Trove
Sign In Sign Up

THE COURT

Person
Mentions
4828
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2363
Also known as:
THE COURT, MR. DONALDSON
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00011552.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, where attorneys debate whether Maxwell had a supervisory or leadership role over Sarah Kellen. One attorney argues against this, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's. In response, another attorney, Ms. Moe, references testimony from a witness named Carolyn who recalled Kellen scheduling massages while Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence, implying a connection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011549.jpg

This court transcript excerpt from July 22, 2022, details an argument by a prosecutor, Ms. Moe, to the Court. Ms. Moe is establishing that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, held a leadership and supervisory role over Sarah Kellen within a criminal conspiracy, positioning Maxwell higher in the scheme's hierarchy than Kellen, who was an assistant to both Maxwell and Epstein.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011547.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell sentencing) dated July 22, 2022. The defense argues that money transfers for a helicopter and Larry Visoski holding car assets for Epstein do not prove the defendant's continued involvement in the conspiracy. Prosecutor Ms. Moe counters that the financial evidence was offered to refute the claim that the defendant had 'moved on' from her association with Epstein.

Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011546.jpg

This document is page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 22, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues against a sentencing enhancement, disputing the reliability of a 'message pad' and arguing that the conspiracy effectively ended in 2004, meaning 2003 guidelines should apply. The defense also contests a government claim that the defendant received $7 million into the 2007 time period.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011545.jpg

This is page 26 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 22, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the conspiracy charge cannot extend to 2005 because the individual named Carolyn was no longer a minor at that time (her birthday being in early January). Everdell also challenges the reliability and admissibility of an undated 'message pad' used as evidence, arguing it cannot be properly authenticated or dated.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011544.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a discussion about the date of a specific message, believed to be from November 2004. An attorney, Ms. Moe, argues that surrounding dates on message pads, flight records, and the defendant's travel with Epstein during that time support this date. The testimony of a crime victim named Carolyn is also cited as evidence of an ongoing conspiracy, which the defendant has the burden to prove withdrawal from.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011543.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022. It details a legal argument between Ms. Moe and the Court regarding the timeline of a conspiracy, specifically whether it extended into 2005. Ms. Moe cites 'message pads' and a specific November 2004 message from an individual named Carolyn contacting 'the house' for an appointment as evidence that the conspiracy was still live during that period.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011542.jpg

This court transcript excerpt details a legal argument between counsel (MS. MOE) and the judge (THE COURT) about the end date of a criminal conspiracy. MS. MOE argues the conspiracy continued through the end of 2004, citing testimony from a witness named Carolyn who stated she was continually at Epstein's house during 2004 and 2005. The Court questions this line of reasoning, suggesting the actions described may constitute 'non-conspiracy conduct'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a government attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the legal end date of a conspiracy, with the government arguing it extended through 2004 and into 2005. The judge expresses concern that the evidence cited by the government is 'post conspiracy' because it falls after the date in the indictment and, crucially, after a person named Carolyn turned 18, an event upon which the conspiracy's continuation was legally dependent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011526.jpg

This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated July 22, 2022, involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court overrules defense objections regarding factual assertions, specifically crediting testimony that Maxwell targeted Virginia Giuffre at Mar-a-Lago and confirming via bank statements that Epstein transferred approximately $23 million to Maxwell during their conspiracy. The Judge also confirms Maxwell's authorship of a specific essay based on computer metadata linking the file to user 'Ghislaine' and computer 'GMax'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002751.jpg

This document is Page 4 of a court filing (Document 165) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on March 9, 2021. The text is the Government's argument opposing the defendant's third request for bail, citing her extreme flight risk, substantial foreign ties (including citizenship in a non-extradition country), and lack of candor regarding finances. The Government argues that the defendant's offer to renounce citizenship and place assets in monitorship is insufficient to assure her appearance in court.

Court filing (government's opposition memorandum)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$162,555,000.00
16 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$162,555,000.00
16 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $9,500,000.00 Value of real property offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received security company THE COURT $1,000,000.00 Bond co-signed by a security company. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $550,000.00 Cash offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... THE COURT $28,500,000.00 Proposed total bond amount. View
2020-12-14 Received Sureties (Family/... THE COURT $0.00 Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... View
2020-07-13 Received Unidentified co-s... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... View
2020-07-10 Received Defense/Co-signers THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. View
2020-07-10 Received Ms. Maxwell / Ass... THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... View
2020-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... View
2019-07-18 Received MR. EPSTEIN THE COURT $0.00 Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... View
2019-07-11 Received Jeffrey Epstein THE COURT $77,000,000.00 Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... View
2010-07-01 Received Epstein's counsel THE COURT $5,000.00 Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. View
As Sender
409
As Recipient
1009
Total
1418

Jury Folders

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Asking permission to place folders under jury chairs for cross-examination.

Court dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness Anonymity

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Requesting anonymity or name protection for defense witnesses.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on Count Four

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Court Exhibit #15; indicated confusion about whether intent for sexual activity in New Mexico was sufficient for conviction.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Character reference/observation

From: Fellow unit inmate
To: THE COURT

Unsolicited letter reciting Maxwell's value as an asset to the unit.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Ambiguous question regarding aiding/abetting or purpose o...

From: Jury (implied 'they')
To: THE COURT

The jury sent a question/note regarding Count Four and intent.

Jury note/question
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Question 48

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

Failure to disclose being a victim of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire response
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Question 25

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

Failure to disclose being a victim of a crime.

Questionnaire response
N/A
Communication Source

Request 2(c)

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Request seeking documentation of dates on which Juror 50 opened and closed social media accounts.

Subpoena request
N/A
Communication Source

No Subject

From: THE COURT
To: the government

Discussion regarding a deposition transcript raised by the government.

Litigation/discussion
N/A
Communication Source

Question regarding Count Four elements

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Inquiry about whether intent for sexual activity in New Mexico and aiding return flight satisfies Count Four.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Dismissal timing

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Note regarding dismissal at 5 p.m. and timing for tomorrow.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling concerns

From: THE COURT
To: MS. POMERANTZ

Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling concerns

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Juror status

From: Unknown
To: THE COURT

Reference to a 'note to the Court' regarding the suspended lawyer issue.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Conviction basis for Count Four

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Indicated jurors were considering convicting Maxwell on Count Four based solely on Jane's testimony about New Mexico.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Ending the day

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Stopping the examination because it is 4:59 PM.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Schedule

From: THE COURT
To: Members of the jury

Instructions regarding daily start times (9:30 AM), arrival times, and the holiday schedule for Christmas and New Year's weeks.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Support/Character

From: Various (implied)
To: THE COURT

Letters indicating the Defendant has significant ties to family and friends abroad.

Letters
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed Bail Motion

From: defense
To: THE COURT

Letters and documentation regarding defendant's ties to the US.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Opposition Letter (Dkt. No. 320)

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Opposing the request to identify the defendant's unnamed co-conspirators.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Response Letter (Dkt. No. 331)

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Raised two issues: seeking identities of co-conspirators and disclosure of co-conspirator statements.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Mem. of Law (Dkt. No. 293)

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Pretrial motions requesting identification of uncharged co-conspirators.

Memo
N/A
Communication Source

The Jury Note

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Referenced in section I.A.2 as a background fact.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Question 48 and 48a

From: Jurors
To: THE COURT

Questions regarding details of victim's sexual abuse.

Written questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Motion for intervention and discovery

From: Juror No. 50
To: THE COURT

Requests regarding judicial document status, currently under seal.

Legal submission
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search