Ms. Maxwell
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
68 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Client |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
55 | |
|
person
Judge Preska
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Defendant victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Financial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Proceeding | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding circumstantial evidence and inferences. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detention Hearing Decision | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator arrives at Jeffrey's, goes to massage room where Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell are waiting... | Jeffrey's residence, massag... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Request by Daily News to unseal documents related to Ms. Maxwell's new trial effort. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Took Minor Victim-2 to a movie | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when alleged events took place (described as 'over 25 years ago') | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged massages of Epstein by Accuser-3 | England | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness duties regarding household preparation | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight to New Mexico | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Last bail hearing where the Court expressed concern about lack of ties. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Mr. Alessi regarding Ms. Maxwell's use of the telephone directory. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's forthcoming motion before Judge Nathan. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Charge/Instructions regarding Count Four | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell visited Mar-a-Lago for potential treatment. | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acts alleged in Count Four of the Indictment (Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexu... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Trial | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transportation of Jane in interstate or foreign commerce. | Interstate/International | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sighting of Virginia Roberts | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Spa Check | Mar-a-Lago (Spa) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Three bail renewal hearings | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017340.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between defense counsel Mr. Everdell and the presiding judge. Mr. Everdell is concerned the jury might convict his client, Ms. Maxwell, based on conduct that occurred solely in New Mexico for a charge under New York law and requests a supplemental instruction. The judge denies the request, stating the proposed instruction is incorrect and that the defense missed an earlier opportunity to limit the related testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00017321.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Judge regarding a note sent by the jury during deliberations. The debate centers on whether the jury is asking about the general legal concept of 'aiding and abetting' or specifically about Ms. Maxwell's role in arranging flights to and from New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00017320.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument concerning jury deliberations in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion focuses on whether Maxwell arranged flights for a victim named 'Jane' to or from New Mexico, whether such travel constitutes a crime under Count Four (corrected from Count Two), and the confusion surrounding a specific note sent by the jury regarding these hypothetical facts.
DOJ-OGR-00017319.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Judge discuss a jury note regarding transportation and accountability for a return flight from New Mexico. The debate centers on whether Maxwell can be convicted based on arranging a return flight from an area where a victim, 'Jane,' claims sexual abuse occurred, as opposed to the initial flight to New Mexico which had alleged illegal intent.
DOJ-OGR-00017268.jpg
This document is a transcript of a judge's charge to the jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge provides final instructions before deliberations, covering communication protocols with the court, the proper use of personal notes, and the jury's duty to weigh the evidence. The core task outlined is for the jury to determine if the government has proven its case against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00017267.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a judge's instructions to a jury in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. The judge outlines the procedures for deliberation, including the election of a foreperson, the method for communicating with the court via written notes, and the process for requesting testimony. Crucially, the judge explicitly instructs the jury not to consider punishment in their deliberations, focusing solely on the evidence to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00017262.jpg
This document is a page of jury instructions from a criminal trial, case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It contains two specific instructions: Instruction No. 49, which directs the jury not to draw any negative inference from the defendant, Ms. Maxwell's, decision not to testify, and Instruction No. 50, which advises the jury not to make assumptions based on uncalled witnesses, as both parties had an equal opportunity to call them.
DOJ-OGR-00017261.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) containing jury instructions regarding the trial of Ms. Maxwell. The judge instructs the jury on how to interpret evidence of 'similar acts' introduced by the government, warning them not to use it as proof of bad character but potentially to determine intent, lack of mistake, or the existence of a common scheme or plan.
DOJ-OGR-00017258.jpg
This legal document is a page of jury instructions from a court case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury on how to assess witness credibility, clarifying that the use of pseudonyms for witness privacy should not influence their evaluation. It specifically details Instruction No. 45, which states that a witness's prior inconsistent statement should only be used to judge the credibility of their trial testimony, not as direct evidence of Ms. Maxwell's guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00017255.jpg
This document is page 234 of the jury charge filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains specific legal instructions to the jury, warning them not to infer guilt solely based on Maxwell's association with wrongdoers. It also introduces Instruction No. 44, guiding the jury on how to evaluate the credibility, honesty, and demeanor of witnesses using their common sense.
DOJ-OGR-00017254.jpg
This document is a transcript of a jury charge from a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury on the legal definition of an inference, distinguishing it from speculation and explaining how to draw reasonable conclusions from evidence. The judge specifically warns the jury that they cannot find the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, guilty based solely on her presence at and knowledge of a crime being committed.
DOJ-OGR-00017253.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, specifically a jury charge from a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text contains Instruction No. 43, which explains the concepts of circumstantial evidence and inferences to the jury. It clarifies that circumstantial evidence holds the same legal value as direct evidence and reminds the jury that they must be convinced of the defendant, Ms. Maxwell's, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt based on all evidence presented.
DOJ-OGR-00017246.jpg
This document is page 225 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, containing jury instructions (Charge) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text outlines legal standards for 'overt acts' regarding conspiracy charges, specifically Instruction No. 37. It explicitly instructs the jury that they cannot convict Maxwell on Counts One or Three solely based on the testimony of a witness named 'Kate'.
DOJ-OGR-00017242.jpg
This document is page 221 of a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) containing jury instructions (Charge) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the legal standards for conspiracy, specifically addressing the presumption of continuity in a conspiracy, the requirements for withdrawal, and Instruction No. 36 regarding the 'Third Element' which requires the government to prove an 'overt act' was committed.
DOJ-OGR-00017240.jpg
This document is a page from a jury charge in a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) against Ms. Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The text instructs the jury on the legal standards for proving participation in a conspiracy, clarifying that the government does not need to show that Ms. Maxwell knew all the details, activities, or members of the conspiracy. It also states that she is responsible for all acts of the conspiracy committed while she was a member, regardless of when she joined.
DOJ-OGR-00017239.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, is a portion of a charge or jury instruction concerning Ms. Maxwell. It defines the terms 'knowingly and willfully' and explains that for a conviction on a conspiracy charge, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Maxwell consciously intended to join and further an unlawful operation. The text instructs that since one cannot directly know a person's thoughts, the jury must infer knowledge and intent from evidence, such as alleged conversations involving Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017233.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains Jury Instruction No. 32 regarding 'Conspiracy to violate federal law' (Counts One, Three, and Five). The judge defines conspiracy under Section 371 as a 'criminal partnership' and explicitly instructs that Ms. Maxwell can be found guilty of conspiracy even if the substantive crime was never committed.
DOJ-OGR-00017230.jpg
This document is a page from a legal charge (jury instruction) filed on August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines the legal theory of "aiding and abetting," explaining that a defendant, specifically named as Ms. Maxwell, can be convicted for assisting in a crime even if she did not physically commit it herself. The text provides definitions for key terms like "counsel," "induce," and "procure" to guide the jury's deliberation.
DOJ-OGR-00017227.jpg
This document is page 206 of a court transcript (Document 767, filed 08/10/22) containing jury instructions for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details 'Instruction No. 27' and 'Instruction No. 28' regarding Count Six: Sex trafficking of an individual under the age of 18. The text outlines the burden of proof for the government to establish that Maxwell knowingly trafficked a specific victim named Carolyn for commercial sex acts while knowing she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00017225.jpg
This document is page 204 of a court transcript (Document 767, filed 08/10/22) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instructions 22, 23, and the start of 24. The text outlines the legal standards for Count Four (transportation of a minor), specifically requiring the government to prove Ms. Maxwell knew 'Jane' was under 17, and clarifying that the failure to actually accomplish the intended illegal sexual activity is not a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00017223.jpg
This document is a page from a legal proceeding, specifically a judge's charge to the jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the first element of Count Four, which accuses the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, of knowingly transporting a minor named Jane in interstate commerce between 1994 and 1997 for illegal sexual activity. The charge clarifies that the prosecution must prove Ms. Maxwell was actively involved in arranging the travel, but not necessarily that she physically transported Jane herself.
DOJ-OGR-00017222.jpg
This document is page 201 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instructions No. 18 and 19 regarding Count Four, which charges the defendant with the transportation of an individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual activity under Title 18, U.S.C. Section 2423(a). The text outlines the legal elements the government must prove, including the defendant's knowledge of the victim's age and intent to engage in criminal sexual activity under New York law.
DOJ-OGR-00017219.jpg
This document is page 198 of a court transcript (Document 767, filed Aug 10, 2022) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the judge's instructions (Charge) to the jury regarding legal definitions of 'knowingly' and 'intentionally,' as well as specific instructions (No. 16 and 17) regarding Count Two: Enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity. The text defines interstate commerce and outlines the government's burden of proof regarding Maxwell's intent to cause an individual to engage in criminal sexual activity under New York law.
DOJ-OGR-00017218.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Charge) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It outlines instruction No. 15 regarding Count Two, specifically the charge of enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity. The text defines the legal elements the government must prove, including interstate travel and intent, specifically relating to a victim referred to as 'Jane' during the period of 1994 to 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00017215.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, details several counts from an indictment against defendant Ms. Maxwell. The charges include conspiracy to transport minors and sex trafficking, with alleged crimes occurring between 1994 and 2004 involving multiple victims, specifically naming Jane and Carolyn in separate counts. The document concludes with an instruction, likely for a jury, to consider each of the six counts individually and return a separate verdict for each.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Government/Victims | $0.00 | Restitution (Government is not seeking restitut... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Unspecified | $0.00 | Sale of 69 Stanhope Mews and purchase of Kinner... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $23,000,000.00 | Transfer of funds confirmed by bank statements. | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court/Government | $0.00 | Discussion regarding a court-imposed fine and M... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | the government | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine; amount not spec... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Attorney Escrow A... | $0.00 | Funds for legal services presently held in atto... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Proposed bond (amount not specified on this pag... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Escrow | $0.00 | Money currently held in escrow for legal fees. | View |
| 2020-12-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Reported assets in support of bail application. | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A (Reporting) | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Ms. Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Assets reported in support of bail application. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Deal closed for leasehold property. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Closing of the deal for property sale. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Contracts exchanged for leasehold property. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Exchange of contracts for property sale. | View |
Non-legal personal matters
Her non-legal phone calls are monitored in real time, and information from them was used by staff to confront her about a personal matter (the death of someone close to her).
Legal consultation
Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
CorrLinks emails
Ms. Maxwell's CorrLinks emails were allegedly erased by guards.
Pretrial motions
Request for a legal call to confer with counsel regarding pretrial motions was denied.
Legal Defense
Meetings behind closed doors, visible but not audible to staff.
Discovery Disc
Federal Express envelope containing an unreadable discovery disc, delayed by two weeks.
Legal Emails
Legal emails prematurely deleted by MDC in violation of policy.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Status/Indictment
Maxwell stayed in contact with the government, allegedly to stave off indictment, but did not provide whereabouts.
Discovery in Giuffre v. Maxwell
Two depositions designated confidential.
Phone Message
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Needs/requests
Communication via beeper if she needed something
General communication
Communication via cell phones
Legal Defense
Facilitated on-going communication.
Location tracking
Government located Maxwell by tracking her primary phone.
Rules and Regulations
Guards were the sole source of information; Maxwell was instructed not to speak to them lest she face disciplinary sanction.
Missed Call
Telephoned / Please Call
Discovery relevant to motions
Ms. Maxwell asked the government for documents relevant to these motions, but was denied.
In-person legal conference
Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.
Video conference
Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.
Video conference
Session reduced by 90 minutes; severe audio/video technical issues impacting confidentiality and visibility.
Defense Preparation
Reference to Maxwell's need to communicate freely with counsel to prepare for defense.
Performance of duties at the residence
Ms. Maxwell provided instructions to Alessi regarding his duties at the residence, which involved tasks in various rooms and areas of the property.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity