| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Hayley
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror No. 93
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Pauley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Steven Lavelle
|
Past association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Conrad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Theresa Trzaskoma
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Her father
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. OKULA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Recruiter recruit |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prior testimony given by a witness with a criminal record. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness testimony regarding civil suit discussions. | Unknown room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounters involving Jeffrey Epstein (massages, oral sex, intercourse). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Massage | Jeff gave the witness a massage and asked how old they were. | upstairs | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The first meeting between the witness and Jeff. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Shopping trip | Hayley bought a purse at Marshall's. | Marshall's | View |
| N/A | Witness testimony | A witness testified about being in "group sexualized massages" or "orgies" involving Epstein and ... | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Trip | A witness described multiple visits to Epstein's house for massages which escalated into sexual a... | Epstein's house/residence | View |
| N/A | Conversation | The witness and their aunt discussed a lawsuit. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Questioning under oath | An unnamed witness was asked under oath about who was involved in her trafficking or sexual abuse... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Police incident | A Florida police report details the witness being dropped off by a local drug dealer at 5:45 a.m.... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Police incident | The witness was found by police in an inappropriate place after running away from home. | Georgia | View |
| N/A | Grand jury | A scheduled grand jury, four days before which the witness allegedly changed her story about her ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Personal conflict | The witness's father kicked her out of his home. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness went to Epstein's house. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Admission to facility | The witness was admitted to a juvenile educational facility. | juvenile educational facility | View |
| N/A | Sexual encounter | The witness states she had her first sexual intercourse at age 14. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged incident | An alleged incident of physical contact between an unnamed witness and Mr. Epstein. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | A witness testified before a Grand Jury when they were 14 or 15 years old. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Transportation | The witness's dad drove them to the Grand Jury testimony. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court appearance | An unnamed witness has a court appearance scheduled for an upcoming Monday. | unspecified court | View |
| N/A | Flight | An unnamed witness is scheduled to get on a plane on an upcoming Monday night. | unspecified | View |
| N/A | Encounter | An encounter between the witness and Mr. Epstein where he allegedly asked her to massage him and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Relocation | The witness moved to Arizona. | Arizona | View |
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination dated August 10, 2022. An unnamed witness, Annie's mother, testifies about Annie's background, stating she was born in Missouri and grew up there, in Florida, and in Arizona. The testimony focuses on the year 1995, during which the witness was a divorced single mother with a 'very limited income', working as a sales representative and living with Annie and a younger daughter.
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of a witness's testimony concerning the technical properties of burning CDs and file dates (created vs. modified). The defense argues that certain technical details were not disclosed in a 'November 26 letter,' while the prosecution argues these details are common knowledge not requiring specialized expertise.
This document is page 236 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains jury instructions regarding the evaluation of witness credibility, specifically focusing on how the jury should weigh the testimony of a witness who is a convicted felon. The text instructs jurors to use their common sense and everyday experience to determine if the witness is truthful despite their criminal record.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The transcript details a discussion between the Judge and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach regarding the admissibility of remote testimony for a witness who may have tested positive for COVID-19, referencing Ms. Sternheim's proffer and the standards of Rule 15. The government indicates it would not resist a finding of unavailability if a positive test is confirmed.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim requests that a male witness, who is quarantined with COVID-19, be allowed to testify via WebEx rather than traveling. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach insists that the witness must be subject to cross-examination (rejecting a stipulation) and demands proof of a positive COVID test.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the afternoon session of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests edits to a limiting instruction for the jury regarding an upcoming witness, specifically changing the phrase 'sexual conduct' to 'physical contact' regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense confer and agree on the language before the judge approves it.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Judge regarding the admissibility of information on an insurance form, specifically whether listing family members constitutes hearsay. The discussion references the 'Lieberman' case precedent regarding business records and verification procedures.
This document is a court transcript from March 11, 2022, detailing the end of a witness's testimony and a subsequent procedural discussion. A witness denies that reading the case summary, which involves sexual crimes, made them reflect on their own past sexual abuse. After the witness is excused, the judge (THE COURT) discusses the schedule for post-trial briefings with the government's counsel, Ms. Moe.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It captures the questioning of a witness about their answers on a jury selection questionnaire. The examiner probes whether the witness, who has a history of sexual abuse, intentionally provided inaccurate answers to get selected for the jury, which the witness denies. The witness also recounts the timeline of being summoned for jury duty and filling out the questionnaire on November 4th.
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding transcript, filed on February 24, 2022, detailing a Q&A session. Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically investigating if two individuals with that name, one identified as 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion also covers the firm's knowledge regarding Juror No. 1's identity and the involvement of Theresa Trzaskoma in related inquiries.
This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.
This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.
This document is page 83 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness acknowledges being aware of the arrangement after it happened but denies knowing any specific details, including whether any money was actually exchanged.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about their contact with Steven Lavelle, stating they no longer speak. The witness denies knowing two redacted female individuals by name but suggests they could identify them from photos, and also denies any knowledge of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
This document is a legal letter dated April 15, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim requests a continuance of the July 12th trial, arguing that a new superseding indictment significantly expands the scope of the case from a four-year period in the 1990s to an eleven-year period (1994-2004). The letter claims the government is responsible for the delay by filing late charges based on a witness known to them since the Florida investigation.
This Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office offense report, dated April 1, 2006, details the arrest of a female juvenile for battery against her father. The report notes the juvenile's erratic behavior, a witness statement claiming she took Xanax at a party, and a history of narcotic use. The juvenile was transported to a juvenile assessment center, and the case was cleared by arrest.
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about conversations they had with their aunt concerning a lawsuit and a 'Mr. Herman'. The witness states that Tiffany Rich never had a conversation with Mr. Herman in their presence, and only answered the door before leaving.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over the propriety of a question. The witness testifies that a "Mr. Epstein" asked her to do more than just massage him, specifically alleging he asked her to take off her bra.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about her living situation, confirming she lives with her aunt and uncle after being kicked out by her father around Thanksgiving of the previous year. The questioning occurs in the context of a fifty million-dollar lawsuit her father filed against Jeffrey Epstein, and it clarifies that her boyfriend, Brett Albritton, has his own apartment where she does not currently live.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, summarizes a sworn statement from a witness regarding an event in November 2004. The witness, who was seventeen at the time, alleges she was recruited by Haley Robson to give a massage to a man named Jeff, during which he engaged in non-consensual sexual acts before paying her $350-$400. The investigation was initiated after police researched a phone number in October 2005.
This document is page 110 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about serious allegations, including whether a firefighter named Brett is in a relationship with a minor and whether the witness has lied about their sister's alleged drug habit. The witness denies the accusations while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as argumentative.
This document is page 65 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about deleting their MySpace page just a few days prior to the deposition, and after having already been subpoenaed. The witness denies deleting the page to avoid a government subpoena, claiming they were simply 'sick and tired' of the platform and the 'drama' associated with it.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Comey are discussing legal obligations under Rule 16 regarding the disclosure of impeachment evidence (specifically photographs) prior to cross-examination. The text mentions a witness who testified about the appearance of a home and notes that this witness worked for Jeffrey Epstein until 2019.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge outlines the protocol for showing electronic evidence to a witness who is testifying under a pseudonym, expressing concern that the material could inadvertently reveal the witness's identity to the gallery. The judge agrees to the proposed method of using limited screens, provided the government is kept fully aware and paper copies are available as a backup.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Unnamed witness | $0.00 | Alleged payment for Interlochen Arts Camp atten... | View |
She reports seeing a woman with short dark hair at the house.
The witness mentions an article about an interview that was published by The Independent.
The witness states they first learned the questionnaire contained a question about sexual abuse history during an interview with Daily Mail reporter Laura Collins.
A witness answers questions about an unnamed female's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, stating their contact began around 2003 when she was 15 and continued until 2005. The testimony also references a contact dated March 1, 2003.
A witness who had already testified called Brian, an anticipated witness, to discuss their experience on the witness stand, including a document they were shown. This communication is the basis for a request to bar Brian from testifying.
Offered to sell the 'Holy Grail' for $50,000.
Instruction not to discuss testimony with others.
Discussion of testimony which may be a transgression.
Interview regarding when Epstein lived at the property.
Providing legal services
Questions about Cohen's resentment, Kushner, Hicks, and Trump's affairs/trysts.
A signed declaration from a witness detailing what his testimony would be, related to the Kinnerton Street property.
A signed declaration from a witness detailing what his testimony would be, related to the Kinnerton Street property.
Stated she didn't feel comfortable talking right now or had no specific recollection.
Stated she didn't feel comfortable talking right now or had no specific recollection.
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about their knowledge of a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness claims to have learned of it after the fact and denies knowing any details.
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about their relationship with Steven Lavelle, their knowledge of two redacted female names, and their awareness of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury. The witness denies current contact with Lavelle and denies knowledge of the other individuals.
An interrogator questions a witness under oath about the timing and motive for deleting their MySpace page, specifically in relation to being under subpoena for the deposition.
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about their knowledge of a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness claims to have learned of it after the fact and denies knowing any details.
Officer Recarey made telephone contact with a witness who agreed to meet at her home.
Officer Recarey made telephone contact with a witness who agreed to meet at her home.
Application stating she did not expect funds from any individual for attendance.
Epstein initiated multiple calls with the witness, starting in December 1995. In the first call, he offered to fly Annie to New York to visit Maria for Christmas. In subsequent calls, he discussed helping Annie with her college selection.
Application for summer of '95; no mention of Epstein support.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity