Mr. Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Adversarial |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator deponent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unknown Witness (Speaker A)
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Deponent)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chauntae Davies
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boise
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 1
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Affiant (Police Officer)
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
other people
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Anouska De Georgiou
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Co counsel co petitioners |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brittany Henderson
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Decision made by counsel to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. ... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding sexual allegations and legal waivers. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting where the witness's immigration status and a U visa form were discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys learned Ms. Giuffre was in the US and willing to testify. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding statements made about Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attempted deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a legal pleading/motion to join. | Legal Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Deposition | A prior deposition where Mr. Alessi was questioned by Mr. Edwards. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-12-13 | Legal motion | Ms. Maxwell's legal team requests permission from the Court to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and... | Court | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where a victim, identified as Jane Doe No. 2, begins to give her testimony reg... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Victim impact statements are being delivered in court regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein.... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Victims provide statements in a court proceeding related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Anouska De Georgiou provides a victim impact statement in court. | Southern District Court | View |
| 2015-10-15 | N/A | Deposition of Alan Dershowitz | Unknown | View |
| 2014-05-01 | N/A | Affiant flew to Florida for a full-day interview with Ms. Giuffre. | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of case under Crime Victims Rights Act | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Initial legal action filed by Mr. Edwards and the speaker. | District Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a petition seeking access to and invalidation of Epstein's nonprosecution agreement. | District Court | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010604.jpg
This document is page 39 of a House Oversight report detailing a deposition where Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The questions Epstein refused to answer concern his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, allegations of fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the destruction of evidence in his garbage, sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of his flight logs regarding celebrities and dignitaries.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015670.jpg
Page 395 of a deposition transcript (likely Prince Andrew based on context) stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015670. The witness denies under oath having sex with the subject (Virginia Roberts) and denies recalling receiving a waiver to allow a civil lawsuit. However, the witness states they offered to waive the statute of limitations for criminal purposes if a prosecutor found probable cause of an offense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness (questioned by Mr. Edwards) is asked about previous statements regarding Virginia Roberts and potential lawsuits. The witness confirms stating they welcome the opportunity to cross-examine Roberts to prove her allegations are false. The witness also mentions receiving a 'nasty letter' from attorney Mr. Scarola regarding a waiver of the statute of limitations, which the witness declined to answer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015653.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 4) arguing that Defendant Alan Dershowitz must produce witnesses, including Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, if he wishes to pursue issues regarding Bill Clinton's travel. It highlights that Dershowitz invoked attorney-client privilege during his January 2016 deposition when asked if Virginia Roberts was lying about Clinton socializing with Epstein. It also notes Epstein's refusal to be deposed despite court orders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013389.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that a fact-finder should draw adverse inferences from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer specific deposition questions. It lists several unanswered questions regarding sexual assault allegations, contact with minors (L.M., Jane Doe, E.W.), and claims of fabricated cases by Mr. Edwards, proposing that his silence implies admission of guilt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013357.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (stamped House Oversight) listing specific instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during a deposition. He refused to answer questions regarding his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, potential fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the value of claims by victims E.W., L.M., and Jane Doe, the destruction of evidence ('garbage'), sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of flight logs involving celebrities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029322.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that adverse inferences should be drawn from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer questions during legal proceedings. It lists specific questions Epstein refused to answer regarding procuring minors for prostitution, sexual assaults on private planes, and assaults on victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. The document asserts that the reasonable inference is that these allegations are true and that Epstein's counter-claims against attorney Mr. Edwards were motivated by extortion and malice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016200.jpg
This document is a legal declaration refuting Alan Dershowitz's public claims that he never traveled without his wife and was never alone with Epstein and young women. The declarant provides specific flight log evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2005 showing Dershowitz on flights with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and other women, noting specifically that his wife was not listed on these manifests. The document also notes that Dershowitz had personal access to flight logs before they were turned over to law enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016199.jpg
This document is an affidavit (page 3 of 6) filed in July 2019, detailing how attorneys (the affiant and Mr. Edwards) connected with witness Virginia Roberts Giuffre in 2014 for the CVRA case. It describes a May 2014 interview in Fort Lauderdale where the attorneys determined Giuffre's allegations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz were credible. Due to limited resources, the attorneys sought the assistance of David Boies and his firm to handle potential civil lawsuits against Epstein's 'rich and powerful friends'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021937.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview, likely prepared for the House Oversight Committee. The speaker discusses the legal landscape in 2010 regarding a civil suit brought by a victim identified as 'S.R.' against Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while most victims (approx. 31 of 35) referenced in the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) had settled, S.R.'s case was heading to trial, which presented an 'explosive situation' threatening to expose Epstein's crimes and organization in open court.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (House Oversight). It details the legal strategy of a legal team (including the witness and co-counsel Mr. Edwards) regarding the decision in the Summer/Fall of 2014 to approach the U.S. Attorney's Office to add Virginia Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties to a case. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined this request, leading to a legal filing on December 30th.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021925.jpg
This rough draft transcript page describes legal maneuvers by associates of Jeffrey Epstein to avoid depositions in civil cases. The speaker details how Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney falsely claimed she was outside the U.S. to cancel a deposition, despite her being spotted at a New York wedding shortly after. The text also implicates Jean Luc Brunel in 'trafficking the girls' and notes that he, like Maxwell and Epstein (via Dershowitz), engaged in patterns of evasion regarding legal questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021916.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving Professor Cassell. The witness testifies that Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards contacted a woman in Australia via telephone, who identified Alan Dershowitz as having information regarding Jeffrey Epstein and the sexual abuse of underage girls. During the questioning by Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola interrupts to assert that Professor Cassell is entitled to refresh his recollection before moving to a new subject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021875.jpg
This document is page 52 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. It features a witness (presumably a lawyer) being questioned by Mr. Simpson about the rationale for including allegations of sexual abuse against Alan Dershowitz involving 'other minors' alongside Virginia Roberts in a legal pleading. The witness asserts that the inclusion was based on the expectation that other victims would testify under oath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021874.jpg
This is page 51 of a rough draft legal transcript, likely a deposition. The witness explains the difficulty of finding victims willing to testify about sexual abuse involving a 'very powerful person' linked to an international sex trafficking ring (contextually implied to be Epstein, with specific questions about Alan Dershowitz). The witness mentions collaborating with Mr. Edwards and notes that the Federal Government has also struggled with this investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a legal proceeding or interview. The speaker describes the procedural history of a 2007/2008 legal challenge (Case 9:08-CV-80736) aimed at invalidating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the NPA provided immunity not just to Epstein, but to 'four named women' and other potential co-conspirators regarding federal sex crimes involving minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021858.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021858). Attorney Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness about legal agreements existing as of December 30, 2014, specifically regarding a 'common interest privilege' with other attorneys in the 'CVRA case' (Crime Victims' Rights Act). Attorneys Mr. Scarola and Ms. McCawley interject to clarify the scope of the question and assert privilege, with McCawley specifically objecting to revealing information about an agreement (transcribed as 'accountant interest agreement', likely a typo for 'common interest agreement').
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript related to a lawsuit identified as 'Epstein versus RRA'. An unidentified witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Scarola, asserts their 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights when asked about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under 18. The witness objects to a subsequent question about Tommy Mottola, accusing a 'Mr. Edwards' of introducing irrelevant names to damage the witness's personal relationships.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014305.jpg
This document is page 32 of a confidential deposition transcript. An unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Edwards, testifies about photographs taken by an unnamed male ('he'), confirming he took naked photos of her which were never recovered. The witness also recalls being shown photos of other 'young women in the bathtub' and confirms a prior statement that 'he' had 'lots of pictures of teenage girls'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Firm/Ponzi funds | Mr. Edwards | $0.00 | Bonuses paid to Mr. Edwards. | View |
When Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell
In a prior deposition, Mr. Edwards asked Mr. Alessi what year Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. Alessi's answer was recalled as being around '99, 2000, or 2002.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding pictures of teenage girls. The witness confirms the unnamed male took naked photos of them and showed them photos of other young women in a bathtub. Mr. Pagliuca makes objections during the questioning.
When Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell
In a prior deposition, Mr. Edwards asked Mr. Alessi what year Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. Alessi's answer was recalled as being around '99, 2000, or 2002.
Victim Statements and Anonymity
Discussion regarding clients addressing the court, the use of 'Jane Doe' for anonymity, and response to defense presentations.
Civil cases representation
Discussion regarding representing Giuffre in civil cases against abusers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity