Trove
Sign In Sign Up

THE COURT

Person
Mentions
4828
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2363
Also known as:
THE COURT, MR. DONALDSON
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00017857.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Besselsen regarding the verification of a camper's file and application photo from the institution 'Interlochen.' During the testimony, Government Exhibit 743 is admitted under seal to protect the identity of a student testifying under a pseudonym.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017855.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the admission of Government Exhibit 741 (GX-741), an eight-page document, into evidence without objection. Following this, attorney Mr. Rohrbach questions witness Mr. Besselsen about record-keeping practices at Interlochen, specifically establishing that student files are kept in manila folders in a locked room in the Maddy Administration Building.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017850.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding on August 10, 2022. It records the conclusion of testimony from a witness named Matt, who is excused by the court. Immediately following, counsel for the government, Mr. Rohrbach, calls the next witness, Daniel Alan Besselsen, who is then sworn in to testify.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017849.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Matt regarding his past relationship with a victim referred to as 'Jane.' The testimony covers Jane's reaction to Ghislaine Maxwell's 2020 arrest, where Jane confirmed to Matt that Maxwell was the woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house who had made her feel comfortable. The witness also relays a conversation where Jane told her mother that money she received 'was not free.'

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017848.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Matt. Matt recounts a conversation from 2011 where he witnessed a person named Jane confront her mother about money connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Jane accused her mother of knowing the money was not 'free' and questioned how her mother thought she had received it.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a sidebar on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim debate with the judge about the admissibility of a witness's testimony regarding a confrontation between 'Jane' and her mother, where Jane allegedly questioned her mother about money and implicitly acknowledged being abused. The discussion focuses on whether this testimony constitutes a prior consistent statement and its presence in the '3500 material'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017845.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Matt. Matt describes his former girlfriend, Jane, and her 'brutal' relationship with her mother. He recounts witnessing an event around 2011 where Jane confronted her mother about Jeffrey Epstein, which prompts an objection from an attorney, Ms. Sternheim.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017844.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Matt. Matt testifies about conversations he had with a woman named Jane regarding her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. He describes Jane's demeanor during these conversations as 'Ashamed, embarrassed, horrified,' but confirms that she did not provide specific details about what happened.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017843.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness. The witness testifies about conversations with a person named 'Jane' that took place around 2009, in which Jane revealed that the presence of another woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house made her feel more comfortable. The transcript includes a sustained objection by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and instructions from the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017842.jpg

This document is a page of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Matt. The witness testifies about conversations he had with a person named Jane, who allegedly told him that her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein began when she was 14 years old after meeting him at a camp.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017841.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Matt. Matt testifies about conversations with a woman referred to as 'Jane,' specifically asking her if she was involved with Jeffrey Epstein for money. The testimony reveals that Jane admitted she had to do things with Epstein she didn't want to do, noting 'it wasn't free,' and the prosecution introduces the term 'massage' into the line of questioning over a defense objection.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017840.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Matt by an attorney, Ms. Moe. The questioning focuses on what a person named Jane told the witness about receiving financial help from Jeffrey Epstein. A key part of the witness's testimony is objected to by opposing counsel, Ms. Sternheim, and the objection is sustained by the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017839.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Matt. He recounts a conversation with 'Jane' in which she revealed that the 'godfather' helping pay her and her family's bills was Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from the Court requiring a more specific question regarding when Jane met Epstein.

Court transcript / trial testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017837.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Matt by prosecutor Ms. Moe. Matt testifies about conversations he had with 'Jane' regarding her childhood financial hardship, specifically detailing how her family went broke paying for her father's medical treatments before he died. The testimony highlights extreme poverty, noting that Jane, her mother, and two brothers lived in a small place where the three children shared a single bed.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017836.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the testimony of a witness about a woman he was in a relationship with. The Court rules to limit the testimony, allowing only topics from cross-examination that serve to attack the woman's credibility.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017835.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and the judge regarding an evidentiary objection. The core of the debate is whether testimony supporting a witness's claims about her difficult home life is admissible after her credibility on that very topic was attacked by Ms. Sternheim's side.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017834.jpg

A sidebar transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court discuss the admissibility of testimony from a witness named Matt, specifically regarding whether a female accuser had revealed abuse allegations to him prior to meeting with the government. The Judge challenges the defense's objection, noting they had previously attacked the accuser's credibility regarding her financial background (living in a pool house, losing her home), making this testimony relevant as a 'prior consistent statement.'

Court transcript (sidebar discussion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017833.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Matt is being questioned about his past dating relationship with a woman named Jane and what she told him about her difficult home life as a child. The testimony is interrupted by a hearsay objection from an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, which is then argued by another attorney, Ms. Moe, before the judge makes a preliminary ruling.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017829.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, successfully moves to enter Government Exhibit 17 into evidence under seal to protect the identity of a witness, Matt, who is testifying under a pseudonym. After the jury is directed to view the exhibit, Ms. Moe begins her direct examination of the witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017827.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) and the Judge discuss sealing exhibits and the use of a pseudonym for the next witness, 'Matt,' to protect the identity of the prior witness ('Jane'). The jury enters, and 'Matt' is sworn in to testify for the Government.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017824.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge and several attorneys (Ms. Moe, Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Rohrbach) regarding trial procedures. Key topics include clarifying testimony about Ms. Maxwell, the status of contacts with a witness named 'Jane', and confirming an agreement that victim-witnesses will not observe the trial until after both the prosecution and defense have rested their cases.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017822.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or legal argument where the defense objects to a witness named Matt using the term 'girls' when recounting what 'Jane' told him, as it implies underage status without proof. The Court sustains the objection, and Prosecutor Ms. Moe agrees to lead the witness to use neutral terms like 'females' or 'people' to avoid unfounded implications of age.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017821.jpg

This court transcript page from August 10, 2022, documents a legal argument between attorney Ms. Sternheim and the judge during the redirect examination of a witness named Jane. The core of the dispute is whether the use of the term 'girls' versus 'women' is a significant distinction, with Ms. Sternheim arguing that 'girls' improperly implies the subjects are minors, which supports the government's theory of the case in a way that is inconsistent with the witness's testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017819.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and two attorneys, Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe, during a recess. Ms. Sternheim raises a potential issue with the government's next witness, Matt, noting that his prior statements regarding a conversation with another individual, Jane, do not fully align with the direct examination. This suggests a potential challenge to the witness's credibility or the consistency of his testimony.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017818.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022. After a witness named Jane is excused, the court calls for a break. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, then raises a procedural issue, requesting a proffer from the government regarding the testimony of the next witness, Matt, to ensure it complies with evidence rules and avoids improper statements.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$162,555,000.00
16 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$162,555,000.00
16 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $9,500,000.00 Value of real property offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received security company THE COURT $1,000,000.00 Bond co-signed by a security company. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $550,000.00 Cash offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... THE COURT $28,500,000.00 Proposed total bond amount. View
2020-12-14 Received Sureties (Family/... THE COURT $0.00 Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... View
2020-07-13 Received Unidentified co-s... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... View
2020-07-10 Received Defense/Co-signers THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. View
2020-07-10 Received Ms. Maxwell / Ass... THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... View
2020-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... View
2019-07-18 Received MR. EPSTEIN THE COURT $0.00 Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... View
2019-07-11 Received Jeffrey Epstein THE COURT $77,000,000.00 Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... View
2010-07-01 Received Epstein's counsel THE COURT $5,000.00 Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. View
As Sender
409
As Recipient
1009
Total
1418

Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Post-Hearing Brief

From: Maxwell Defense Team
To: THE COURT

Dismissed Juror 50's responses as 'self-serving'.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Second Motion for Bail

From: . MAXWELL
To: THE COURT

Addressed concerns regarding flight risk and corroboration of evidence.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Second Bail Motion

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Opposition to bail.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Third Motion for Bail

From: . MAXWELL
To: THE COURT

Offer to renounce foreign citizenship.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photographs

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether photographs corroborate a witness's blind description of a residence interior given the time lapse.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statements

From: Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria ...
To: THE COURT

Written submissions submitted in accordance with the Court's order.

Written submissions
N/A
Communication Source

Order de-designating documents

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Motion to remove Highly Confidential status from materials.

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on Count Four

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Asked if defendant can be found guilty if she aided the return flight but not the flight to New Mexico where intent for sexual activity existed.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Br. at 14-15

From: Maxwell Defense Team
To: THE COURT

Speculated that the jury was focused on a 1997 flight.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Additional proposed redactions

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Submission of additional redactions under seal

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Reply at 23

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Argues that Rule 606 violates Maxwell's constitutional rights.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct inquiry

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Statements about a second juror.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Presentation of Photos

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell explains they only have single copies of certain photos received that morning and proposes walking them to the jury row rather than distributing copies.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Withdrawal of arrest warrant request

From: defense (implied)
To: THE COURT

Withdrawal of the request to issue an arrest warrant for witness Kelly.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Disclosure of Maxwell grand jury materials

From: Victims (via represent...
To: THE COURT

Letters urging broad disclosure of investigative records regarding Epstein and Maxwell, provided identities are redacted.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to [Unseal/Redact]

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Government proposes to redact names and personally identifying information of victims and third parties.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Answering Brief (Ans.Br.)

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Government claims Maxwell is attempting to have the Court weigh in on investigative methods.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Briefing Schedule

From: Defense Counsel (Mr. E...
To: THE COURT

Proposal for a briefing schedule after counsel confers.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Question on Count Four

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Opposition to release

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Cited two pages of cases regarding health risks and dangerousness.

Legal brief/reply
N/A
Communication Source

Sidebar Request

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Requesting a sidebar to discuss proving an inconsistent statement of a prior witness.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Defendant's brief cited at page 12 regarding legislative history.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Page 32 note 13

From: Brune/Defense Team
To: THE COURT

Stated defendants had no basis to inquire whether Conrad was lying.

Memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search