| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. VILLAFANA
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's Victims
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein victims
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Oversight investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1
|
Litigation victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Jurisdictional coordination conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Federal Judges in the Southern District of Florida
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
state attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Jurisdictional coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FAA
|
Cooperative limited |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations between Epstein's attorneys and the USAO, resulting in reduced prison time and other... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) where Epstein's legal team raised his financia... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Consideration of declaring Epstein in breach of the NPA, which could lead to litigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | USAO investigation into Epstein, which ran for more than a year. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Federal investigation of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sloman met with Dershowitz and informed him of USAO's opposition to early termination and transfe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial considerations for Epstein case, including victim trauma and evidentiary challenges | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña notified Black that USAO opposed transfer of supervision to U.S. Virgin Islands. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) after initial 'term sheet' was presented. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | Agreement signing | Signing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | N/A | View |
| N/A | Litigation | CVRA litigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Entering into the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a follow-up letter to Acosta, expressing USAO's concern about Epstein intentionall... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal Investigation Resolution | Federal Jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation, execution, and implementation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing and negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | USAO | View |
This document is an email chain from October 19, 2020, between the Southern District of New York (USAO) and likely the FBI. The emails discuss the distribution of a review protocol for image and video files retrieved from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. Ten specific device identification numbers (starting with NYC) are listed for immediate FBI review. The correspondence also mentions the attachment of the Maxwell indictment and plans for a conference call once document copies are processed.
This document contains an email thread from December 2019 between the United States Attorney's Office (implied) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The estate's counsel requests search warrant inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss the government's potential forfeiture claims. The government response notes that the criminal case is 'now-defunct,' directs them to discovery previously provided to defense counsel (referencing specific Bates numbers), and clarifies that the government had not searched the New Mexico property.
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (Government) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The Estate's counsel requests search warrant returns and inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss resolving potential forfeiture claims. The Government responds by noting that defense counsel was required to destroy discovery materials after the case was nolle prossed, but provides Bates number references for documents previously produced regarding the New York property and clarifies that the New Mexico property was not searched.
This document is an email dated July 26, 2019, containing a US Marshals Intake Form request for Jeffrey Epstein. It lists his case identifiers (Court Number 19 Cr. 490, USAO Number 2018R01618, USMS Number 76318-054), arrest date (July 6, 2019), and date of birth.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI regarding the forensic review of image and video files from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The email outlines a specific list of ten device IDs (e.g., NYC024363) assigned to the FBI for initial review and attaches legal protocols, search warrants, and the Maxwell indictment.
An email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to FBI and USAO teams dated October 19, 2020, outlining the protocol for reviewing image and video files found on Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The email attaches search warrants and the Maxwell indictment, and specifically assigns a list of ten devices (identified by NYC numbers) to the FBI team for initial review.
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorney Matthew L. Schwartz and members of the US Attorney's Office. Schwartz requests a discussion regarding an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question,' clarifying that it is separate from his firm's representation of victims. A respondent identifies three (redacted) AUSAs as the 'Epstein case team' responsible for such inquiries, and a call is subsequently scheduled.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 regarding the technical processing of evidence for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case #2018R01618). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) requests the uploading of subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The technical staff discusses issues with DVD-formatted video files (VIDEO_TS folders) and specific interviews/walkthrough videos that require conversion or exclusion from the database.
An email dated March 25, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York requesting the upload of subpoena response documents from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity database for the case US v. Epstein (2018R01618). The email specifies a network file path on the DOJ cloud server containing the documents and outlines the desired folder structure for the upload relative to the 'FBI Case File'.
This document is an email dated July 27, 2020, from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the Chief of Public Corruption at USAO-SDNY. It provides statistical data regarding an OPR investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, noting that approximately 516,000 email files were obtained from 5 subjects, with about 3,000 deemed directly relevant. The email also details document counts related to the CVRA litigation, distinguishing between pages produced to petitioners and privileged documents submitted to the court.
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
This document is a summary of a trial preparation interview conducted on June 7, 2021, by the USAO with a witness/victim in the Epstein case. The notes detail that the witness received a $3.5 million award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she used for housing, transportation, and family support. The witness reported mental health struggles involving dreams of Epstein and disclosed that she lied about her age (claiming to be 17 when younger) to a redacted individual (presumably Epstein or an associate) while dating.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and technical support staff. The correspondence concerns the uploading of digital evidence into the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case # 2018R01618). Specifically, the attorney requests the creation of a folder structure to house the 'first subpoena response' received from the law firm Boies Schiller, dated March 4, 2019.
This document is an internal email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated March 24-25, 2021. The correspondence concerns drafting a response to a discovery demand made by Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' and 'Maxwell'). The emails include attachments referencing a letter to the USAO regarding discovery and FOIA requests.
Administrative travel request form dated November 20, 2021, submitted by an AUSA to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit for a fact witness in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The witness, whose identity is redacted, was scheduled to arrive in New York on November 27, 2021, and depart on December 2, 2021, for trial preparation. The document explicitly notes that this individual is a fact witness and not a victim-witness.
This document is a 'Fact Witness Travel Request' submitted to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit on November 19, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a domestic witness who is explicitly identified as a 'Victim-Witness' to appear for trial and trial preparation. The witness's identity and specific travel dates are redacted, but the form confirms they reside within the continental United States and require a hotel.
This document is an email chain dated August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. A Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) contacts the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) seeking records from Epstein's prior incarceration in Florida to assist with 'various investigations into the incident this past weekend.' The USANYS official replies that they have been 'walled off' from the investigation but provides a contact at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Violent Crimes/Homicide division.
This document is an email chain from December 3, 2009, regarding 'Op Stolen Globe.' The email coordinates a meeting scheduled for December 17, 2009, at the USAO in Miami to discuss a potential new investigation against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender requests FBI presence (SAC, ASAC, or handling agents) and notes their own travel schedule involving South Carolina, Colombia, and West Palm Beach.
This document is an email chain from August 10-11, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. It culminates in a formal letter from attorney Martin Weinberg to government officials and the MCC, requesting the preservation of all evidence related to Epstein's detention, his July 23 suicide attempt, and his death on August 10. Specific requests include video footage, visitor logs, medical records, and notes found in the cell. The chain also includes earlier emails from government officials confirming the initiation of FBI and Attorney General investigations.
This document is an email chain from August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death, discussing the logistics and legal basis for continuing victim interviews. Colleen Mullen, an attorney for the victims, coordinates a meeting in New York for August 26 and requests travel arrangements and counseling resources. Government officials discuss internal protocols for funding and authorizing witness travel to SDNY for an 'active grand jury investigation' despite the indictment status changing.
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
This document is an email thread from September 11, 2019, regarding logistics for an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. A government official requests travel arrangements for an unnamed 'Epstein victim' to fly from Palm Beach, FL to New York City on September 12, 2019. The purpose of the trip is for the victim to meet with the 'Epstein team of AUSAs and agents' at the SDNY office. The email confirms that USAO funds were approved to cover the costs of the flight and hotel.
An Assistant U.S. Attorney emails colleagues to report rumors that Epstein is falsely claiming cooperation in the Bernie Madoff case to secure a reduced sentence from the State Attorney's Office. The email also flags a suspicious court docket change removing 'Special Conditions' from Epstein's sentence and discusses the potential to investigate new allegations involving New York victims, noting interest from Madoff prosecutors in using evidence against Epstein.
An email exchange between Paul Cassell (representing victims) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the wording of a protective order. The order concerns the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to the victims. Cassell urges speed, citing government representations that 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement,' and negotiates the timing of when victims must sign acknowledgments of the protective order.
An email exchange between Epstein's lawyer, Roy Black, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Florida from August 2008. Black thanks the prosecutor for agreeing to block the disclosure of Epstein's 2007 plea agreement in civil cases, arguing that civil lawyers would use it to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA responds briefly, requesting a phone call to discuss a matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity