MR. TEIN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Deponent
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Interviewer interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator deponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Questioner and deponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator deponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Deponent
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversaries |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Opposing counsel questioning witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial in proceeding |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Examiner deponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED WITNESS]
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JACK
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Goldberger
|
Co counsel likely |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. | Unknown (Transcription serv... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Recess | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Exhibit 31-001 | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Proceeding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a redacted witness | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... | Unknown (Reporting firm bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness | Unknown (Likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancelled Hearing | Unknown Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition hearing | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a... | During deposition | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where Mr. Tein questioned an unnamed witness represented by Mr. Leopold. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness represented by attorney Mr. ... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by MR. TEIN. The questioning focuses on wheth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A scheduled appearance was allegedly missed by the deponent, which Mr. Tein refers to as breaking... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent who is represen... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A hearing was scheduled but got cancelled. An agreement related to this cancellation was allegedl... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00033047.jpg
This document is page 59 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from a deposition or hearing. It details a contentious exchange between attorneys, where Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning of a female witness, arguing that she has already answered the question multiple times and is being harassed. The other attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Goldberger, push back against Mr. Leopold's objections.
DOJ-OGR-00033046.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about her awareness of being sought and an incident where she switched name tags with a friend at her workplace, Quarterdeck, to avoid them. The witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects strongly to a question he deems harassment, highlighting a contentious legal exchange.
DOJ-OGR-00033043.jpg
This is page 55 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about an incident at the Quarterdeck Tavern where she allegedly asked co-workers to lie and switched name tags with a friend named Tiffany to avoid people serving papers. The witness denies asking anyone to lie but admits name tags were switched, claiming it was a coincidence common among staff. Attorneys Leopold and Goldberger discuss the marking of Exhibit 18-001 and photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00033042.jpg
This is page 54 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a female witness, accusing her of lying about her name to avoid being served a lawful subpoena and questioning her willingness to repeat a story she told police. Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions and eventually instructs the witness not to answer, prompting Mr. Tein to ask to 'certify' the question. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a 2017 public records request date.
DOJ-OGR-00033041.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about how much money she hopes to receive from a Mr. Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs his client not to answer, leading to a certified question.
DOJ-OGR-00033040.jpg
This document is page 52 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about whether they received a victim notification letter (confirmed) and if they provided physical evidence to law enforcement. The witness denies providing physical evidence initially, but then clarifies they gave their cell phone to a woman named Michelle Pagan approximately three or four years prior to the deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00033039.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding on July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of potential financial compensation from the government for a criminal case and whether they ever received a victim notification letter. The witness denies knowledge of these matters, and another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00033037.jpg
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about conversations they had with their aunt concerning a lawsuit and a 'Mr. Herman'. The witness states that Tiffany Rich never had a conversation with Mr. Herman in their presence, and only answered the door before leaving.
DOJ-OGR-00033034.jpg
This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.
DOJ-OGR-00033032.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The witness denies being told by federal prosecutors about reimbursement or entitlement to money from a Mr. Epstein. However, the witness confirms having met with federal prosecutors, who they believe were from the FBI, at their home around the year 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00033031.jpg
This document is page 43 of a legal deposition transcript (Page 2718 of the larger record). An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a conversation with a woman named Hayley regarding earning money by visiting 'Epstein's house' every weekend. The witness denies making the comment, attributing it to Hayley instead. The testimony also covers the group leaving Epstein's house with money and going to a Marshall's store, with the witness denying they spent the money personally.
DOJ-OGR-00033028.jpg
This document is page 40 of a deposition transcript (stamped DOJ-OGR-00033028) involving the cross-examination of a witness by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on sexual acts (masturbation) and whether the witness previously lied to the police. The witness admits that while she told police Epstein did not touch her, that statement was not 'fully truthful,' and she confirms in this testimony that Epstein did, in fact, touch her.
DOJ-OGR-00033027.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over the propriety of a question. The witness testifies that a "Mr. Epstein" asked her to do more than just massage him, specifically alleging he asked her to take off her bra.
DOJ-OGR-00033025.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness who confirms they lied to Jeffrey Epstein about their age, pretending to be 18 when they were not. The witness also confirms telling Epstein they went to school in Wellington.
DOJ-OGR-00033024.jpg
This document is page 36 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a prior statement she made to Detective Pagan, suggesting she lied to a person named Epstein about her age. The witness denies the specific phrasing but admits to telling someone that she told Epstein she was 18, while attorneys Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold repeatedly object to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00033022.jpg
This document is page 34 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein attempts to question a witness about a past conversation at "Epstein's house," while Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning, citing procedural issues like lack of foundation and predicate.
DOJ-OGR-00033021.jpg
This document is page 33 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about their interactions with a man named Jeff, specifically whether they told Jeff's assistant about their background, which the witness denies. The transcript also captures a procedural argument between two other parties, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, regarding objections and the proper way to refresh a witness's memory.
DOJ-OGR-00033016.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense and adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. A third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, intervenes to clarify a procedural point amidst the escalating argument.
DOJ-OGR-00033015.jpg
This document is page 27 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from Consor & Associates. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, presumably attorneys. Mr. Leopold objects strongly to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct, browbeating, and harassment, and threatens to end the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00033014.jpg
This document is page 26 of a deposition transcript involving a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The witness is questioned about whether anyone persuaded them to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money before arriving at his house, which the witness denies. The document features a significant procedural argument where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'coaching the witness' during the testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00033010.jpg
This document is page 22 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, likely attorneys named Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, regarding the proper procedure for making objections. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction, while Mr. Leopold defends his actions by citing the requirements of judges in West Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00033009.jpg
This document is page 21 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness who admits to sending a message to a friend calling the deposition 'stupid court s-h-i-t'. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00033008.jpg
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript produced by Censor & Associates. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Leopold asks the witness to spell a word for the record (the witness begins spelling 'N-i-g-g' before being cut off), leading to an objection by Tein and a subsequent argument regarding whether a document (identified as Exhibit 31-001) was properly marked and identified.
DOJ-OGR-00033005.jpg
Page 17 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. The text captures a tense procedural argument between attorneys Leopold, Tein, and Goldberger regarding a break, lateness (9 a.m. vs after 2 p.m.), and professional demeanor. Following a recess, Mr. Tein resumes questioning a witness (whose name is redacted) about the seriousness of the deposition and introduces Exhibit 31-001. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17 and a DOJ-OGR stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00033004.jpg
A transcript page from a deposition involving attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The text captures a heated exchange where Leopold requests a break, which Tein resists, accusing Leopold of obstructing the deposition. Leopold explicitly requests that the audio of the deposition be preserved.
Age and Body Piercings
Tein accuses the witness of lying about their age to obtain body piercings. The witness denies lying but discusses the number of piercings they have.
Questioning tactics and volume of voice
Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.
Seriousness of testimony
Questioning regarding the witness's understanding of the seriousness of the deposition and respect for the court.
Deposition Break and Evidence Preservation
Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.
Direct Examination
Introductory questions establishing the witness's name (redacted) and setting ground rules for the deposition.
Photo Identification
Questioning regarding individuals in a specific photograph.
Solicitation for sexual activity
Questioning regarding whether anyone persuaded the witness to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money.
Questioning about reimbursement, Mr. Epstein, and meeting...
Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about discussions with federal prosecutors regarding reimbursement or money from Mr. Epstein. The witness denies these discussions but admits to meeting with federal prosecutors, possibly the FBI, at their house in 2008.
No Subject
MR. TEIN questions THE WITNESS about an incident involving evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers, with MR. LEOPOLD representing the witness.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
A recorded Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about a photograph and the circumstances of being served a subpoena. The session includes procedural arguments between the attorneys.
No Subject
Mr. Tein questions the witness about their knowledge of a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Mr. Leopold repeatedly instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client privilege regarding conversations between him and the witness.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
No Subject
A heated exchange between the two attorneys. Mr. Tein questions a witness about their family speaking to reporters. Mr. Leopold objects and threatens to leave. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding for your client' and tells him to 'be quiet'.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age. The witness admits to lying about being 18 on one exhibit but denies lying about being 19 on another.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about instances of lying about their age, specifically to buy beer, on MySpace, and in relation to Exhibits 26-01 and 33.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity