MR. LEOPOLD
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Saige
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed female witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client/Witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness (unnamed)
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial in deposition |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] Deponent
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Correspondents |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female witness
|
Protective representative |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Deponent
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Witness counsel presumed |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Allies |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversaries in a deposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige, who is represented by attorne... | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness defended by Mr. ... | A room with a table. | View |
| N/A | N/A | A tense exchange during a legal deposition where one attorney (Mr. Leopold) objects to the questi... | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A three-day evidentiary hearing where Mr. Leopold observed Mr. Tein from the back of the courtroom. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was held where an unnamed witness was questioned by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuse... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness listened to a prior statement. | here | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold argue over the nature and form ... | A legal proceeding, possibl... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition involving a contentious argument between attorneys over questioning procedure ... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001)... | Unspecified deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their at... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is conducted where a witness is questioned about using a racial slur in a written me... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where Mr. Tein questioned a witness, with Mr. Leopold present as counsel. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or court hearing is being conducted, as evidenced by the Q&A format and presence of ... | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute cente... | Deposition Room (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein, with her attorney Mr. Leopold prese... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition of an unnamed witness was conducted. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness is questioned by Mr. Tein in a legal proceeding. | Not specified (likely a dep... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony where an unidentified witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold also pres... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein with Mr. Leopold present. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorneys are engaged in a heated procedural dispute. Mr. Tein attempts ... | Undisclosed deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious exchange during a legal deposition. Attorney Leopold accused Attorney Tein of unpro... | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness named Saige, during which a procedural argument between attorneys Mr. Tei... | Implied to be in or under t... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about their negative characterizatio... | Deposition | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012442.jpg
This document is page 47 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. The witness denies asking co-workers to lie and refutes an accusation about getting a friend to switch name tags, claiming the situation was a coincidence. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Mr. Leopold, and a discussion about marking photographic exhibits for the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012441.jpg
This document is page 46 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, aggressively questions a witness named Saige. He accuses her of lying about her name to avoid a subpoena and of lying to get out of the deposition. Saige's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions and ultimately instructs her not to answer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012440.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition (page 45), where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed female witness about evidence she provided and her connection to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms giving her cell phone to a 'Michelle Pagan' 3-4 years prior. When asked how much money she hopes to get from Mr. Epstein, her lawyer, Mr. Leopold, objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs her not to answer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012439.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, page 44, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about receiving reimbursement for damages and a victim notification letter. The witness denies receiving either and states they no longer live at the relevant residence. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012438.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal testimony where an unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of matters related to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies meeting several named agents, including FBI agent Nesbit Kirkendall, and denies ever discussing being reimbursed by Epstein. They also deny any knowledge of an alleged promise by the government to provide money to girls at the end of a criminal prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012437.jpg
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a meeting with 'Mr. Herman'. The witness confirms the meeting occurred at her aunt's house, where a lawsuit was discussed, but claims her aunt's only involvement was opening the door. The witness's attorneys, Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold, are also present, with Mr. Leopold objecting to a question about 'privileged matters'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012436.jpg
This document is page 41 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is questioned about their lawyer, Mr. Herman. The witness clarifies that their father, not them, selected Mr. Herman, and they met him once at a friend's house with their aunt present. An attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to further questions about the meeting, successfully invoking attorney-client privilege.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012435.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012434.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness denies knowing individuals named Marie Villafona and Jeffrey Sloman but confirms that they know someone named Jeffrey Herman. The questioning also covers a visit by 'two ladies and two guys' to the witness's house and whether any cell phone communication occurred.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012432.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about events following a visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness denies spending money received there but admits to going to a Marshall's store with two other girls, where one of them bought a purse. The questioning concludes by asking the witness about conversations with federal prosecutors regarding financial reimbursement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012429.jpg
This document is page 34 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a massage she gave to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states that, contrary to just giving a massage, Epstein also asked her to remove her bra and did touch her. She denies touching Epstein's penis or 'whacking him off,' which she clarifies means masturbating, and is confronted with what appears to be a contradictory prior statement to the police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012428.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition dated September 29, 2010. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over a question Mr. Tein posed to an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of asking an improper and unethical question intended to make the witness, who claimed not to remember something, appear to be lying.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012427.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, admits to intentionally lying to Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms they pretended to be 18 when they were not and also lied about which school they attended. The document contains two redactions, likely obscuring the name of the school, and notes an objection from another attorney, Mr. Leopold.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012426.jpg
This document is page 31 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a prior statement she made to a Detective Pagan, in which she allegedly described lying about her age to Jeffrey Epstein by saying it "really fast." The witness's attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Ms. Belohlavek, repeatedly object to the line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012424.jpg
This document is page 29 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over questioning procedure before Mr. Tein asks the witness about a conversation she had with a woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing lack of foundation and predicate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012423.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about her first meeting with Jeff Epstein. The witness confirms Epstein asked her age 'upstairs' during a massage, not upon initial introduction, and denies having spoken to Epstein's assistant who escorted her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012420.jpg
This document is page 25 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questioning style, noting the presence of a child, while Mr. Tein asks if the witness was persuaded to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money and about specific methods of communication, which the witness denies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012419.jpg
This document is a two-page transcript from a contentious legal deposition, likely related to a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation. It captures a heated argument between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedure and professional conduct, with a third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, attempting to mediate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012418.jpg
This document is page 23 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012418'. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Leopold vehemently objects to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct and harassment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012417.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, likely dated September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about whether they were induced by anyone to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money, which the witness denies. The transcript captures a contentious exchange between Mr. Tein and the witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, whom Mr. Tein repeatedly accuses of coaching the witness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012414.jpg
This document is page 19 of a deposition transcript featuring a heated argument between opposing counsel, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedures in West Palm Beach. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction before proceeding to question the deponent, Saige, about whether she believes giving testimony is 'bull s-h-i-t' and if she wrote that on MySpace the previous week.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012413.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition, page 18 of a larger volume. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a message they sent to a friend, in which they described the deposition as "stupid court s-h-i-t." The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as having been 'asked and answered'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012412.jpg
This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript, potentially from a U.S. House Oversight investigation. An unnamed witness is questioned about using the racial slur 'Niggaa' in a message, which they state they do not find offensive. The transcript also captures a heated procedural argument between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, over the questioning and the proper identification of an exhibit numbered 31-001.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012411.jpg
This document is page 16 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a female witness about a message she sent on MySpace. The questioning becomes contentious when Mr. Tein asks if the witness finds a racial slur offensive, implying she used it, which the witness denies. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, leading to procedural arguments between the lawyers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012410.jpg
This document is a transcript from a deposition where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001). The witness reads the message aloud, which mentions "stupid court shit," and then claims not to know when it was sent because they have since deleted their MySpace account. The questioning implies a contrast between the witness's professed respect for the court and the derogatory language used in the message.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition.
No Subject
A contentious exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the deponent about a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman, and Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange between opposing counsel during a deposition regarding the manner of questioning and professional conduct.
No Subject
A contentious dialogue during a legal deposition concerning the conduct of the attorneys. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold objects strongly to his behavior, and Mr. Goldberger tries to clarify procedure.
No Subject
A contentious argument between attorneys during a legal deposition. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold interrupts and objects. Mr. Goldberger tries to clarify procedural rules.
No Subject
Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold have a contentious exchange about procedural rules. Mr. Leopold insists Mr. Tein must show the witness a document to refresh her memory, while Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where attorneys question a witness under oath about events surrounding the service of a subpoena.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where attorneys question a witness under oath about events surrounding the service of a subpoena.
No Subject
Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold have a contentious exchange about procedural rules. Mr. Leopold insists Mr. Tein must show the witness a document to refresh her memory, while Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction.
No Subject
A meeting to prepare for the deposition, which lasted from the start of the meeting until the deposition began.
No Subject
A contentious dialogue during a legal proceeding where Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female client, leading to a personal argument between the two attorneys.
No Subject
A heated argument between the two attorneys regarding the propriety of Mr. Tein's questions to a female witness. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of trying to make the witness appear dishonest.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
No Subject
A heated argument between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's repetitive questioning and demeanor towards the witness, threatening to end the deposition and accusing Mr. Tein of harassment.
No Subject
A meeting to prepare for the deposition, which lasted from the start of the meeting until the deposition began.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A heated exchange between the two attorneys. Mr. Tein questions a witness about their family speaking to reporters. Mr. Leopold objects and threatens to leave. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding for your client' and tells him to 'be quiet'.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A contentious legal deposition where Mr. Tein questions a witness, and Mr. Leopold objects.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a contentious deposition dialogue.
No Subject
A heated argument between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's repetitive questioning and demeanor towards the witness, threatening to end the deposition and accusing Mr. Tein of harassment.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
No Subject
A heated argument between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's repetitive questioning and demeanor towards the witness, threatening to end the deposition and accusing Mr. Tein of harassment.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity