposes victim participation in legal proceedings. The attorney contends this view is inconsistent with the Crime Victim Rights Act, especially in the context of Mr. Epstein's prosecution, and asserts that the purpose of modern criminal law is to mitigate harm to victims. The attorney also informs the court of their advice to their clients that the government must move to dismiss the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000655.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where a lawyer, Mr. Weingarten, argues that the court has the authority and public duty to investigate the death of his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Weingarten emphasizes the intense public interest and conspiracy theories surrounding the death, and specifically references a prior incident on July 23, 2019, described as an alleged attempted suicide, as a matter the court had already shown interest in.
DOJ-OGR-00000652.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten addresses the court regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that prison employees falsified information and ignored orders never to leave Epstein alone. Weingarten states that despite the medical examiner's conclusion of suicide by hanging, the defense has received medical evidence suggesting the injuries were more consistent with assault.
DOJ-OGR-00000638.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 29, 2019, which formally dismisses the criminal case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, follows a recommendation and directive from the U.S. Attorney's office to file a nolle prosequi. The judge's order also references a hearing held on August 27, 2019, and the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00000624.jpg
This document is the second page of a letter dated August 14, 2019, from Lamine N’Diaye, the Warden of MCC New York, to the Court. The Warden states that the facility will provide an update on the official cause of death for an individual (implied to be Mr. Epstein) as soon as the autopsy is complete. The letter copies several U.S. government officials, including Marshals and Attorneys, as well as two individuals identified as counsel for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000623.jpg
This letter, dated August 10, 2019, is a formal notification from the Warden's Office at the Metropolitan Correctional Center to Chief Judge Colleen McMahon and Judge Richard M. Berman. It reports the death of inmate Jeffrey Epstein, who was found unresponsive in his cell that morning from an apparent suicide and later pronounced dead at a local hospital. The letter states that investigations by the FBI and the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General are underway.
DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 6, 2019. In it, a representative for the government, Ms. Moe, proposes a detailed schedule to the court for the defense to file discovery-related and pretrial motions, with corresponding deadlines for the government's responses. Ms. Moe concludes by requesting that the court schedule a trial for June of the following year.
DOJ-OGR-00000606.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 26, 2019, in which a judge orally delivers a ruling concerning Mr. Epstein. The judge denies the defense's application for pretrial release and grants the government's application for continued remand, meaning Mr. Epstein will remain in custody. The judge states that a full written opinion will follow, which will address issues such as dangerousness, risk of flight, and the proposed bail package.
DOJ-OGR-00000599.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 25, 2019. It defines "Confidential Information," which can include personal data and witness identities, and sets forth strict rules for how this information must be handled by the defendant and their Defense Counsel. The rules govern the use, storage, review, and disclosure of the sensitive material throughout the legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00000596.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on July 25, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. The order establishes strict rules for handling discovery materials, stipulating they are for defense purposes only and cannot be copied or transmitted by the defendant. It specifies that only the Defense Counsel can disclose the information to a limited group of 'Designated Persons,' including defense staff, experts, and others authorized by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00000590.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB filed on July 25, 2019, establishes the rules for handling "Confidential Information." It dictates that the defendant's counsel is responsible for the secure maintenance of this information and outlines strict limitations on how the defendant can access it and to whom it can be disclosed, such as Designated Persons and Potential Witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00000578.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a speaker, likely Mr. Epstein's lawyer, argues that Epstein is not a flight risk. The lawyer contests the government's interpretation of payments Epstein made to witnesses in late 2018, arguing that Epstein's subsequent travel into the country, where he was arrested, demonstrates he did not intend to flee. The lawyer also introduces Mr. Joseph Jaffe, who is present to discuss services his company could provide as part of a potential release condition for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from a case in the Southern District. A speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues against granting bail to a defendant, claiming he is a flight risk due to a lengthy, covert government investigation and his recent indictment. The judge ('THE COURT') questions the speaker about a recent submission that mentioned victims or their counsel oppose the defendant's release and asks if any of them wish to be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00000575.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, in a case involving Mr. Epstein. An unidentified speaker, likely the prosecutor, argues against the credibility of the defense's claims, particularly the idea that Epstein has disciplined himself. The speaker contends that this claim is an admission of his "appetite for children" and that the court should not risk community safety based on it, also referencing articles by the Miami Herald about Epstein's past misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00000569.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 24, 2019, where a speaker identified as Mr. Weinberg argues against the imposition of monetary bail conditions. He supports his position by referencing the federal Bail Reform Act of 1984, a similar movement in Massachusetts, and a broader societal shift away from the overcriminalization policies of the 1980s. Weinberg contends that defendants should not be incarcerated simply because they are unable to pay bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000565.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning bail conditions for Mr. Epstein. His attorney, Mr. Weinberg, argues that Epstein is not a flight risk, contrasting him with another defendant who lied to pretrial services. Weinberg proposes an additional condition of a credible trustee living in Epstein's home to ensure compliance, in an attempt to persuade the judge to reconsider the detention order.
DOJ-OGR-00000547.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney argues that their client, Mr. Epstein, is not a flight risk. The attorney cites past actions as evidence, including not fleeing before his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), hiring lawyers, and serving time in county jail, from which he was released in 2010. The document also mentions a past legal dispute in New York regarding Mr. Epstein's classification.
DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government argues against the defendant's legal claims, stating a non-prosecution agreement is not applicable and that the case will proceed, and urges the court to order the defendant's detention. Following the government's statement, a lawyer named Mr. Weinberg begins to address the court.
DOJ-OGR-00000528.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, a representative for the government argues against a defendant's release, citing a significant danger to victims and witnesses. The government alleges the defendant previously instructed people to lie to law enforcement and has recently sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to two individuals, supported by police reports from Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00000522.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. A prosecutor is arguing to a judge that the defendant should be detained, citing evidence of witness tampering through payments to associates, and highlighting that the defendant is an 'extraordinary flight risk' due to his immense wealth (over $500 million), six homes, two private islands, and a residence in France.
DOJ-OGR-00000521.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, detailing a bail hearing. The prosecution, represented by Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained, citing the defense's failure to provide detailed financial information and the legal presumption of detention for sex trafficking charges, which is strengthened by the defendant's prior sex offense conviction. The judge interacts with the prosecutor to clarify the government's burden of proof in the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00000520.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. In the transcript, a government lawyer, Mr. Rossmiller, argues before a judge for the pretrial detention of a defendant, citing an extraordinary risk of flight and danger to the community. Rossmiller states that for the sex trafficking offense charged, there is a legal presumption for detention which the defendant has not provided any information to rebut.
DOJ-OGR-00000514.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge discusses the bail hearing for Mr. Epstein. The judge notes that pretrial services has recommended detention but clarifies that they have not yet made a decision and will announce it on Thursday, July 18. The judge also acknowledges the presence of alleged victims who oppose bail and will be given an opportunity to be heard.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity