NCB
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ashton Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Burnett Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Sovereign Defendants
|
Co defendants |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PIF
|
Ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
bin Mahfouz family
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NCB
|
Family |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
US
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Instrumentality |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PIF
|
Major shareholder of |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Authorization of limited jurisdictional discovery regarding PIF | Federal Court (USA) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denial of NCB's motion to dismiss | Federal Court (USA) | View |
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Legal proceedings regarding Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 | Court | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling | Court | View |
| 2004-10-14 | N/A | Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding failure to state a claim. | Court (S.D.N.Y.) | View |
| 2004-10-12 | N/A | Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding motions to dismiss for lack of personal juris... | Court (S.D.N.Y.) | View |
| 2002-09-04 | N/A | Lawsuit filed | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2001-02-01 | N/A | SNCB Securities Inc. (NCB subsidiary) dissolved. | New York (Presumed) | View |
| 1998-02-17 | N/A | Closing of lawsuit Nat'l Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley Asset Mgmt., Inc. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1995-07-24 | N/A | Termination of lawsuit Logan Feed v. Nat'l Commercial Bank. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | NCB closed its New York City branch office. | New York City | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023381.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the financial infrastructure supporting al-Qaeda, specifically implicating financial institutions such as Al Shamal, FIBS, Al Rajhi Bank, and National Commercial Bank (NCB) in knowingly providing services and funneling money to the terrorist organization. The text cites testimony confirming that high-ranking banking officials had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and that the banks used charity fronts to channel funds for 'financial jihad.' Note: While labeled as an Epstein-related document request, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it focuses entirely on 9/11 terrorist financing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (specifically 2012 WL 257568) regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It details procedural history concerning the dismissal of claims against numerous defendants, including Saudi banks (Al Rajhi, SAMBA), organizations (Saudi Red Crescent), and individuals (multiple members of the Bin Laden family). The text discusses the impact of the 'Doe v. Bin Laden' decision on jurisdictional arguments under the FSIA (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) and mentions motions to vacate previous dismissals. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023375.jpg
This document is a Westlaw printout (dated 2019) bearing a House Oversight Committee bates stamp. It details legal proceedings regarding the 'Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation, specifically summarizing Judge Daniels' 2010 dismissals of numerous defendants (including members of the Bin Laden family, Saudi banks, and other individuals) for lack of personal jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The text focuses on the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act and the requirement to prove specific intent to support the 9/11 attacks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023365.jpg
This document is a page from a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities for a legal filing related to the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Torture Victim Protection Act, and negligence claims against defendants alleged to have materially supported al-Qaeda, specifically mentioning 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank) and 'Sovereign Defendants.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production, likely related to investigations into financial networks supporting terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024866.jpg
A page from a Cowen Collaborative Insights market research report dated February 25, 2019, analyzing the pricing segments of CBD confections and bars. It presents data on various brands like Lord Jones and baceae, categorizing them into Super Premium, Premium, Main, and Value segments based on price per milligram of CBD. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024866' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029459.tif
This document from Bank of America Merrill Lynch's Global Equities division provides an analysis of the Saudi market, anticipating positive outcomes from EM index reviews in March and June. It highlights strong Saudi fundamentals, including a bottomed-out growth and fiscal adjustment, and outlines a positive equity strategy. The report also details key events such as Crown Prince MBS's US tour and meeting with Trump, and recommends 10 single stock names to own in Saudi, including Al Rajhi, NCB, SABIC, Yansab, and STC.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016135.jpg
This document is page 25 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report ('GEMs Paper #26') dated June 30, 2016, analyzing Saudi Arabia's fiscal policy and the Public Investment Fund (PIF). It includes a detailed table of PIF domestic assets, calculating the potential monetary value of selling government stakes in major Saudi companies like SABIC and Saudi Telecom to replenish fiscal reserves. The text discusses the necessity of fiscal consolidation, the impact of oil prices, and predicted economic measures such as the implementation of VAT in 2018. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence in a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial connections.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity