Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Everdell

Person
Mentions
1327
Relationships
118
Events
605
Documents
644
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
118 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
16 Very Strong
35
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
13
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Co counsel
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
12 Very Strong
12
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
196
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
22
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
28
View
person the Judge
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Chapell
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
person Mr. Visoski
Legal representative
8 Strong
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Espinosa
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross Examination of Tracy Chapell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding sentencing or appeal arguments (Case 22-1426). Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Rule 29 Argument Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury instructions and a question asked by the jury. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing Hearing / Pre-sentencing argument Southern District of New Yo... View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Patrick McHugh Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kelly Maguire Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding supplemental jury instructions Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court ruling on the 'attorney witness issue' regarding the defense case-in-chief. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding Maxwell's sentencing or appeal points concerning her role in the conspiracy. Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Extension of Jury Deliberations New York City Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conference between Defense and Government Courtroom (implied) View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury questions and instructions for Count Four. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Trial Resumption Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury instructions and admissibility of testimony for conspiracy counts. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00018557.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by an attorney, Ms. Moe. The testimony serves to authenticate Government Exhibit 929, a photograph of a dressing room and a safe found during a search of a residence. After Maguire confirms the photograph's accuracy and describes its contents, the exhibit is admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018556.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of Special Agent Maguire. The government attorney, Ms. Moe, questions Maguire about Government Exhibit 926, a photograph of CDs seized by the FBI from a closet on a fifth floor. Maguire confirms the CDs were marked as evidence Item 1B-63, and the court admits the exhibit into evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018553.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about admitting evidence. An attorney, Ms. Moe, successfully argues for admitting Government Exhibit 925 under seal because it contains identifying information of third parties, while a redacted version, Exhibit 925-R, is admitted as a public exhibit for the jury to review. The transcript also briefly mentions that FBI personnel were responsible for placing labels on binders related to the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018551.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The questioning, led by government counsel Ms. Moe, concerns binders found during a search, which are depicted in photographic exhibits. After conferring with opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, Ms. Moe amends her request to admit evidence, withdrawing Exhibit 914 and successfully moving to admit Exhibits 925 and 925-R without objection.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018549.jpg

This page is a transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on identifying a 'massage room' and a wooden shelving unit depicted in Government Exhibits 917-R and 928-R. Both exhibits are received into evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018548.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on the identification and admission of Government Exhibits 904-R and 917-R, which serve as photographic evidence of a massage room containing a massage table and a doorway leading to an adjoining bathroom. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell offers no objections to the evidence, and the Court admits the exhibits for publication.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018546.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 902-R and 903-R, which are identified as photographs of an entryway and the interior of a 'massage room.' Defense attorney Mr. Everdell offers no objections to the admission of these exhibits.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018544.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents the direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, introduces a photograph of a blue spiral staircase (Government Exhibit 915-R), which the witness identifies and confirms is an accurate depiction. The exhibit is then admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018535.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a discussion between the defense (Mr. Everdell), the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the Court regarding Exhibit 913, which contains photos of children and other individuals found on a desk; the parties agree to file it under seal due to privacy interests. Following this discussion, the jury enters, and the government calls Special Agent Kelly Maguire as a witness.

Court transcript (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018532.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of a schoolgirl outfit as evidence. The prosecution argues the outfit corroborates a witness's testimony about Epstein's 'practice' of asking people to wear such costumes. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, contends the evidence is highly prejudicial, based on a single witness, and insufficient to establish a pattern, a position with which the judge seems to agree.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018529.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a legal argument over the admissibility of photo exhibits dated from 2019. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues the photos demonstrate Jeffrey Epstein's sexual preference for schoolgirls, while the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the Judge question the relevance given the time gap and location discrepancies (New York vs. Palm Beach) relative to the charged conspiracy. The text mentions testimony from a witness named 'Kate' regarding schoolgirl outfits.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018527.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises an objection regarding the admissibility of exhibits 919 and 920 (photographs of schoolgirl outfits) intended to be introduced by the next witness, Kelly Maguire. Everdell argues that although 'Witness 3' (Kate) described wearing such outfits, she did not identify these specific photos during her testimony, lacking the proper legal foundation required for admission, similar to a previous situation with a witness named Jane.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018525.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Witness McHugh testifies regarding the authenticity of Government Exhibit 507, identified as a JP Morgan account signature card. The witness confirms comparing the exhibit against internal bank records, and the Court admits the exhibit into evidence without objection before excusing the witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018516.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. McHugh, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on the financial trail of a 2007 helicopter purchase, specifically a $7.4 million transfer from an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein to one held by Ghislaine Maxwell. These funds were then allegedly moved through an entity called Air Ghislaine to pay the manufacturer, Sikorsky.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018511.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh. The questioning focuses on Government Exhibit 506, which is identified as a signature card for a bank account ending in 4324. The questioner establishes a link between this account and the company Air Ghislaine Inc., while attorneys Ms. Moe and Mr. Everdell interject to clarify details about the exhibit for the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018505.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh by an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding the typical functions of a 'family office' in managing the finances of wealthy individuals. Another attorney, Ms. Moe, repeatedly objects to the questions, which probe whether wealthy clients personally control their accounts or cede that control to the family office.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018504.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. McHugh, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on Mr. McHugh's familiarity with the concept of a 'family office'. Another attorney, Ms. Moe, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, with the court sustaining at least one of her objections.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018495.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named McHugh. Under questioning, McHugh explains that instructions for transactions, such as the purchase of a green helicopter, are provided by the client. He explicitly denies any personal involvement in the accounts or transactions being discussed and also denies ever having any interactions with Ghislaine Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018490.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness McHugh) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on financial records, specifically 'Government Exhibit 502,' which is a premiere checking account statement belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell at the address of the 'New York Strategy Group.' The prosecution attempts to ask about a $5 million wire transfer to Maxwell dated September 18, 2002, but the defense (Mr. Everdell) successfully objects to the question as leading.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018487.jpg

This court transcript page, filed on August 10, 2022, documents the direct examination of a witness, Mr. McHugh. The testimony establishes that on October 19, 1999, an account belonging to the Financial Trust Company, Inc., whose president was Jeffrey Epstein, wired $18.3 million to Ghislaine Maxwell. The document records objections from an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and a request from another attorney, Ms. Moe, to display an exhibit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018483.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of witness Mr. McHugh by Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on the admission of several government exhibits and specifically examines Exhibit 509, a 'Morgan account corporate partnership information application page' for an entity named 'Financial Trust Company, Inc.' The witness confirms that the contact person listed for this account is Jeffrey Epstein.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018469.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge (THE COURT) and three attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Rohrbach, and Ms. Pomerantz) regarding an objection to having an agent testify about exhibits. The discussion clarifies that the agent in question is the one who conducted a search, not the current witness, after which the judge concludes the matter and calls for the witness and jury to enter.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018460.jpg

This document is a court transcript from an afternoon session on August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Moe, confirms with the court and opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, an agreement regarding the '900 series' of exhibits. Following this, another attorney, Ms. Sternheim, begins to make a request for the court to order the government to disclose certain information.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016893.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) and government counsel (Ms. Moe). The core issue is the admissibility of a deposition from Ms. Maxwell, which the government wishes to use to rebut a 'last minute' issue raised by the defense concerning Kinnerton Street property records. The defense offers to stipulate to the property records to avoid the deposition being entered and to negate the need for an additional witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016892.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and the judge. Mr. Everdell discusses his intent to use newly acquired property records for Stanhope Mews to impeach a witness's deposition testimony about their residence. He argues that despite the government's objection, further factual development, and possibly an additional witness, is necessary to counter the government's claims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
109
As Recipient
10
Total
119

Jury Instructions / Case Law

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Discussion regarding the use of the word 'dominant' in jury instructions for 18 U.S.C. 2421, citing United States v. An Soon Kim.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding Government Exhibits 919, 920, and 53, specifically requesting they not be described as 'schoolgirl outfits' to the jury.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the elimination of a jury charge concerning investigative techniques.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Age of allegations and lack of evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: The Court (Your Honor)

Everdell argues that highlighting the 25-year age of the allegations is fair because records get destroyed over time, explaining the absence of corroborating evidence like geo-location data.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit 913 Privacy

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Requesting privacy interests for photos on a desk.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural point on cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell raises a concern about the government referring to passengers as 'and others' without naming them during direct examination.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Issue with fourth witness

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Mr. Everdell informs the court of a small issue regarding the fourth witness (Mr. Rogers) and requests time to confer with the government.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Technical Issues

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the definition of 'entice' and citations of case law.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions/Verdict Sheet Language

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the phrasing of Counts Two, Three, Four, and Six, specifically regarding the age of victims and the name 'Jane'.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross Examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Visoski

Questioning regarding whether the witness saw any inappropriate activity during 30 years of employment.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Ms. Chapell

Questioning regarding FedEx invoices and their maintenance in the regular course of business.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

TECS Reports

From: Mr. Aznaran
To: Mr. Everdell

Confirmation that Aznaran ran three traveler reports in the TECS system for Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding Government Exhibits 234 and 245

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Mr. Parkinson

Discussion regarding photos of Epstein's desk and bookcase.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Juror Exhibits

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Request to put folders with exhibits under jurors' chairs.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Trial Logistics

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Discussion regarding the handling of paper evidence binders and maintaining witness anonymity during cross-examination.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the admissibility of property ownership records to impeach witness testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Calling next witness

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell calls Raghu Sud to the stand.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Objection to scope of questioning

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the relevance of Maxwell's father's death and her housing history.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instruction Dispute

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding how to answer a jury question about conspiracy in Counts One and Three.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit Identification

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Inquiry about trial mark for the 1996 London home sale agreement.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding search video

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Mr. Parkinson

Discussion of Government Exhibit 296 showing a property search.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Rodgers

Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions/Charge Language

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the specific wording of sex trafficking charges and conspiracy counts.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions regarding New Mexico Law

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument that specific sexual activity was not illegal under New Mexico law because it lacked force or coercion, and the jury instruction should reflect this.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Legal definitions

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Verbal exchange regarding case law and definitions for jury instructions.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search