| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anjan Sahni
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve D'Allessandro
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant (Redacted)
|
Professional administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Approver (Redacted)
|
Professional hierarchical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Respondent
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Stockholm, Sweden | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation | Los Angeles, CA | View |
| 2019-12-15 | N/A | Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. | Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-04 | N/A | Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-03-20 | N/A | Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein | West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... | View |
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.
oops [Link to Detroit News article about U of M switching firms due to Epstein representation]
Email transmitting attachment: [Redacted]_convo_notes.docx
Clarifying data handed over: 9 IDE drives from July 2007 search, loose media from NY, Windows machines. Mention of difficulty processing Macs.
Explaining delay due to network replacement (deletion of 400TB old stuff). Confirming Windows items and loose media from NY handed over. Mentioning 'kitchen' Mac from Island produced.
Follow up regarding a phone conversation earlier that day; requesting to schedule a meeting with Ms. [Redacted] the following week in New York.
Requesting a meeting to organize the massive amount of data (over 1 million documents) from NY and Virgin Islands properties.
Confusion regarding hard drive dropped off by Mandy; mixing of old and new materials; request for spreadsheet tracking devices.
Confusion over content of a hard drive; folder with 600,000 items; need for a tracking spreadsheet to avoid disaster.
Confirming flight selection (Delta JFK-PNS) following clarification on refundable options.
Explaining policy to steer away from penalty flights and offering American Airlines alternative.
Requesting travel to Pensacola, FL for witness interview on Feb 19 regarding case 2018R01618.
Bloxsome states they will reflect on the DOJ's position and provide a considered response shortly.
SDNY states rehashing prior conversations is unproductive. Confirms standard practice to refrain from commenting on witness interviews but makes no commitments beyond that. Demands to know if Prince Andrew will agree to be interviewed and when.
Bloxsome accuses SDNY of breaching confidentiality assurances given on Jan 10. Objects to the 'zero cooperation' statement. Asserts the Duke has a strong desire to cooperate. Demands confirmation that future communications will be confidential and no further commentary will be offered.
Scheduling discussion, coordinating a time for the following day (Tuesday).
Discussing 'Sweden travel memo', delays in 'OIA approval', and seeking 'final DOJ approval'. Requesting a meeting.
Confirming the memo was 'signed and sent upstairs'. Suggesting meeting next week instead of that afternoon.
Submission of 'Sweden travel memo' after OIA delay; hoping for DOJ approval.
Dropped off Sweden travel memo. Delayed getting OIA approval. Hoping for final DOJ approval this afternoon.
Informed recipient that the Sweden travel memo was dropped off after a delay in getting OIA approval; requested final DOJ approval.
SDNY defends Berman's public comments. States Prince Andrew publicly offered cooperation in Nov 2019 but has provided 'zero cooperation' to date. Says they will announce an agreement to be interviewed once the Prince commits to a date.
Bloxsome disputes the accuracy of Berman's statements, citing press reports calling it 'zero co-operation' and 'wall of silence'. Requests a transcript of Berman's statements and confirmation of no further public comments.
SDNY claims Berman made a factual statement correcting the record that the Prince has not yet provided cooperation. Looks forward to hearing if the Prince is willing to speak.
Bloxsome complains that U.S. Attorney Berman disclosed confidential communications to the press and stated the Duke has not cooperated. Reasserts Duke's desire to cooperate but expresses concern over misleading impressions.
States they do not believe SDNY can help with preliminary tasks at present. Will welcome conversation once information is gathered from Royal Household.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity