attorneys
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROBERT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROBERT
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
expert witnesses
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein Victim
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Female Subject]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE #4
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR concluded that attorneys negotiating the NPA did many things contrary to internal government ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of victims by attorneys to the Administrator. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing and sealing of deposition transcripts under protective order. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closing arguments | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Impaneling of the Jury | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR conducted an extensive investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, reviewing documen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Voir dire | The jury selection process where Ms. Conrad was questioned and made omissions about her husband's... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document is an instruction for the jury during a trial, identified by case number 1:20-cr-003... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Closing arguments | Attorneys presented their closing arguments, asking the jury to make inferences from the evidence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The document discusses the legal process of voir dire, specifically how the court can limit attor... | this district | View |
| N/A | Courthouse entry procedure | A mandatory procedure for all members of the public and attorneys to complete a health questionna... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A proposed charging conference to be held on a Friday. | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting between AK and attorneys to discuss a proposal for SDNY to investigate conduct previous... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A criminal trial where the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, exercised her right not to testify. The docume... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of the defendant's motion for attorney-conducted voir dire (jury selection) due to pre... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial during which the names of people were heard who did not appear to testify. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document is a transcript of jury instructions from a trial, specifically Instruction No. 43 r... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Trial | The overall legal proceeding during which information about Ms. Conrad was or was not available. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A remarkable hearing where victims provided testimony and input, and attorneys offered legal advo... | N/A | View |
| 2023-11-09 | N/A | Settlement Hearing scheduled to determine fairness of the settlement. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of transcript document 761. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Mid-morning break | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing date for this transcript document. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing of Court Document 745 (Transcript) | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-09 | N/A | Status conference held. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020086.jpg
This legal document discusses the defendant's financial status and its implications for her bail conditions. It highlights that the defendant possesses significantly more assets ($22 million, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds) than initially reported, making her a substantial flight risk. The document also raises concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed bail bond, noting that some co-signers are UK residents who haven't offered cash or property, and the defendant's $7 million attorney retainer is presumed unspent.
DOJ-OGR-00025322.jpg
This document is an email chain involving MCC New York Associate Warden Charisma Edge and a redacted individual (likely a legal professional or specialized visitor) discussing the 'Last contact with Epstein.' The core content is a report from the redacted individual describing a visit to Epstein in the SHU on the Thursday prior (likely August 8, 2019). The visitor explicitly states Epstein denied suicidal thoughts, showed no signs of distress or anxiety, was interacting with a cellmate, and was making future-oriented plans regarding legal meetings and moving to general population.
DOJ-OGR-00005252.jpg
This legal document is page 3 of a court filing from October 18, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the court's reasoning for denying a defendant's request for attorney-conducted voir dire. The defendant argued for it based on significant pretrial publicity and the case's sensitive nature, but the court concluded that court-conducted voir dire is sufficient to ensure fairness and prevent potential prejudice, citing legal precedents.
DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.
DOJ-OGR-00008776.jpg
This document is page 70 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 50 regarding 'Uncalled Witnesses,' instructing the jury not to draw inferences from the absence of certain witnesses and reiterating that the defendant has no burden to produce evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008690.jpg
This legal document, specifically a jury instruction from a case filed on December 18, 2021, directs the jury on how to handle 'uncalled witnesses'. The instruction states that since both parties had an equal opportunity to call these witnesses, the jury should not draw any inferences from their absence. It also reinforces the legal principle that the defendant in a criminal case has no obligation to call witnesses or produce evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00025270.jpg
This document is an email chain dated August 10, 2019, the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death, discussing a staff member's last contact with him. The original message, sent from an AOL account, details a visit to Epstein in the SHU on the previous Thursday (August 8), noting that Epstein denied suicidal thoughts, showed no signs of distress, interacted with a cellmate, and was making future plans involving his attorneys and transfer to general population. Associate Warden Charisma Edge forwards/replies to this information.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | Received | Citigroup Settlem... | attorneys | $4,900,000.00 | Legal fees in exchange rate suit | View |
Legal Consultation
Confidential communications compromised by guard proximity, camera repositioning, and sensitive audio recording.
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Legal Consultation
Calls placed from the day room phone.
Legal Strategy/Info
Implicit discussion of attorney-client communications which Ms. Pomerantz objects to on grounds of privilege.
Legal Defense
Review of discovery materials and legal consultation.
Closing Arguments
Attorneys asking jury to infer facts based on reason and experience.
Legal advice/representation
The transcript mentions the witness's conversations with her attorneys, which are subject to privilege issues.
Depositions and potential perjury
AK has a vague memory of attorneys contacting her to inform her about depositions, but cannot recall specifics or if perjury was mentioned.
Legal Counsel
5 hours per weekday; 25 hours per week total.
In-person legal visits
In-person visits as needed.
No Subject
After a February 2016 meeting, AUSA-1 received a limited number of emails from the attorneys.
Testimony
Previous testimony referenced during cross-examination.
Discovery in Giuffre v. Maxwell
Two depositions designated confidential.
Attorney-client communication
Complaints about lack of privacy in open areas and poor ventilation in visiting rooms.
Legal correspondence
Emails sent/received via MDC desktop computer.
Legal analysis of Epstein's case
Epstein's attorneys prepared lengthy memoranda analyzing evidence and arguing nuanced legal points regarding federalism and federal criminal statutes.
Briefing Schedule
Setting deadlines for factual investigation results (6 p.m.) and briefs (Midnight).
Pretrial motions information
MDC refused Maxwell's request to speak with her lawyers the night before a filing deadline.
Attorney-client meetings
Unrestricted attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse were rejected due to COVID-19 concerns.
Prosecution of Epstein
A presentation was made by attorneys in February 2016 for SDNY to prosecute Epstein.
Common Interest Privilege
Discussion regarding the existence of a common interest privilege agreement between attorneys as of this date.
L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein
Epstein claimed he did not recognize George Rush.
Deposition Testimony
Witness testified under oath regarding whether she told the truth to the FBI.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity