Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Conrad
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Wallace
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Government Counsel (Redacted)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISAINE MAXWELL
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Professional adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted BOP Official]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AJN (Judge Nathan)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
EFTA00025278.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and Bureau of Prisons officials. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with a USPS barcode despite never being mailed externally. She also complains about poor conditions at the MDC, including cramped meeting rooms violating COVID protocols, electricity/water issues, and the prison serving Maxwell a bologna sandwich despite her vegetarian diet.
EFTA00025206.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger, et al.) and Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns scheduling a call to discuss evidence requests and includes the transmission of an index of physical items held in FBI custody by the Miami office. The prosecutor references a previous discovery production from August 2020 and specific Bates ranges for scanned items.
EFTA00025196.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from March 8-9, 2021, between defense attorney Laura Menninger and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns a request to view evidence, specifically discussing spreadsheets indexing physical evidence seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the US Virgin Islands in 2019. The prosecutors note that while some evidence is indexed in Excel, other items like search warrant returns are not, and they mention specific Bates ranges for previously produced scans.
EFTA00025195.pdf
An email chain from February 23, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca) sending a courtesy copy of a bail application filing to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email was forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office with the commentary 'Apparently they think third time's the charm,' referring to Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure bail.
EFTA00025177.pdf
This document contains an email chain dated April 27, 2021, among staff at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), celebrating a court victory in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 21-58). The emails forward a Notice of Docket Activity from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals indicating that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail was denied. The staff congratulate a redacted colleague for doing a 'kickass job with this appeal.'
EFTA00025167.pdf
This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to prison officials (MDC), complaining that Ghislaine Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week. Sternheim provides four USPS tracking numbers showing legal mail has been 'Available for Pickup' at the Brooklyn post office for days (dating back to Oct 12) without being retrieved by the facility. Sternheim threatens to file an 'order to show cause' requiring the recipients' presence in court if the issue is not resolved immediately.
EFTA00025015.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP officials regarding legal access at the MDC. Sternheim requests permission to hand-deliver time-sensitive legal documents due to postal delays ahead of a January 25th filing deadline. The BOP official denies the request, citing policies requiring standard mail processing and a ban on visitors (likely due to COVID-19 protocols). The emails also confirm a schedule for Video Teleconferences (VTCs) for the week.
EFTA00024992.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and government/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be provided to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. The correspondence also includes a request for Maxwell to have access to a government-provided laptop to review discovery materials, arguing that MDC computers are insufficient for her defense.
EFTA00024912.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.
EFTA00024888.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials from January 2021. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is being targeted, physically mistreated (specifically alleging a guard squeezed her breast during a search), and denied proper food (receiving rotting fruit and meat despite a non-flesh diet). The correspondence references Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody as a reason for heightened concern regarding Maxwell's safety and requests the removal of the current guard team.
EFTA00024664.pdf
This document is an email thread between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in 'US v. Maxwell'. The defense advocates strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the Government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense suggests that consenting to bail would resolve the scheduling flexibility issues.
EFTA00024228.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and MDC officials. Sternheim raises concerns about non-functioning HEPA filters during attorney visits, requests the use of a larger corner room for future visits, and complains about delays in legal mail pickup. The final response from the facility confirms that the legal mail in question was picked up and delivered to Maxwell on the 15th and 18th of the month.
EFTA00024170.pdf
This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, related to the US v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr 330). Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (a legal mail delivery request) to co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) and potentially opposing counsel. The top email discusses the filing and attempts to schedule a call regarding an issue to be addressed at the final pretrial conference scheduled for the following Monday at 11 a.m.
EFTA00023481.pdf
An email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and likely prison or government officials. Sternheim complains about conditions during a legal visit (broken HEPA filters), requests use of a larger visiting room, and reports that legal mail sent to the MDC has not been picked up. The recipient acknowledges the concerns and promises to inquire with staff.
EFTA00023462.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 29-30, 2021, between Defense counsel (Christian Everdell et al.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of filing motions in limine. The correspondence details which specific exhibits are to be sealed (including grand jury testimony, a 'contact book', and a 'photobook') versus redacted. The parties coordinate the timing of their respective filings and discuss a joint cover letter.
EFTA00023458.pdf
This document is an email thread dated October 29, 2021, regarding urgent legal mail issues for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim complains that the MDC has failed to retrieve four items of legal mail despite them being available for pickup, noting Maxwell hasn't received legal mail in over a week. The response from a redacted official briefly states that mail was picked up that day. The footer reveals involvement from Isabel Maxwell acting as a paralegal for the Law Offices of Leah Saffian.
EFTA00023329.pdf
Defense counsel Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan opposing the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) regarding alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these materials are exculpatory under Brady because they relate to post-1997 allegations where witnesses do not implicate Maxwell, thereby supporting her defense against perjury charges that she was unaware of Epstein's abuse. The letter also argues the government has failed to show 'good cause' under Rule 16 to delay this discovery.
EFTA00023213.pdf
Legal correspondence from attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding the conditions of confinement for Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim complains that HEPA filters were not functioning during a visit on October 25, 2021, necessitating a move to a larger room, and requests that future visits occur in that larger room. Additionally, she provides tracking numbers for legal mail that has been sitting at the post office in Brooklyn without being picked up by the facility.
EFTA00023118.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell (Inmate 02879-509) at the MDC. Sternheim complains that during a visit on Oct 24, HEPA filters were broken in the small visiting room and requests future visits be moved to a larger corner room, noting that officers successfully positioned cameras there despite previous denials. Additionally, Sternheim raises urgent concerns about legal mail sent to the MDC not being picked up by the facility.
EFTA00023113.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 30, 2020, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and the Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim details complaints regarding Maxwell's detention conditions, specifically citing excessive searches, lack of privacy during showers, cold temperatures in her isolation cell due to lack of insulation and body heat from other inmates, and constant surveillance. The thread concludes with the attorneys arranging a phone call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00023047.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Motion' filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress all evidence obtained from a government subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The document lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell.
EFTA00023037.pdf
An email chain from October 12, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs recipients (likely MDC officials) that the government has sent a hard drive to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ghislaine Maxwell via Federal Express. Sternheim emphasizes that the hard drive must be given to Maxwell immediately upon arrival as time is of the essence.
EFTA00023009.pdf
This document is an internal email chain among US Attorney's Office (Southern District of NY) staff celebrating a court order from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals on April 27, 2021. The court denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail (Case 21-58). The emails convey congratulations to a redacted team member for their work on the appeal.
EFTA00022455.pdf
This document is a footer or signature block from a legal communication sent by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. It contains a standard legal privilege disclaimer and a specific notice regarding office closure and remote work due to the Covid-19 pandemic, instructing recipients to use email or fax instead of regular mail.
EFTA00022454.pdf
An email dated May 7, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email provides a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Unknown
Standard legal disclaimer and Covid-19 office closure notice found in an email signature/footer.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Maurene Comey (maurene.comey@usdoj.gov) and Andrew Rohrbach (andrew.rohrbach@usdoj.gov).
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via U.S. mail (postage prepaid) to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Hon. John M. Leventhal (judgeleventhal@aidalalaw.com).
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter opposing the motion filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to give oral victim impact statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing. The letter argues that neither individual qualifies as a statutory crime victim under the CVRA.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs Judge Nathan that her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been unjustifiably placed on suicide watch by the MDC, preventing her from preparing for her sentencing. Sternheim states Maxwell is not suicidal and warns that she will move for an adjournment if the situation persists.
No Subject
This is the signature page of a letter or legal filing from Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicating that attachments are included and that Counsel of Record have been copied.
Challenge to standing under CVRA
No preview available
Sentencing Procedures / Victim Statements
Request regarding the manner of sentencing and opposition to impact statements from individuals not identified as victims in the charged offenses.
Defense counsel letter regarding sealing of certain docum...
No preview available
Defense counsel writes regarding sealing of certain docum...
Letter dated 6/17/2022 entered on 6/21/2022.
2-day extension to file sentencing submission
Request for extension (Denied by court on 05/11/2022).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for a two-day extension to file sentencing submission due to attorney travel.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Requesting a stay of ruling pending review of a new interview given by Juror 50 to Paramount Plus.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing for a new trial for Ghislaine Maxwell based on the assertion that Juror 50 gave false answers on a juror questionnaire regarding his own past sexual abuse, which should have disqualified him from the jury.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting a proffer from Juror 50's counsel to explain the basis for the juror's assertion of the Fifth Amendment, in light of the juror's public statements and the government's consideration of immunity.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request regarding Juror 50's assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege and government immunity.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order, in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610) from the same day.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610).
Response to Dkt. 605
Letter in response to Order 605.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussion regarding proposed redactions to documents related to Juror 50's conduct and motion for a new trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in response to a previous docket entry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity