CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020455.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket covering filings and orders from November 24, 2021, to November 30, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes motions regarding expert testimony and jury instructions, orders concerning the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and a minute entry noting the beginning of jury selection and the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020448.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details entries from November 15, 2021, including logistics for public/press access to the courtroom, the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a dispute regarding the late receipt of government disclosures at the MDC. It concludes with a minute entry for a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present with her defense team and the government prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00020445.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of filings entered on November 12, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily consist of numerous motions in limine filed by Maxwell's defense to exclude various pieces of evidence, testimony, and government exhibits, as well as motions and responses from the prosecution (USA). The docket also includes a memo endorsement by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding trial logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020444.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings on November 10 and 11, 2021. It details the scheduling of voir dire, COVID-19 courtroom protocols, and rulings on motions in limine, including the denial of a defense motion to exclude expert testimony on grooming. It also lists the attorneys present for both the prosecution and defense during a pretrial conference.
DOJ-OGR-00020439.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from October 29, 2021, to November 2, 2021. It lists various court orders regarding legal mail, motions in limine, redactions, and scheduling for Daubert and Rule 412 hearings. It also includes a minute entry for a pretrial conference attended by the defendant, legal counsel, and government representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00020435.jpg
This document is a court docket from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from October 20-22, 2021. It records efforts by media organizations, including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, to oppose the sealing of jury selection materials, ensuring public access. The central entry is a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying the request to seal the materials and outlining the specific procedures and a comprehensive schedule for the upcoming jury selection process, including questionnaires, voir dire, and deadlines for counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020432.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from September 1, 2021, to October 13, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan ordering the government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators, scheduling jury selection for November 19, and various filings regarding redactions and voir dire procedures. The document highlights the logistical preparations for the trial, including scheduling around the Christmas holidays.
DOJ-OGR-00020426.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from May 17 to May 25, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial motions filed by Maxwell's defense team, including motions to suppress evidence, strike surplusage, and dismiss the superseding indictment. The log also records correspondence with Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the defense and the prosecution (USA) regarding document redactions and scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.
DOJ-OGR-00016152.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding, specifically the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the jury must focus solely on Maxwell's alleged actions, not Epstein's, and contends the government's case is built on the unreliable testimony of four accusers whose memories have been corrupted over time and who are motivated by money.
DOJ-OGR-00015539.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015168.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 17, 2021. It records an agreement between the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense to admit specific exhibits (MG-12, MG-1, 610-A, and A-5) into evidence. The document bears signatures from both the Assistant United States Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015166.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). It represents an agreement between the prosecution and defense regarding the authenticity of UK land registry records. Specifically, it validates records retrieved in 2021 concerning properties at 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London, with one record dating back to ownership confirmation in January 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00002333.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on January 25, 2021. In it, Christian Everdell certifies that on that same date, he served a memorandum and accompanying exhibits via email to Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002319.jpg
This document is a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It is a 'Notice of Motion' submitted by Maxwell's defense attorneys from the firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The motion seeks to dismiss the superseding indictment against her, arguing that it was obtained in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights.
DOJ-OGR-00002319(1).jpg
This document is a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It is a Notice of Motion submitted by Maxwell's attorneys at Cohen & Gresser LLP to dismiss the superseding indictment against her. The motion argues that the indictment was obtained in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights and requests an oral argument on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002263.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on January 11, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice, submitted by her attorney Christian Everdell, appeals an order from December 28, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan that denied Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00002263(1).jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on January 11, 2021, in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney Christian Everdell, is appealing an order entered on December 28, 2020, which denied her renewed motion for release on bail. The document notes that Maxwell is currently 'Committed' (incarcerated) and the case is presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00016914.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell presents stipulations agreed upon by both parties, including the birth date of Mike Wallace and the opening dates of *The Lion King* on Broadway. The page concludes with the beginning of a written stipulation regarding a witness named 'Kate' attending a meeting with prosecutors in September, listing the full legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00009084.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The potential juror denies having any personal or familial connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. As the juror answered 'No' to all questions, the follow-up section for explanation is left blank.
DOJ-OGR-00019694.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on January 11, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 1:20-CR-00330). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP, is appealing the 'Order Denying Defendant's Renewed Motion for Release on Bail' which was entered on December 28, 2020. The document indicates Maxwell's bail disposition is 'Committed' (incarcerated) and lists Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00010217.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on March 11, 2022, regarding a motion for a new trial for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The hearing's purpose, as stated by the court, is to examine the responses of 'Juror 50' to a jury selection questionnaire, following a court order from February 24, 2022. The transcript begins with counsel for the government, the defense, and Juror 50 stating their appearances for the record.
Motion to Dismiss Either Count One Or Count Three
Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Maxwell regarding multiplicity of counts.
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counts as Time-Barred
Legal arguments supporting the dismissal of counts based on time limits.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Sending attached order signed by Judge Nathan.
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Requesting authorization for CSOs at Worth Street entrance to allow defense counsel to bring electronic devices inside for evidence views starting shortly.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing list of attendees for evidence review (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Harkins, Shropshire, Delgado).
Re: Letter re: Electronic Device Permission
Initial request to bring personal electronic devices and equipment into the courthouse for upcoming evidence views.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming 11am meeting at warehouse on April 12.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming arrival at warehouse on April 12 with investigator and paralegal.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledgment of Everdell's plan to wait for vendor feedback.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting conference after vendor input. Plans to contact MDC regarding hard drive delivery to Maxwell.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledging receipt of previous email, will confer with vendor.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing hard drive delivery to MDC and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing logistics of sending a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting they confer after vendor feedback; plan to call MDC regarding hard drive delivery.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments, metadata errors on Epstein's devices, and production gaps.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 issues regarding discovery production, including hard drive logistics, missing attachments, and metadata errors.
Discovery Issues
Initial letter outlining 7 specific discovery disputes, including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments, and metadata issues on thousands of files.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues regarding hard drives, file formats, missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies.
Discovery Issues
Initial list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments (109,000 emails), and metadata discrepancies.
RE: Discovery Issues
Stating supervisors will not allow direct drive delivery to MDC; offering to join application to Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Providing initial responses to the 7 points raised by defense, including refusal to send IT-unverified drives to MDC and explanations for metadata discrepancies.
Discovery Issues
Listing 7 specific discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata discrepancies, and Bates number gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial response regarding MDC drive restrictions, file conversion, and metadata explanations.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing attachments (109k emails), metadata errors on Epstein devices (110k docs), and missing production numbers.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 legal discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata inconsistencies, and access to files for Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity